OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

Teipinophresene: The Quiet Strength Within Marriage

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 26 March 2026 at 19:42

Teipinophresene: The Quiet Strength Within Marriage

sketch.png

Someone once asked me—newly married, with that mixture of hope and uncertainty still fresh—if there was a single piece of advice that could help hold a marriage together.

I remember pausing, not because there was nothing to say, but because there was too much. All the little lessons life presses into you over time rarely come as neat answers. But one word kept rising to the surface, quiet and steady.

Teipinophresene.

They had Greek roots, so I offered it gently, knowing it might feel familiar even before it was understood.

Teipinophresene—ταπεινοφροσύνη—is a rich and beautiful word. It means humility of mind, a kind of lowliness of heart, though not in any way that diminishes a person. It is not about shrinking oneself or thinking poorly of who you are. It is something far more balanced, far more honest.

It is seeing yourself truthfully—neither inflated nor diminished.
It is letting go of the restless need to be right, to be seen, to stand above.
It is becoming gentle, teachable, and quietly mindful of the other.

In marriage, this becomes something living.

Not an idea, but a daily posture.

It shows itself in the small things—the tone you choose when you are tired, the way you listen when you feel misunderstood, the willingness to step back when every instinct tells you to press forward and defend yourself.

There is a moment, in nearly every disagreement, where pride waits just beneath the surface. Teipinophresene is the quiet decision to leave it there.

The word appears in the New Testament, in places like Philippians 2:3 and Colossians 3:12, where it describes the spirit we are called to carry. And it is seen most clearly in Jesus Christ—not as weakness, but as a quiet strength that never needed to prove itself.

That is what surprised me most when I first came to understand it.

This humility is not fragile. It is not uncertain. It does not come from insecurity, but from a deeper knowing—a groundedness before God that frees a person from the need to elevate themselves above another.

A simple way to hold it in your mind is this:

Strength without arrogance.
Confidence without self-glory.
A heart willing to bow, not because it is lesser, but because it knows what truly matters.

And if there is one place where such a spirit matters most, it is in the closeness of marriage, where two lives meet without distance or disguise.

I told them, as simply as I could: if you can learn this—imperfectly, patiently, over time—you will have something that steadies everything else.

Goodness, if the whole world practiced Teipinophresene, it would indeed be a gentler place.

But the world is large and difficult. A marriage is smaller. Closer. And perhaps that is where such things are meant to begin.

Not all at once.
Not perfectly.
But in the quiet choosing, again and again.

Don’t let selfishness and prideful agendas take over.

 Embrace true humility, and lift your heads to extend love to others.

Phillipians 2:3

The Voice Bible

Scripture taken from The Voice™. Copyright © 2012 by Ecclesia Bible Society. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Journeys of the Heart

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:41

sketch.png

Journeys of the Heart

“We laugh, we cry, we care about characters on screen—not because we mistake them for real, but because what they stir within us is real.” — Anonymous

Sir Walter Scott once journeyed to Stratford-upon-Avon. In another time, Li, a Business Studies student in Glasgow, set out with friends to glimpse the Glenfinnan Viaduct. That same year, Kioko, a widowed woman from Tokyo, boarded a flight to Canada; years before, her mother had travelled from the same city to Edinburgh.

At first glance, their stories seem unrelated—scattered across continents, shaped by different lives. Yet beneath the surface, they are bound by a quiet, shared impulse. Each was drawn by something unseen yet deeply felt, engaging in what psychologists describe as a parasocial relationship: a one-sided bond with a person, place, or story that has nonetheless left a genuine imprint on the heart.

Scott sought the home of Shakespeare, a figure who had lived in his imagination long before he stood at his door. Li and her friends travelled to a viaduct made famous not by history, but by fiction—the imagined passage of the Hogwarts Express. Kioko crossed oceans to visit the setting of Anne of Green Gables, while her mother had once made her own pilgrimage to the hometown of the Bay City Rollers.

I recognise the same impulse in myself. In the late spring of 2017, my wife and I travelled to the Lake District. There, almost without planning, we found ourselves drawn to Grasmere—the village where Wordsworth had lived, and where so much of his poetry had quietly taken root.

The morning we arrived felt strangely hushed, as though the village were holding its breath. Sunlight lay gently over the stone cottages, yet the stillness gave the place an almost ghostly air. We wandered slowly until we reached Wordsworth’s cottage.

Then, quite suddenly, the silence broke. A group of visitors appeared—forty or fifty in number: professors, teachers, poets, lovers of literature. They had come from Delhi, Kerala, Gujarat, Hyderabad. Standing there, I felt a quiet astonishment. What had drawn them so far, across distance and difference, to this small, unassuming place?

I managed to speak briefly with one man from Delhi, himself a poet. Pressed for time, he could offer only fragments, but I asked him the question that has lingered with me ever since: Why do we make these journeys? Why do we travel so far to stand where our favourite writers once stood, or to see the landscapes that shaped imagined worlds?

I asked it as “we,” because I am no observer standing apart. I, too, am caught in this gentle, persistent pull.

Yet even as we spoke, the answer seemed to slip just beyond reach. We circled it, touched its edges, but never quite entered its centre. And so I left with the same quiet sense I had carried in: that something important remained unspoken—something still waiting to be understood

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Quiet Reward of Reading

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:44

sketch.png

The Quiet Reward of Reading

I must have been eight when the janitor at St Anthony's in Govan brought in a big box of brand new books. The teacher handed us all a copy and I sat and got lost in the pages of mine. Many of the pupils got bored with theirs and asked for a change. "Look at McCrory" the teacher said, "He is enjoying his." The truth is, it was boring, but I got on with it and persevered. And if the truth were told, it was the only compliment I ever got from a teacher.

In Selma Lagerlöf's The Wonderful Adventures of Nils, a profound yet straightforward insight is introduced: “The more things that come into your head, the more room there is for others.” This notion implies that the mind, unlike any physical space, expands with its contents. It grows ever vaster with each new thought, idea, or dream. Reflecting on this concept, I recognize its resonance in my experiences, especially in my interactions with others—both enriching encounters with individuals who read and think deeply.

My journey through life has often meandered along paths lined with books, through landscapes rich with paragraphs and ripe with rhetoric. Along these paths, I have met kindred spirits—people whose minds, like mine, seem to thrive on the endless nourishment of words and ideas. There is a palpable depth in conversations with these individuals, a shared understanding that reaches beyond the spoken word, facilitated by our mutual expeditions through literature.

This literary journey does more than just broaden our knowledge; it enhances our capacity for empathy. Like the trees I observe from my window in winter—prepared and eager for the abundance of spring—our minds, fertilized by myriad narratives and perspectives, grow branches and forge connections. Each book, each story, adds a layer of understanding, enabling us to relate more profoundly to others' feelings and experiences.

Moreover, empathy—a quality deeply tied to our ability to understand and share the feelings of another—seems enhanced by reading. Literature serves as a rehearsal space for empathy, inviting us into the minds and lives of others, promoting understanding across boundaries of time, culture, and circumstance. Without this engagement, my capacity to empathize would be stunted.

Reflecting on Lagerlof's wisdom, the more we fill our minds with thoughts, ideas, and emotions, the more expansive they become—not crowded, but enriched and deepened. Those who abstain from reading deny themselves not just the knowledge and entertainment books hold but also the chance to expand their cognitive and emotional capacities.

As I continue to navigate a world populated with both types of individuals—those open to the endless possibilities of thought and those closed off—I strive to advocate for the value of reading. Not just as a source of information, but as a vital exercise in building bridges between minds. My hope is that more people will discover the joy and value of reading, not only for their enrichment but for the greater empathy and understanding it fosters within our communities.

Thus, my journey, much like that of young Nils, remains an inward as much as an outward adventure—an endless exploration where the more I discover, the more I realize how crucial it is to encourage others to open the books, open their minds, and by doing so, open

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

What Lies Beyond the Grave?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:44

sketch.png

What Lies Beyond the Grave?

One Saturday about a year ago, I spent some time in the British Museum, moving quietly among its displays. It struck me how many of the objects recovered from graves, tombs, and burial chambers once belonged to people who clearly believed life continued beyond death. In certain cases, pharaohs and others of high status were laid to rest alongside their servants, as though they expected to carry their comforts—and their way of life—into whatever lay beyond.

Yet one burial in particular has stayed with me this week. It was uncovered by chance in 2021 near Břeclav in South Moravia, in what is now the Czech Republic. Dating back roughly 4,500 years to the Bronze Age, it contained something quite unusual: a puppet-like figure with a ceramic head. The body, likely made of wood, has long since disappeared, but the head remains, marked with carefully incised geometric patterns. There is something quietly compelling about it, hinting at meaning—cultural, symbolic, or even spiritual—that we can only try to piece together.

Still, I find myself cautious when it comes to interpretation. Archaeology, for all its careful study, often relies on inference, and even well-informed conclusions can be debated. So I wonder if this figure might have been more personal than ceremonial—something tied to the individual’s livelihood, a means of storytelling or entertainment. After all, a puppet can carry a voice, a craft, even a small piece of a person’s identity. And what more fitting way to be remembered than through something that once brought hippieness to others? Perhaps children?

These practices open a deeper line of thought about the human heart. Why does there seem to be such a persistent sense that life does not simply end when we close our eyes for the last time? Across cultures and centuries, people have spoken of Paradise, Heaven, a New World, Valhalla, Fiddler’s Green, the Elysian Fields, Tian, Jannah, and many other names besides. Wherever one looks, the idea of an afterlife appears again and again, as though it has been quietly written into us.

Scripture tells us that humanity was originally given the prospect of everlasting life, before sin entered and death followed in its wake. Through Jesus, that hope is opened again to those who trust in him. That is why he could say to the repentant man beside him, "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die.” (John 11:25)

Coming back to that burial, it led me to consider what I might choose to leave behind. What single object could speak, however faintly, of who I was? For me, a writer’s notebook feels close to the truth—a small collection of thoughts, unfinished and searching.

And you—what would you leave for those who come after, something that quietly tells them who you were?

“He will wipe away every tear from their eyes,

and there will be no more death

or mourning or crying or pain,

for the former things have passed away.”

Revelation 21:4 (BSB).

 
Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Care for the Human Family

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 25 March 2026 at 11:01

sketch%20%281%29.png

 

 

Care For the Human Family

 

 

I popped into the supermarket this morning for a few bottles of Scottish spring water ahead of a long train journey. I’ve always begrudged the price of water in stations and cafés—it feels like such a small necessity made unnecessarily costly. So, I stood there, bottles in hand, quietly satisfied with my small act of thrift.

At the checkout, the man in front of me was searching his pockets, his wallet, his coat—his loyalty card nowhere to be found. There was a kind of gentle frustration about him, the sort we all recognise.

“I did that recently,” I said, almost without thinking. “Got all the way to the checkout and realised I’d left my credit card at home.” I smiled. “A woman behind me insisted on paying for my shopping.” I continued.

The cashier looked up and nodded. She spoke about how often she sees small kindnesses like that—quiet, unannounced, but real. For a moment, the three of us were strangers sharing something unseen but understood.

But then, as these things sometimes do, the conversation shifted. It deepened.

We spoke about the world as it is—fractured, hurried, often self-absorbed. And there was an unspoken question hanging between us: if kindness is not taught, not lived, not passed on, then where will it come from? Who will show the next generation what it looks like?

It felt less like a complaint and more like a calling.

There was something about the cashier—not dramatic, nothing outwardly remarkable—but a quiet sincerity. The kind you recognise not with your eyes, but somewhere deeper. I found myself mentioning a book my wife had listened to a few months ago.

“It’s about human kindness,” I said. “It’s called A Knock at the Door.”

I encouraged her to look it up, though I suspect what mattered more was not the title itself, but the idea behind it—that kindness is not abstract. It is lived. It arrives, often unexpectedly, in the ordinary spaces of life. A checkout queue. A passing conversation. A moment where someone chooses to care.

And so I extend that same invitation beyond that small exchange.

To you, the reader.
To my family.
To my friends and neighbours.

Pause, if only for a moment. Seek out something that reminds you of what it means to be human in the best sense. Let it reshape how you see the world—not as it is at its worst, but as it might yet become through small, faithful acts of kindness.

In thinking about that book, I came to learn more about its author, Rob Parsons. Years ago, he founded a charity called Care for the Family. It stands quietly in the background of people’s lives, offering strength where it is most needed.

Rooted here in the UK, yet reaching far beyond it, their work is centred on walking alongside families—particularly in moments when life feels fragile or uncertain. They support parents, couples, and those carrying the deep and often silent weight of loss.

Sometimes that support comes through gatherings or courses. Sometimes through a voice on a podcast. And sometimes, perhaps most powerfully, through the simple presence of someone willing to listen.

What they offer is thoughtful and accessible, shaped not just by theory but by lived experience—by an understanding of how complex and tender family life can be.

And just as importantly, they invest in others. They equip those who care for families—whether in formal roles or in quiet, unseen ways—to do so with greater confidence and compassion.

It is, at heart, a work of coming alongside.

Steady. Practical. Deeply human.

And that is what stayed with me most as I left the supermarket, water bottles in hand, stepping back into the ordinary rhythm of the day.

Kindness does not need a stage.
It only needs a willing heart.

And maybe, just maybe, that is how we begin to mend what feels broken.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

New blog post

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:46

Tìng yǔ tīng xīn 

sketch.png

Do You Feel Empty?


Ting yǔ tīng xīn – Listening to the Rain, Listening to the Heart

There are days when the world seems full of colour, movement and laughter, and yet you walk through it feeling grey and weightless. Like a ghost among the living. You pass people chatting, joking, caught up in the momentum of their lives, while something inside you quietly asks, Is this it? Why do I feel so empty?

If that sounds familiar, you are not alone.

In Chinese, there is a phrase that speaks into such moments. Tìng yǔ tīng xīn. It means listening to the rain, listening to your heart. It suggests not rushing past the ache but letting it fall, like the rain does—softly, steadily, insistently—until you notice what it is trying to tell you. Often, when life goes quiet and questions rise, that is when we begin to hear what is really going on inside. And it is in these pauses that the deepest questions begin to surface. Why are we here? What is life really about? Why is there so much evil in a world that longs for good? What does the future hold? And why do I feel so far away from peace?

That emptiness you feel is not a sign that you are broken beyond repair. It may in fact be a sign that you are human. That you are awake.

The Bible speaks directly to this. Not with slogans or empty platitudes, but with honest recognition. The writer of Ecclesiastes observed that God has set eternity in the human heart. That is not an easy burden to carry. It means we are wired for something more than the material. More than schedules and status updates and surface-level living. It means we are made to long, to wonder, to ache for a home we have not yet reached. Your emptiness is not a flaw in the design. It is part of the signal that you were made for eternity.

And yet we live in a world that often pretends otherwise. The modern rhythm urges us to stay distracted. Work more. Scroll more. Laugh more. Buy more. But beneath all the noise, the soul still whispers, Something is missing. When the distractions fade, when illness or loss or silence fall upon us like rain, that whisper becomes a roar. And in those moments, many wonder if something is wrong with them—why they feel so heavy, so hollow, so out of sync with the joy they see on other people's faces.

But the truth is, the world is not as it should be. Even creation, Paul wrote in Romans, was subjected to frustration. It groans, as if in the pains of childbirth. In other words, you are not strange for noticing that something is wrong. You are simply paying attention.

Jesus never promised an easy life. But he did say, Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Rest not in the sense of avoidance, but in the sense of soul-deep peace. A return to something true. Not religion for its own sake. Not ritual or reputation. But relationship. He saw people’s emptiness. He wept at gravesides. He touched lepers. He noticed the people others ignored. And he said, I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry. Whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

That promise is not about material success. It is about fullness in the soul. The kind of fullness that is not shaken by disappointment or rejection or the news cycle. A fullness that comes from knowing you are loved—now, already, eternally.

You may feel unworthy. You may feel like you have failed too often or wandered too far. But the very heart of the gospel is that grace meets us there. In our emptiness. Not after we have tidied it up, but in the middle of it.

Feeling empty, then, is not the end of the road. It may be the beginning of something sacred. Something honest. A turning point. The Psalms are filled with voices crying out in despair. Why, Lord, do you stand far off? Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble? But those same voices often find their way to hope. Yet I will praise you. That shift from pain to praise does not always happen in a single moment. Sometimes it is slow, like dawn after a long night.

Still, it comes.

So when you feel empty, do not rush to fill it with noise. Sit. Listen. Let the rain fall. Let your heart speak. And know this. You are heard. You are seen. You are not alone in your emptiness. And your longing is not in vain.

For in the silence, there is a Voice.
And that Voice says, I have loved you with an everlasting love.
Let that truth fall upon your soul like gentle rain into dry earth.
And listen—not just to the rain, but to your heart

Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

On Shyness and Missed Chances

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

On Shyness, Missed Chances, and Learning to Speak

The Yaghan people of Tierra del Fuego—such a beautiful name to say—have a word I’ve always loved: Mamihlapinatapai. It describes that fleeting moment when two strangers catch each other’s eye, both longing to speak, yet neither finding the courage to begin. The Owl of Minerva flies at dusk, as the philosophers say, and the moment slips away. A small tragedy.

I know that feeling well. My early childhood was spent in a kind of solitary confinement—those were the days before nurseries—and most of my hours were passed alone in the back yard. By the time I reached high school, I had already attended four different primary schools. It’s no surprise, then, that I grew up painfully shy, missing opportunities simply because I didn’t know how to step forward.

At eighteen, I bought a book on shyness, and it changed everything. So often shyness is not a lack of desire to connect, but a lack of material—not knowing what to say, not having anything to draw from. I know people who never read, who spend their evenings drifting through television or the cyber-hive of video games and social feeds. Then, when they meet others, they have little to offer beyond the same recycled lines. Conversation becomes a loop, and boredom follows.

Reading changed that for me. Books give you worlds to bring into the world.

And conversation, like any craft, can be learned. A few simple openers can unlock remarkable encounters:

  • “I see you’re reading a book—what’s it about?”

  • “That’s a great camera. Do you have a website for your photos?”

  • “Is this your full-time job, or are you studying as well?”

I’ve had some of my most memorable exchanges with complete strangers using questions like these. Think of the countless scenarios where a gentle prompt could open a door. Go on—bite the bullet. You never know what might happen when you do.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: A Law Without a Voice

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday 24 March 2026 at 07:11

Why are some morals objective?

sketch.png

A Law Without a Voice

 

The queue barely moves as my wife and I  wait for our flight to Sweden to visit old friends.  Suitcases edge forward by inches, then stop again, wheels turned at slight angles as if they’ve grown tired of straight lines. A child sits on the floor, tracing the grooves in the tiles with one finger. Somewhere behind, a man exhales loudly, not quite a sigh, more a signal to anyone listening that time is being wasted.

Then the couple arrives.

They don’t rush. They don’t rush, they saunter then look at the queue with surprise. Then, they notice familiar faces near the front—laughter, “How are you both? Goodness, it must be about ten years?”  A brief pat of shoulders—and drift inward, folding themselves into that small circle as though they had always belonged there. It is done lightly, almost gracefully. But the effect ripples outward. Conversations stall. Eyes lift. A woman flabbergasted shifts her weight and looks down the line then looks at those around as if to say, “Did you see that?” No one speaks, yet something shared has been disturbed.

It is difficult to name what exactly has been broken. No rule has been written on the airport wall forbidding such movement. No official steps in. Still, the tension is unmistakable. It settles in the space between strangers, in the way people avoid looking at one another for too long.

We live as though this instinct requires no account of itself. It feels native, like balance or hunger. Yet it carries a peculiar authority. It does not present itself as preference. It does not say, I would rather things were different. It speaks more plainly: This is not right.

That distinction matters.

If such responses were only habits formed by convenience, they would bend more easily. They would shift with circumstance, soften under pressure. But they resist. Even when inconvenient, even when costly, they remain. A person may ignore them, silence them, argue against them—but not without effort, and never without some remainder.

There is a passage, written long before airports and council offices, that describes something similar. It speaks of those who have not received formal instruction, yet still act in accordance with a standard they seem to recognise. Not consistently, not perfectly, but often enough to suggest that the awareness precedes the teaching.

That idea lingers.

If our responses were the product of accident alone, it is difficult to see why they would carry this weight. Survival might explain cooperation, or even restraint, but not the quiet insistence that certain actions are wrong regardless of advantage. The person who steps into the queue gains time. Yet the reaction of others does not disappear simply because someone profits.

Perhaps this is why such moments feel larger than they are. A queue at an airport is not a court of law, but with an awareness that seems already present.

Consider the following quote from a book,

 “Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.”

Ponder on that. If we are products of a blind evolutionary process, why would “nature” drive us towards a sense of justice? The book quote is from the Bible; from the book of Romans chapter two.

The Christian understanding does not treat this as an accident. It suggests instead that what we experience in these small disturbances’ points beyond them. That the quiet protest we feel is not self-generated, but received. Not invented, but recognised from an external source.

If that is so, then the unease in the queue is not merely irritation. It is a faint echo of something steadier. The dissatisfaction at unequal treatment is not simply preference. It is a response to a pattern that does not align with what we sense to be fitting.

And if such awareness is indeed given, then it speaks of a giver. Namely, God.

Note: 

The quotation comes from Romans 2:14. It suggests that although people of the nations were not given the Law of Moses, they nevertheless lived in accordance with its moral principles by instinct. The idea that God’s moral order is embedded within creation itself and can be discerned through human reason.

See Romans 2:14 Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

"I’m Going into Glasgow to Drive Some Trains”

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:38

"For most of history, Anonymous was a woman."

Virginia Wolfe

 

 

sketch.png

On the train to Glasgow this week, I felt the physics of the journey working against me. A man sitting nearby had a heavy cold—the kind of deep, wet cough and persistent sneezing that occupies the air around it. Usually, you’d just find it annoying, but when you have cancer, a stranger’s germs feel like a tactical threat from someone who would best serve mankind by staying home. But here he was gifting man with his own suffering.  As the train hurtled forward, I could almost feel the gravitational pull of our travel vacuuming his infection directly toward my seat. I couldn't risk it; I had to move.

My wife and I found a spot in the next carriage albeit we were separated by the middle isle. I sat beside a young woman. This being Scotland, the silence didn't last long. We have a way of acknowledging each other's existence that doesn't feel like an intrusion. Although discernment must prevail.

"What are you up to today?" I asked.

"I’m going into Glasgow to drive some trains," she said.

Her answer hit me with a sudden, sharp memory of Norway. Decades ago, I was in a massive industrial structure in Stavanger. I remember standing there one early morning , completely struck, as I watched a young woman—the project manager—directing a crew of electricians through their tasks. At that time, Scotland felt miles behind. The idea of a woman in total command of a heavy engineering site was, back then, an anomaly to me.

Now, as I looked at the woman across from me, I realized how much the scenery has changed. I see women behind the wheels of buses, trains  and heavy trucks; I see them in the police, in the boardroom, and leading the country as Prime Ministers.

For centuries, women have been held back by a system designed to keep them small. Seeing them finally take the controls—quite literally, in this woman's case—is a relief. It’s a correction of history that's been a long time coming, and it made the rest of the trip feel a lot lighter.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

Visible to anyone in the world

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

“It is not for me to say how I have earned the love and confidence of my fellow men;

but I am deeply grateful.”

sketch.png

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

 

One of my favourite authors by far is Dickens. He was a keen observer of human nature—the good, the bad, and the ugly traits that so often live side by side within us. One character that makes Dickens a man after my own heart is his portrayal of Pecksniff.

There are some people who do not simply enter a room, they seem to become its centre of gravity. Conversation leans toward them, attention gathers almost instinctively, and before long everything begins, subtly, to orbit their presence. At first, nothing feels wrong. They are warm, articulate, often disarmingly moral in tone. They speak of goodness as though it were second nature. And yet, if you remain long enough, something begins to shift. The warmth thickens. The goodness feels arranged. What first appeared sincere begins to feel, well … performed.

It was Dickens who gave me the language for this unease. In Martin Chuzzlewit, he introduces Mr. Pecksniff—a man who does not merely value virtue but displays it, almost as though it were a kind of theatre. He speaks in elevated tones, as when he declares, “Let us be moral. Let us contemplate existence…”—words that seem, at first glance, almost noble. And yet Dickens, with quiet precision, allows us to see beyond the words to the man himself.

What makes these lines so powerful isn’t just what they say, but how Dickens lets us see through them. On the surface, they sound admirable—even admirable enough to deceive. But placed in context, they become almost painfully transparent. The more Pecksniff speaks of morality, the less we trust it.

He tells us, “I am a humble individual, who is very sensible of his own shortcomings,” and somehow manages, in the same breath, to draw attention to his virtue. He insists, “My moral influence is very extensive,” with a seriousness that borders on the absurd. And perhaps most tellingly, he reflects, “It is not for me to say how I have earned the love and confidence of my fellow men; but I am deeply grateful.” Even gratitude, in him, circles back toward self-admiration.

Pecksniff unsettles because he is not entirely unfamiliar. He is not merely a figure of satire, but a pattern—one we recognise, if we are honest, in the world around us. I have met him in different forms across the years. Not always so theatrical, but present nonetheless—in conversations that subtly turn, in kindness that seems to require acknowledgment, in goodness that feels as though it is being quietly narrated.

One begins to notice it in the small moments. You try to share something—a thought, a burden, a quiet joy—and it is gently taken from your hands and redirected. “That reminds me…” they begin, and suddenly your moment dissolves into theirs. You are no longer being heard; you are being used as a passing reference point.

There is also the imitation of empathy. It can look convincing—concerned expressions, sympathetic tones—but it cannot remain still. It cannot sit with another person’s sorrow without reshaping it. True empathy requires a kind of self-forgetfulness, and that is precisely what is missing. Like Pecksniff, who can summon the appearance of feeling while remaining untouched within, there is emotion on the surface but not in the depths.

Then there is the quiet need to be seen. Goodness is not simply lived—it is, in some subtle way, displayed. Not always openly, not with trumpets, but with just enough light cast upon it that it may be noticed. It calls to mind that older warning against performing virtue for the sake of recognition. Yet here it is again, softened, refined, but still present.

Beneath all this lies something quieter still—an assumption, barely spoken, that one’s presence carries a certain weight. It appears in interruptions, in expectations, in the gentle resistance to being overlooked. And if such a person is questioned, even lightly, the response often reveals more than the behaviour itself. There is injury, surprise—sometimes even moral outrage. Dickens captures this perfectly in Pecksniff, who cannot conceive that his motives might be anything other than pure.

Over time, one begins to see that this is more than a collection of habits. It is a way of being—a life curved inward. Not dramatically, not with obvious arrogance, but gradually, subtly. A narrowing of attention that leaves little room for others except as reflections.

And yet, Dickens does not leave us comfortably pointing outward. Pecksniff is not only there to be recognised in others, but, more uncomfortably, to be glimpsed in ourselves.

That is the harder truth.

Because there are quieter versions of this in all of us—the desire to be acknowledged, the small satisfaction in being seen as good, the tendency to redirect rather than truly listen. These things do not announce themselves loudly, but they are there. And if left unattended, they take root.

So the answer is not condemnation, but attentiveness. To live with a quieter kind of honesty. To practise a goodness that does not seek to be observed. To listen without preparing to speak. To give without rehearsing the moment afterwards.

Pecksniff, for all his absurdity, becomes something like a mirror. Not a cruel one, but a truthful one. He reminds us that virtue, when performed, begins to lose its substance. And that the truest measure of character is not what we say, nor even what we believe about ourselves, but how we quietly, consistently turn toward others.

In the end, his grand declarations linger—not as wisdom, but as warning. It is not enough to speak of goodness. It must be lived, often unseen, and without applause.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today’s Thought: The Garden After the Scuffle

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

 

 

 

The Garden After the Scuffle

sketch.png

 

I read this week that a missile had struck a vast gas complex in the Gulf; an installation so large it helps power whole regions, now burning, its output cut, its value counted in 36 billion dollars. 

It is hard to picture what that really means. The reports speak in figures, percentages of supply lost, years of disruption, markets shifting in response. But behind those measurements there is something more physical: metal twisted by heat, pipelines ruptured, the long preparation of engineers and workers undone in a few moments.

I tried, for a while, to imagine that same amount of wealth in another form, not as infrastructure, but as possibility. What could be built instead of broken. What might have been made steady. It didn’t settle easily. The mind keeps returning to the image of destruction, because it is simpler, more immediate.

Perhaps that is something about us.

The simile is apt man’s striving for power is like two groups of baboons in the garden fighting for a banana and ruining the garden in the process. Afterwards, there was very little left worth taking.

It is difficult not to think of that scene when reading about these events. Not because the comparison is exact, but because the pattern feels familiar. A resource is there—valuable, limited, desired. Groups gather around it. Each move is justified by the one before. And in the struggle, the thing itself is damaged, sometimes beyond repair.

The ground suffers as much as the prize.

What unsettles me is not only the scale of it, but the repetition. This is not new. Different places, different names, but the same underlying motion. Effort directed toward control rather than care. Energy spent in contest rather than in preservation. The outcome rarely surprises, yet it continues.

If I think back to the idea of that vast sum of money—what it could do if directed differently—it begins to feel almost like an alternative history that never quite happens. Instead of repairing what is fragile, we seem drawn to test its limits. Instead of maintaining what sustains us, we place it in the path of conflict.

There is a line, quiet but persistent, that comes to mind from the last book of the Bible. It speaks of a time when those who ruin the earth will themselves be brought to ruin. Not as a dramatic flourish, but as a kind of reckoning that mirrors the damage done.

I don’t know exactly how that unfolds. It isn’t described in practical terms. But the idea itself lingers. That there is a point at which the cost of what we are doing returns to us—not symbolically, but directly.

When I think again of the burned-out structures in the Gulf, the interrupted flow of energy, the careful work undone, it does not feel distant. It feels immediate, almost ordinary. Another entry in a long pattern.

And yet, the contrast remains. The same resources that are fought over could, in another direction, be used to steady lives, to maintain what is already fragile. The difference between those paths is not technical. It is something quieter, harder to define.

Perhaps it comes down to what we are willing to leave intact.

The baboons, after their struggle, moved on. The ground remained marked where they had been. No one returned to repair it.

We, at least, are capable of noticing the damage. Whether that leads to anything different is less certain. And I pray, “Let your Kingdom come and may Your will be done here on earth.

 

For You have wielded Your great power
        and have begun Your reign.
     The nations have raged against You,
        but Your wrath has finally come.
        It is now time to judge all of the dead,
    To give a just reward to Your servants, the prophets,
        and to the saints and all who honor Your name,
        both the small and the great,
    And to destroy those who cause destruction to the earth.

Revelation 11:17,18.

The Voice Bible

 

 

 

Reference: The Voice Bible Copyright © 2012 Thomas Nelson, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

 

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: Why 2 + 2 = 4

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

sketch.png

The Mind Behind the Math: Why 2 + 2 = 4

Mathematics presents us with a quiet but profound mystery. Statements such as 2 + 2 = 4 are not merely useful—they are universally and necessarily true. They do not change with time, culture, or location. Whether in ancient Greece or the modern world, whether on Earth or in some distant galaxy, the result remains the same.

This raises a fundamental question: why are mathematical truths true at all?

They are not physical objects. One cannot encounter the number two in nature as one encounters a tree or a stone. Mathematical operations cannot be observed in isolation; they are not material processes. And yet, these abstract realities govern the physical world with astonishing precision. The same mathematical structures that exist in the human mind also describe planetary motion, atomic behaviour, and the structure of the universe itself.

This dual feature—being both abstract and universally applicable—demands explanation.

One possible view is that mathematics is invented, a human construction imposed upon reality. But this struggles to account for its consistency and discovery. Mathematical truths often appear to be found, not created. They confront us as fixed realities, not flexible conventions. A mathematician does not decide that 2 + 2 equals 4; rather, they recognise that it must be so.

If mathematics is not invented, then it must exist independently of us. But in what sense can something immaterial, timeless, and universal exist?

This leads to a deeper philosophical consideration. Abstract truths—logical laws, mathematical relations—do not behave like physical objects. They do not come into being or pass away. They are necessary rather than contingent. Such features are difficult to ground in a purely material universe, which is defined by change, limitation, and temporality.

A more coherent explanation is that these truths exist within a mind—one that is itself not bound by time or matter. If mathematical laws are eternal, universal, and rational, then the most fitting foundation for them would be an eternal, universal, rational source.

In other words, a mind.

This line of reasoning has long been recognised. The scientist Johannes Kepler described his work as “thinking God’s thoughts after Him,” suggesting that the order he discovered in nature reflected a prior intelligence. Likewise, Albert Einstein famously remarked on the deep intelligibility of the universe, noting the surprising fact that it can be understood at all.

From a theistic perspective, this intelligibility is not accidental. If the universe is the product of a rational Creator, then it follows that it would be structured in a rational way—and that human minds, also products of that Creator, would be capable of understanding it. The correspondence between mathematics and reality is therefore not a coincidence but an expression of shared origin.

This idea is also consistent with the biblical concept of logos—a term meaning word, reason, or rational principle. The opening of the Gospel of John presents creation as grounded in this divine rationality: “In the beginning was the Word.” The implication is that order, logic, and intelligibility are not secondary features of the universe but foundational to it.

Without such a grounding, the effectiveness of mathematics remains unexplained. Why should abstract, non-physical truths map so precisely onto a physical world? Why should the universe conform to laws that can be expressed in the language of numbers?

If, however, both the structure of reality and the truths of mathematics arise from the same rational source, the connection becomes clear. Mathematics works because reality itself is ordered according to reason.

Thus, the statement 2 + 2 = 4 is more than a simple calculation. It reflects a deeper consistency woven into the fabric of existence. It points beyond itself to the conditions that make such certainty possible.

Ultimately, the most satisfying explanation is that behind the order we observe is a mind that established it—a mind in which these truths reside and from which they derive their necessity.

In that sense, mathematics is not just a tool we use. It is a signpost.

And every equation, however simple, quietly points beyond itself to the One who made it so.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Where the Brief Lives Rest

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 19 March 2026 at 17:22

sketch.png

Where the Brief Lives Rest

I walked through the Glasgow Necropolis as I often have. It was one of those bright Scottish mornings that softens even the hardest thoughts. The Necropolis, that city of the dead perched above Mother Glasgow; the city of the living, where space not only for memory but for quiet conversation with time itself exists. 

As I made my way among the gravestones, I found myself counting years, not just my own sixty plus but those etched into stone: the tiny, abbreviated lifespans of children lost long ago in a Dickensian age to epidemics like cholera, diphtheria, typhus. Names barely had time to settle and establish into the world before they were carved in stones suggesting they were here.

It’s a strange thing to be old in a place filled with the young who died. I felt not so much survivor’s guilt as survivor’s wonder. I’ve had decades of travel, of reading, of walking beaches at sundown, of writing, of grieving and healing, of faith evaluated and restored. What would any one of these children have become with even half of my years?

My cancer, in that moment, seemed less like an ending and more like a milestone. I don’t know how many more years are allotted to me, but I know now how many I’ve already been given, and I know what a privilege it is to reach an age where you look both forward and back.

The graves made me think of God’s purpose—not as a tidy doctrine, but as a question folded into every name worn smooth by wind, moss, and rain. What becomes of children who never had a chance to choose faith, to assess goodness, to wrestle with meaning? Where are they in the great scheme of things?

Jesus once said, “Let the little children come to me... for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” I must believe that children taken early are held in a mercy deeper than we can grasp. They are not forgotten; they are not lost to God . If anything, it is we who are still lost, walking among headstones trying to make sense of the living and the dead.

There’s a sobering democracy in cemeteries. All names are equal here, whether child or elder, rich, or poor, known, or unknown. We all close our eyes and rest with our forebears. And yet, those of us still walking have something the dead do not: time. Time to reflect, to forgive, to change. Time to be grateful. My cancer has made me aware of time—not just its scarcity, but its richness.

So, I keep walking, not just through the Necropolis, but through each day, carrying with me the invisible company of children who never saw their coming-of-age birthdays or perceived  the invisible grace of a God.

Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: When Nothing Adds Up

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

sketch.png

 

Today's Thought: When Nothing Adds Up

 

“Be careful when a naked man offers you a shirt.”
African proverb

Now I got thinking today about the problem of nothing. No, I am not sitting on rice paper emptying my thoughts to achieve ultimate happiness. I am thinking of another nothing.

Consider the universe with its stars, galaxies, and dark matter. Now imagine it compressed into a sphere no larger than our solar system. Press it further, down to the size of the sun, then to the span of the earth, then smaller still. A watermelon. An apple. A pea. An atom.

You are now holding an impossible weight in a vanishing space.

Take the next step. Remove it all. Not just matter, but space itself. Not just space, but time. What remains is not emptiness, because even emptiness suggests a place where something could be. This is nothing in its purest sense. No dimension, no duration, no foothold for thought.

The mind strains here. It reaches for an edge and finds none. Like a man trying to see beyond the horizon while standing in a closed room, it meets a limit it cannot cross.

Yet from this nothing, we are told, everything came. That is the claim. But in all our science, nothing does not produce something. It has no tools, no energy, no capacity. It cannot act because it is not.

So we face a quandary. If nothing cannot give rise to something, then the origin of all things must lie beyond the physical order. Beyond space, beyond time. Not bound by the rules that govern the universe, but the source of them.

The opening line of Genesis speaks with a calm certainty that cuts through the confusion:

“In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.”

A simple statement, yet it answers the riddle. Not nothing, but a mind. Not chance, but intention.

So be careful when a naked man offers you a shirt.

 

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Where the Storm Pauses: Cancer and Technology

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 18 March 2026 at 08:05

sketch.png

Where the Storm Pauses: Cancer and Technology

It’s March 17, 2026, and I’ve just had my consultation with my doctor at the Beatson cancer hospital in Glasgow.

I was adopted and raised by a man old enough to be my grandfather and who belonged, in some quiet way, to another century. He had lived in a time when milk arrived at the door in glass bottles, set down gently from a horse and cart, as if even delivery, like the proud horse carried a sense of dignity. He loved Dickens, and I think he trusted stories more than inventions. I now find myself in a fast‑moving world that would seem, to him, almost like fiction.

If I could sit with him again—perhaps on an ordinary afternoon—and tell him what I am about to write, I think he would listen with that same patient curiosity. Not disbelief exactly, but caution.

I watch a scientist called James Tour, who has built—I’m not sure this is the correct word—a “nanocar”: a micro‑structure in the form of a vehicle small enough to enter the bloodstream and carry out essential repair work in the body. It is a strange thought, that something so small could be made to move at all. But there it is, pulled out of the realm of science fiction and made real as the sun rises.

Now, what has this to do with my conversation with the doctor?

In the first chapter I explained that I was diagnosed with neuroendocrine cancer. For a time, the treatments held things in place, like bags of sand placed carefully against a rising storm. But yesterday, I was told that one tumour has begun to grow again. Back in my father’s day, if the first diagnosis was the end of the line, what would he have made of this latest news?

The doctor spoke of something called PRRT—Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. It doesn’t quite roll off the tongue. The name itself feels weighty. But in essence, it is something surprisingly simple.

PRRT works by using a kind of targeted medicine. Cancer cells like mine carry specific receptors—think of them as micro parcel lockers. PRRT carries a substance designed to find those lockers, open them, and drop in a tiny amount of radiation. And unlike parcel delivery, which can be indiscriminate at times, these tiny parcels of radiation find the specific locker. It sounds similar to the nanocar to my mind: the idea that something so small, so carefully designed, can move through the body, find its target, and act. Not with drama, but with quiet purpose.

I think my father would have struggled with this—not because he lacked understanding, but because it asks us to trust in things we cannot see at all. A story of human hands learning, slowly, how to speak to the smallest parts of creation. I am not sure why, but I think of that verse where David writes, “Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book.”

Cancer remains what it is. It does not become less serious because the tools have become more refined. The storm still exists. There are still days when one wakes in that land of Oz.

PRRT does not promise a complete solution. It offers time in a life where we refuse to die.

And in a life where time is no longer measured in years but in distances between worlds, that matters.

Perhaps that is what I would say, if I could sit beside my father again. That the world has changed, yes—but not entirely. That even now, beneath all the complexity, there remains something familiar: a quiet reaching toward life, even in its most fragile places.

But there is something else, too—something that does not belong to laboratories or consultations, something that does not depend on what can be measured or delivered.

A hope that stands a little further out, beyond the reach of medicine.

“Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth… God Himself will be with them as their God.
He will wipe away every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death, or mourning, or crying, or pain, for the former things have passed away.”
Revelation 21:3–4 (BSB)

I find myself thinking, more often now, that the distance between worlds is not only something we endure, but something that will one day be closed. When the quiet absence that follows loss will give way to presence again.

I think of my father then—not as someone left behind in another time, but as someone simply sharing an eternal horizon where time merges and to be truthful, time will only be the gaps in eternal events.

Reference: Scientists say tiny ‘DNA nanobots’ could deliver medicine by travelling through the body - College of Medicine and Integrated Health

Image my Marcus Woodbridge https://unsplash.com/@marcuswoodbridge

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

In the Stillness of Morning

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 15 March 2026 at 07:56

sketch.png

In the Stillness of Morning

There is a moment before the day properly begins when the world seems to rest in its own breath. The streets are quiet, my mind has not yet been crowded by the noise of the day, and thought moves more gently through me than it will later. It is in that hour that I often find myself sitting to write.

Writers have long recognised something of this hour. Emily Dickinson once wrote that “the brain is wider than the sky,” and in the quiet of early morning one begins to understand what she meant. When the world is silent, thought opens in unexpected directions. T. S. Eliot suggested that even in stillness there can be a kind of movement — “the still point of the turning world.” In silence, something continues to move inwardly, though nothing outward seems to stir.

For me, writing often begins there.

What appears on the page in those early moments is rarely polished or carefully arranged. It is usually made up of the thoughts that rise naturally when a person sits quietly long enough to hear them — reflections on faith, memory, small observations about life, and the kind of passing impressions that might otherwise slip unnoticed through the day. Writers across centuries have done something similar. From the meditations of Marcus Aurelius to the letters of Rainer Maria Rilke, there runs a quiet tradition of turning inward, listening carefully, and allowing thought to take form in solitude.

Yet the stillness of morning carries a deeper value than reflection alone.

There is a wisdom in beginning the day before God. The Psalmist captures it with simple beauty: “In the morning, Lord, you hear my voice; in the morning I lay my requests before you and wait expectantly.” There is something profoundly right about that order. Before striving, before speaking to the world, the soul first turns toward its Creator.

Morning silence makes room for that turning. It is an hour when prayer can rise plainly and without effort. The mind has not yet been scattered; the heart has not yet been pulled in many directions. One simply brings one’s voice before God and waits.

That waiting is part of the holiness of the hour. The Psalm does not rush past it. The Psalmist lays his requests before the Lord and then waits expectantly — not anxiously, but with quiet trust. It is a reminder that before we act, endure, or attempt to shape the day ourselves, we are first called to stand in His presence.

Perhaps that is why the morning feels so well suited to writing as well.

In that silence, words seem to come less from effort and more from listening. What begins as prayer often continues as reflection. Thoughts gather slowly, like small stones found along a quiet path — some random, some wholesome, some searching, yet each carrying something of that deeply human moment when the soul is given space to speak.

Writing in such an hour becomes less about producing something clever and more about paying attention. Faith, thought, and language meet quietly on the page. The act itself becomes a kind of gathering — of memory, of reflection, of those inward stirrings that remind us what it means to be human.

If these pages hold any value at all, it is not because the thoughts are remarkable, but because of the hour from which they come.

The early morning remains one of the few times when the world feels unhurried, when prayer rises more easily, and when thought can unfold without pressure. It is a small and gentle space before the day claims its attention — a place where the soul can turn toward God, and where a few quiet words may find their way onto the page.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Ship of Theseus and the Island of Memory

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 14 March 2026 at 10:29

 We too were made for a greater voyage,
where nothing that was truly loved is ever lost,
and the joys of the past are lived again—without end.

Everlasting Cadence 

sketch.png

The Ship of Theseus and the Island of Memory

 

Raised in a maritime city like Glasgow, one inevitably learns to look outward. Ships depart, tides shift, horizons beckon. Yet the places we travel to often shape the landscapes within us even more profoundly than the geography we leave behind.

I'm in the middle of an MA Creative Writing and in desperate need for a break. One morning I cross to the Isle of Bute aboard the MV Bute. In my hands is a book describing an ancient philosophical puzzle first recorded by Plutarch: The Ship of Theseus. According to the story, the Greek hero Theseus sailed to Crete to slay the Minotaur. After returning triumphantly to Athens, the vessel was preserved as a monument. As the years passed and the ship slowly decayed, carpenters replaced its timbers one by one until eventually every plank had been renewed.

The question arises: which vessel is truly the Ship of Theseus—the restored ship standing proudly in the harbour, or the original timbers rotting somewhere on the shore?

Our own bodies are not so different from this paradox. Red blood cells form, set off on arduous voyages through our circulatory seas, navigating what for them must seem like violent rapids and treacherous currents. They travel through nearly half a million miles of arteries, veins, and capillaries before quietly disappearing after a journey of roughly two months.

Skin cells also live brief lives. They loosen, shift, and fall away like tiny avalanches from continental plates, drifting downward in invisible currents until they vanish entirely within a day or two.

Scientists estimate that much of the human body renews itself every seven to ten years. Like Theseus’s vessel, we are continually rebuilt plank by plank. Standing on the ferry deck, contemplating the quiet industry of renewal taking place within my own body, it is difficult not to wonder what exactly remains constant within us.

I step off the ferry into sepia-coloured showers on this Sunday morning. A grey-haired man remarks to a young student beside him, “Back in the day this place was like Benidorm in July.”

But that day has long since passed. A subdued stillness hangs over the town this autumn morning. The island seems to rest in a kind of mournful silence, like a village abandoned after the Vikings have come and gone as they did in the past.

In the 1960s my father bought a small cabin in the island’s interior. Each summer he would pack our blue Comer van to the roof and transport my mother and me—along with every conceivable necessity—to what became our seasonal home: a three-by-twelve-metre wooden hut with no running water, no electricity, and no sewage.

At the time these inconveniences never occurred to me. All that mattered was escape—from playground bullies, razor gangs, and the shadowy characters who loitered in dark corners of the Govan streets among half-starved dogs and crumbling tenements.

Bute was paradise.

Half a century has passed since those bright summers. Now I walk through the town once more, paying quiet homage to the landscapes of my childhood.

There is a Portuguese word, saudade, sometimes described as a pleasure you suffer, an ailment you enjoy. The past has become something like that for me in recent years—an indulgence in gentle melancholy.

Crossing the town square, I am conscious of walking upon layers of history. Hangings were carried out here. Witch trials once echoed across these stones, and human bodies burned in medieval nights that flickered with firelight and fear. The past truly is, as someone once wrote, a foreign country—wistfully recalled, imperfectly remembered, and often misrepresented through the slow march of time.

One record in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft Database captured my attention:

McNicol, Janet – 15 October 1673
Prison: Tolbooth, Rothesay
Confession: 1673
Sentence: Execution – to be strangled and burned at the gallows.

One cannot help wondering why Janet McNicol, having once escaped the island, returned a year later to face such a fate. Perhaps, like many of us, she felt some invisible tether binding her to this place.

The Victorian age has left a stubborn footprint here. Even with the trams long gone from the promenade, a nineteenth-century flaneur transported into the present might feel little disorientation. The streets remain narrow, built for horse-drawn carriages. Beach shelters still face the water. Public conveniences retain their tiled mosaic floors and gravity-fed cisterns.

I find myself thinking about the countless generations who have passed through this town.

I am only passing through myself.

Yet above it all the pale October moon continues its silent watch over each wandering generation.

Turning left at Rothesay Castle—built in the thirteenth century as defence against Viking raiders—I climb the Serpentine, a steep road twisting through thirteen tight bends. One year my father attempted this ascent in the overloaded van. The engine roared uphill only to slip backwards again and again in a Sisyphean ritual before he finally admitted defeat.

Halfway up the hill I notice a Victorian letterbox embedded in the wall. The initials VR remain proudly stamped into the iron. It comforts me strangely, this small symbol of continuity linking present and past.

Later, walking across Canada Hill golf course, the honking of migrating geese interrupts my thoughts. Instinctively I recall a song I once sang accompanied on my guitar—words written by the Victorian poet Violet Jacob.

O wind, hae mercy, haud yer whisht,
For I daurna listen mair…

Like the homesick exile in Jacob’s poem—the “hameless loon”—perhaps we are all exiled from somewhere, especially from our own past.

The Japanese speak of wabi-sabi, a quiet acceptance of life’s impermanence: the bonsai tree struggling to root itself in shallow soil, shedding its leaves, withering, and eventually dying. Such transience, we are told, should be observed with a sense of gentle appreciation.

But human hearts do not surrender easily to such wisdom.

The poet Kobayashi Issa wrote after the death of his child:

The world of dew
Is the world of dew
And yet… and yet—

That hesitation—the refusal hidden in those final words—reveals the difficulty of accepting a world where everything passes away.

We are born with the capacity to live a thousand lives. Our bodies age, yet inside we remain strangely youthful. Deep within the hippocampus lie countless neurons preserving the memories of everything we have loved and lost.

These memories form a kind of inner archive—the quiet record of who we are.

Why would nature equip us with such elaborate machinery for remembrance? Memories of childhood summers, of friendships, of first loves and small moments that once seemed insignificant but now shine with unexpected clarity.

Perhaps these memories are not accidental at all.

Eventually I find the clearing I have been searching for. Only those who once belonged here would know how to reach it.

The cabins are gone.

Where once stood sixty small huts filled with families, laughter, bonfires, music, and children’s voices, there is now only open land dotted with a few Guernsey cows staring curiously in my direction.

Yet the memories remain vivid.

Here I first heard Creedence Clearwater Revival singing Up Around the Bend. Here, I carved my eternal love beside a girl whose name I can no longer remember—and who surely has forgotten mine. How fickle the prepubescent boy.

The landscape itself remains unchanged. Loch Ascog glimmers to my right; the Firth of Clyde stretches to my left. But the cabins, the families, the laughter—gone forever.

Still, they shine brightly in memory like sunlight dancing on water.

There is a German word, Sehnsucht, which describes a deep longing for something lost, something altered beyond recovery. Standing here, looking over this quiet field, it is the only word that seems adequate.

Centuries ago, the ancient prophet Job asked a question that has echoed through human history:

“If a man dies, will he live again?”

Will all our memories be sealed permanently within our coffins?

Job answered his own question with quiet hope:

“I will wait for my renewal to come.”

Like the Ship of Theseus, we are vessels continually renewed. Perhaps we too were designed for a greater voyage—one in which nothing truly loved is ever lost, and the joys of the past are lived again without end.

Postscript

“For there is hope for a tree: if it is cut down, it will sprout again, and its shoots will not fail. Though its roots grow old in the ground and its stump dies in the soil, at the scent of water it will bud and put forth shoots like a plant.”
Job 14:7–9 (BSB)

“His flesh shall be fresher than a child’s; he shall return to the days of his youth.”
Job 33:25 (BSB)

 

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Courage to Examine Faith

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 13 March 2026 at 19:59

“Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him because he was not following us.”

Luke 9:49

“It is better to take refuge in the LORD than to trust in man.”
Psalm 118:8

sketch.png

The Courage to Examine Faith

Faith is, at its heart, something deeply personal. It shapes how a person understands the world, how decisions are made, and where meaning is found. Yet even sincere believers sometimes find questions stirring within them. Doubts can appear quietly, almost uninvited. When that happens, many wonder whether such questioning is wrong—perhaps even sinful—or whether it might instead be part of a genuine search for truth and a closer walk with God.

People question their religion for many reasons. Some do so out of an honest desire to understand their faith more clearly and to be certain it truly reflects God’s will. Others, it must be admitted, may seize upon doctrinal disagreements as a convenient way to loosen moral restraints. But questioning itself is not the real issue. The deeper question is why we ask.

When my wife and I eventually stepped away from our religion, it was not done lightly or in haste. We wanted to return to the very foundation of our faith, so we began reading the Gospels and the Book of Acts with fresh eyes. We asked ourselves a simple but searching question: What do God and Jesus actually ask of us? The path was not easy, yet it led to a sense of freedom we had never known before.

For nearly thirty years I had lived with the feeling of being constantly occupied by religious demands. Life moved in a blur of obligations, leaving little room to pause and reflect. Even simple pleasures—a quiet evening watching a film or a day of rest—could carry a faint sense of guilt, as though something more important was being neglected. When we stepped away from that structure, a new kind of quiet entered our lives. I found time to read Scripture slowly and thoughtfully, without the weight of expectation pressing from the outside. It felt like breathing fresh air after years indoors.

Around that time I read Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick, a book describing life in North Korea. It revealed how people can live with two conflicting beliefs at once. Citizens are taught that their leader is almost divine, yet many quietly recognize the absence of proof. To voice such doubts, however, risks isolation or punishment.

The parallels with my own experience were unsettling. In the religious system I had known, questioning the structure itself was discouraged, sometimes strongly. The consequences were not prison walls, but they could still be painful—strained relationships, quiet distance, or social exclusion. Doubt was often treated as disloyalty, and leaving could mean losing much of one’s world.

Yet the Bible itself offers a very different example. In Acts 17 we read of the Bereans, who listened to Paul and Silas preach but did not accept their message blindly. Instead, they examined the Scriptures daily to see whether what they heard was true. For that careful spirit they were called noble. Their faith was not passive; it was thoughtful and searching.

When I began examining my own beliefs in that same spirit, many assumptions began to crumble. It was not a rebellion against God but a quiet return to Him. I wanted to know Him more directly—not through layers of human interpretation and tradition, but through the words of Scripture itself.

It does trouble me when people leave a religion and abandon faith altogether, sometimes directing their hurt toward God. Yet the Scriptures gently remind us not to place our ultimate trust in human beings. People can disappoint us; institutions can fail. God, however, remains unchanged. Walking away from a religious system does not necessarily mean turning away from Him. In some cases, it may open the door to knowing Him more deeply.

I often reflect on the question raised in the story of Eden: will humanity remain loyal to God, or will we choose our own path apart from Him? That question still echoes today. But the choice is not limited to blind loyalty to human institutions on one side or complete rejection of faith on the other. There is another path—the quiet pursuit of truth, guided by a sincere desire to know God.

So is it wrong to question one’s religion? I do not believe it is. Honest questions can refine faith, remove unnecessary burdens, and lead to clarity. As Jesus said, “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” Truth is not something a believer should fear. It is something worth seeking with an open heart.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Ghorbat: A Word for the Weary Soul

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

Ghorbat: A Word for the Weary Soul

My thoughts and prayers are with the Iranian people at this time. As I reflect on their situation, I find myself thinking of the Persian word Ghorbat (غربت).

It is a word that speaks of a deep and quiet loneliness. It describes the feeling of being a stranger in the world, even when surrounded by familiar faces. Sometimes it refers to homesickness, yet often it reaches further than that. It is the sense that, in some way, you do not fully belong where you are.

Many people encounter this feeling during their spiritual journey, especially when life becomes difficult and the heart begins to ask deeper questions.

Who is God?
Why is there so much suffering?
Does God know me?
How can I be sure?

There are moments when faith sets a person slightly apart. The questions carried within the heart, and the longing that grows there, are not always easily shared. At times it can feel like walking along a quiet road while the rest of the world rushes somewhere else.

Yet Scripture offers a gentle assurance that another journey is unfolding, one that is guided by the Holy Spirit.

Scripture says in 2 Chronicles 16:9,

“For the eyes of the Lord run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show Himself strong on behalf of those whose heart is loyal to Him.”

Farsi (Persian)
«زیرا چشمان خداوند در تمام زمین گردش می‌کند تا خود را به نفع کسانی که دلشان نسبت به او کامل است، نیرومند نشان دهد.»

Over the years I have often read accounts emerging from Iran. Many of these stories are shared quietly, sometimes almost in whispers. They speak about dreams. Not ordinary dreams, but dreams in which Jesus appears to people, speaking to them, calling them, comforting them.

Even a simple search reveals many such testimonies.

When the Bible becomes difficult to obtain, something remarkable often seems to happen. Faith finds another way. Similar stories are heard from places such as North Korea, Afghanistan, and other parts of the Middle East. When the written word is hidden, the message still finds its way into the quiet places of the human heart. No regime can limit what God has approved.

Within that spirit of hope there is reassurance.

The Gospel contains a promise that speaks directly to this longing. In the Farsi Bible, Jesus says:

English (Luke 23:43)
“Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.”

Farsi (Persian)
«به‌راستی به تو می‌گویم، امروز با من در فردوس خواهی بود.»

These words carry a gentle truth. Sometimes the homesickness we feel is not really for a place on this earth.

Perhaps Ghorbat is more than loneliness or homesickness in the ordinary sense. Perhaps it is a longing for another home, a place where love, righteousness, kindness, and peace reign. The paradise that Jesus spoke of.

For now, though, peace can still be found in the midst of a restless world. Hope can still appear in the middle of uncertainty.

For those who search quietly, whether in Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, or anywhere else, such words can feel like a light in a darkened room.

The feeling of being a stranger may remain for a time. Yet the promise remains also.

And perhaps that quiet longing in the soul, the sense that we do not quite belong here, is not something to fear.

It may simply mean that our hearts are already turning toward another home.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Letting Go of What Lives in the Mind

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 12 March 2026 at 15:23

sketch.png

Toxoplasma gondii.

Letting Go of What Lives in the Mind

 

 It looks as innocent as an octopus. It's

Toxoplasma gondii, and microscopic, invisible to the naked eye, yet capable of entering the bodies and brains  of warm-blooded animals, including human beings. 

It is a disturbing thought: something so small finding its way into the brain and quietly shaping behaviour.

Bitterness can behave in a strangely similar way.

A wound enters the mind; a word spoken in anger, a betrayal, an injustice, and if it is fed long enough, it begins to burrow into our thoughts. The memory repeats itself. The hurt grows familiar. Before long, resentment begins to influence how we see people, how we speak, even how we feel about life itself. The parasitic thought dictates their whole life.

Back in the day when I was part of organised religion, I gave several speeches as a visiting speaker in other congregations. The most requested talk was "Do You Harbour Resentment or do You Forgive?" This was a talk primarily for a Christian audience, the frequency of this talk demonstrated the tendency in humans to nurse other's faults.

History offers us the way forward in the life of Corrie ten Boom. During the Holocaust, Corrie and her family hid Jewish people in their home. Their courage led to arrest and imprisonment in Ravensbrück concentration camp, where her sister Betsie died.

Out of that suffering came a discovery Corrie would later speak about around the world: the power of forgiveness.

Years after the war, while speaking in a church, a man approached her. She recognized him immediately. He had been one of the guards at Ravensbrück. With quiet sincerity he told her he had become a Christian and asked if she could forgive him.

In an instant the past returned—the humiliation, the cruelty, the loss of her sister. Forgiveness felt impossible. Yet the words of Jesus came to mind: “Forgive, and you will be forgiven.”

Silently she prayed for help. Then, almost against her own strength, she reached out and took his hand.

What she felt in that moment, she later said, was something she could only describe as God’s power—an overwhelming sense of release that washed away the bitterness she had carried.

Most of us know the quieter version of that struggle. Someone wounds us, and the mind returns to it again and again. We rehearse the conversation. We imagine what we should have said. Meanwhile, the other person may have long since forgotten.

The strange truth is that resentment rarely imprisons the person who hurt us.

It imprisons us.

Jesus pointed to a different path. When Saint Peter once asked how many times forgiveness should be offered—seven times perhaps—Jesus replied, “Not seven, but seventy-seven.” Forgiveness was never meant to be arithmetic. It is not a ledger of debts, but a freedom of heart.

To forgive does not deny the wound. Pain is real. Loss is real. Forgiveness simply refuses to let the injury rule the rest of our lives.

Corrie ten Boom once said that forgiveness is the key that unlocks the door of resentment. By forgiving, she did not erase Ravensbrück. She simply refused to carry the camp into her future.

And perhaps that is where forgiveness begins for most of us—not as a sudden emotion, but as a quiet decision. Sometimes it must be chosen again and again. Sometimes it is only a whispered prayer: “Lord, help me forgive.”

Yet we are not asked to do this alone. The same Jesus who spoke of forgiveness also practiced it from the cross, and the strength He showed there is the strength He offers to us.

So, it may be worth asking a gentle question.

Is something living in your mind that should no longer be there?

If resentment has burrowed in like a parasite, perhaps it is time to let it go. Forgiveness is not merely a gift given to another person.

It is freedom given to your own soul.

 

A brief reflection on the Gospel of Matthew 6:14–15

“For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.
But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive yours.”

 

These words come from Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount, shortly after He taught the Lord’s Prayer. They reveal a deep spiritual principle: a heart that receives God’s mercy should become a heart that gives mercy.

Forgiveness here is not merely a rule. It is about the condition of the heart. When someone holds tightly to bitterness, it can close the door to the freedom and peace that God’s forgiveness brings.

Christ is inviting people into a different way of living—one where mercy flows in two directions:

  • from God to us, and

  • from us to others.

It can be difficult, especially when wounds run deep. Yet the teaching reminds us that forgiveness is not about pretending the hurt was small. It is about placing the hurt in God’s hands instead of carrying it forever.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Who Are the Travellers Who Pass This Way?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 11 March 2026 at 08:35

sketch.png

Who Are the Travellers Who Pass This Way?

With the first shy signs of spring appearing along Scotland’s west coast, my wife and I took a drive over to Loch Lomond at the weekend. The air still carried the coolness of winter, yet the light had begun to soften in that subtle way which hints that the season is turning.

As I stood looking across the water, I noticed two swans resting quietly on the loch, perhaps a metre apart. For a while they drifted there in silence. Then, quite suddenly, they rose together, their wings beating loudly against the still air, lifting themselves upward as though setting out on some long and purposeful journey.

I watched them with a sense of quiet wonder. Which of the two had first suggested it was time to leave? There had been no visible signal, no call, no movement that I could detect. It seemed almost like telepathy — a silent understanding shared between them.

Later, as we walked along the promenade at Duck Bay, with the quiet majesty of Ben Lomond standing watch across the water, my wife asked a question that gently drew my thoughts in another direction.

“How many visitors were on the website last night?”

“Seven and a half thousand,” I replied.

She paused for a moment, then said, “Who might these people be? What countries are they from?”

“That,” I said, “is a good question — one I wish I knew.”

In this rather one-sided act of blogging, I often find myself reflecting on that very mystery. Words are written in solitude, yet they travel far beyond the quiet room in which they were first formed. Somewhere, across towns and cities, across countries and oceans, someone pauses long enough to read them.

In a curious way, it reminds me of something from my childhood.

When I was a boy on the cusp of youth, I owned a Grundig Satellite multiband radio. Growing up around Clydeside, the outside world often arrived through the voices of sailors passing through the docks. But that radio opened the world in another way. In the evenings I would tune across the bands, discovering distant stations that seemed to arrive from beyond the horizon.

One evening I found a German station playing music. Among the pieces they broadcast was Beethoven’s Ode to Joy. I remember sitting there, listening in the dim glow of the dial, feeling unexpectedly lifted by the sound travelling invisibly through the air.

Perhaps that early experience planted a quiet fascination in me — the idea that voices and thoughts can travel across great distances to reach people we may never meet.

And so I find myself wondering about those who arrive here.

Why do you come, dear friends?

Perhaps the answer lies in something deeply human — our shared search for meaning, for the spiritual, for those quiet questions that sit beneath the surface of everyday life. Questions about existence, about the moral nature of humanity, and about the enduring place of Christian belief in a restless world.

Whatever your reasons, I am sincerely grateful for your visits. Yet I cannot help feeling curious about the people behind the numbers — who you are, where you live, and what led you here.

If you ever feel inclined, I would be delighted to hear from you. You can write, in complete confidence, to:

blogger2026ou@gmail.com

It would be a pleasure to know a little more about the fellow travellers who pass by this small corner of the world.

Perhaps in the great purpose of God, we may one day meet,

“After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne…”

Revelation 7:9

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Strangers Today, Neighbours in Eternity

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 8 March 2026 at 08:08

sketch.png

Strangers Today, Neighbours in Eternity

Wasn’t it Gwendolyn Brooks, in Maud Martha, who once wrote about all this life and what shall we do with it? Bless her for asking.

We may have met before. Perhaps on the West Highland Way. Or that day in Dubrovnik. Maybe Warsaw or Berlin. It might even have been at a Horslips gig in Glasgow or the time I was in Boston. Perhaps we went to school or university at the same time. Who knows?

Or perhaps we have never met at all. What are the chances?

I found myself pondering this as I wandered through Glasgow yesterday. The streets were full of people. Some bright with a ready smile. Some carrying their burdens like invisible luggage.

A woman stood quietly debating which jumper to buy. For her husband perhaps. Or maybe for her dad. A man in a wheelchair asked gently for a few coins. In Waterstones a fellow was buying six books, moving with the certainty of someone who knew exactly what he was looking for.

I caught myself wondering about him. Gifts, or indulgence? Either way he seemed a well read soul.

And there it was again. That restless longing the Portuguese sometimes speak of, the ache to know the world and its people.

As the city opened around me, it felt like moving through a tapestry woven from unspoken stories. Each person I passed was a quiet universe. Complete. Complicated. Immeasurably rich. Yet all I glimpsed were small fragments. A glance. A gesture. The turn of a shoulder as someone slipped past.

It is astonishing how many lives we brush against without ever stopping long enough to feel the contours of their humanity.

Still, something in me thrills at these brief proximities. I find myself imagining the paths that brought each stranger to that precise moment beside me on Buchanan Street.

Were they running late? Thinking of someone they love? Wrestling with a decision? Savouring a small secret joy?

There is a gentle magic in the not knowing. A soft wonder that asks nothing more than attention.

I suppose that is the heart of it. The warmth I feel does not come from conversation but from possibility. The possibility that any one of these unknown faces might have been a friend, a confidant, a companion for a few miles or a few years.

We pass through one another’s stories like shadows. Yet the passing leaves an imprint, however faint.

It reminds me that the world is wide and still full of people I have yet to meet. People who might change the colour of my days.

As I walked, the thought settled into me with surprising tenderness. Even in a crowd we are not alone. We share the pavement. The weather.  The faint smell of food drifting from a stall.

We share the quiet truth that life is happening around us constantly and vibrantly. And we are part of it whether we speak a word or not.

Perhaps that is why strangers draw my attention. They represent the untold. The unfamiliar. The chapters not yet written.

They remind me that the world is not exhausted. There are still stories waiting beyond the bend in the road.

By the time I reached the end of my walk dusk had begun to gather over the rooftops. The city lights flickered alive and scattered gold into the evening air. People hurried past with shopping bags swinging and scarves pulled tight against the cold.

I watched them for a moment and felt that gentle ache again. Not loneliness. Something closer to a longing for connection, however brief.

Perhaps we have crossed paths somewhere. Or perhaps our worlds will never quite collide.

Still, the thought of you. Another unknown face moving through its own landscape. Another story unfolding somewhere beyond my view. That thought carries a quiet comfort.

In the great weave of things we are all wanderers. Drawn toward one another by the simple warmth of being human.

And then another thought rose. Soft but steady.

Perhaps the warmth we feel toward unknown faces is not only for this world.

It may echo something deeper. A quiet recognition that in the long light of eternity many of these unknown faces may one day become familiar.

After all, life does not end with our brief crossings on a winter street. With eternity in view there will be time enough to meet those whose names are written in God’s Book of Life. Time without hurry. Time without loss. Time to see one another as we were meant to be.

Christians have long spoken of the promises of Scripture as carrying both a present glow and a future one. A hope we taste now. A fullness still to come.

Paul wrote of the hidden wisdom of God. Of things no eye has seen and no mind could yet imagine, now made known in Christ. Again and again Scripture points toward a restored creation. A world made whole. A place where sorrow, death, and decay no longer have the final word.

If that is so, then every stranger I pass may be someone I will one day greet not with curiosity but with recognition.

The woman choosing the jumper.
The man in the wheelchair.
The fellow with six books under his arm.

And countless others whose paths brushed mine for a moment and then were gone.

For now we move through a world filled with lives known only to God. Yet the day is coming when loss will have no place. When separation will end. When the warmth of unknown faces will become the joy of known ones.

Beloved. Redeemed. Gathered together in the same forever.

Most likely we have never met.

At least not yet.

But in the hope set before us there remains a promise. Someday, in the renewed creation God is shaping even now, there will be life enough to meet, to know, and to rejoice together in the great story He has written.

“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no heart has imagined
what God has prepared for those who love Him.”

1 Corinthians 2:9

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

What It Means to Be Human: Who Decides?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 5 March 2026 at 11:04

sketch.png

What It Means to Be Human: Who Decides?

I woke today and prayed for something encouraging and specific to how I was feeling about this broken world. In the randomness, up came Psalm 1.

There are hundreds of opinions about what being human means. What are the Creator’s thoughts on this? The opening words of Book of Psalms begin with a picture. It is a simple one, yet it quietly sets the tone for everything that follows.

The psalm begins:

“Blessed is the one
who does not walk in step with the wicked
or stand in the way that sinners take
or sit in the company of mockers.”

There is a gentle progression in those words.

First we walk.
Then we stand.
Finally we sit.

Take something like pornography. It rarely begins with an intention to fall into addiction. An image appears on a screen; perhaps something suggestive, something easy to dismiss. We glance, then look again. Then peer.  Curiosity becomes habit. Habit deepens into something stronger. Before long the appetite grows, demanding something more explicit, more consuming.

And what began as a moment of curiosity slowly reaches further into life itself. Marriages strain and sometimes break. Children sense the change in the atmosphere of a home that no longer feels the same. What began as a passing glance quietly reshapes a family.

It reflects something true about human nature. We rarely move away from what is good in a single moment. More often, we drift. A step beside the wrong path becomes a pause. The pause becomes a place where we settle. The psalmist understands how easily the human heart grows comfortable in places it once would have passed by.

Yet the psalm quickly offers another image.

“That person is like a tree planted by streams of water,
which yields its fruit in season
and whose leaf does not wither.”

In a dry land, streams often referred to carefully dug irrigation channels guiding water to the fields. The tree is planted where life can reach it. Its roots draw quietly from a steady source.

The result is not frantic growth but steady fruitfulness. The tree stands, season after season, nourished and alive.

Then the image changes.

“Not so the wicked!
They are like chaff
that the wind blows away.”

The scene shifts to a threshing floor. Farmers toss crushed wheat into the air so the grain falls back to the ground while the chaff—the empty husk—is carried away by the wind.

The contrast is striking.

The righteous are like a tree: rooted and nourished.
The wicked are like chaff: light and drifting.

The psalm is not only speaking about behaviour. It is speaking about substance. A tree has roots that reach down into life-giving water. Chaff has no roots at all. It moves wherever the wind carries it.

In this way the psalm quietly teaches something about what it means to be human. Our lives are shaped by the sources from which we draw our life. When we are rooted in what is good and true, fruit slowly appears. But when life is detached from its source, it becomes restless and weightless.

Before the rest of the psalms speak of joy, sorrow, fear, and hope, this first image remains before me: a tree beside flowing water, and chaff scattered on the wind.

And each life, in time, becomes one or the other.

He has shown you O mortal, what is good

And what does God require of you?

To act justly and to love mercy

And to walk humbly with your God.

Micah 6:8

*****

Verses from the Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011.  All rights reserved worldwide.

Image by ChatGPT

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Feeling Undervalued

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 4 March 2026 at 10:53

sketch.png

Feeling Undervalued

Many years ago, I watched the film Fiddler on the Roof. One scene has stayed with me ever since. Tevye’s wife, Golde, suddenly asks him a question after many years of marriage: “Do you love me?”

The question catches Tevye off guard. In their tradition marriages were arranged, and love was rarely spoken about openly. To him, the answer seems obvious. He begins listing all the things he has done for her over the years: working hard, providing for the family, sharing the burdens of life. Surely these things demonstrate his love. But Golde is looking for something more than a list of duties fulfilled; she longs to hear words of appreciation.

Her question reveals something deeper. What she really wants is recognition expressed aloud—something that acknowledges the bond between them. The moment becomes tender and reflective, leading into the gentle song Do You Love Me? where the two cautiously explore feelings that had long been assumed but never spoken.

The scene captures something deeply human. We live not only by actions but also by words. A kind word can lift the spirit in ways that practical service alone sometimes cannot. Most people do not seek constant praise, yet sincere appreciation has a quiet power. It reassures us that we are seen and valued.

Unfortunately, the opposite can also be true. Some people carry with them a kind of gloom—an atmosphere of criticism or coldness. It may appear in sharp remarks, dismissive attitudes, or simply a lack of warmth. Such negativity can weigh heavily on those around them. Where appreciation is absent, discouragement often takes its place.

Gratitude, by contrast, has a remarkable effect on human well-being. It can increase happiness, strengthen relationships, and even lessen feelings of depression. One reason for this is simple: gratitude shifts our attention. Instead of focusing on what is missing or imperfect, it turns our gaze toward what is present and good.

Literature offers many poignant reflections on this theme. In Middlemarch by George Eliot, we encounter the quiet suffering of Dorothea Brooke. I recall cringing, I mean really cringing as I watched a certain scene play out. Dorothea is an intelligent and idealistic young woman who longs to dedicate her life to meaningful work and moral purpose. Believing she can contribute to something intellectually significant; she marries the scholar Edward Casaubon.

Yet her hopes gradually fade. Rather than welcoming her devotion and assistance, Casaubon becomes defensive and distant. Dorothea’s generosity, intelligence, and willingness to serve are not only unappreciated but subtly resented. The marriage becomes a place where her gifts remain largely unseen.

Her story reveals a quiet tragedy: the sincere desire to contribute, combined with the pain of feeling that one’s efforts do not matter. Eliot writes with deep sympathy for such people—those whose goodness is genuine but easily overlooked in the ordinary patterns of life.

In reality, many people experience something similar. Those who are thoughtful, generous, or humble do not always attract attention. Louder personalities or rigid social expectations can overshadow quieter virtues. Yet the absence of recognition does not diminish the value of those qualities.

From a Christian perspective, kindness and appreciation are not merely social niceties; they reflect something deeper about the way human life is meant to be lived. In Galatians 5:22–23 we read:

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.”

Here kindness is described as something that grows naturally in a life shaped by God’s Spirit. It is not forced or artificial. It emerges from a heart that has learned to see others with compassion and respect.

A quiet thread runs through these reflections from Golde’s simple question, to Dorothea’s unnoticed devotion, to the biblical call toward kindness.

Gratitude does more than acknowledge a good deed. It recognises the dignity of the person who offered it.

In this way, a few sincere words can do something remarkable: they affirm the quiet worth of a human soul

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Written in the Genes

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 2 March 2026 at 11:04

sketch.png

Written in the Genes

In the back end of the 70s, I was standing on the thin edge between boyhood and whatever came next, I sensed a quiet unravelling. The friendships of my youth fell away, not with drama but with a kind of inevitability. I was restless. Unqualified, unformed and lost. Cardonald College in Glasgow became my refuge, a place to gather the pieces required for university after wasted school years, though I suspected I was searching for something less tangible than certificates.

One Sunday afternoon a door-to-door evangelist knocked my door; he noticed me watching a Scottish Gaelic language programme called Can Seo. Nothing remarkable in that, yet a week later he placed a cassette in my hands. A folk group called Na h-Òganaich. I remember the feel of the music unfamiliar yet familiar. I played it until the music felt less like sound and more like memory. Soon after, I found my way to Runrig’s Play Gaelic. The songs did not simply entertain me. They unsettled me. It was as though a door had opened somewhere inside and light poured through.

Youth have a way of disguising turning points as accidents. Someone gives you a cassette. You press play. A seed is planted in the dark.

Last year, decades later, that seed stirred again. At the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall, Beat the Drum performed a Runrig tribute set before an audience drawn from across the UK, Ireland, and mainland Europe; a primarily over 50s audience. I looked around at faces lit by stage light and memory. We were not merely spectators. We were witnesses to something we had carried for years.

For much of my life I felt a quiet grievance with the curve balls that life handed me. Why Govan? Why tenements and shipyards, angry hammers and the neurotic sizzle of welding torches. Why not sea lochs and machair and the tongue to read the poets? Why Glasgow and not the Hebrides? Age softens certain questions. I have made peace with this pilgrim rather than a native. Still, there remains a pull I cannot fully name.

I felt it again watching Donnie Munro Walk the ridgelines of Skye in Wilderness Walks. The Cuillins rose behind him, ancient and unspeaking. He spoke of music as though it were a current running through the human spirit, invisible yet undeniable. He recalled a concert in Ireland during the years of unrest. The morning after, a Catholic woman approached the band to thank them. Her family had attended and for a few hours, she said, the bitterness that haunted their home had loosened its grip.

A song cannot rewrite history. Yet it can still a storm, if only briefly.

That story settled into me. I grew up far from the islands where Gaelic endured, yet the language had claimed me early. Over the years I travelled north and west. Skye. Islay. Jura. Each arrival felt less like discovery and more like recognition. I would stand looking out over water and feel an easing in my chest, as if my internal compass had stopped trembling.

Curiosity eventually led me to test my ancestry. Numbers returned, clinical and precise. Ninety percent Celtic heritage, reaching even to Brittany.

I was adopted as a baby so I never knew the details of family history, so after a DNA test and some digging. My paternal line traced back to Islay. The island that had long stirred something wordless within me was not only a symbol. It was blood.

What are we to do with such knowledge?

It is easy to dismiss these moments as coincidence, to speak of probability and genetic drift. Yet when a melody learned in adolescence continues to echo across a lifetime, when a landscape you have barely known feels like an inheritance, coincidence begins to feel too small a word.

Perhaps there are currents moving beneath the visible world. Currents of language, of song, of memory carried not only in stories but in cells. Perhaps what we call longing is simply recognition delayed.

I think now of that young man in 1974, sitting with a borrowed cassette, unaware that he was being quietly called home. Not to a place he had lived, but to a place that had lived in him.

And I am left with the sense that our lives are threaded with meanings we only perceive in retrospect. A melody. A mountain. A strand of DNA. Each one a whisper.

As if something within us has always known.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 1788783