"The best writing gives a voice to our deepest humanity—it's not just about the story,
but about the truth that lies within." — Unknown

Image by https://unsplash.com/@thoughtcatalog
When a student asked me,
“What kinds of stories do we need more of?” I knew they were asking the wrong
person, or at least someone with a different focus. For me, writing isn’t just
about adding another voice to the noise; it’s about creating a space where I
can explore ideas, reflect on the human experience, and, ideally, contribute
something meaningful to the world. I want to offer something nourishing in a
landscape that often feels cluttered with superficial or harmful content.
There’s already an abundance of stories that revolve around sex, gratuitous
violence, morally bankrupt characters, and even the occult. But what are these
stories really doing to the minds of those consuming them? Countless studies in
the social sciences have raised concerns about the effects of such content, yet
much of modern storytelling seems determined to push the boundaries, often to
the detriment of the audience.
I completed my MA in
Creative Writing in 2022, and during my studies, I was introduced to the
personal essay—something that deeply resonated with me. I specialized in
creative nonfiction, and the personal essay became a form I cherished, a vessel
for exploration. I often think of it like a camel on the Silk Road: capable of
carrying an eclectic mix of quotes, news, stories, and personal
anecdotes—whatever is needed to drive the narrative forward toward that
powerful “aha!” moment.
If I had to name a single
book that has profoundly influenced my approach to writing, it would be Henning
Mankell’s Quicksand: What it Means to be a Human Being. It’s not his
well-known crime fiction, but his collection of personal essays that left a
lasting impact on me. Writing courses often stress the need for tension,
insisting that it’s essential for holding a reader’s attention. And while
that’s true to an extent, I’ve found that much of what’s marketed as “tension”
today is just an excuse for ugliness, designed to shock rather than engage the
reader on a deeper level.
What I learned from
Mankell’s essays is that you don’t need overt conflict or sensationalism to
craft something compelling. His writing draws you in, not with tricks or cheap
thrills, but with genuine insight and reflection. It’s about life’s complexities,
not life’s staged dramas. I’m often put off by modern television dramas that
insist on major conflict every five minutes, as if we, the viewers, have no
patience for anything else. It feels manipulative, like the writer is
constantly trying to pull strings rather than trusting the strength of the
story itself.
That’s not to say
conflict doesn’t have its place—of course, it does. Any writing course will
tell you that conflict is essential, especially in fiction. Life itself has its
moments of struggle, and the hero’s journey depends on those peaks and valleys
of tension to push the narrative forward. But surely, like all things, conflict
is best in moderation. Too much of it, and the story becomes a mere exercise in
endurance, rather than a meaningful exploration of human experience.
So, what kinds of stories
do we need more of? In my view, we need more writing like Mankell’s Quicksand—writing
that can captivate and resonate without being drowned in conflict for
conflict’s sake. Stories that offer depth, nuance, and insight into what it
truly means to be human, without relying on gratuitous violence or contrived
tension. We need more stories that nourish, that challenge the mind without
assaulting the senses, and that leave us better, more thoughtful people than
when we first picked them up.
Tags: Creative writing decisions. A802 Open University, A803 Open University, A215 AND A363 Open University, Creating a better world