OU blog

Personal Blogs

Richard Walker

New Discovery Rapeseed Oil is Dichromatic

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 29 May 2026 at 23:54

It's well known that Pumpkin Seed oil is dichromatic - a thin layer of it is a greenish-yellow but a thicker layer is a dark red.

Yesterday I noticed that another oil seems to have a similar property. There was a tiny drop of Rape-seed left in the bottom of the bottle and I noticed it appeared green, although in bulk the oil was not green at all but a golden yellow. Here it is - definitely green.

Here is what a bottle of this oil looks like when full - definitely yellow.

What's going on, why is the colour different? I think the explanation, very roughly, is that the light passing through the oil is made up of different colour components. The light is partially absorbed by the oil but some colours are absorbed more than others. If the light has to travel a significant way through the oil the blue and some of the green get preferentially absorbed and the remaining components are perceived as yellow. But if we only have a thin layer most of the blue and green survives and now the colour we perceive is green.

I first learned about the properties of Pumpkin Seed oil in 2021 and wrote a blog post about it then/ I bought some Pumpkin Seed oil back then and tried it some experiments. Here's a photograph I took. I hope you can see that at left where the oil is deeper it has a dark red hue, whereas at right where is only a thin oil layer the colour is green/

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Tiny Person in Your Eye? How ‘Pupil’ Got Its Two Meanings

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 27 May 2026 at 00:48

I expect you've heard the ancient joke about the cross-eyed teacher. He couldn't control his pupils, you see. 

I always assumed the two different meanings of pupil evolved independently and their being homonyms is pure accident. But not so! While looking something else up, I found to my astonishment (whatever could the connection be?) they have the same root and their origin is a fascination story.

In Latin there was a word pupus, 'boy' and a feminine form pupa, 'girl'. These had diminutives, pupillus and pupilla, 'little boy' and 'little girl'. These words were used to describe orphans, or young persons under the tutelage of an adult. In French this became pupille and was borrowed into English to simply mean a young student. (A vestige of the tutelage meaning remains when pupil is used to describe a trainee barrister.) 

Pupilla also meany 'doll' and this is what the pupil of the eye gets its name from.

If you look into someone's eyes you may see a tiny reflection in their pupils. Light passing through the pupil is absorbed, making the pupil look black, but some light is reflected off its surface and in favourable circumstances you may see a tiny reflected image of yourself - a 'doll'! and pupilla was the name given to this doll.

Fascinatingly Ancient Greek had a word κόρη (kori), 'little girl', and this too was used to mean the pupil of the eye.

This little doll in the eye really exists, although I think you would need a special camera to photograph it, but here is rather nice photo by Vladimer Shioshvili

'Stephanie was looking out through the window, looking at clouds passing...'

And now you can probably make a guess about where puppet and puppy come from.

Picture credit: Vladimer Shioshvili, 17 October 2007, licensed under Creative Common.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Question 1182471 and its unexpected Links to Optics and Electronics (not forgetting crossed Ladders)

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Sunday 24 May 2026 at 00:48

A few days back I posted a geometry problem, Question 1182471 from Math Stack Exchange, and then have a proof in a follow-up post. My proof was correct, I believe, and a decent effort , I thought.

But I must still have been thinking about it subconsciously, because yesterday I suddenly saw a much shorter and simpler solution, one that is also more insightful because it throws up an interesting link to optics, to electronics, and to the infamous Crossed Ladders Problem †

Here's the problem amd the (new) proof.

Now when I got to the equation at the end I realised I had seen it before! In optics it comes up in the Lens Formula, in electrical circuits it is the rule for the resistance formed by parallel resistors, and in the crossings ladders puzzle it is the height of the point where two ladders cross, expressed in terms of the heights the ladders reach up the walls of an alley.

The equation is also related to the Harmonic Mean, which has many uses, and to things like Egyptian fractions.

† Look it up. A problem that sees easy at first but isn't, it leads to 4th degree equations.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Photo - A Pair of Great Crested Grebes with Chicks

Visible to anyone in the world

My bother sent me this picture of a pair of Great Crested Grebes (Podiceps cristatus) with their chicks, which you can see riding on a parent's back.

The RSPB describes the bird like this

'a delightful, elegant waterbird with decorative head plumes'

About

Courtship

These birds are famous for their courtship ritual, often described as a dance.

A floating nest

Their nest is a floating platform of reeds and other vegetation.

In at the Deep End

The chicks ride on a parent's and when the parent dives down they go too! But they take to it like ... Grebes to water.

Victorian Ladies' Headgear

Their head plumes were an object of fashion in the 19th century, which brought the species to the brink of extinction.

The name

From French grèbe, so much is certain. Possibly this is a borrowing into French from Breton, related to Welsh crib, 'crest', including of a mountain ridge. or 'comb' as in a cock's comb. But this is not universally accepted.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

'The Bonny Rowan Tree' - Why do we call it 'Rowan'?

Visible to anyone in the world

A friend has a rowan tree, also called the mountain ash, in her garden, which set me wondering (a) if I could get hold of some rowanberry jelly, just to try; and (b) where name rowan comes from.

The answer to (a) is no, unless I make myself or pay an exorbitant delivery charge. The answer to (b) is that it's probably named for the bright red colour of its berries. The immediate origin seems to be Scandinavian (the Swedish is rönn) but there is a suggestion that it may go back ro the Proto-Indo-European root *ruidh-, 'red'.

This is the PIE colour word we are most confident of, because words that can be traced back to it, with meanings related to 'redness', are found in so many branches of the Indo-European language family. Some examples are English ruddy, Sanskrit rudhira, Polish rudy, Welsh rhudd, Lithuanian raudona, Latin rufus, Greek erythros.

Other English cognates include red, of course; rust, russet, rouge, roan and ruby. A particularly interesting one is ruddock - Britain's favourite bird, known today as the robin, but called in Old English rudduc, 'little red'. Here's a later example I found in the Middle English Compendium (sote = 'sweet' and the two thrushes are the song and the missel.)

How sote this seson is..The thrustelis & the thrusshis..The ruddok & the Goldfynch. 

Picture credit: George Chernilevsky, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, Rowan Berries, on Wikimedia, Licensed under Creative Commons.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Solution to Earlier Problem with Two Equilateral Triangles

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 18 May 2026 at 23:25

This is a solution to the problem I posted 16 May 2026.

In the diagram triangles ABC and CDE are equilateral, with points A, C and E lying on a straight line. The problem is to prove CP and CQ have the same length.

There are probably many proofs - for example using coordinate geometry or complex number - but here is a short one using Euclidean geometry.

In the second diagram the coloured triangles ACD and BCE are congruent ('two sides and the included angle'), because AC = BC, CD = CE, and angle ACD = 120° = angle BCE . The two angles marked x are therefore equal.

In the third diagram the coloured triangle CPD and the shaded triangle CQE are congruent ('two angles and the included side'), because angle PCD = 60° = angle QCE, angle PDC = x = angle QEC and side CD = side CE.

Consequently CP = CQ which was to be shown.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Nice Problem with Two Equilateral Triangles - Can You Find a Proof?

Visible to anyone in the world

Here's a nice problem I found on math stack exchange (question 1182471).

ACE is a straight line and triangles ABC and CDE are equilateral. Prove that CP = CQ.

If you have a solution do put in the comments. I imagine there are a number of different solutions. I'll post mine this Monday coming.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Darren Menachem Drapkin, Monday 18 May 2026 at 21:21)
Share post
Richard Walker

Water vole (Arvicola amphibius) photographed by my brother

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 15 May 2026 at 23:08

These attractive little rodents are found all across Europe and Asia, as far as China. In the British Isles they seem to be mainly aquatic (as suggested by the species name amphibius) but on the Continent the same animal is a land vole (which is why Linnaeus named the genus Avicola = 'field dweller).

Across its range it is not at risk but in Britain it has declined and is a protected species. The main reasons for decline seem to be habitat loss and predation by American mink, descended from animal who escaped or were released from fur farms.

However conservation efforts seem to have made a difference and the population seems to have picked up to some extent, but they are still much less common than they pnce were.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Not Luggage—Geometry! Why Packing Problems Are Having a Golden Age

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 13 May 2026 at 12:59

Packing problems ask questions like 'What is the optimal way to pack n copies of shape A in shape B?' For example we might be trying to pack four equilateral triangles in a square, and the best known arrangement is this. 

We can think of the problem in two equivalent ways

  • Choose a size for the square and make the triangles as big as possible
  • Choose a size for the triangles and make the square as small as possible

The example above, which I drew in GeoGebra, has been known since 1996 and was discovered by Erich Friedman. It's pleasingly symmetric and you might expect symmetry is the norm. But it absolutely isn't. As n increases every new number has its own idiosyncratic pattern, typically somewhat chaotic but with patches of local orderliness. For instance here is the best known arrangement for n equals 45 .

It was discover this month (May 2026) by Emerson Connelly and I found it on the legendary site Erich's Packing Center, maintained by Erich Friedman for the last 30 years. Erich's site has pages for dozens of different combinations. (Pentagons in Dominoes is one I rather like.)

I've known about this site for ages but when I revisited it yesterday I was astonished to find we have just entered a sort of Golden Age of Packing Problems. Of the 45 arrangements of equilateral triangles in squares found on the site, stretching back to 1996, 27 (60%) have been discovered in the last two months, April and May 2026! That's about one every other day.

And it's not just triangles in squares. Across the many different combinations of shapes hosted on Erich's site 46 have seen updated records in 2026, nearly all in that same two months. 

What accounts for this huge upsurge? I asked Copilot and it trawled the internet and proposed a combination of several factors

  1. Faster and more sophisticated search algorithms
  2. Dramatically greater computing power
  3. Widespread parallel experimentation
  4. Increasing use of AI/heuristics
  5. Rapid online collaboration
  6. A problem structure that rewards brute-force discovery

In some ways the problem resembles the search for bigger and bigger prime numbers. Packing problems have practical importance in manufacturing and transport (and prime numbers have practical importance in cryptography) but the search for new records and the application of such extraordinary human ingenuity and massive computing power is not motivated from practical considerations at all. I guess it comes to the spark of human curiosity and the attraction of a challenge.

And perhaps these records are a little like athletic ones; there is scope for a potentially endless series of small improvements and we always strive to reach them.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

What Links “Squirrel” and “Cynosure” Etymologically? (And Is “Wheatear” Rude?)

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 11 May 2026 at 09:45

I knew squirrel is from Ancient Greek skiouros (σκίουρος), ‘shadow tail’. To me this always seemed quite apt; a squirrel’s bushy tail does resemble a shadow. (Although apparently Ancient Greeks explained it as being because a squirrel carries its own portable sunshade.) 

The elements of skiourus are ski-, ‘shadow’, and ourus, which is the same word as ‘arse’.

Yes, really. I was staggered recently when I learn this but there is good evidence that Proto Indo-European (PIE), the ancestor of English, Greek, and many other languages, had a word *ors-, ‘backside’.

By now you may have spotted that this is the second element in cynosure, which today means focus of attention; or something or someone to which all eyes turn. The word is derived from Greek kunosoura (κυνόσουρα), “dog's tail”, first element kuon (κύων), ‘dog’ and the -oura element is a variant form of ouros.

Kunosoura was the Greek name for the constellation we now call Ursa Minor.

‘All eyes were on it’ because Greek sailors looked to it to find North. My sketch shows things as they are today; but because the Earth’s axis wobbles, the star that was nearest to North in classical Greek times was the one I’ve ringed and that is what Greek navigators used.

And now... the wheatear (Oenanthe Oenanthe). This bird when seen in flight has a very eye-catching white rump.

The general consensus is that it was originally called whiterse, ‘white-arse’, from this striking feature, but the word morphed into wheatear. This might be because the original sense got forgotten and the compound of familiar words wheat + ear was something speakers felt comfortable with. Or there might have been an element of prudery; perhaps arse was just too ‘Anglo-Saxon’ but ear did not offend.

This ‘explaining’ a word’s origin as a compound of more familiar and homely terms is called folk etymology. A nice example is sparrowgrass, a green vegetable better known today as asparagus, but often called sparrowgrass historically and in some dialects to this day.

And now back to our squirrel. Well-respected scholars have been sceptical about the etymology I began this post with. They suggest instead that it was a borrowing from a pre-Greek language and the Greeks rationalised as skiouros by folk etymology. This could well be true, but we shall never know, and the idea of an animal that carries its own beach umbrella around with it is too appealing to give up lightly.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The Unique Triangle that Covers Every Triangle of Perimeter Two

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 6 May 2026 at 22:50

In 1999 Zoltán Füredi and John E. Wetzel, two covering problems meisters, found a triangle with a remarkable property.[1]

It can cover[2] each and every triangle of perimeter 2. It is the smallest region (not just the smallest triangle) that can do this and it is unique. I made a drawing of it using GeoGebra and fitted some sample triangles with perimeter 2 inside it

The length of cap a times cap b is two solidus three , prefix angle of cap a times cap b times cap c equals 60 postfix degree , the length of cap a times cap b is 1.00285 and the perimeter of cap a times cap b times cap c is about 2.823 .

[1] The smallest convex cover for triangles of perimeter two, Geometriae Dedicata, 2000

[2] To be precise, it can cover a congruent copy of any such triangle.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Covering One Triangle with Another - An Elegant Proof

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Tuesday 5 May 2026 at 22:55

Covering problems, which ask how a shape can be covered with other shapes, are part of what's called combinatorial mathematics. They often appear in recreational mathematics. have applications to real-world problems such as siting mobile phone mast to get adequate coverage, and are a subject of active current research.

Covering problems are often easy to state but even in simple cases the answers can be difficult to establish, because when you are arranging a bunch of shapes it's hard to be sure all the possibilities have been thought of.

One I thought of the other day and posted in this blog is 

What is the smallest equilateral triangle that can cover every triangle whose longest side has length 1?

This is about as simple as it gets but it's not trivial. The first idea you might have, an equilateral triangle with sides of length 1, turns out not to be the answer; a bigger triangle is needed.

I haven't proved to my satisfaction what the smallest possible answer is but I can prove the following.

Any triangle whose longest side is 1 can be covered by an equilateral triangle of side length two solidus Square root of three almost equals 1.155 .

To see this consider Figures 1 and 2 below.

In Figure 1 AB is the longest side of the triangle we wish to cover, so its length is 1. Where can the third vertex of the triangle, call it C, be located?

If we draw circles of radius 1 centered at A and B then C must be in the lens-shaped region AXBY; if not, C would be more than 1 away from at least one of A and B , contradicting AB being the longest side.

From symmetry it is enough to just consider the shaded sector in Figure 1. In Figure 2 we see this sector is covered by equilateral triangle AX1B1, which therefore covers all three vertices of the triangle we want to cover and thus covers the whole of that triangle. 

The side length of AX1B1 is two solidus Square root of three almost equals 1.155 , which completes the proof.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

🦕 If the Anglo-Saxons had invented names for Dinosaurs

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 4 May 2026 at 13:55

Can you match each Old English name to the right Dinosaur?

Remember Thorn þ is a 'th' sound, as in 'thin'.

Snelþēof

Brontosaurus

Þæclixca

Triceratops

Þrihornanwlite

T-Rex

Þunorlixca

Stegosaurus

Tīrlixcacyning

Velociraptor

See Comment for information on the Od English versions.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Monday 4 May 2026 at 13:47)
Share post
Richard Walker

Triangle on Triangle

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 1 May 2026 at 21:53

What is the smallest equilateral triangle that can be guaranteed to cover any triangle whose longest side has length script l ? We might be tempted to think an equilateral triangle whose side length is also script l will do the job, as in (1) below.

However if a base angle is just over 60 postfix degree as shown in (2) the side marked script l is still the longest side but now the triangle we want to cover cannot fit into the equilateral triangle. Moving the equilateral triangle cannot help; the only way to cover two points that are script l apart is if they lie at vertices of the equilateral triangle and the same problem will arise whatever pair we pick.

Can you work out how large the equilateral triangle has to be before we can be confident it can cover any triangle whose longest side is script l ?

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

What connects the name Richard, an emoji and a famous Gallic freedom fighter?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Thursday 30 April 2026 at 23:15

On forums I sign myself like this

Rich 🙂

... but the platform button often suggests a different emoji

🤑 

I was puzzled by this when I first saw it but eventually realised 'rich' is the link; the emoji is called 'money-mouth face', a symbol of wealth (and greed). 

'But rich is a different word', I thought to myself, 'and nothing to do with my name.'

Except... I was wrong. It has, it's fundamentally the same word, but has reached us by two different routes, and thus ended up as two words with different meanings. 

The name Richard means something like 'strong ruler', from Germanic words ric, 'ruler' and hard, 'strong'.  We see the ric element in other names, such as Eric, 'ever ruler' and Wulfric, 'ruler of wolves'. It also survives in the sense of a domain, as in bishopric.

The ultimate origin is the Proto Indo-European (PIE) stem *reg-, which had the sense of being direct and then from that of imposing order, ruling, reigning over, leading, and so on. 

The same PIE stem *reg- gave the Celtic languages rix, 'king', and modern Gaelic still has ri or righ (pronounced 'ree'). The ancient Gauls who Julius Caesar conquered spoke a Celtic language, Gaulish, and their version was rix. This was an early borrowing into Germanic and came down to us as rich.

There may have been influence from French riche (itself a borrowing from Frankish) but from early Middle English on its meaning was widened to magnificence (think 'richly dressed') and nowadays the predominant meaning is wealthy of course. 

And now we come to the freedom fighter. Although familiar with the history I literally had no idea of the etymological connection until I started writing this post

The most famous of the Gauls was Vercingetorix, something like 'great king over fighters', who led a revolt against the Roman rule imposed by Julius Caesar but in the end was forced to surrender. In the modern era he has become a symbol of French spirit and resistance to foreign invasion. Here's an iconic statue to him. See the Comments for more details.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Thursday 30 April 2026 at 20:07)
Share post
Richard Walker

Why this little garden flower is called a pansy

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 27 April 2026 at 23:49

It's one of my favourite flower names. It's from Old French pensee, 'thought', but already in French applied to the flower, with the sense of a remembrance. Pensee comes from Latin pensare, 'weigh up' and this is where it gets really interesting, because pensare comes from a word pendere connected with weighing or hanging something up.

This in turn goes back to a Proto Indo-European root *(s)pen- which is the ultimate origin of a long list of words, some quite unexpected, such as as dispensary, expensive, peso, penthouse, spider and spontaneous.

I'll finish with a rather touching little poem ca. 1450 I found in the Middle English Compendium.

The lynyng of hit was with nedille wrought..With litille, litille flowris soft, The soven and the daisy, But most of pancy.

Soven must be connected with souvenance (think souvenir) so presumably another flower symbolising remembrance, but I couldn't find what it is. Perhaps we can never know.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The two most iconic woodland flowers of spring: Bluebells and Primroses

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 25 April 2026 at 23:50

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Oh, Vocative, Where are You? A Grammatical Feature Lost in English

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 25 April 2026 at 00:09

I don't know why but I've always had a soft spot for the vocative. I wish English still had it. What is it? Basically a special form of a name you use when addressing someone or something.

A really nice and surprising example, if you didn't know about it, is Scottish Gaelic Seumas, 'James', which becomes the vocative A Sheumais when you directly address someone of that name. This is pronounced uh-haymish and now you know where the name Hamish comes from.

I don't know any Gaelic but I know some Greek. In Greek, when speaking directly to someone you use the vocative. For some names the end of the name may change, for example if you address Kostas it will be as Kosta, Yiannis as Yianni. Other names may not change their spelling but are still regarded as vocatives; for example Maria or Anna, and I think that speakers, even non-native ones,  sense them as vocatives

This can be confusing to people learning Greek, who when hearing someone address Kostas, using the vocative Kosta of course, tend to assume he is called Kosta when he's actually called Kostas (hope you're keeping up!) Even more confusing, if you speak about Kostas, you must refer to him as 'The Kostas', Ο Κοστας.

The vocative is also used when addressing someone by a title-based form. For example 'Doctor' in Greek is Yiatros but when I address the doctor I have to say Yiatre. I could even speak to my dog (skylos) in the vocative, Kaló skyle!, 'Good dog'.

Originally all the branches of the large Indo-European family used word endings to mark what role a noun played in a sentence, for example being the object of an action ('I patted the dog')'or being a possessor ('the dog's dinner) or a recipient ('I gave the dog a bone'). There were eight different 'cases' altogether, including our vocative. 

Over time some branches of the Indo European family have eroded or abolished the case system in favour of things like word order, and nowadays cases have largely disappeared from all the Germanic languages bar Icelandic and German itself, and all the Romance languages bar Romanian. This included the poor vocative, now only hanging on in Icelandic and Romanian respectively. 

But it's alive and well in Greek, as we have seen and in many other branches as well. An interesting exception is Russian, which unlike most Slavic languages lacks a vocative. It was abolished by the Russian government in 1918 on the grounds that it was archaic and little used. However, and this is fascinating, an informal 'neo-vocative' has apparently emerged in Modern Russian. for example Sasha would become Sash.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

When Is a Bottle Not a Bottle? How Felix Klein Got Misread

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 23:35

One of the answers in my crossword today was KLEIN BOTTLE which set me wondering where Felix first described his famous mathematical object. It turns out the answer is (as far as we can tell) a set his handwritten lecture notes 1882 and after some searching I was able to find a facsimile of the relevant page at kleinbottle.com. 

But along the way I found that Klein never called it a bottle. He called it a Fläche, 'surface', related to English ply and pleat, but it got misread as Fläsche, 'bottle' related to English flask and flagon.

Why? The obvious answer is they couldn't read his handwriting, but I'm not convinced. The word Fläche appears four times on the relevant page and is written in quite a clear and consistent way.

So maybe someone simply thought 'bottle' worked better than 'surface' (it does) or maybe it was a flash of inspired humour. Who can tell? But below I have pasted an image of the page (courtesy of kleinbottle.com.)

With a steer from Copilot I was able pick out and highlight Fläche in four places and you can judge for yourself whether it is legible. And as a bonus you get to see Klein's sketches where he is showing that if you just join the end of a cylinder in the obvious way you get an anchor-ring (or torus), but if you join them so the end have opposite orientation you get a one-sided surface.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The World of Triangles: An Etymological Treasure Trove

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 01:21

In the world of triangle we find a rich etymological heritage, with most words having old roots, with many going back to Proto-Indo-European (PIE), the 5000-ish year old ancestor of most European languages and many from Northern India and the Iranian region.

Triangle is from Old French, from Latin triangulum. The tri- is from PIE *treyes, 'three' obviously, but -angle is less obvious; the PIE root is *ang or *ank, 'bend', which is also the source of ankle.

It also seems the Angles (as in East Anglia) took their name from the same root, perhap in reference to a bend in the coastline of their original homeland, or alternatively because the hooks they used to catch fish, so they would be 'The people of the fishing-hook' according to this theory.

Triangles come in many flavours and I've sketched some below. Triangle can be classified by the size of their largest angle, or by how many equal sides they have. In this post I'm only looking at the first classification, by angle, and I'll look at classification by equal sides in another post.

Number 1, the Acute, has all angles less than 90 degrees, so they are 'sharp'. Acute is derived from Latin acutis 'sharp', from PIE *ak-, 'sharp' or 'pointy', from which we get many words, such as acid, acropolis, acupuncture, eager and oxygen.

Number 2, the Obtuse, has an angle greater than 90 degrees. Obtuse means 'not sharp', from Latin obtusus, 'blunt', from PIE *(s)teu-,'beat' or 'push. This is the source also of type (from being struck), stupid (as in struck insensible), student (students push forward keenly) and stupendous (stunning).

Number 3, the Right-Angled, has a 90 degree angle, and sits right (!) on the cusp between (1) and (2). The right part is a translation of Latin rectus, 'upright', into Old English riht, 'straight', which both descends ultimately from PIE *reg-, the root of a whole host of words around being correct or regulated, or reigning, or being a maharajah, or being reckless, or being regal.

And it is the first element of my given name Richard!This is a so-called dithemic name, a compound of two Germanic elements meaning 'strong ruler' but with the ruler element first. So my name has the same PIE origin as right as in right angle.

Finally an old joke. See if you can spot how this ties in with PIE *reg-,

Did you hear about the king who was only 12 inches tall? He was a lousy king but a great ruler.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 01:02)
Share post
Richard Walker

A Simple Tiling Pattern That Solves a Hard Geometry Problem

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 20 April 2026 at 23:18

Here's a well known story whose connection will become apparent later.

One day the famous mathematician David Hilbert gave a lecture and finished by saying, 'And the rest of the proof is obvious!'

But then he had a sudden doubt and paused. After thinking for a while he said, 'Perhaps it is not obvious after all. I will think about it and let you know the answer in next week's lecture.'

When next week came the students waited eagerly. Hilbery arrived a little late and spoke to them. 'Students', he said, 'I have been thinking about the problem the whole week long. But it was only a few minutes ago, while I was on my way here, that it finally came to me.

It is obvious.'

A few days ago I ran across a problem I had not seen before. It was posted on the YouTube channel Mind Your Decisions as a hard problem and it goes like this (my description).

In the interior of an equilateral triangle we choose an arbitrary point and from it draw line segments to the triangle's corners. Suppose these have lengths a , b and c and the angles they make around the chosen point are alpha , beta and gamma .

Now construct a triangle with sides a , b and c . What will its angles be? 

I saw the answer must treat the angles symmetrically and it must take an angle sum of 360° (around a point) down to 180° (in a triangle), and so formed the conjecture that the angles of the new triangle are simply alpha minus 60 postfix degree , beta minus 60 postfix degree and gamma minus 60 postfix degree .

But could I prove it?

After several days I found a proof but I wasn't happy with it. It was too long. Besides, I thought that because the result was so simple the proof should be obvious. So I went to bed and in the night I had a sort of dream that showed me the solution. And it is obvious. Here is a look-and-see proof using a tiling pattern.

The tiling consists of multiple copies of our equilateral triangle with an interior point. The white triangle are copies of the blue ones rotated 60°. All the interior points are in the same relative position and as well as being joined to the corners of the triangle they lie in they have been joined to the interior points of the three adjacent blue or white triangles.

The lattice this creates contains multiple copies of what I shall refer to as the triangle of interest, ans of equilateral triangles of three different side lengths, equal to the three sides of the triangle of interest. There are many noteworthy things we can find out about the lattice but for our proof we just need to focus on the triangle I have emphasized.

You can see three copies of the triangle of interest meet at the interior point, with each of its three different angles being represented exactly once. Moreover each of the angles we previously labelled  alpha , beta and gamma the line segments to the corners make at the interior point consist of one angle from the triangle of interest and one 60° angle from an adjacent equilateral triangle. It follows that the angles of the triangle of interest are alpha minus 60 postfix degree , beta minus 60 postfix degree and gamma minus 60 postfix degree , as conjectured.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Cambridgeshire Bluebell Wood

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 20 April 2026 at 01:06

From a friend who knows my love of wild flowers.

The scientific name derives from Hyakinthos, a mythical Spartan prince who was a lover of Apollo. One day in a sporting apollo accidentally killed Hyakinthos with a discus. This (or some other, its not certain what flower was meant) plant was said to have sprung from the blood of the unfortunate youth.

The name hyakinthos (ὑάκινθος) is etymologically interesting. Greek words with -nth- in them, such as plinth or Corinth have an ancient pre-Greek and pre-Indo European origin, so I suppose the name hyacinth harks back to the language of a Bronze Age Mediterranean people.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Hummingbird Hawk Moth - A Summer Visitor

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Sunday 19 April 2026 at 12:43

Another photo from my brother. A Hummingbird Hawk Moth in his garden. These insects are notoriously hard to photograph because they flit quickly from one blossom to the next and it's hard to anticipate their next move.

If you look carefully you can see it\s using its extended  proboscis to drink nectar from the flower.

Amazingly these insects are summer visitors who migrate here from Southern Europe. They seem to be becoming commoner in the UK and it's thought they might be starting to become resident here as a result of climate change.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Photo of Heron's Nest - Adult with Chicks

Visible to anyone in the world

Here's a photo my brother Simon took yesterday of a Grey Heron's nest with chicks.

These imposing birds can be up to 1 m tall, with a wing span of up to 2 m.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Stunning Equilateral Triangle Problem

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 15 April 2026 at 22:10

I saw this problem on Mind Your Decisions.

At left is an equilateral triangle. From an arbitrary point in its interior we draw line segments to its vertices, making angles alpha , beta and gamma as shown. If now we construct a second triangle (right) whose sides are equal in length to these three line segments, as indicated by the tick marks—What will the angles of the new triangle be?

I have never seen this before and have not viewed the solution. But I have worked out what the answer must be, just not proved it yet. And it's a truly beautiful result.

I wonder if it can be generalised to non-equalateral triangle? Or to a square?

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 6057443