Edited by Jonathan Vernon, Monday, 19 Nov 2012, 12:34
Fig. 1. Evaluating accessibility - H810
All of this can be multi-layered, more like petals of a rose that a poster-sized mind-map.
It is of course an iterative process too - things get shifted about all the time. Exported as a TEXT document it becomes the first draft of an assignment. At a glance I can see there are 6 or 7 main themes here, though a substantial part of my thinking will be around the ideas of usabilty and accessibility and whether universal design is more appropriate than highly focused user centred design.
I thought I could offer a PDF version here - apparently not. Clicking on it will allow a download that can then been zoomed and should remain legible.
Not an assignment, but can something like this work in a piece of work for evaluation?
H810 - Evaluating accessibility : e-learning scrutinised
Fig. 1. Evaluating accessibility - H810
All of this can be multi-layered, more like petals of a rose that a poster-sized mind-map.
It is of course an iterative process too - things get shifted about all the time. Exported as a TEXT document it becomes the first draft of an assignment. At a glance I can see there are 6 or 7 main themes here, though a substantial part of my thinking will be around the ideas of usabilty and accessibility and whether universal design is more appropriate than highly focused user centred design.
I thought I could offer a PDF version here - apparently not. Clicking on it will allow a download that can then been zoomed and should remain legible.
Not an assignment, but can something like this work in a piece of work for evaluation?