OU blog

Personal Blogs

Richard Walker

The "Soup" Theorem : When Erdős Met Pósa

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 14 November 2026 at 23:42

The renowned mathematician Paul Erdős told this story about the 12-year-old Louis Pósa

While Pósa was eating his soup, I asked him the following question. Prove that if you have n + 1 positive integers less than or equal to 2n, some pair of them are relatively prime.

Here's the very neat proof Pósa came up with in about half a minute. I like it because it uses a sort of reverse pigeonhole principle.

Imagine we have n boxes and we put the two times n integers into the boxes like this

1 comma 2 3 comma 4 ellipsis 2 n minus 1 comma 2 n

Now we try to choose the n plus one integers. Since we want more integers than there are boxes we are bound to empty at least on box and so our selection will include a pair of consecutive integers.

But a pair of consecutive integers, say k and k plus 1 must always be relatively prime; that have no common factor greater than one , because any such factor of k would leave a remiander of one when divided into k plus 1.

For more about Pósa see his Wikipedia biography.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

at first I thought they were snowflakes

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 14 November 2026 at 15:54

          at  

 first

     I

               thought        they

were snow

     flakes                    because   of

          the

way                 they fell

gently                              to

          earth

 

autumn leaves

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Do I Use Expletive Infixes? Abso-Bloody-Lutely!

Visible to anyone in the world

The 'Bloody' in the title is an example of an expletive infix—a swear-word (or a euphemism for a swear-word, such as bally or blessed etc.) inserted in another word, to convey mild sarcasm, humour, or simply emphasis.

Abso-bloody-lutely and its many variants are some of the commonest examples but there are plenty of others, such as fan-bloody-tastic, un-sodding-believable, re-fucking-diculous and so on.

It seems a relatively modern linguistic innovation. Green’s Dictionary of Slang is a gold-bloody-mine  of early occurrences using absolutely, but the earliest are from around the 1890s and the popularity grew in the early 20th century.

Although new example using expletive infixes can be coined at will by any speaker, they have to follow certain rules. These have been and still are the subject of discussion amongst linguists but in simple terms we can say the infix must come immediately before a stressed syllable. 

So for instance, if our base word is 'overthinking', we can say 

over-bloody-thinking

but

overthink-bloody-ing

is impossible.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

The Riddle of the First Ace : What is the Best Position to Bet On?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 13 November 2026 at 01:15

Another one from Cut the Knot : Probability Riddles by Alexander Bogomolny. This is riddle 3.9, my paraphrase.

Riddle

A standard pack of 52 playing cards contains as we know four aces. If the pack is thoroughly shuffled and we then work our way through it, the first ace we encounter may be at any of the positions 1 comma 2 comma ellipsis 49. Which of these has the highest probability of being the position where the first ace is found?

Scroll down for solution



























My Slightly Simplified Version of the Solution

Let p left parenthesis k right parenthesis be the probability that the first ace is at position k . We count the number of possible ways the aces may be arranged if the first ace is at position k .

If the first ace is at position k , the remaining three must be each be located at one of the 52 minus k positions from k plus 1 to 52 , which can be done in StartBinomialOrMatrix 52 minus k Choose 3 EndBinomialOrMatrix ways, all equally likely to occur, given the pack is in random order.

Now we calculate the total number of ways the fours aces can be arranged altogether, irrespective of where the first ace is. This is StartBinomialOrMatrix 52 Choose 4 EndBinomialOrMatrix.

The probability p left parenthesis k right parenthesis is therefore StartFraction StartBinomialOrMatrix 52 minus k Choose 3 EndBinomialOrMatrix Over StartBinomialOrMatrix 52 Choose 4 EndBinomialOrMatrix EndFraction equals StartFraction left parenthesis 52 minus k right parenthesis left parenthesis 51 minus k right parenthesis left parenthesis 50 minus k right parenthesis Over 1 comma 624 comma 350 EndFraction. This plainly decreases with k and so its maximum is when k equals one , and p left parenthesis 1 right parenthesis equals one thirteenth (as we would naturally expect).

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

'Afford' : An Old English Word 16th C Scribes Thought Was Latin

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 11 November 2026 at 23:11

We hear a lot about affordability just at the moment but where did afford come from?

The Old English was geforðian (yeh-FOR-thee-an), 'to contribute or further', which later became became aforðian, which in the 16th century scribes apparenly began parsing as as af-fordian, thinking it was Latin word with a prefix af, a variant of Latin ab-.

However it isn't Latin at all but a native word of Germanic origin, derived for Proto-Germanic *furÞa, 'forth', and ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *per-, 'forward' or 'through'. This is the ancestor too of many words with the meaning of 'for' or 'first' (there are two), including some surprising and non-obvious examples like paradise (from the extended sense of 'around'), veneer (connected with furnish), privy and priest (from the idea of an elder, someone born before, as far as I can make out). 

And of course proto-.

The original sense of afford as 'provide' is still used; you could say something like 'My theatre seat afforded me a good view of the stage', although it has a slight dated feel, and the primary meaning nowadays is being able to meet the cost of something—as in affordability, where we came in.

Here's a joke.

My friend in the country couldn't afford his water bill... so I sent him a 'Get Well Soon' card.

@Dadsaysjokes on X, 7 July 7, 2020

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Tom Swifty

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Sunday 8 November 2026 at 14:23

 "I need a snack", said Tom crisply.

This popped nto my head this morning and I believe it is original; at any rate it is not in The Canonical List of Top Swifties, which only lists

80. "Please, Christopher," said Tom crisply.

81. "Let's go get some lettuce," said Tom crisply.

Interestingly, when I went to look at a sample Tom Swift adventure, I discovered the eponymous Tom gives a "crisp" answer near the start of Tom Swift and his House on Wheels, from 1925, which you can find at Project Gutenberg.

Tom Swift, with a negative shake of his head, shoved several papers across the table that separated him from a burly, red-faced man whose eyes narrowly observed the young inventor.

"Then you refuse this contract, Mr. Swift—a contract for constructing over one hundred thousand dollars' worth of machinery on which you can make a handsome profit? You absolutely refuse it?"

The red-faced man in his eagerness was leaning forward now.

"Yes, Mr. Cunningham, I refuse!" was Tom's crisp answer. "The Swift Construction Company does not care to handle it."

Here is the front cover. I think I might try and get an original copy secondhand, if it's not too pricey. Definitely a collector's item.

illusc.jpg

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

A Circle and a Square : Can You Find the Area?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Sunday 8 November 2026 at 01:33

I saw this on the YouTube channel Math with Omani but I've not looked at the solution there. The puzzle is to find the shaded area, given on the marked length.

Scroll down to find my solution

Solution

There are probably different ways to tackle this but those right angle suggest Pythagoras is the way to go, so we draw in some more lines and create a right-angled triangle. Let the side of the square be s and the radius of the circle c .

We can compute s as two times r minus one and we see the legs of triangle cap o times cap p times cap q are r minus one and s solidus two , and its hypotenuse r . By Pythagoras we have

left parenthesis r minus one right parenthesis squared plus left parenthesis s solidus two right parenthesis squared equals r squared .

Substituting for s   gives

left parenthesis r minus one right parenthesis squared plus left parenthesis left parenthesis two times r minus one right parenthesis solidus two right parenthesis squared equals r squared .

and after expanding and tidying up we get

four times r squared minus 12 times r plus five equals zero , which factorises
 
left parenthesis two times r minus one right parenthesis times left parenthesis two times r minus five right parenthesis equals zero and the roots are one divided by two and one divided by two . The first is invalid and so we conclude r equals five divided by two whence s equals four and the area is 16 . In fact cap o times cap p times cap q has the proportions of a 3-4-5 triangle, which is rather neat.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Heroes and Villains : Can You Guess Which of These Fantasy Names are Goodies and Which are Baddies?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 6 November 2026 at 23:26

What's in a name? Here are six Goodies and six Baddies all mixed up. Can you sort out which are the Goodies and which the Baddies?

1 Malzor Kest
2 Elowen Brightmere
3 Tarian Wren
4 Dravik Rane
5 Corin Emberleaf
6 Vexigar Corven
7 Zargath Vorr
8 Alarion Vale
9 Seraphine Lark
10 Krulmar Veyn
11 Lysandra Dawnfall
12 Mordrek Voss

My answers

Credit: I am indebted to Copilot for inventing these, following a set of (unwritten?) conventions for naming fantasy characters.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Another Probability Riddle from the Book

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 6 November 2026 at 01:20

This is 7.1 in Bogomolny's book.

A and B both tell the truth with probability one divided by three and lie with two divided by three .

A makes a statement which B confirns is true.

What is the probability that A's statement is in fact true?

Scroll down for a solution.





















Solution

A and B might both be telling the truth or they might both be lying.

But from the given information it can't be the case that A is telling the truth and B is lying, because B's confirmation would the truth and not a lie.

Similarly it can't be be the case that A is lying and B is telling the truth, because B's confirmation would be a lie and not the truth.

So we cam draw this diagram, in which the shaded areas are excluded because they represent situations that are ruled out by the arguments above.

sketch.png

The remaining area is one divided by nine plus four divided by nine equals five divided by nine in total, of which one divided by nine represents A telling the truth. Hence the probability that A is telling the truth is one divided by nine solidus five divided by nine equals one divided by five

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

How Many Helium Atoms Does it Take to Power a Lightbulb?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Tuesday 3 November 2026 at 22:35

About 90% of the energy we use comes directly or indirectly from the Sun. Apart from solar panels, we have wind and hydroelectric power, which are ultimately driven by the effect of solar radiation on the climate, and burning of fossil fuels which are the remains of photosynthesis by plants that grew millions of year ago and stored up sunlight. And then there is combustion of wood and biowaste, but these too are stored sunlight.

The bulk of the energy generated in the Sun is from hydrogen atoms fusing together at high pressures and pressures to create helium atoms. In the process some mass is converted to energy according to Einstein's famous equation.

The fusion actually happens in three steps called the Proton-Proton Chain Reaction, with six hydrogens atomic mass 1 being input and one helium atomic mass 4 and two hydrogens emerging at the end. It's a bit more complicated but that is the gist.

Thinking about this I wondered if I could relate something we are all familiar with — powering a light bulb — to actual numbers of helium atoms being created in the sun.

How many helium atoms does it take to power a lightbulb?

Assuming a 10 w bulb, we need to find 10 Joules of energy each second (a Watt is one Joule per second by definition).

The creation of one helium 4 atom releases about four multiplication 10 super negative 12 Joules, so 10 divided by four multiplication 10 super negative 12 almost equals 2.5 multiplication 10 super 12 or around 2,500,000,000,000 helium atoms must be created per second.

Here's a (very) peripherally related joke.

"When Einstein met Pythagoras"

equation sequence part 1 e equals part 2 m times c squared equals part 3 m times a squared plus m times b squared full stop

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

What I'm Reading : "Cut the Knot : Probability Riddles" by Alexander Bogomolny

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 2 November 2026 at 23:51

This is a wonderful book which I've just bought. It presents 79 riddles in probability, organised into 11 chapters on different topics, building on and extending the material collected on the cut-the-knot website.

I've only dipped into the book so far but in Chapter 3 Likely Surprises I came across this gem.

A flips a fair coin 20 times and B flips another 21 times. What is the probability that at the end B has more heads than A?

Bogomolny gives five solutions but my favourite is the last one. To read my version of the argument scroll down.





















 
Solution
 
Suppose A has HA heads and TA tails, and B has HB heads and TB tails.
 
We know HA + TA = 20 and HB + TB = 21, so HB + TB > HA + TA. 
 
But this would not be possible unless either HB  > HA or TB > TA: B must either have more heads than A or more tails than A (it can't be both because B only did 21 coin flips).
 
But the riddle is completely symmetric in heads and tails and therefore we have
prob(B has more heads than A) = prob(B has more tails than A) = one divided by two .
 
The same argument applies for any numbers n and n+1 in place of 20 and 21. We can easily check this by hand for n=1
 
A B
H HH, HT, TH, TT
T HH, HT, TH, TT
 
You can see that B has more heads than A exactly 50% of the time. 
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

A Plant that Moves and Knows What Time to Get Up : Mimosa pudica

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 2 November 2026 at 01:03

I've just bought a 'Sensitive Plant' or 'Touch-Me-Not', Mimosa pudica.  Mine is quite small at the moment and nowhere near flowering, but I found a good photo on Wikimedia [1].

This plant is remarkable in more than one way. Firstly, if you touch it, a kind of impulse runs through its foliage, and the plant immediately folds up nearby leaves. It's this behaviour that causes Linnaeus to dub it pudica, 'shy'. 

Even more remarkably it has a circadian rhythm. During the hours of darkness the plant furls its leaves but begins unfurling them ahead of the dawn; it's got a biological clock.

And it can learn; if its leaves are touched repeatedly without any harm being caused to them, it will come to disregard these stimuli.

Mimosa pudica , a member of the pea and lentil family, came originally from the Caribbean and Central America but is now widespread in parts of the world with warm climates, and a weed in some places. In temperate regions it is a fairly common indoor plant.

For some interesting botanical history of the plant see the article Sensitive Plant (Mimosa pudica) on the Cambridge University Botanic Garden website.

[1] Suyash.dwivedi, Mimosa pudica in September month, Wikimedia, Licensed Under Creative Commons.

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Richard Walker, Friday 6 November 2026 at 22:24)
Share post
Richard Walker

An Acute Angle Can be Bisected Using Two Parabolas (Follow-Up to Previous Post)

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Sunday 1 November 2026 at 00:24

This is a follow-up to my post of 30/10/2036, where I described an interesting and elegant geometrical fact I had stumbles across., but without any proof.

I suspected it would already be known, and so it was, but as far as I have been able to tell, not for centuries but only 90 years (which I felt quite gratified about). The first relevant publication was by E.H. Neville in 1936, followed B. Lawrence in 1937 and later A.W. Walker (no relation) and others. I haven't read the original papers but I believe they discussed this result along with other closely related ones and various generalisations.

All we need to do to establish the previous result is prove the assertion I've made in the title above. In this post I'll present a proof of this, see below. It's quite short and I hope easy to follow, and rather elegant once you grasp the idea.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

The Wasp, the Wopsie and the Guêpe : A Little Entomological Etymology

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 30 October 2026 at 22:01

There was an Old Man of St Bees,

Who was stung on the Nose by a Wasp.

When they asked, "Does it hurt?"

He replied. "No, not much."

"I'm so glad it wasn't a Hornet." [1]

The modern English name of the insect Vespula vulgaris is of course wasp, but in Old English it was wæps or wæsp, and this goes back via a Germanic line of descent to a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *wapso-. This is also the origin of Latin vespa, and the latter may have influenced the form of modern wasp.

Interestingly there is a dialect version wopsie, which I've always been aware of and occasionally use, and this is surprisingly close to the ancestral root, so much so that it's possible to imagine that if we could travel 5,000 years back in time we might agree with people living then what the insect is called.

The French name is guêpe and if we recall that the circumflex over the 'e' originated as a scribal abbreviation for an 's', we can see it is not all that far from Latin vespa after all. But it's thought that it is a kind of amalgam of two words, both coming from PIE *wapso-, one from Frankish (so via the Germanic route) wapsu and the other from Latin vespa.

As a final aside, the name of the Roman Emperor Vespasian might derive from vespa, and there are Italian people with the surname Vespa (and also a famous brand of scooter) and Wasp is an English surname, although quite rare.

[1] I have quoted this Limerick as I remember it but checking the original by W.S. Gilber (of Gilbert and Sullivan), poking fun at Edward Lear, I see my version is a little different, but even more ridiculous so I've left it as is.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Three Parabolas and a Triangle : A Mind-Blowing Geometrical Discovery

Visible to anyone in the world

I was playing around with GeoGebra tonight and stumbled across something really surprising.

You probably drew some parabolas when you were in school, using coordinate geometry, but a parabola can also be defined in purely geometrical terms, without using coordinates. It is the set of points whose distance for a fixed point, called its focus, is the same as its perpendicular distance from a fixed line called its directrix. A parabola is defined as soon as you specify its focus and its directrix.

It occurred to me to wonder what would happen if we took a point in the interior of a triangle and drew three parabolas, taking this point as the common focus, but using each of the three sides of the triangle in turn as directrix.

So I tried this and I got a very interesting figure.

P is the common focus AB, BC, and CA the directrices, and I have labelled the parabolas r, s and t. Each pair of parabolas defines two crossing points: I and J, E and F, and G and F in the diagram.

Now for the surprises. If we draw lines through each of these three pairs, each line passes through a vertex of the triangle, and all three meet at the point I have labelled O.

This is surprising enough, but more surprising still these lines bisect the angles of the triangle/ It is well known that the angle bisectors of a triangle meet at a point called the incentre, because it is the centre of the unique circle, the incircle, inscribed in the triangle and tangent to its sides.

The point O is a fixed point of the triangle. which means the position of P, the common focus, makes no difference to the three lines. Moving P will change the parbolas, and hence the points at which the parabolas intersect, but the intersection points will always lie on the same three lines.

Here are a couple of examples where P is in different places.

So that's what I discovere, I have no idea (yet) how to prove it, and it's about 99% likely thatit's a well-known result, but if not I shall claim it as Walker's Theorem.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Friday 30 October 2026 at 03:08)
Share post
Richard Walker

🦔 What Hedgehogs Were Once Called, and Where Sea-Urchins Come In

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 28 October 2026 at 00:19

Hedgehogs – why can't they just share the hedge?

This was the joke that won Dan Antopolski the Funniest Joke of the Fringe award at the 2009 Edinburgh Festival Fringe. [1] 

Hedgehogs were not always called that. In old English, it was an igil, cognate with modern German Igel. But in the early part of the Middle English period this was displaced by yrichon, 'urchin', a word of French origin. This was in turn replaced in the 15th century by heyghoge and hedgehog it has been ever since.

But where did igil and urchin come from? Well Old French herichun is from Latin ericius and the latter is thought to derive from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *ghers-, 'bristly' or 'spiny', probably the origin also of horror, in the sense of your hair standing on end, bristling, you see.

At this point you may be guessing igil is from the same root, but you'd be wrong ; igil is from a different root *heg-, 'hedgehog'. The hedgehog had a PIE root all to itself, hogging it you might say!

This is also the source of Ancient Greek ekhinos, 'hedgehog' or 'sea urchin'. which of course is where we get echinoderm. It seems people have often seen a parallel between between the spiny land animal and the spiny sea creature, and at one time hedgehogs were sometimes called land urchins to distinguish them.

Modern Greek has a different word for hedgehog which I rather like: skandzóchiros, 'prickly pig', which seems a bit more descriptive than the English equivalent.

[1] BBC News. (2009, August 24). Hedgehog joke is Fringe funniest. bbc.co.uk

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

High Above Thunderclouds are Kinds of Lightning We Don't See : Sprites, Jets, Elves and Many Others

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Tuesday 27 October 2026 at 15:49

For most of human history no-one suspected there is any kind of lightning apart from the familiar kind we can see from the ground. But in 1989 researchers testing a low-light TV camera accidentally captured a recording of what was later name a 'sprite and later that year a similar phenomenon was filmed from the Space Shuttle.

It is not surprising they hadn't been observed before, because they are brief duration (milliseconds to seconds) and to see them an observer needs to be able to see the top of a stormcloud, which means from a favourable ground location, an aeroplane, or space.

I can remember reading about them, probably in Scientific American, soon after they were discovered,  and being very surprised and excited.

Since then many different kinds of what are termed Transitory Luminous Events (TLEs) have been describes; as well as Sprites there are Jets, Giant Jets, Elves, Pixies, Ghosts, Troll and Gnomes.

Here is a diagram [1]  from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, showing what some of them look like, their scale, elevation, and relationship to ordinary lightning.

Here is a recording of some sprites [2]

And here is one of a giant jet, taken from the International Space Station. We can get a rough idea of its size by comparing it with the curvature of the Earth, visible  in the background, and it must indeed have been truly gigantic.

Credits

[1] Transient luminous events (TLEs), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Public Domain.

[2] Cropped from Red sprite above Hungary, MTA Geodéziai és Geofizikai Kutatóintézet / Geodetic and Geophysical Reseach Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Licensed under Creative Commons.

[3] Photograph of a gigantic jet taken from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers, Public Domain.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

"X Men Went to Mow" : A Problem by the Author of War and Peace

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 26 October 2026 at 01:18

Leon Tolstoy, as well as being one of the most famous novelists of all time, was an educationist, who founded a school for peasant children in his country estate, and wrote several textbooks for their use, one of which dealt with arithmetic.

I haven't been able to find the original text of Tolstoy's arithmetic book, but one problem that has become quite famous and appeared in a number of places is reproduced in Yakov Perelman's book Algebra Can be Fun. Here is the wording of the problem as it appears there.

A team of haymakers were assigned the task of scything two meadows, one twice the size of the other. Half a day the team worked on the larger meadow. Then it split into two equal groups: the first remained in the larger meadow and finished it by evening; the second group scythed the smaller meadow, but by evening there still remained a portion to do; this portion was scythed the next day by one haymaker in a single day’s work. How many men were there in the team?

Scroll down to see a solution














Solution: There are doubtless many ways to solve the puzzle but this was my take on it.

Suppose there are x people in the team. Then in the first half-day they will put in x divided by two person-days of work. After the team splits, the x divided by two people remaining in the first field will work for half a day, so putting in a further one divided by two multiplication x divided by two equals x divided by four person-days, for a total of three times x divided by four person-days to mow the first meadow.

Over in the second field the x divided by two people diverted there will work for half a day, making x divided by four man-days, and on the second day the lone mower will contribute a further person day, for a total of x divided by four plus one .

But we know the first is twice the size of the second so

three times x divided by four equals two times left parenthesis x divided by four plus one right parenthesis , three times x divided by four equals x divided by two plus two , x divided by four equals two which implies x equals eight and that is the answer.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Why Did Little Jack Horner Sit in a Corner?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 24 October 2026 at 23:56

Here's little Jack Horner giving us a thumbs up. To be honest, I don't know why he sat in the corner, but I suspect it's because Horner and corner rhyme. 

However a corner is quite an appropriate place for somebody called Horner to sit. Horner and corner share a common ancestor; both go back to an ancient root *ker-.

Corner comes from Latin cornu, 'horn' and has reached us from Anglo-French cornere. The modern sense of corner seems to have developed via first the word being applied to a region (think of 'The four corners of the world' and points of the compass), and then narrowed to an angle between walls, or a cosy nook. 

Horner is an occupational name; a horner worked with horn, and horn is a close cognate ot cornu, but has reached us through the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages. Like many words that start with C is Latin (whic is a /k/ sound), the Germani equivalent starts with /h/.

Some examples are 

canis - hound

caput - head

cor - heart

casa - house

centum - hundred

... and TIL, cannabis - hemp!

Image: Little Jack Horner 2 - WW Denslow - Project Gutenberg etext 18546.jpg, Public Domain.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Imagine Your Broken Calculator Maxes Out at a Trillion. Can You Still Solve this Puzzle?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 24 October 2026 at 14:20

Imagine your calculator is broken. It won't handle numbers beyond 1,000,000,000,000 but you have been asked to find the last two digits of three super 2026 .

Can you still find the answer. What is it?

Scroll down for Solution and Discussion.



























Solution

Even with the broken calculator we can start calculating some small powers of three and when we get to three super 20 we discover the last two digits are 01 . This means three super 40 comma three super 60 comma three super 80 times ellipsis all end in (01\).

So three super 2020 will end in 01 also and to find the last two digits of three super 2026 we can just multiply 01 by three super six equals 729 , which tells us the answer is 29 .

In fact it is possible to prove the rather astonishing fact, that for any prime p not equals two comma five , p super 2026 has the same last two digits as p super six .

And so for example we can be sure that the last two digits of 11 super 2026 , a number of some 2,000 digits, are 61 .

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Whiter than the Whitewash on the Toga: Where the Word "Candidate" Comes From

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 23 October 2026 at 02:05

Ancient Roman candidates for office would put on white togas, as a form of purity and honesty signalling, and to stand out better in the crowd. 

The garment was called the toga candida, from Latin candidus, 'dressed in white', and from this they were called candidati, 'ones dressed in white', which has come down more or less unchanged to Modern English, although the meaning was widened slightly.

This is well attested, for example an early etymologist Sextus Pompeius Festus writing in the 2nd century CE has this to say

Candidati dicebantur, quod togam candidam induebant.

"They were called candidates because they put on a white toga."

De Verborum Significatu, "On the meaning of words"

These white togas appear to have been whitened using chalk powder (you can still using whiting to restore your canvas plimsolls to a brilliant white). 
 
The Latin root of candidati was candere, "to shine", which comes from an ancient PIE root *kand- with the same meaning. Other words descended for this root are candid, candle, and incendiary, as well as incense, candelabra and chandelier.
 
 
 
 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

A Nice Theorem About 'Flank' Triangles : (What Are They?)

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 21 October 2026 at 00:45

If we start with a triangle ABC and erect squares on two of its sides, then join the two outer vertices of the squares it creates a new triangle, called a flank triangle.

Theorem:  If we draw a line passing through the midpoint of the outer edge of the flank triangle and the apex of the original triangle, it will be perpendicular to the base of that triangle. In the diagraml ine HCI is at right angles to AB.

Proof: Rotate the flank triangle through 90° about point C.

Consider the triangle ABD'.

From the construction:

ACD' must be a straight line, and AC = CG, so C is the midpoint of AD'.

BD' is the image of GD and H' the image of midpoint H, so H' is the midpoint of BD'.

Hence CH' joins the midpoints of two sides of ABD' and is therefore parallel to the base AB. CH' is perpendicular to CH and hence to HI.

But this means HI must be perpendicular to AB, because CH' and AB are parallel. //

Exercise: Prove the flank triangle and the original triangle have equal areas.

I got this problem from Cut-the-Knot 'Properties of flank triangles' and drew the graphics in GeoGebra.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Word of the Day : Kardigan

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Tuesday 20 October 2026 at 14:24

Not knitwear but an umbrella term for expressions we use when we can't remember the word for something or can't be bothered to think what is; words such as

Thingamabob

Oojamaflip

Whatchamacallit

Thingamajig

Modern English has a very rich collection of words like this, with new ones being coined as recently as the second half the 20th century. I think the official name for this category of words is undifferentiated placeholders, rather a mouthful, and although it's not made it into the Oxford English Dictionary yet, the word kadigan seems to be an alternative popular amongst people interested in this kind of thing.

The origins of kadigan are debated. One suggestion is that it was coined by the American word lover Willard R. Espy around 1960 but the Useless Etymology websote suggest some other possibilities.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

Can We Extend "A" Paper Sizes To 3D? If So, What Are The Dimensions Of An A0 Block?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Monday 19 October 2026 at 00:24

If you cut a sheet of A4 paper in half you get two sheets of A5, which have half the area but maintain the same proportions of length to width.

Can we do the same in 3D? Yes we can!! Imagine a block with dimensions a , b and c , with a being the longest side.

If we "cut along the dotted line" and let b be the longest side of the new blocks so formed, we need the proportions to remain the same,so we can write

a colon b colon c equals b colon c colon a divided by two

or equation sequence part 1 a divided by b equals part 2 b divided by c equals part 3 c divided by a solidus two . Solving gives

a equals c times root of order three over three and b equals c times root of order three over three . For a proper "A" system we need A0 to have a volume of 1 m3, in the same way as an A0 sheet of paper has an area of 1 m2. So

a full stop b full stop c equals c times root of order three over three full stop c times root of order three over three full stop equation sequence part 1 c equals part 2 two times c cubed equals part 3 one m3 and c equals one divided by root of order three over three making the dimensions of the A0 block 1260 mm x 1000 mm x 794 mm.

This extends naturally to higher dimensions, even though we can't physically construct the higher-dimensional blocks we can describe them mathematically. In four dimensions, the A0 hyperbox would have dimensions in the ratio root of order four over four comma root of order four over four comma root of order four over four comma one and higher dimensions follow the same pattern.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Richard Walker

"Shiver MeTimbers! : The Pirate Oath 🏴‍☠️

Visible to anyone in the world

"The score!" he burst out. "Three goes o' rum! Why, shiver my timbers, if I hadn't forgotten my score!"

Robert Louis Stevenson, Treasure Island, Ch. 8.

Wiktionary suggests this expression refers to a wooden ship being pounded by rough seas, so its 'timbers shake' and its sailors experience 'fear' and 'awe', so the sense is of shivering or trembling with fear, both ship and man.

But I don't think this explanation is correct. I think in this context shiver literally means split apart, the image is of the ship breaking up. One definition of shiver in the OED is 'To break or split into small fragments or splinters',  recorded from the 12th century.

It's sometimes suggested that it's a purely literary or comic phrase but Etymonline gives several examples of very similar phrases in which 'my timbers' get started, smited or split, and suggests the tantalising idea that sailors might have used timbers as slang for arms and legs, so it could have been a profanity, similar to blimey, 'blind me'.

And what is the etymology of shiver?  It's thought to come ultimately a Proto-Indo-European root *skei-, 'split', so it shares it origin with a fascinating medley of words, including

shin = a bit cut off

science = originally to separate things out, to know

nice = originally careless or ignorant, from Latin nescius, 'not knowing'

schism = a rift between factions

shit = waste got rid of

shingle = wooden rooftile

shed = cast off

ski = a piece of wood split off

To finish off here's a joke

'I' before 'E', except after 'C'. Disproved by Science.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 7048013