This website will be unavailable from 05:00 (for up to 4 hours) for scheduled maintenance.
Due to scheduled maintenance, this website may become unavailable at any moment.
Personal Blogs
Personal Blogs
Ex 2.2 A844 Block3 Gender & space: Elizabeth Wilson Into the Labyrinth
Monday, 21 Jan 2019, 17:43
Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Steve Bamlett, Monday, 21 Jan 2019, 21:44
Ex 2.2 A844 Block3 Gender & space: Elizabeth Wilson Into the Labyrinth
Once you have finished the extract go back and make a list in the
box below of as many of the paired characteristics or contrasting terms as you
can which Wilson discusses as framing our understanding of the urban. What do
you think the impact is of this way of defining the city?
The ’list’ given by Wilson is on p. 152;
NATURAL
MONOLITHIC
PUBLIC
PITILESS
RICH
BEAUTIFUL
UNNATURAL
FRAGMENTED
SECRET
ENVELOPING
POOR
SUBLIME
MALE
CULTURE
CITY
FEMALE
NATURE
COUNTRY
But I started making antinomies like this as I read and before
getting to p. 152 and knowing it was there. This is what I got.
Living
Beautiful
Familiar
Self
Normal
Legal
Non-criminal
Same
Stasis
Still
Full
MINOTAUR
Dead
Ugly
Strange
Other
Abnormal
Illegal
Criminal
Different
Change
Moving
Empty
SPHINX
Of course the last one is the culmination of the essay.
One impact is to set up a preferred and not preferred option,
but it isn’t always clear on which side this falls. We could say that these
binaries express socio-cultural determined preferences and what becomes
subordinated to these. These issues are
obviously to the fore in doppleganger myhs such as Jekyll and Hyde, or Dorian Gray.
For Wilson the issue is to explain how left radicalism often
damns the city because of its alliances in this binary. However she then
insists that this is at a contrary to the experience of her life as a woman –
that women and the city have a hidden connection other than at the level of
male otherness or repository for his unacknowledged desires – the prostitute
stereotype.
She sees that ‘making strange’ as a function of cities has a
role in freeing women from patriarchal norms that may be akin to the experience
of her own longing and desire despite men not because of them (149f.)
Ex 2.2 A844 Block3 Gender & space: Elizabeth Wilson Into the Labyrinth
Ex 2.2 A844 Block3 Gender & space: Elizabeth Wilson Into the Labyrinth
Once you have finished the extract go back and make a list in the box below of as many of the paired characteristics or contrasting terms as you can which Wilson discusses as framing our understanding of the urban. What do you think the impact is of this way of defining the city?
The ’list’ given by Wilson is on p. 152;
NATURAL
MONOLITHIC
PUBLIC
PITILESS
RICH
BEAUTIFUL
UNNATURAL
FRAGMENTED
SECRET
ENVELOPING
POOR
SUBLIME
MALE
CULTURE
CITY
FEMALE
NATURE
COUNTRY
But I started making antinomies like this as I read and before getting to p. 152 and knowing it was there. This is what I got.
Living
Beautiful
Familiar
Self
Normal
Legal
Non-criminal
Same
Stasis
Still
Full
MINOTAUR
Dead
Ugly
Strange
Other
Abnormal
Illegal
Criminal
Different
Change
Moving
Empty
SPHINX
Of course the last one is the culmination of the essay.
One impact is to set up a preferred and not preferred option, but it isn’t always clear on which side this falls. We could say that these binaries express socio-cultural determined preferences and what becomes subordinated to these. These issues are obviously to the fore in doppleganger myhs such as Jekyll and Hyde, or Dorian Gray.
For Wilson the issue is to explain how left radicalism often damns the city because of its alliances in this binary. However she then insists that this is at a contrary to the experience of her life as a woman – that women and the city have a hidden connection other than at the level of male otherness or repository for his unacknowledged desires – the prostitute stereotype.
She sees that ‘making strange’ as a function of cities has a role in freeing women from patriarchal norms that may be akin to the experience of her own longing and desire despite men not because of them (149f.)
Steve