Edited by Valentin Fadeev, Sunday, 18 Sept 2011, 23:25
The first time I encountered these weird objects of analysis was probably while surfing the book of E. Kamke "A reference of ordinary differential equations" which in turn gave a reference to Whittakker and Watson. I was at that time delving into the methods of analytic geometry and only new that lemniscate was an 8-shaped algebraic curve of the 4th order, a particular case of Cassini ovals. So I was pretty shocked to find out that it could give rise to some "trigonometric" system.
Although these functions were already studied by Gauss (no surprise), most of the original and subsequent research concentrated on different series expansions and evaluation of particular elliptic integrals.
Being fresh from the first course on calculus, I attempted an investigation of the properties of lemniscate functions by means of only the very basic techniques used derive similar results for circular functions. I wanted to derive formulas for derivatives and primitives, addition theorems, complementary formulas, etc.
However, looking back at that paper I see that in the most crucial steps I just took the known relations for Jacobi elliptic functions (from W&W book) and then reduced them to the particular case of lemniscate functions.
I think that lemniscate functions can be used for changing variable when evaluating certain integrals, or converting differential equations into manageable forms. Although in my rather limited practice I have never encountered the cases where it would be appropriate, I still want to make a small, but independent account of these devices and keep them in my arsenal waiting for the right moment to come.
So, enough of the words, let's get down to business.
(I am using the original Gaussian (and my own ;)) notation instead of the more lengthy sinlemn and coslemn)
Take the first integral and differentiate both sides by :
MathJax failure: TeX parse error: Extra open brace or missing close brace
The same would hold, if we started with the second integral. Hence we obtain the differential equation for lemniscate functions:
Now we shall find an algebraic relation between sl and cl.
Substitute . Then
Inserting it all in the integral and observing new integration limits we obtain:
Now comparing this with the integral defining and looking at the limits we conclude that:
Conversely:
Now it is easy to establish the expressions for derivatives:
Formula for cl can be obtained similarly, but we can follow a different path using complimentary formula.
Rewrite the definitions in the following way:
Then:
So
Then we immediately obtain:
The constant value which is half the length of the "unitary" lemniscate can be evaluated substituting in the integral:
Integral of the lemniscate function is easily calculated:
Now I am only one step away from deriving the addition theorem using the same method due to Euler that works for Jacobi elliptic functions, but got somewhat lost in the algebra.. Hope to post that later on.
Lemniscate functions: the lost symbols
The first time I encountered these weird objects of analysis was probably while surfing the book of E. Kamke "A reference of ordinary differential equations" which in turn gave a reference to Whittakker and Watson. I was at that time delving into the methods of analytic geometry and only new that lemniscate was an 8-shaped algebraic curve of the 4th order, a particular case of Cassini ovals. So I was pretty shocked to find out that it could give rise to some "trigonometric" system.
Although these functions were already studied by Gauss (no surprise), most of the original and subsequent research concentrated on different series expansions and evaluation of particular elliptic integrals.
Being fresh from the first course on calculus, I attempted an investigation of the properties of lemniscate functions by means of only the very basic techniques used derive similar results for circular functions. I wanted to derive formulas for derivatives and primitives, addition theorems, complementary formulas, etc.
However, looking back at that paper I see that in the most crucial steps I just took the known relations for Jacobi elliptic functions (from W&W book) and then reduced them to the particular case of lemniscate functions.
I think that lemniscate functions can be used for changing variable when evaluating certain integrals, or converting differential equations into manageable forms. Although in my rather limited practice I have never encountered the cases where it would be appropriate, I still want to make a small, but independent account of these devices and keep them in my arsenal waiting for the right moment to come.
So, enough of the words, let's get down to business.
Lemniscate functions arise when rectifying the length of lemniscate and are defined by inversion of an integral (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LemniscateFunction.html for intermediate steps):
(I am using the original Gaussian (and my own ;)) notation instead of the more lengthy sinlemn and coslemn)
Take the first integral and differentiate both sides by :
MathJax failure: TeX parse error: Extra open brace or missing close brace
The same would hold, if we started with the second integral. Hence we obtain the differential equation for lemniscate functions:
Now we shall find an algebraic relation between sl and cl.
Substitute . Then
Inserting it all in the integral and observing new integration limits we obtain:
Now comparing this with the integral defining and looking at the limits we conclude that:
Conversely:
Now it is easy to establish the expressions for derivatives:
Formula for cl can be obtained similarly, but we can follow a different path using complimentary formula.
Rewrite the definitions in the following way:
Then:
So
Then we immediately obtain:
The constant value which is half the length of the "unitary" lemniscate can be evaluated substituting in the integral:
Integral of the lemniscate function is easily calculated:
Now I am only one step away from deriving the addition theorem using the same method due to Euler that works for Jacobi elliptic functions, but got somewhat lost in the algebra.. Hope to post that later on.