Edited by Altahair Attia Adelkarim, Wednesday, 9 July 2014, 20:15
The first thing that I noticed about the categorisation of the comments was that it was broadly similar in areas to those I had made and others had shown, the actual detailed breakdown was less negative and more attempted answers ;
Table 3: Comparing ‘Ann Other’ Bales’s analysis by hand and by OpenMentor
Bales’s categories
Total number of comments categorised by hand
Total number of comments categorised by OpenMentor
Positive reactions
A1 Shows solidarity
A2 Shows tension release
A3 Shows agreement
0
0
0
0
0
0
Attempted answers
B1 Gives suggestion
B2 Gives opinion
B3 Gives information
3
1
0
2
2
3
Questions
C1 Asks for information
C2 Asks for opinion
C3 Asks for suggestion
1
0
0
0
0
0
Negative reactions
D1 Shows disagreement
D2 Shows tension
D3 Shows antagonism
6
0
0
1
0
0
It will be very interesting to see the breakdown from the rest of the group, but I could understand the reason for the computer assessments.
H817 Open Mentor
The first thing that I noticed about the categorisation of the comments was that it was broadly similar in areas to those I had made and others had shown, the actual detailed breakdown was less negative and more attempted answers ;
Table 3: Comparing ‘Ann Other’ Bales’s analysis by hand and by OpenMentor
Bales’s categories
Total number of comments categorised by hand
Total number of comments categorised by OpenMentor
Positive reactions
A1 Shows solidarity
A2 Shows tension release
A3 Shows agreement
0
0
0
0
0
0
Attempted answers
B1 Gives suggestion
B2 Gives opinion
B3 Gives information
3
1
0
2
2
3
Questions
C1 Asks for information
C2 Asks for opinion
C3 Asks for suggestion
1
0
0
0
0
0
Negative reactions
D1 Shows disagreement
D2 Shows tension
D3 Shows antagonism
6
0
0
1
0
0
It will be very interesting to see the breakdown from the rest of the group, but I could understand the reason for the computer assessments.