Considering the consequences for collaborative discussion as opposed to competitive debate
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2015, 15:19
Visible to anyone in the world
Collaborative discussion could be seen as a double edged sword. In one aspect it is great for creativity that allows for space for the participants to express their ideas with limited constraints and this can lead to an evolving nature of curriculum that is driven by the participants. The discussion may start at one point but very quickly move to a whole new topic area. This then moves on to what could be perceived as the potential issue.
The discussion may move away from the original topic to an area that has limited connection to the original activity brief. This may be negative if it moves too far away or gets too focused on another factor raised in the discussion (or not depending on the learning outcome!). This perception of usefulness is very individual. One participant may find the discussion direction useful and of interest, whereas others may find the direction confusing or unhelpful.
This is where participants can select specific individuals within a group to support their PLN (Personal Learning Network), if they have particular similarities or ways of working that makes their collaborative work beneficial.
Competitive Debate, although potentially less creative, it may reach a more conclusive point or highlight two extremes on a continuum of thought and views, that then allows others participants an opportunity to select where they sit on that spectrum and reflect upon others views.
Considering the consequences for collaborative discussion as opposed to competitive debate
Collaborative discussion could be seen as a double edged sword. In one aspect it is great for creativity that allows for space for the participants to express their ideas with limited constraints and this can lead to an evolving nature of curriculum that is driven by the participants. The discussion may start at one point but very quickly move to a whole new topic area. This then moves on to what could be perceived as the potential issue.
The discussion may move away from the original topic to an area that has limited connection to the original activity brief. This may be negative if it moves too far away or gets too focused on another factor raised in the discussion (or not depending on the learning outcome!). This perception of usefulness is very individual. One participant may find the discussion direction useful and of interest, whereas others may find the direction confusing or unhelpful.
This is where participants can select specific individuals within a group to support their PLN (Personal Learning Network), if they have particular similarities or ways of working that makes their collaborative work beneficial.
Competitive Debate, although potentially less creative, it may reach a more conclusive point or highlight two extremes on a continuum of thought and views, that then allows others participants an opportunity to select where they sit on that spectrum and reflect upon others views.