This can't mean there were only 18,901 active OU'ers when I started in 2005, can it?
I notice most other people's numbers are much higher, well into the hundred thousands. What does it mean?
If it's in the order they were allocated, then there are some people out there who I would very much like to speak to.
Those numbers in ascending order are: 1, 4, 13, 16, 22, 31, 32, 40, 44, 64, 112, 121, 211, 256, 444, 1111, 1120, 1024, 1210, 1801, 1984, 2110, 4096, 11110, 16384, 65536, 262144.
Are any of you out there?
If not, there are many secondary numbers that would also be of interest. It would just be a little odd to list them all here, right?! Yes, it would.
User = 18902
This can't mean there were only 18,901 active OU'ers when I started in 2005, can it?
I notice most other people's numbers are much higher, well into the hundred thousands. What does it mean?
If it's in the order they were allocated, then there are some people out there who I would very much like to speak to.
Those numbers in ascending order are: 1, 4, 13, 16, 22, 31, 32, 40, 44, 64, 112, 121, 211, 256, 444, 1111, 1120, 1024, 1210, 1801, 1984, 2110, 4096, 11110, 16384, 65536, 262144.
Are any of you out there?
If not, there are many secondary numbers that would also be of interest. It would just be a little odd to list them all here, right?! Yes, it would.