It’s been
painfully too close for comfort on my family side of life, but I’m grateful
that we’re all able to see the year out together. And I’m also very relieved
that I made the decision to have surgery at the start of this year, as I hadn’t
realised the impact my issue was having on my life, until post-surgery. It
still makes me growl, knowing that the past five years could have been avoided.
But on the
flip side, on the academic and professional side of my life, it’s been a
whirlwind of changes and experiences. I’ve completed my Paralegal diploma, found
my ad-hoc legal support role and started my Law degree with the Open University.
And I know
how hard it can be to find that kind of newbie/entry experience role, so that
has been the best surprise of the year for me. I had only intended to start
looking for somewhere to gain some experience in the interim of my diploma and
degree, expecting it to take some time to find, given how I also work full time
shifts. That’s why it surprised me when it happened; I wasn’t expecting it. I
know this doesn’t happen and it goes against the grain of everyone else’s
experiences, but it does show zero legal experience entry-level does exist, and
can happen.
So here I
am, just under half way of my first module of my Law degree and now with six
months legal office experience, and I’m finding the one common question I’m
being asked is “what do you want to do in Law?” And hand on heart, at the
moment, I don’t know. I’ve never worked in Law before this year, and everything
is new and different and has wider implications than anything I have ever done
before. Law is more than the three letters that make up the word. It is
interwoven into everything we do on a daily basis, and when you’re stood at the
start line and are looking at everything,
how do you know?
I hope the
answer will reveal itself to me over time, as this was one of the reasons I
chose the Open University, given their history of distance learning and helping
people figure out a path so dreams can be fulfilled.
So in the
meantime, I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing.
I’m going to
continue listening to podcasts for the areas of Law that are in Stage 2 of my
degree, to help me decide on what optional modules I’d like to take, and
continue with the development booklet from the Open University career advisor whilst
I get myself ready for the next assignment. And I’m going to continue reading
news articles and Law Reports about all the different goings-on and see how I
feel about it and what I make of it.
For example,
the one event from 2023 that still confounds me is the case of Andrew
Malkinson.[1]
He was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit, yet nearly twenty
years later it was private DNA testing from the charity Appeal.[2] that ultimately prove his
innocence, something I feel the Criminal Case
Review Commission.[3] should have ordered when
his case first presented itself to them, because the testing hadn’t been done
at first instance. I’m probably missing some key element on this, but the fact
that there are still miscarriages of justice like this in the 21st
century is mindboggling to me.
As does the comments
from the Government to those who work in Immigration law, who work on ensuring
those who are in genuine need receive the basic human right to live, as well as
the comments that are being made about barristers.
To claim
that the clients’ barristers represent means that counsel is aligned to their
beliefs is outright stupid. This is the cab rank rule at work, a process that
ensures equal due process no matter what
and even for a newbie to Law, it’s not rock science. Simply, when a case
presents itself, the first available barrister with the needed discipline must
accept the brief without discrimination. There are very few finite reasons why
it can be refused but like the black cabs of London it’s named after, it’s
accepted “no ifs, no buts”.
I know as I
gain more awareness of Law itself and how it ebbs and flows and intertwines,
that there will be more items like the examples I’ve used in this blog that will
challenge the way I think. Maybe one day it will help me fine tune my compass. And
maybe that’s the point.
For now, as
I look back on 2023 in both a pleased and relieved way, all I can say about
2024 is this.
I may not
know exactly what I’m going to do next, but I need to get a few things in place
so that in 2024, I’m finally where I want to be.
Law is more than a three letter word
What a mixed bag this year has been.
It’s been painfully too close for comfort on my family side of life, but I’m grateful that we’re all able to see the year out together. And I’m also very relieved that I made the decision to have surgery at the start of this year, as I hadn’t realised the impact my issue was having on my life, until post-surgery. It still makes me growl, knowing that the past five years could have been avoided.
But on the flip side, on the academic and professional side of my life, it’s been a whirlwind of changes and experiences. I’ve completed my Paralegal diploma, found my ad-hoc legal support role and started my Law degree with the Open University.
And I know how hard it can be to find that kind of newbie/entry experience role, so that has been the best surprise of the year for me. I had only intended to start looking for somewhere to gain some experience in the interim of my diploma and degree, expecting it to take some time to find, given how I also work full time shifts. That’s why it surprised me when it happened; I wasn’t expecting it. I know this doesn’t happen and it goes against the grain of everyone else’s experiences, but it does show zero legal experience entry-level does exist, and can happen.
So here I am, just under half way of my first module of my Law degree and now with six months legal office experience, and I’m finding the one common question I’m being asked is “what do you want to do in Law?” And hand on heart, at the moment, I don’t know. I’ve never worked in Law before this year, and everything is new and different and has wider implications than anything I have ever done before. Law is more than the three letters that make up the word. It is interwoven into everything we do on a daily basis, and when you’re stood at the start line and are looking at everything, how do you know?
I hope the answer will reveal itself to me over time, as this was one of the reasons I chose the Open University, given their history of distance learning and helping people figure out a path so dreams can be fulfilled.
So in the meantime, I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing.
I’m going to continue listening to podcasts for the areas of Law that are in Stage 2 of my degree, to help me decide on what optional modules I’d like to take, and continue with the development booklet from the Open University career advisor whilst I get myself ready for the next assignment. And I’m going to continue reading news articles and Law Reports about all the different goings-on and see how I feel about it and what I make of it.
For example, the one event from 2023 that still confounds me is the case of Andrew Malkinson.[1] He was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit, yet nearly twenty years later it was private DNA testing from the charity Appeal.[2] that ultimately prove his innocence, something I feel the Criminal Case Review Commission.[3] should have ordered when his case first presented itself to them, because the testing hadn’t been done at first instance. I’m probably missing some key element on this, but the fact that there are still miscarriages of justice like this in the 21st century is mindboggling to me.
As does the comments from the Government to those who work in Immigration law, who work on ensuring those who are in genuine need receive the basic human right to live, as well as the comments that are being made about barristers.
To claim that the clients’ barristers represent means that counsel is aligned to their beliefs is outright stupid. This is the cab rank rule at work, a process that ensures equal due process no matter what and even for a newbie to Law, it’s not rock science. Simply, when a case presents itself, the first available barrister with the needed discipline must accept the brief without discrimination. There are very few finite reasons why it can be refused but like the black cabs of London it’s named after, it’s accepted “no ifs, no buts”.
I know as I gain more awareness of Law itself and how it ebbs and flows and intertwines, that there will be more items like the examples I’ve used in this blog that will challenge the way I think. Maybe one day it will help me fine tune my compass. And maybe that’s the point.
For now, as I look back on 2023 in both a pleased and relieved way, all I can say about 2024 is this.
I may not know exactly what I’m going to do next, but I need to get a few things in place so that in 2024, I’m finally where I want to be.
[1] BBC article “Andrew Malkinson’s rape conviction quashed after 20-year fight”, by Lauren Hirst & Tom Mullen, 26 July 2023, accessed 31 Dec 2023
[2] Appeal
[3] Criminal Case Review Commission