I sit next to a senior learning designer in the Open University Business School - he is wrapping up a new module for the MBA course. I'm in late doing course work - we talk as we return from the kitchen with coffee.
This is clearly way beyond what an online course can deliver in terms of the impromptu face-to-face, one-to-one mini tutorial. I'll just milk it and promise to share insights.
He knows I have struggled with getting into this week's activities; however, late in the day (last night), having finally got through all the reading and made notes and looked back on previous weeks, I told him how important it was, indeed how significant Richardson's set of papers, the reference to the previous work is.
I shall revist this week repeatedly not only as we head towards TMAO2, but for the duration of H800 and beyond.
Perhaps I can hear in the back of my mind the conversations that were had when creating H800 and each academic chose or was allocated a week, or set of weeks. Did they sit down with a learning designer? Did they work it all out from home? I do at least now fully respect and understand why they should and will refer to their own reports, papers, research and books. These are but the published corners of their minds ... and we, after all, are trying to get inside their heads, just they want to tickle the contents of our brains.
Marton, Sfard, Saljo, Richardson ... there is some quality thinking in hear to extract and play with.
New commentAll this research and reading has given me renewed respect for the design - as it Lecturer this is something that I took for granted. There is no doubt that the OU do a magnificent job!
New commentI really want to build in the evaluation ideas from Price et al. and see what experience our students have. As with you Jonathan, I'll also be returning to these for quite a while.