OU blog

Personal Blogs

Kim Aling

Comparing national reports

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Kim Aling, Tuesday, 9 Apr 2013, 09:28

Comparing the US Horizon Report , the NSF Report and the BECTA report with a report on education technology in Australia.

 

All the reports share several features in common.  Firstly they are all optimistic about the ability of education technology to improve learning outcomes and the learner experience.  The BECTA Report also suggests there are wider social benefits, developing greater social cohesion through the creation for networks for learning and communities of practice.  Secondly, they identify the driving force behind adoption of technology as primarily economic, to create a future workforce and to compete effectively in the global economy.  The Horizon Report suggests the US lacks scientists and engineers for example.  The Australian Report also identifies the needs of the workplace as driving change as does the BECTA Report for the UK.  Thirdly, the reports all argue that technology is ubiquitous in learners' lives outside of school and developments with Web 2.0 have created more tolls for use in education.  A final common feature is that the reports all recognise limitations, or barriers that need to be addressed.  The main barrier seems to be the slow adoption by teachers, though some innovative examples are given in the reports.  The BECTA report also argues there is a lack of reliable infrastructure.   The ESF Report argues that embedding digital skills is slow. 

The Australian Report is very similar in tone and intention, but also argues that integrating education technology will improve outcomes for indigenous and remote learners, which are probably particular concerns to Australia.  They also identify further barriers in their case, firstly, the fragmented nature of education policy between the states and, secondly, the inadequate bandwidth.    The Australian proposals include:  to create an agreed national future directions framework;  to develop a blended approach in the classroom; and free access to publicly funded learning materials.

The reports for the US, UK and Australia all see the further adoption of education technology as important for education, to improve learning, to develop new skills for the digital workplace and to align the experience of technology in education with learners' experience outside education. 

 

 

Australia's future using education technology  (2004) found at http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/DA49B95A-DDF8-4081-B4E7-92AD14959634/4597/aust_future.pdf

 

Becta (2008) Harnessing Technology: Next Generation Learning 2008-14, Becta report on behalf of the Department for Children, Schools and Families and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skill, Coventry, Becta; also available online at http://routes.open.ac.uk/ ixbin/ hixclient.exe?_IXDB_=routes&_IXSPFX_=g&submit-button=summary&%24+with+res_id+is+res20018

National Science Foundation (NSF) (2008) Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge, A 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation, report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning, Arlington, VA, National Science Foundation; also available online at http://routes.open.ac.uk/ ixbin/ hixclient.exe?_IXDB_=routes&_IXSPFX_=g&submit-button=summary&%24+with+res_id+is+res20019

 

New Media Consortium (NMC) (2009) Horizon Report, report from the New Media Consortium and the Educause Learning Initiative, Austin, TX, The New Media Consortium; also available online at http://routes.open.ac.uk/ ixbin/ hixclient.exe?_IXDB_=routes&_IXSPFX_=g&submit-button=summary&%24+with+res_id+is+res20026

Permalink
Share post

Comments

Design Museum

New comment

The optimism and evangelical point of view ignores the substantial parts of their communities who cannot access the kit or technology, who for a myriad of reasons will miss out as others reap the advantage. Whilst not wishing to deny anyone and everyone access to such transformative ways to learn will there not be the potential also for considerable disappointment if the jobs don't materialise or people are restricted from emigrating? A fellow student in our tutor group directed us to this: TED Lecture Salman Khan talks about how and why he created the Khan Academy, a carefully structured series of educational videos. He shows the power of interactive exercises, and calls for teachers to give students video "homework" while in the classroom the teacher is available to help. http://www.ted.com/talks/salman_khan_let_s_use_video_to_reinvent_education.html
Kim Aling

New comment

Thanks for this - it is very useful.  I think the idea of getting the information over outside the class and then using class time productively to get students to apply that information and make sense of it together is much more logical and a better use of time. The class also becomes much more student-centred.

An excellent example of a blended approach