OU blog

Personal Blogs

Design Museum

H810 Accessibility and equality

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jonathan Vernon, Thursday, 6 Sep 2012, 14:55

Given the start of the Paralympic Games last night it is hardly surprising that disability is a topic or theme on TV, the radio and in the press. Even the Simpsons' satire yesterday evening - the one where the school is split into girls and boys and Liza dresses up as a boy and becomes the object of bullies - had a powerful message regarding equality. It should be about seeing the strength while not ignoring the 'weakness', but accommodating or compensating for it, that it is the lack of x, y or z that makes the disability more of an issue that it needs to be.

Is it just about money?

It took a Paralympian wheelchair basketball player to point out how countries that hadn't the provision of the richer economies had older, clunkier, heavier wheelchairs.

I watched a piece of theatre for deaf people by deaf people. It reminded me of comia del arte - highly physical and rumbustious. I hadn't the slightest clue what was going on, certainly no idea what was being said. Had I someone twlking it through how different would the experience have been.

How do the movies portray disability? From Richard III and Frankenstein, to Finding Nemo, Slum Dog Millionaire and Avatar. Even Dr Who where Darleks, and certainly Davros, are disabled beings in wheelchairs with a wheelie bin, plunger and egg- whisk for limbs.

It takes being ill, of confined to a bed or wheelchair to get some sense if it, or having a close relation, infant or elderly in a state, or phase of amelioration or deterioration to feel it personally. I broke a leg badly enough and far enough away from home to require amabulances and special flights, hospitalisation then a wheelchair. For some months in order to get into the garden I pulled myself about quite happily on a large wooden tea-tray. We knew it was temporary, indeed within six months I was riding a bike and walking with a stick and six months after that competing in the swimming pool and on the rugby pitch - wherein lies a stark difference, the disabled person is very likely to be set inspite or despite of treatment and how the disability came about, indeed their situation is likely to be more complex with medications, care, a deteriorating prognosis even.

There is mental illness and disability in the family too - depression, learning difficulties, aspergers and autism. I'd even dare to say that being exceptionally bright or that ridiculously isolating term 'gifted' in the case of my late father isolated him.

If we wish for inclusivity when will the Olympics and Paralympics play out simultaneously?

Perhaps at a club level I should suggest that once a year we do this - having an inclusive event in contrast to the other exclusive events we run or take part in.

As I reflect I need of course to bring it back to H810.

The Amateur Swimming Association (ASA) runs a workshop for coaches who work with disabled athletes - there is an online module too which I will sign up for. Annually we apply for a national award called Swim21 which includes an audit in relation to disabled swimmers - we ticked every box without question with qualified personal, watertime set aside, entry into internal and external galas and working with our local leisure providers but is this enough? If the bar isn't that high no wonder it is easy to get over.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

Comments

Picture of Gillian Wilkinson

New comment

Good morning Jonathan. Interesting thoughts. I agree, the two 'olympics' should run side by side...wouldn't that just be wonderful?

I think I talked about inclusivity on your blog once before so I won't do it again.

Just to tell you something that made me smile. We are back in the UK and being able to overhear conversations is bliss...(it doesn't really happen when it's your second language) and yesterday I heard two comments about the olympics.

The first was a 30ish year old couple saying how much they had enjoyed the 'good' athletes olympics and it was nice to see how the others got on in theirs in the highlights on the news.

The other comment was from my 92 year old father-in-law (with the beginnings of dementia) who told me he is watching the 'cripple' olympics and they were magnificent and what they could do was incredible. He said they should put that fast Jamaican against these, give the one with a dodgy leg a bit of a start and see how they get on....

So, ok the word cripple is his generation and not politically correct but, you know...I preferred his opinion on it all. It was just more honest and inclusive somehow...

Ok...off to sit in a cafe and listen.......

Gillian

(I hope your mum is ok)

Design Museum

New comment

Thanks for this, we keep having to hive our step father a dressing down, often quite angrilly as he quite deliberately says the wrong thing regarding race, disability and gender - just as well he says nothing against the elderly as he is 85 and increasingly disabled himself. My late father was a homophobe, not racist, but too tolerant of some white South Africans with offensive views - but do you give someone a dressing down when they are a guest in your home? I am the UK generation who bridges the incorrect to the inclusive views and practices of today - as a boy at an all male prep school then public school there was far too much bullying, arrogance, elitism and privilege. It takes a good deeal of listening and 'enculturization' in the real world with all genders, races, ages and backgrounds to shake it off - some don't if they take certain career paths. At a English public school I had to seak advice about a boy who was unwittingly being racist and he was roundly admonished, made to apologise, explain himself and change his behaviour.I've stumbleupon a brilliant guide to inclusivity from The OU aimed at all educators - this isn't pr gone mad, rather reasonsed, balanced, involving and accepting - with one exception. I don't see why my wife and I, married for 19 years, should refer to each other only as 'partner'. I don't particularly like wife or husband, but see nothing wrong with 'spouse', just as I see everything right for 'partner' both in the business sense and in a relationship that has important bonds whether same gender or simply a couple who haven't or don't intend to go through a formal marriage. There are many shades of everything: gender, race, disability, age, background - and we're all a ridiculously eclectic concotion of it all. I believe it's termed the 'post modern' age where individuality is celebrated over conformity.