OU blog

Personal Blogs

Me on top of Skiddaw

Old & Sad politics

Visible to anyone in the world

This blog was mainly for blogging about economics, the subject that drew me to study with the OU. However, I'm going to digress a little today and write about politics instead. That's OK, because I'm currently studying module DD101, "Introduction to the social sciences", which is quite a wide ranging course with a bit of politics thrown in as well.

And besides, it's my blog, so I can write what I like.

So, politics. I feel thoroughly depressed by the result of yesterday's Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election, which was won by the Labour candidate. My dismay at this result has nothing to do with any party politics, and I don't wish to make any comment here about which party is better qualified to sort out the economic mess that the country is in and run the country generally.

No, what I find depressing is that the voters in this by-election didn't seem to care about the events leading to the by-election. Just a reminder for anyone who missed it, the seat was won in May by the Labour candidate Phil Woolas, on the back of producing election literature that contained some disgraceful lies about his opponents. The literature was held to be illegal by an election court, and he was stripped of his seat as a result.

Pretty disgraceful behaviour, isn't it?

A rational electorate would be disgusted with that sort of behaviour. They would want to punish the people responsible. But not so the people of Oldham East and Saddleworth. They voted for another Labour candidate, as if none of this had ever happened.

Now, you might argue that the illegal leaflets were entirely down to Phil Woolas, and the new candidate was entirely innocent. To which I would say: bollocks. The illegal leaflets were hardly a secret. They had thousands of the bloody things printed. Everyone in the local Labour party must have seen them. And what did they do to stop them? Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

The entire Labour party in the Oldham East and Saddleworth constituency were surely just as responsible for the leaflets as Woolas. Woolas was held individually responsible by the court and was the person who was stripped of his seat, but to claim that the leaflets were the act of one rogue individual is deeply disingenuous.

But the voters of Oldham East and Saddleworth didn't seem to care about this. They were perfectly happy to vote in their thousands for a party that were proven liars.

Perhaps there should be no surprise here. When all the revelations about MPs' expenses were published in 2009, I thought that this could be a real game-changer in politics. I thought the electorate would want to punish the politicians responsible for betraying their trust and cheating like a bunch of common criminals. I thought that the general election in May last year would see huge numbers of candidates from smaller parties and independent candidates, untainted by the expenses scandal, returned to Parliament.

But no. We saw the 3 main parties, who had so utterly betrayed the trust of the electorate, returned to Parliament to carry on where they left off.

I find all this incredibly depressing. It seems that the majority of voters are unaffected by these issues, and presumably vote unthinkingly for the party they have always voted for.

This sends a clear message to politicians: "You, the politicians, can lie, cheat, and generally betray our trust as much as you like, and we, the utterly supine bunch of sheep that pass for an electorate, will just let you get on with it."

An Old & Sad day for politics indeed.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

Comments

New comment

Had I lived in Oldham, I'd have voted Labour. Not because the lies Phil Woollas told were unimportant - they were disgraceful: I'm glad he was found out, barred from politics and disowned by (most of) his Party - but because the lies told nationally by the other two parties (VAT rises, tuition fees, etc) are more important and more damaging to politics in this country. You may respond that had Labour been re-elected they would also have reneged on pre-election pledges. Maybe. But if we play that "what-about" game we could also say that Woollas' main misfortune was to be found out - many other parties have employed such tactics in the past. In fact, the Lib-Dems are legendary for it.
Me on top of Skiddaw

New comment

Hi Toby

I agree that the lies told by the Tories and LibDems are also shocking. Particularly what the LibDems said about tuition fees.

But just because you think voting Tory or LibDem is unacceptable (and I wouldn't disagree with you there) why vote Labour? Why not vote for one of the smaller parties? Or an independent candidate? I think this is part of the problem: people are so fixed in the mindset that they have to vote for one of the big 3 parties that the big 3 parties can get away with pretty much anything they like.

Me on top of Skiddaw

New comment

In fact I think this link sums it all up better than I could.

New comment

You have a point: we should get out of the Big 3 parties mind-set. Having said that, looking at the smaller parties in the by-election (UKIP, BNP, Greens*, etc) sometimes the larger parties don't look so bad! What will be depressing is if the forthcoming AV referendum does not pass. This will show the voters are happy with the current corrupt system with its safe-seats, rotten boroughs and tactical voting. AV may be far from perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. *Although the Greens have many laudable aims, they are too pro-woo and anti-science for me.