OU blog

Personal Blogs

Activity 25.1 Seale Chapter 6

Visible to anyone in the world

Read Seale Chapter 6 Planning and developing accessible e-learning experiences: the lecturer’s perspective.

Seale refers to ‘lecturers’: in other contexts this might include ‘faculty’, ‘teachers’, ‘instructors’ or anyone whose main role is teaching.

  1. On page 70, it is suggested that accessibility is frequently framed as a technical issue rather than a pedagogical (learning and teaching) one.

    Can you think of any arguments, evidence or examples from what you have read, or from your experience, which could help lecturers or those with a similar teaching role to see accessibility as a pedagogical issue?

    Accessibility could be seen as a pedagogical issue too regardless of the technical issues that is consisting of and this is because teachers need to make their resources available and accessible to each and every student according to their own needs.  For example, when this year in October, I went to teach into a class and there was a student with severe problems but the most important one was the hearing impairment.  I have seen that not all the teachers take into consideration this disability and they just leave the student in a corner with very few attention.  I suppose that if I was their teacher there every day I would have change this attitude and when I am there once a week in that class I am trying as much as I can to offer to the student resources that are as accessible as I can.  It might not be with technology however but it is mainly with printed material.

  2. Some of the key principles that underpin different design approaches include: inclusivity, equity, holism, proactivity and flexibility.

    How are these principles defined in the literature?

    Inclusivity: Inclusive design involves designing curricula that aim to include studetns with disabilities from the outset.

    Equity: The design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities.

    Holism: According to Schenker and Scadden (2002), holistic design means starting with the pedagogy first, in their case the pedagogy of collaborative learning, and then addressing accessibility as it relates to collaborative learning.

    Proactivity: It involves thinking about the needs of students with disabilities at the beginning of the design process rather than making a multitude of adaptations once the course is up and running.

    Flexibility: It involves thinking of the appropriate ways to offer equivalent and alternative access to the curriculum for students with a disability, which may or may not involve e-learning.

    Are they sufficiently clear and consistent so that lecturers can apply them to their own practice?

    I believe that they are sufficiently clear and consistent as far as I am concerned but in order to apply them into practice there might be a need to consider not only ourselves but learning technologists too who are more into the theme and take also their advice.

     

Permalink
Share post

Core Activity 2.2: Reflection

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Elena Kondyli, Thursday, 18 Feb 2010, 12:55

At first, when I saw the activity I was wondering what is this all about, what are the drivers and for what reason do we need to make this comparison between the countries.  I thought while I was scanning the table of what information should we need to put in in order to fill it and be precise.  Even when I saw that this activity should be collaborative I felt a little bit panicked as to how we were going to collaborate with each other and reach to a final conclusion.  After this, while I started reading and discussing in the forum with the members of my group, I was not so much stresses as I was at the beginning.  Many things cleared for me and I was able to continue on with the activity.  However, I have noticed that collaborative work is, in my opinion, more difficult to organise and function it.  Some people were absent, some were doing one thing, others were doing something else.  Of course, I do not know if this is the way that it should have been but I prefer the non-collaborative activities or activities with fewer people involved e.g. 2 or 3 people because the functionality and organisation would be easier for all of us.  In addition, the readings we had to do were straight forward, although that at some points I faced some difficulties in my way to recognise the drivers and put them in the drivers template.  Even when I have finished my reading and put them on the table I was not so sure.  After, re-consideration and re-read of my colleagues opinions I cleared my mind a bit more. Then, I placed my table with my comments in MyStuff.

In addition, this drivers template is connected with the proactivity and technology related competencies for the Framework for Personal Professional Development as it is related to the e-portfolios which is an electronic framework emerging with the area of technology and also it is considered to be as proactivity since the creation was collaborative between members of our group and we all work together to reach to a conclusion through discussion, leadership and motivation amongst us through an e-learning context which we shared.

 

 

 

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 268914