Can we break
out of established ways of thinking? Are there new ways to understand ourselves
in the world? This week's blog for DD317 Advancing
social psychology reports on research from psychologists who belong to the
Association for Process Thought (APT). As the name suggests, their research
begins by looking not at how the world 'is' but at the ongoing processes
(actions, movements, change) that make up our social environment. The blog, by Professor
Paul Stenner, reports on some of the research presented at the APT's meeting in
June 2018.
At this meeting of the Association of
Process Thought, there were presentations which all used the concept of process
to open up new ways of understanding three very different but important aspects
of contemporary life: religion, intimate relationships, and environmental
destruction.
The first presentation, by Martin
Savransky (Goldsmiths College, University of London), considered how we might
understand experiences that are often dismissed as irrational, including
religious experiences. The presentation discussed a book by anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann called When God Talks Back, about charismatic
evangelists. Rather than focussing on ‘belief’, Luhrmann’s work is
consistent with a processual account that concerns the felt reality of
religious experience. Through asking her participants how they experience the
unseen reality of God, Luhrmann is able to show the relative irrelevance of
heady thought in comparison to a slow relationship of feeling, embodied and
embedded within practices. Arguably,
this emphasis on process enables a different understanding of religious
experience, escaping from the now clichéd and obstructive question of whether
God exists.
The second presentation, Process in action: Relational drug use, by Dr Katie Andersen, concerned intimate couple
relationships. Again, rather than focussing on what intimacy 'is', the
presentation approached intimacy as a set of practices. This opens up
possibilities of understanding the significance of movement, space and material
objects for relationships. Andersen's research considers how chemical
interventions, specifically the use of the drug MDMA, can contribute to the
creation of new subjectivities which alter boundaries within the self, between
self and other, and between self and world. In a social world where
recreational drug use is increasingly prevalent, this possibly contentious
research considers how such use might function within contemporary lives.
The third presentation, Bio-semiotics and Integral ecology, was given by Dr John
Pickering from the University of Warwick. His concern is the geopolitical reality of our time in which ecological
degradation follows the vast and technologically mediated global increase in human
numbers, associated with a widening gap between rich and poor, and the ongoing
political struggles to control remaining planetary resources, like water. In
this context, he suggests, there is a pressing need for new relational and
processual modes of thought. He proposes a shift from mechanistic being (mere
existence) to organic becoming (productive happening), suggesting that this
ushers in a new understanding of the world at all levels, from the workings of
the brain and mind, through to the organic interactions animating the minutest
portions of life and evolution. His argument is that this kind of radical
re-thinking is needed in order to address a problem of such magnitude.
Of
course this brief overview of the presentations cannot cover the details of the
arguments but it indicates some of the interdisciplinary thinking which is
taking forward the field of social psychology.
Changing our thinking: Process and progress
Can we break out of established ways of thinking? Are there new ways to understand ourselves in the world? This week's blog for DD317 Advancing social psychology reports on research from psychologists who belong to the Association for Process Thought (APT). As the name suggests, their research begins by looking not at how the world 'is' but at the ongoing processes (actions, movements, change) that make up our social environment. The blog, by Professor Paul Stenner, reports on some of the research presented at the APT's meeting in June 2018.
At this meeting of the Association of Process Thought, there were presentations which all used the concept of process to open up new ways of understanding three very different but important aspects of contemporary life: religion, intimate relationships, and environmental destruction.
The first presentation, by Martin Savransky (Goldsmiths College, University of London), considered how we might understand experiences that are often dismissed as irrational, including religious experiences. The presentation discussed a book by anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann called When God Talks Back, about charismatic evangelists. Rather than focussing on ‘belief’, Luhrmann’s work is consistent with a processual account that concerns the felt reality of religious experience. Through asking her participants how they experience the unseen reality of God, Luhrmann is able to show the relative irrelevance of heady thought in comparison to a slow relationship of feeling, embodied and embedded within practices. Arguably, this emphasis on process enables a different understanding of religious experience, escaping from the now clichéd and obstructive question of whether God exists.
The second presentation, Process in action: Relational drug use, by Dr Katie Andersen, concerned intimate couple relationships. Again, rather than focussing on what intimacy 'is', the presentation approached intimacy as a set of practices. This opens up possibilities of understanding the significance of movement, space and material objects for relationships. Andersen's research considers how chemical interventions, specifically the use of the drug MDMA, can contribute to the creation of new subjectivities which alter boundaries within the self, between self and other, and between self and world. In a social world where recreational drug use is increasingly prevalent, this possibly contentious research considers how such use might function within contemporary lives.
The third presentation, Bio-semiotics and Integral ecology, was given by Dr John Pickering from the University of Warwick. His concern is the geopolitical reality of our time in which ecological degradation follows the vast and technologically mediated global increase in human numbers, associated with a widening gap between rich and poor, and the ongoing political struggles to control remaining planetary resources, like water. In this context, he suggests, there is a pressing need for new relational and processual modes of thought. He proposes a shift from mechanistic being (mere existence) to organic becoming (productive happening), suggesting that this ushers in a new understanding of the world at all levels, from the workings of the brain and mind, through to the organic interactions animating the minutest portions of life and evolution. His argument is that this kind of radical re-thinking is needed in order to address a problem of such magnitude.
Of course this brief overview of the presentations cannot cover the details of the arguments but it indicates some of the interdisciplinary thinking which is taking forward the field of social psychology.
Our Level 3 module, Advancing social psychology, offers students the opportunity to explore new developments in social psychology, including in their independent study. To learn more about DD317, you can watch a video here https://youtu.be/dbzF4hBeBkk You can also look at the new Open Learn course course DD317_1 Social psychology and politics: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/health-sports-psychology/social-psychology-and-politics/content-section-0