You can supranational away our sovereignty, but you’ll never
take our ‘freedom’.
So the Scottish had a independence referendum, 3 years ago.
The result was a NO to independence by a wide 10% majority. Job done, message
sent, VHS copies of Braveheart put away and a continuation of the continuum by
the UK.
Described at the time by the lead Yes to independence
campaigner and head of the Scottish nationalist party, Alex Salmond, as a ‘once
in a generation’ vote. Well generations move very quickly in Scotland, 3 years
later the generations who voted to remain in the union (baby boomers, generation
X and millennials) look set to vote again. This time we might have a second
‘once in a generation’ vote in a second generation (baby boomers+3, Generation X+3, millennials+3 and generation
Y-those born in the first 18 months of generation Y only though, these 3 year
generation gaps really do stop a real divergence of generational voting
demographics!).
Perhaps Mr Salmond, meant something different when he spoke
of generations. Perhaps it was a threat, do it now or you will never get to do
it again. Perhaps that was the motivation behind his evaluating the referendum
as a generational defining moment. This is a historic vote everyone, best do
your best, and bring home the result us nationalists have been longing for. The
hopes of the nationalist Salmond were dashed, but his replacement, Mrs Sturgeon
(that fishy surname confluence might come back to haunt these two, later in
this article-when I am looking at the economic claims made by them both and the
SNP).
So what changed?
We had a Uk wide referendum about our membership of the
European Union. In which we voted, by a 4% margin, to leave. Scotland voted by
a 24% margin to remain- now that is a big margin-if the population of your
slice of the Uk was bigger than 8.5%. This disparity of a 24% margin of 8.5
million Scottish voters is the basis for the calls for a second referendum. If
the entire population of Scotland had voted remain, 100%, the result would have
been the same, Leave, instead of a 4% margin, it would have been a 1% margin
for the Leave campaign. So Scotland might not liked the result, but they could
not have changed it, even with 100% return. So was that demographics over
democracy or just the social contract in operation? Either way it is enough to
warrant the new SNP calls for a second-once in a generation-independence
referendum, because Scotland does not want the result of the EU referendum to
stand for them.
So the whole UK voted to leave the EU, if you consider the
whole UK to be a democratic union. Scotland does not seem to feel this way,
they are unhappy with the democratic result of the union they are in, so wish
to leave the union to restore their democratic membership of the E.U. So rather
than leave the EU as part of the world’s 5th largest economy ( and
forecasted to become 4th, over taking Germany, in the next 10 years)
the Scottish would aim to leave the Union and re-join the E.U as an independent
economy, an economy that is 43rd largest in the world and 12th
largest in the E.U. and about the same size as Chile in a global perspective or
Ireland in an E.U perspective.
Lots of claims were made by Nationalist’s in the first,
once-in-a-generation independence referendum. Three years having passed some of
the claims made the firs- time round can be viewed with better perspective if a
second referendum comes about. Mr Salmond had claimed that the revenue from oil
production would be, in the first year of independence, £ 8 billion pounds (UK
pounds), where as the actual figure as audited by the national Audit office was
£ 600 million (still in UK pounds). Mr Salmond was wrong by a factor of 1300%,
or to put it another way 3% of the total Scottish GDP!. This is staggering, but
then if you are going to tell a lie, try to make it a whooper. If a second
referendum goes around then Ms Sturgeon will not be able to be quite so ‘liberal’
with the projected oil revenue’s. So if granted a second referendum, the SNP
will not be asking to leave the union so it can be an independent country, it
will need to leave the union so it can join the E.U asap because it will need
the euro, the European central Bank and the subsidies that the E.U provides to
survive as an independent economy, I do appreciate the this is an oxymoron, to
be an independent economy whilst being locked to a currency union, central bank
loans and a group wide economic policy, does not sound very independent at all.
It all sounds a bit fishy really, not that Mr Salmond or Ms Sturgeon would
recognise the pun.
So we will see, Mrs May has already refused a second
referendum, the Scottish parliament is still discussing if they should even ask
for one, and the SNP are still curtailing generations to 3 year spans and
declaring everything that is not to their liking as ‘undemocratic’. So while
the world turns, liberalism in western societies continues to spin, the SNP are
sounding like a broken record (we have to presume a Rod Stewart record).
‘you will never take our freedom’ *
* Terms + Condition’s apply, the word freedom may be substituted
for currency union, economic union, ECB debt and IMF influence over internal political
policy or supranational influence of a state’s sovereignty by the E.U at any
given time.
Scottish Independance
From the www.thespecialistgeneralist.net
The Second Scottish referendum.
Or
You can supranational away our sovereignty, but you’ll never take our ‘freedom’.
So the Scottish had a independence referendum, 3 years ago. The result was a NO to independence by a wide 10% majority. Job done, message sent, VHS copies of Braveheart put away and a continuation of the continuum by the UK.
Described at the time by the lead Yes to independence campaigner and head of the Scottish nationalist party, Alex Salmond, as a ‘once in a generation’ vote. Well generations move very quickly in Scotland, 3 years later the generations who voted to remain in the union (baby boomers, generation X and millennials) look set to vote again. This time we might have a second ‘once in a generation’ vote in a second generation (baby boomers+3, Generation X+3, millennials+3 and generation Y-those born in the first 18 months of generation Y only though, these 3 year generation gaps really do stop a real divergence of generational voting demographics!).
Perhaps Mr Salmond, meant something different when he spoke of generations. Perhaps it was a threat, do it now or you will never get to do it again. Perhaps that was the motivation behind his evaluating the referendum as a generational defining moment. This is a historic vote everyone, best do your best, and bring home the result us nationalists have been longing for. The hopes of the nationalist Salmond were dashed, but his replacement, Mrs Sturgeon (that fishy surname confluence might come back to haunt these two, later in this article-when I am looking at the economic claims made by them both and the SNP).
So what changed?
We had a Uk wide referendum about our membership of the European Union. In which we voted, by a 4% margin, to leave. Scotland voted by a 24% margin to remain- now that is a big margin-if the population of your slice of the Uk was bigger than 8.5%. This disparity of a 24% margin of 8.5 million Scottish voters is the basis for the calls for a second referendum. If the entire population of Scotland had voted remain, 100%, the result would have been the same, Leave, instead of a 4% margin, it would have been a 1% margin for the Leave campaign. So Scotland might not liked the result, but they could not have changed it, even with 100% return. So was that demographics over democracy or just the social contract in operation? Either way it is enough to warrant the new SNP calls for a second-once in a generation-independence referendum, because Scotland does not want the result of the EU referendum to stand for them.
So the whole UK voted to leave the EU, if you consider the whole UK to be a democratic union. Scotland does not seem to feel this way, they are unhappy with the democratic result of the union they are in, so wish to leave the union to restore their democratic membership of the E.U. So rather than leave the EU as part of the world’s 5th largest economy ( and forecasted to become 4th, over taking Germany, in the next 10 years) the Scottish would aim to leave the Union and re-join the E.U as an independent economy, an economy that is 43rd largest in the world and 12th largest in the E.U. and about the same size as Chile in a global perspective or Ireland in an E.U perspective.
Lots of claims were made by Nationalist’s in the first, once-in-a-generation independence referendum. Three years having passed some of the claims made the firs- time round can be viewed with better perspective if a second referendum comes about. Mr Salmond had claimed that the revenue from oil production would be, in the first year of independence, £ 8 billion pounds (UK pounds), where as the actual figure as audited by the national Audit office was £ 600 million (still in UK pounds). Mr Salmond was wrong by a factor of 1300%, or to put it another way 3% of the total Scottish GDP!. This is staggering, but then if you are going to tell a lie, try to make it a whooper. If a second referendum goes around then Ms Sturgeon will not be able to be quite so ‘liberal’ with the projected oil revenue’s. So if granted a second referendum, the SNP will not be asking to leave the union so it can be an independent country, it will need to leave the union so it can join the E.U asap because it will need the euro, the European central Bank and the subsidies that the E.U provides to survive as an independent economy, I do appreciate the this is an oxymoron, to be an independent economy whilst being locked to a currency union, central bank loans and a group wide economic policy, does not sound very independent at all. It all sounds a bit fishy really, not that Mr Salmond or Ms Sturgeon would recognise the pun.
So we will see, Mrs May has already refused a second referendum, the Scottish parliament is still discussing if they should even ask for one, and the SNP are still curtailing generations to 3 year spans and declaring everything that is not to their liking as ‘undemocratic’. So while the world turns, liberalism in western societies continues to spin, the SNP are sounding like a broken record (we have to presume a Rod Stewart record).
‘you will never take our freedom’ *
* Terms + Condition’s apply, the word freedom may be substituted for currency union, economic union, ECB debt and IMF influence over internal political policy or supranational influence of a state’s sovereignty by the E.U at any given time.