OU blog

Personal Blogs

Richard Walker

The Tavern and the Tabernacle

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 5 November 2025 at 22:02

"There is a tavern in the town, in the town
And there my dear love sits him down, sits him down
And drinks his wine 'mid laughter free,
And never, never thinks of me."

When I first visited Greece and went to a taverna I thought that name might be a borrowing from English. After all Greek has a word "bar". But in fact both languages have borrowed from Latin, Greek directly and English via French (and now again from Greek, so taverna is now an English word too). 

The Latin taverna seems to have been something like a shop/stall/shed/tent, with connotations of being moveable. A related word is tabernacle, used in the English translation of the Bible to mean a moveable sanctuary or temple, and deriving from the diminutive form tabernaculum, "tentlet" (the suffix is the same as in pendulum, "little hanging thing").

Other related words are architrave, where the -trave element is from an Italian words for beam and the unusual word contubernal, "living in the same tent". More surprisingly there may just be an ancient connect with tree, which may originally meant "beam" or "dwelling". You can see the semantic connection.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Who Will Win: A, B or C?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 1 November 2025 at 17:22

Imagine three fair spinners.

sketch%20%281%29.png

If we compare A and B there are 9 equally likely outcomes. The ones where A wins are highlighted.

2-1  2-6  2-8  4-1  4-6  4-8  9-1  9-6  9-8

A beats B 5/9 or about 56% of the time.

if we compare B with C there are 9 equally likely outcomes. The ones where B wins are highlighted.

1-3  1-5  1-7  6-3  6-5  6-7  8-3  8-5  8-7

B beats C 5/9 or about 56% of the the time.

So A beats B most of the time and B beats C most of the time. How will A fare against C? Intuitively we might reason A beats B and B beats C, so A will beat C most of the time too. But not so! C beats A the majority (56% again) of the time. Here's C versus A, C's wins highlighted.

3-2  3-4  3-9  5-2  5-4  5-9  7-2  7-4  7-9

This is a simplified version I made up of something called intransitive dice (Wikipedia), where three dice are numbered in such a way that A will beat B the majority of the time, B will beat C the majority of the time, but when A is pitted against C it is C that has the greater chance of winning. It's also possible to have a longer chain, of four or more dice.

Interesting

If we arrange the numbers 1 through 9 into a 3x3 square and note which numbers are on spinners A, B and C, we find we hey a "Latin square"; each letter appears in each row and each column,

sketch%20%282%29.png

Also note the three numbers on any spinner always sum to 15.

Just for fun I wrote and ran a Python simulation that spins the three spinners a million times and prints out the percentage of the time A beats B, that B beat C and that C beats A, and sure enough I got

A>B 55 %
B>C 56 %
C>A 56 %

Program below

import random

A = [2, 4, 9]
B = [1, 6, 8]
C = [3, 5, 7]

abeatsb = 0
bbeatsc = 0
cbeatsa = 0

trials = 1000000

for go in range(trials):
    a = random.choices(A,k=1)[0]
    b = random.choices(B,k=1)[0]
    c = random.choices(C,k=1)[0]
    if a > b:
        abeatsb = abeatsb + 1
    if b > c:
        bbeatsc = bbeatsc + 1
    if c > a:
        cbeatsa = cbeatsa + 1
    
print('A>B',round(abeatsb/10000),'%')
print('B>C',round(bbeatsc/10000),'%')
print('C>A',round(cbeatsa/10000),'%')

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

One Liner

Visible to anyone in the world

Good news! I’ve taught my dog to beg. It’s about time he helped pay the bills.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Tiaras and Diadems

Visible to anyone in the world

When I came to this crossword clue —

Small crown for one in farewell (5)

— I wondered where "tiara" comes from.

Everywhere I looked agreed it is from Latin tiara, which was in turn a borrowing from Greek, but it's not clear if we can trace it back further. The OED describes it as being "of unknown origin" and Wiktionary likewise, but Etymonline suggests the Greek word is "of Oriental origin". Geoffrey Munn, quoted in Wikipedia, suggested the word is from Persian and was applied to the crown worn by Persian kings. It was indeed, but I'm not sure we can infer from this that the word was Persian.

My doubt arise from the fact that Munn also mentions diadems as being wrapped around said tiaras.

This is also true, but diadem is pure Greek; it has a Greek meaning, something like 'around binding'. The OED explains its etymology in this way, and describes it as "the regal fillet of Persian kings" (which I rather like) and states that Alexander the Great adopted it in the course of his conquests. So the headgear was indeed Oriental but the name used for it by Greek writers was a Greek one.

So we have no real evidence for "tiara" being of Persian origin that I can see; the Greek may have borrowed it from somewhere else, or it might have been pre-Greek, or it might have Greek etymology now lost to us.

So my quest for the origin of "tiara"only took me so far and I think the OED's conclusion that the Greek word τιάρα is of unknown origin is sound.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Prince Rupert's Cube - Breaking News

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 25 October 2025 at 17:43

In 1685 the mathematician John Wallis recounted that Prince Rupert had a bet that it is possible to pass a cube through a hole in one of smaller side length. Wallis showed how this could be done and out ot curiosity I tracked dow the source in the Internet Archive. Here it is

sketch%20%281%29.png

I only know odd words of Latin, so I asked Copilot what this was (that's all I asked, I gave no clues apart from the image) and quite surprisingly it not only read the text and translated it but also identified what it was and meant.

Copilot

The image contains a Latin excerpt from John Wallis's work on Prince Rupert's Problem, a famous geometric puzzle. Here's a translation and explanation of the key parts:


📜 Latin Text (Translated)

Prince Rupert, while at the court of King Charles II of England, a man of great ingenuity and insight, claimed—and said he would demonstrate—that it is possible for one cube to pass through a hole in another cube of equal size. He was said to have actually done this. We will now show how this can be done.


🧩 Problem Statement

Problem:
Of two equal cubes, shape one in such a way that the other, intact, can pass through it.

Wallis' diagram shows the view from one corner of the cube looking towards the opposite corner and inside it a square with side length equals to that of the cube's faces, showing a cube of the same size could indeed pass through.

But this is not the best possible solution! A century later Peter Nieuwland found it is actually possible to pass a bigger cube through, which I posted about three or four years ago. His solution is known to be the best possible.

The problem remained a curiosity until  the 1960s, when it was found you can have a "Prince Rupert's Tetrahedron" and a "Prince Rupert's Octahedron", and then it was found the other two Platonic Solids also work, although physical models twould be very hard to make because the size differences are very small.

There was then speculation that all convex (roughly, no sticky-out bits. dimples or holes) polyhedra might be "Rupert". However the breaking news is that this conjecture isn't true!  A convex polyhedron has just been found that isn't Rupert. There is a really good article here

https://www.quantamagazine.org/first-shape-found-that-cant-pass-through-itself-20251024/

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

My Homage to E. Lear

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

 Own work

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Word Of The Day: Septentrionate

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Friday 24 October 2025 at 16:08

Septentrionate means "To point North", ultimately derived from Latin septentrio, "North". You have probably spotted the first element sept- is connected to the number seven. the second part, trio, is not to do with three, but apparently mean "plough ox". So what were these seven plough oxen? Well here they are:

sketch.png

A familiar constellation in the Norther sky, Ursa Major and often also called The Big Dipper/The Plough/Charles' Wain.

Latin also had Boreas, the North wind originally and I think borrowed from Greek (think Aurora Borealis). Modern Greek for North is still βορράς, voras, so it hasn't changed much, except that the letter beta has become a "b" sound to a "v" sound in Modern Greek.

I leaned that Septenrio was Latin for North from the excellent Words Unravelled podcast and YouTube channel, which also featured the surprising fact that Romance languages have names for North, South, East and West that are essentially the same as the English words, e.g French nordsudest, and ouest. This is as a result of borrowing, most likely from Old English into Old French and from there to the other languages, supplanting the names inherited from Latin.

It's not at all clear why this replacement happened. When I heard about it I assumed that the geographical closeness of France to England and of Spain, Portugal, Italy to France would have been a factor, but to my astonishment I found Romania shares the borrowing too, even though it's much further off. So it's a mystery.

And where did North come from anyway?  Well not everyone agrees with it, but the strongest theory is that the word and its cognates in other Germanic languages come from a root that meant "left" (or perhaps "down" or both). Why would North be left? Because most ancient societies, would probably have been East oriented (literally), rather than North because that is where the Sun rises, and when we look East, where is North then?

photo credit

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

One Liner

Visible to anyone in the world

I bought some vegetables and the packet said wash before eating, so I went upstairs and took a quick shower.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Solution to puzzle 21/10/2025

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 October 2025 at 23:36

This is the solution to the puzzle at https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=312323

sketch%20%281%29.png

Given ABC is a square of area 100 sq. units and M and N the midpoints of the sides on which they lie, to find the areas 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Solution

The small triangle (3) can be got from triangle (4) by a rotation of 90° followed by a scaling. The hypotenuse of triangle (4) is equal to the side length of the square, and that of triangle (3) is half the side length of the square, so the dimensions of (3) are half those of (4) and its area one-quarter the area of (4).

But (3) and (4) between them make up one-quarter of the square, which represents an area of 25 sq. units and given their areas are in the ratio 1:4 the area of (3) must be 5 sq. units and that of (4) 20 sq. units.

The combined areas of regions (2) and (3) is also one-quarter of the square, hence the area of region (2) must also be 20 sq. units.

Finally the areas of these three regions add up to (20 + 5 + 20) sq. units, which leaves 55 sq. units for region 1.

So finally we have

Region 1: 55 sq. units

Region 2: 20 sq. units

Region 3: 5  sq. units

Region 4: 20 sq. units

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Find The 4 Areas

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch%20%281%29.png

The square has an area of 100 sq. units and points M and N are the midpoints of the sides they lie on. Lines AM and BN cut the square into four regions numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4 as shown. Find the area of each of these regions.

Answers tomorrow.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Chord Crossing Conundrum

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 18 October 2025 at 22:53

I saw this on a YouTube channel "Knights & Knaves" but this or similar questions seem to have been asked elsewhere too.

In a circle, if we draw 10 random chords, what is the expected number of times two of the chords will intersect? 

(What we mean by a random chord needs defining but for the purposes of this question we take it to be that each chord joins two points on the circumference with a uniform probability distribution, so the probability of the point chosen lying in a given arc is the length of that arc as a proportion of the circumference.)

One solution begins with the case of two chords and reasons along these lines. Suppose we choose four random points and consider the point A. If we join it randomly to one of the other points there are three cases, as shown below, and they are all equally likely, with probability 1/3.

sketch.png

Cases 1 and 3 have no intersections, Case 2 has 1. So the expected number of intersections is 

(1/3)x0 + (1/3)x1 + (1/3)x0 = 0 + 1/3 + 0 = 1/3

This seems to be the generally accepted argument, but I felt it was rather glib, so I got Copilot to write a simulation in Python. You can find the program at the end of this post. I added a bit of code at the end to run it multiple times and after 10,000,000 trials the overall proportion of times it found an intersection was 33.34%, so that seems to support the expectation being 1/3.

The argument continues as follows. We know the expectation for one pair of chords is 1/3 and if there are 10 chords there will be "10 choose 2" which is 10x(10-1)/2 = 45. There is a beautiful fact, called Linearity of Expectation, which tells us if the know the individual expectations of a set of random variables we can find their combined expectation just by adding all the individual expectations together, and this is valid even if the random variables are not independant of one another.

So in the present case we just add 45 lots of 1/3, one for each pair of chords, and find the expected number of intersections is 15. In the general case of n chords we have "n choose 2" pairs, and the expected number of intersections is nx(n-1)/2 lots of 1/3, or nx(n-1)/6.

I think this is the standard line of argument and there is no need to consider how many pairs there are. Here is a simpler approach that occurred to me.

Suppose we have two chords c1 and c2 and we add a third, c3. The expectation that c1 intersects c2 is 1/3 and the expectations that c3 intellects c1 and c2 are 1/3 and 1/3 respectively. By the Linearity of Expectation we can just add all these, so we get 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1.

Now if we add a fourth chord c4, the expectation of it intersecting c1, c2 and c3 respectively will all be 1/3 so now the total expectation is 1 + 3x(1/3) = 2. When add a fifth chord the expectation will be 2 + 4x(1/3) = 10/3, and so on. After we have added the n-th chord the total expectation will be

(1 + 2 + 3 +... + (n-1)) x (1/3) = ((n-1)xn/2) x (1/3) = nx(n-1)/6

and voilà, we have the same answer as before!

Here is the Python program generated by Copilot

import math
import random

def generate_random_point_on_circle():
    angle = random.uniform(0, 2 * math.pi)
    return (math.cos(angle), math.sin(angle))

def ccw(A, B, C):
    """Check if three points are listed in a counter-clockwise order."""
    return (C[1] - A[1]) * (B[0] - A[0]) > (B[1] - A[1]) * (C[0] - A[0])

def segments_intersect(A, B, C, D):
    """Return True if line segments AB and CD intersect."""
    return ccw(A, C, D) != ccw(B, C, D) and ccw(A, B, C) != ccw(A, B, D)

def random_chords_intersect():
    # Generate two chords
    A = generate_random_point_on_circle()
    B = generate_random_point_on_circle()
    C = generate_random_point_on_circle()
    D = generate_random_point_on_circle()
    
    # Check if they intersect
    return segments_intersect(A, B, C, D)

count = 0
trials = 10000000
for trial in range(trials):
    if random_chords_intersect():
        count = count + 1
print((count/trials)*100)
Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The Merriam-Webster Time Machine

Visible to anyone in the world

Thanks to those excellent people at Merriam-Webster you can now travel back in time to see what words and expressions are first attested from any particular year. It's interesting to see what words have become common, which are around but not common, and which have faded from view.

Here are some from 80 years ago, first some that are fairly familiar today (I couldn't find an example for all 26 letters) and don't all seem as old as they are, then some that are now obscure (to me anyway).

  1. anti-fungal, blip, commoner, d'oh, end user, firestorm, guided missile, hassle, information theory, macroeconomics, name-dropping, off-limits, press-secretary, rollover, snorkel, turbocharged, up-front, work ethic
  2. acrocentric, bacitracin, daidzein, extraliterary, infraorderer, microbus, nol-pros, ripstop, scungilli, vizsla, x-height

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Pet Shop Joke

Visible to anyone in the world

A customer walks into a pet shop and asks to buy a giraffe. "Hey, that's a tall order", says the shopkeeper.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Some Neat Geometry For You

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Thursday 9 October 2025 at 00:55

sketch%20%281%29.png

In the diagram above circle c is the unique circle passing through the vertices of triangle ABC (its circumcircle) and the line through O and E bisects the side AB at right angles (the perpendicular bisector of AB). The perpendicular bisector intersect the circumcircle at point E.

1) What is special about the line ED?

Every point on the perpendicular bisector is necessarily equidistant from A and B, so AE is equal to EB. Equal chords on the same circle make (subtend) equal angles on the circumference of that circle, and so ∠ ADE and ∠ EDB are equal, as shown. We see that ED is the angle bisector of ∠ ADB. I presented thois rather neat result in an earlier post.

2) As noted E is equidistant from A and B and we can therefore draw a circle d, centred at E, that passes through A and B, as seen in the diagram above. What is the significance of the point G at which the angle bisector ED cuts this circle and what is the line AG that also passes through G?

In the figure  below we have shown an addition line segment EB (dotted).

sketch%20%282%29.png

A classic theorem well known to Euclid tells us that in a given circle any two angles subtended by the same chord are equal. In circle c, ∠ BED and ∠ BAD are both subtended by chord BD, so they are equal, as shown.

Next we consider the angles in circle d. In the diagram below we have shown the segment BE (dotted), which is a chord of circle d. 

sketch%20%286%29.png

A second classic theorem, also familiar to Euclid, stated that the angle a chord subtends at the centre of a circle is twice the angle it subtends at any point on the circumference of that circle. In circle d chord BG subtends ∠ BEG at the centre and ∠ BAG at the circumference. Hence∠ BEG = 2 ∠ BAG, or ∠ BAG = ½ ∠ BEG = ½ ∠ BAG because we already know ∠ BEG, which is the same as ∠ BED, is equal to ∠ BAD. 

Thus we see that GA bisects ∠ BAD and is a second angle bisect, and G the point at which the two angle bisectors meet. But it is well known that all three angle bisectors meet at a single, point called the incentre, which is the centre of the unique incircle, the circle inside the triangle that is tangent to all three of its sides.

Conclusion

In a triangle the perpendicular bisector of a side and the angle bisector  of the angle opposite that side meed at a point on the triangles circumcircle which is the centre of a circle passing through the vertices of that side and also through the incentre of the triangle.

All this is building up to a very beautiful theorem proved  by Euler, which connects the radii of the circumcircle and the incircle with the distance between their centres. That's for another post.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Autumn Cyclamens at Angelsey Abbey

Visible to anyone in the world

30 September, 2025

Anglesey has what may be the finest display of cyclamens in the country, rivalled only by the RHS gardens at Wisley.

sketch%20%287%29.pngThe name cyclamen goes back to Greek kyklos, "circle", and we have related words like circus and cycle etc. These words may even be related to ring, the common PIE root being something like *sker-, "turn", with kyklos being a reduplicated form skersker. "ring" is from the same PIE root, so I suppose "circus ring" could be consider a triplication.

But what has this to do with cyclamens? Well the plant grows from a round tuber and the plant is named for that, the theory goes. This seems a bit tenuous to me; many plants have round tubers or bulb or corms, so why are cyclamens special? 

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Word Of The Day — Absquatulate

Visible to anyone in the world

To clear off or do a bunk. You can also absquatulate something, meaning to send it away.

The OED suggests it comes from ab (as in abscond) + squat + ulate (as in congratulate), as the OED puts it, "in imitation of a word of Latin origin".

It has the air of a humorous coinage, along similar lines to discombobulate, "disconcert", first attested from the same era (first half of 19c). The OED suggest discombobulate may be humorously based on words like disconcert, and there is an interesting parallel with absquatulate, whose initial syllable abs- reminds us of abscond, in the same way that the dis- at the start of discombobulate makes us think of disconcert and discomfort and similar words.

How common is absquatulate? About 1 in 100,000,000 words so pretty rate and getting rarer, but hopefully this post will help preserve it from extinction.

Here are a couple of quotations from the OED. The first seems jocular.

  • 1830
    Cracker Dictionary... Obsquatulate, to mosey, or to abscond.
    Georgia Messenger 15 May

The second has a sardonic ring to it.

  • 1990
    Some overthrown..dictator who had absquatulated to the USA with his starving nation's treasury.
    K. VonnegutHocus Pocus xxxvii. 262

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Two Tangled Triangles

Visible to anyone in the world

I saw this on "Andymath" but I haven't looked at the solution there. The problem is to find the marked angle.

sketch%20%281%29.png

We have two equilateral triangles, not necessarily of equal size, arranged as shown in the diagram, but no information about the orientation of the upper triangle or its relative size.

One reason geometry problems are so interesting is that often the solution requires some divergent thinking, "out of the box" as the saying goes. This can often involve adding auxiliary elements such as extra lines or circles to the given diagram, and seeing what to add can require considerable creativity.

But experience plays a role too, and one rule of thumb is that it is usually worth drawing in any standout perpendiculars and seeing if they do anything for us. So let's add line CD.

sketch%20%282%29.png

Now we notice that angles CGD and CBD are both interior angles of equilateral triangles, so they are equal. They both stand on CD and the converse of the angles in the same segment theorem tells us CD must be a chord of a circle passing through BG and B. Let's add that circle.

sketch%20%283%29.png

But now we see DB is a chord in that circle with angles DCB and DGB being angles in the same segment and therefore equal. DCB is obviously 30 degrees and so the angle DGB that we want is 30 degrees also. Solved!

A different approach is to say that we were not told the orientation of the upper triangle relative to the lower one and yet expected to solve the puzzle. So we conclude the orientation does not affect the answer and we can choose it to be anything we like. Very well, let's position the upper triangle directly above the lower, like this. 

sketch%20%286%29.png

Now it's self-evident the angle sought is 30 degrees and from the argument just given we see it must have this value irrespective of the orientation of the upper triangle. Another example where the absence of what seems a crucial piece of information turns out to be the key that unlocks the puzzle!

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The Insane Etymology Of "Hearse" - With Pictures

Visible to anyone in the world
A 2,000-year long story

1) Oscan hirpuswolf. Oscan was a now-extinct language spoken in Southern Italy at least until the 1st century CE. Quite a few Oscan graffiti have been found in Pompeii.

A composite image featuring six distinct elements: 1) a snarling wolf with bared teeth and intense eyes in a forest setting, 2) a rustic wooden rake lying on grass, 3) a harrow being pulled by a grey donkey across a field, 4) a medieval wheeled candelabra made of wrought iron with lit candles, 5) a hand-drawn hearse with wooden wheels and a simple canopy, and 6) a Victorian horse-drawn hearse with ornate black horses wearing black plumes on their heads, set against a cobblestone street.

2) Borrowed into Latin as hirpex, "rake", the semantic link evidently being teeth.

sketch%20%283%29.png

3) The meaning was extended to mean a harrow and came into Medieval Latin as hercia, Old French as herce and then into Middle English as hierche or herse.

Create an image of a harrow being pulled by a donkey across a field

4) Now the meaning was further extended to describe a triangular candelabra placed over a coffin.

sketch%20%288%29.png

Henry VIII had three herses, the largest being about 10 m high.

5) Finally we get to modern use of the word hearse, which has come to mean a wheeled conveyance for a coffin.

sketch%20%289%29.png

The bulk of the information I have used is from Wiktionary, which suggests that Oscan hirpus is from a PIE root *ghers-, "bristly" and related to Latin hirsutus and Modern English hirsute, "hairy". Herse can also mean a portcullis or gate. 

Hearse is probably also related to rehearse, deriving from Old French rehercier, "re-harrow", "rake over again".

Pictures generated by Copilot, 27 September, 2025.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

Optical Illusion

Visible to anyone in the world

Here are two views of a puzzle object I bought on Amazon.

sketch%20%282%29.png

How can this be? I promise you there is only one object and the viewpoint is all that has changed.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Helen Drake, Saturday 27 September 2025 at 11:37)
Share post
Richard Walker

The Puzzling Object Revealed

Visible to anyone in the world

See question here

The object I had in mind is approximated by this bit of an old toothpaste tube. You can see that  viewed at different angles it looks (roughly speaking) like a rectangle, a triangle, and a circle respectively. They are a bit sketch but hopefully you get the idea.

sketch.png

This is only proof-of-concept of course, but you should be able to convince yourself that with modelling clay or a 3D printer we could make a solid object that was indeed a rectangle from one angle, an equilateral triangle from the second and a circle from the third. And we could describe it mathematically and find its volume and surface area.

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Maths Experiment To Try At Home

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Tuesday 23 September 2025 at 14:23

According to Wolfram MathWorld "Any triangle can be positioned such that its shadow under an orthogonal projection is equilateral. "

You can try this for yourself.

I cut a triangle out of printer paper and taped it to a cocktail stick. Then we put a sheet of paper under the kitchen light and a friend experimented with positioning the triangle until we got a shadow that was a pretty fair equilateral triangle. Here's the photo.

sketch%20%283%29.png

A is the paper triangle (the shadow behind is my friend's hand) and B is the triangle's shadow, which you can see is more or less equilateral. It took two or three minutes of trial and error to get the position right but we were pleased with the eventual result!

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

A Puzzling Object

Visible to anyone in the world

What 3-dimensional object looks like

  • a rectangle from the front,
  • a triangle from the side, and
  • a circle from the top?

If you can visualise this object

  • Could you find something approximately like it in your home?
Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

The Nine Mewses

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 20 September 2025 at 22:35

sketch.png

In Greek mythology the Muses* were the daughters of Zeus and Mnemosyne, whose name is connect with mnēmē "memory", which gives us mnemonic. This probably, although not all authorities agree, comes from a PIE root  *men-, which is to do with thinking and mental (!) capacity in general, and is connected with many words, some quite surprising, for example Ahura Mazda, comment, mandarin, mantra, monster and mosaic — and of course Muse.

*The Muses

Wikipedia gives the following list of Muses and the art or science associated with each, although as you would different authors, classical and later, did not always agree with this list and even with how many the Muses were.

Calliope (epic poetry)
Clio (history)
Polyhymnia (hymn and mime)
Euterpe (flute)
Terpsichore (chorus and dance)
Erato (lyric choral poetry)
Melpomene (tragedy)
Thalia (light verse and comedy)
Urania (astronomy and astrology)

Acknowledgement

Copilot generated the image 20 Sep 2025

Permalink
Share post
Richard Walker

3, 4, – , 6 🤔 What, No Pentagon?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 20 September 2025 at 13:50

A cross-section through a cube can be an equilateral triangle, a square, and a regular hexagon, as seen in my drawing below.

sketch.png

It can also be a number of less regular shapes. But is it possible for it to be a regular pentagon?

Solution in comments.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Saturday 20 September 2025 at 13:46)
Share post
Richard Walker

Portuguese Man o' War

Visible to anyone in the world

A friend in Devon sent this photo yesterday.

sketch%20%281%29.png

After some Googling I found it is a Portuguese Man o' War and quickly messaged my friend warning her to give it a wide berth, because the tentacles you can se in the photo are highly venomous. and in fact the Portuguese Man o' War is seriously dangerous.

It has been quite windy and stormy there and the animal must unfortunately have been blown off course in the Atlantic and become stranded on the beach.

Actually, from my reading, I found it is not an animal but a siphonophore, a whole colony of animals referred to as zooids, each multicellular, and all genetically identical, but having specialised into different roles. One (or maybe some, I am not sure) forms a gas-filled bladder which acts as float for the whole colony. Other zooids form the venous tentacle which incapacitate other animals and presumably draw them back to the colony. A third type of zooid there digest them, and presumably share the nutrients, I don't know how.

Finally a fourth zooid is responsible for sexual reproduction.

In life the colony might have look a bit like my sketch.

sketch%20%282%29.png

There are many other surprising facts about this strange life-form. One I particularly like is the small fish that has evolved immunity to the venom and now lives with impunity amongst the tentacles feeding on any left-overs.

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 3352412