OU blog

Personal Blogs

New photo

H817 Week 2: Activity 5: Shakespeare Speaks: Lesson 1 . Innovative?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Steve Bamlett, Saturday, 30 Jan 2016, 17:56

Activity 5: Shakespeare Speaks: Lesson 1 . Innovative?

Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/course/shakespeare/unit-1/session-1 (Accessed 27/01/2016)

(BBC / OU)

This short module is an example from the BBC collaboration with the OU on ‘Learning English’. It is multi-modal, interactive and links to additional resources to extend or individualise study. Here are some of the features (illustrated throughout):

  • Multi-modality

  • Short (4 min.) radio play (Voice)

  • Playful language use throughout to show idioms related to death in ‘real’ linguistic contexts. These are not always signposted so facilitate discovery learning.Image / text / interactivity / feedback

  • Cartoon illustration

  • Specific Learning sectionsVocabulary Reference Page

  • Illustrations to allow identification of words (donkey)

  • Bulleted lists in boxes

  • Hyper-Link to background of project and progression beyond the module

  • Hyper-Link to transcript

  • Hyper-Link to the actors and crew of the play

  • Interactive quiz – assesses first level knowledge

    • Instantaneous Feedback on the quiz, allowing retrial – practice learning, with some rote revision.Grammar testing with use of idioms

  • Interactive pages with abstract of points of learning for –

    • Vocabulary

    • Grammar

BackgroundIs it innovative?

None of the tasks are new or outside the range of Enlish Language Teaching and EFL Teaching. However, their combination in such a short space, with subdivision between sub-modules, whichare linked by marginal ‘lists’ uses the ‘attractive affordances’ of digital presentation, especially multi-modality, interactivity and feedback and hyper-linked units in selectable sequence. There is teaching design but no teacher. It could, of course, be combined with a teacher face-to-face.

In one important sense, it is FAR from innovative. It supports a myth of linguistic creativity being based in the 'genius' of nationally regarded INDIVIDUALS. It tends to see language as a merely neutral medium  of expression with an almost 'natural' growth. But that is a far larger issue - I'll leave it for E854 reflections


Permalink
Share post