OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

Why Hebrew? On Cancer and Memory

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 12 September 2026 at 12:36

sketch.png

Why Hebrew: On Cancer and Memory

 

With winter coming in, and cancer having done rather more to my memory than I would have liked, I decided to do something completely different with my brain.

I had read those unfamiliar mental exercises—even something as simple as writing your name backwards—can be good for the brain. So I decided to go the whole hog and learn Biblical Hebrew.

Why Hebrew? I was hoping you would ask.

For a start, it is certainly different. You read from right to left, the alphabet is unfamiliar, and at first a page of Hebrew looks as though it might require archaeological equipment. More importantly, though, I love the Bible. The Old Testament was written predominantly in Hebrew, and I wanted to get a little closer to the language behind the English translations I have read for years.

One of the delights of Biblical Hebrew is the way it can make you see and feel an idea rather than simply define it.

The Hebrew word שָׂפָה (safah) literally means “lip,” but it can also mean an edge, border or shore. So, the expression שְׂפַת הַיָּם (sefat hayyam) is literally “the lip of the sea”, where English would naturally say “the seashore” or “the edge of the sea.”

You can see the image: the land forms a lip around the water. It’s wonderfully physical.

For example, Genesis 22:17 describes Abraham’s descendants as being as numerous as “the sand which is upon the seashore.” The Hebrew is literally the sand that is “upon the lip of the sea.”

Biblical Hebrew can be wonderfully concrete. Where English speaks of the ‘seashore’, Hebrew can speak of the lip of the sea. The ordinary word for a human lip, safah, can also describe an edge or boundary. Suddenly the coastline becomes almost bodily: the place where land and water meet is the sea’s lip.”

There’s another intriguing twist: the same Hebrew word safah can also mean “language” or “speech”—presumably through the association with the lips that produce speech. That is why Genesis 11:1, just before the Tower of Babel story, can say that the whole earth had “one safah”—one language, but quite literally, “one lip.”

Take the famous opening of Psalm 23:

יְהוָה רֹעִי לֹא אֶחְסָר

YHWH ro‘i, lo ’eḥsar.

“The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not lack.”

There is no separate Hebrew word for “is” in that first phrase. The two realities are simply placed together: The LORD—my shepherd. It has a wonderful, almost carved-in-stone directness.

Hebrew is rich in concrete imagery. The word ruaḥ (רוּחַ), for example, can mean wind, breath or spirit. These meanings inhabit the same imaginative world: something invisible that cannot be grasped, yet whose presence is known by what it does. It moves, breathes and gives life.

Then there is shalom (שָׁלוֹם). We translate it as “peace,” but it can suggest something fuller: well-being, completeness, wholeness, things being as they ought to be. So when the ancient priestly blessing asks God to give someone shalom, it means rather more than wishing them a quiet life. It is a blessing of flourishing and wholeness.

Another beautiful word is ḥesed (חֶסֶד), variously translated as “steadfast love,” “mercy,” “lovingkindness” or “faithful love.” No single English word quite carries its range. It speaks of a committed, loyal goodness: love that does something.

This is where learning even a little Hebrew becomes fascinating. You don't suddenly discover that English Bibles have been getting everything wrong. Quite the opposite. You begin to appreciate what translators have been trying to carry across—and how difficult their task is.

Hebrew is a real language, not a secret biblical code, and context always determines what a word means. Yet some of its richness inevitably gets thinned out in translation. The face can signify presence and favour; the heart can think and choose; walking can describe how a person lives; breath can speak of spirit; and peace can mean the restoration of wholeness.

Perhaps that is what I am beginning to enjoy most. I am not discovering a different Bible hidden behind the English one. I am beginning to glimpse something of the texture of the original.

Sometimes you can see exactly what the translators managed to carry across. And occasionally you spot something beautiful that fell out of the boat on the journey.

So this winter, while the weather closes in, I shall be sitting with my unfamiliar alphabet, trying to persuade my brain to remember which way the words go.

Cancer has taken a few liberties with my memory. Hebrew, I have decided, can have a go at putting it through its paces.

And if nothing else, I have finally found a language in which starting at the right-hand side of the page is not a mistake.

 

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Home, Stars, Milkmaids and Bedouin Shepherd Boys

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 7 September 2026 at 13:37

 

sketch%20%281%29.png

The  "Huts", Bogany Farm, circa 1960s AI enhanced

Home, Stars, Milkmaids and Bedouin Shepherd Boys 

Some songs seem to accompany us through life without ever asking to be noticed. We hear them when we are young, carry them somewhere beyond conscious memory, and then, years later, they return. When they do, they bring more than melody. They carry people, places, rooms, weather, and versions of ourselves we had almost forgotten.

Clifford T. Ward’s Home Thoughts from Abroad has always been such a song for me. There is something wonderfully restrained about it. It never reaches for grandeur, yet somehow finds it. Ward, an English schoolteacher before music brought him wider recognition, had a quality that made his songs feel less like performances and more like confidences. When I first heard him, I was young, and although I could not have articulated it then, I sensed that he was not singing at me. He was sharing something, and somewhere between his experience and mine we met.

The title reaches further back, of course, to Robert Browning and his poem Home-Thoughts, from Abroad. Browning writes of England from elsewhere, noticing the things absence has made precious: blossom, birdsong and the coming of spring. It is an old human experience. Distance alters our vision. We begin to see the ordinary things we once overlooked, and a place that scarcely announced itself while we inhabited it can acquire an extraordinary power once we have left.

Maybe that is because home is not merely geography. It is emotional ground. It is the place, or sometimes only the memory of a place, where something within us once settled and said, without words, I belong here.

I found myself thinking about this one Saturday evening while sharing a meal with friends. Among us was a friend from Mongolia, and as she spoke about home, I sensed that she meant something larger than the country marked on a map. It led me afterwards to the Mongolian expression нутгаа санах (nutgaa sanakh), commonly translated as homesickness or longing for one’s homeland. Yet “homesickness” seems too slight a word for what I heard in her conversation. This was closer to a tether: an attachment to homeland that survives distance because the landscape itself has somehow become part of the person.

I found myself envying that certainty. Not Mongolia itself, but the knowledge of where one belongs.

I have never really possessed it. There are places I love deeply. My heart is drawn to the Hebrides and to Norway, and to another place I shall come to, but I did not grow up in any of them. The landscape of my childhood was the heartland of the Clydeside shipbuilding industry, a world shaped more by labour than romance. It was soot, tenements, industry and function. Beauty existed, but you had to know where to look for it.

For me, one of the places where it revealed itself was across the water.

We had a cabin on the Isle of Bute, between Rothesay Golf Course and Bogany Farm, and when the summer holidays arrived, I would spend the full six weeks there. The distance from Clydeside was not enormous, yet to a child it might as well have been another country. Loch Ascog lay on one side, quiet and watchful, while the Firth of Clyde opened towards a horizon that seemed impossibly wide.

Then there were the stars.

City darkness is never truly dark, but on Bute the night seemed to reveal what the city had been hiding. The stars did not merely appear; they cascaded.

My days were spent fishing and wandering with the extravagant aimlessness available to children before we discover schedules. Friendships formed quickly because summer demanded it. We knew, without dwelling on it, that most of us would disappear from one another when the season ended, so we belonged intensely for the little time we had.

The cabin had neither running water nor electricity. One of my daily jobs was to take containers to the communal well. Cows would wander towards me with that peculiar combination of suspicion and curiosity that cows seem to have perfected. The smaller ones sometimes ventured closer, studying me as though I were the unusual animal in the field.

When evening came, we lit paraffin lamps. I can still remember their soft, sibilant sound and the warm, imperfect light they cast across the cabin. My father would read aloud to us: Heidi, Tales from 1001 Nights, Chinese folk stories. We ate pancakes with jam and were given small glasses of stout, which seemed to me less like a drink than participation in some ancient ceremony of adulthood.

As the kerosene burned down, the light softened and the cabin became quieter. Sleep did not arrive abruptly. It gathered around us.

I would lie in bed and look through the window at the stars. The stories my father had read were still alive in my imagination, and I wondered whether somewhere far away a Chinese farmer boy, a Bedouin shepherd or a milkmaid among the Swiss mountains might be looking upwards at the same sky.

I did not have theological language for such thoughts. I was simply a boy staring into the immensity of things. Yet I remember a sense of presence, a feeling that the world was greater, deeper and more mysterious than the visible things immediately around me. Looking back, I think those were among my earliest intimations of God. Nothing was spoken. Nothing needed to be. The stillness itself seemed full.

Then came the part every summer had been quietly moving towards: leaving.

There were bags to pack, the ferry to catch and school waiting on Monday. The wide skies disappeared and the tenements of Clydeside closed around us again. I remember a heaviness that I could not explain. It was not ordinary disappointment at the end of a holiday. It felt more like grief, as though I had left something of myself on the island.

Only by leaving did I begin to understand that the cabins near Bogany Farm had become home.

Not home in the conventional sense. We did not own the landscape and our lives there were temporary. Yet something about those summers felt complete. We needed very little. A paraffin lamp, a fishing rod, a campfire, pancakes, stories, friends and six weeks that seemed capable of lasting forever.

Many years later I encountered a word coined by John Koenig in The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows: kenopsia, the eerie atmosphere of a place that was once bustling with life but is now abandoned and quiet.

I knew the feeling immediately.

When I return to Bute and walk the stretch between Bogany Farm and Canada Hill, the world I remember has largely disappeared. Once there were fifty or sixty cabins scattered across the land. Now there is overgrowth. Nettles have reclaimed paths once made by human feet, and the outlines of our little summer civilisation are difficult to find beneath everything that has grown in its place.

The cows still look at me, though now they seem to have a stronger claim on the land than I do. In fairness, they are probably right. I am the visitor now. The landscape continued living while I was away.

Yet I can still populate that empty field.

I can smell barbecue smoke and burnt toast carried on the sea air. I can hear songs around campfires and children calling to one another through the dusk. I can see adults sitting outside their cabins, leaning into the last of the evening sunlight as though unconsciously storing it against the darker months ahead.

Memory cannot be trusted as a perfect historian. It edits, rearranges and softens. It illuminates one corner while leaving another in shadow. The people I remember may not have been quite as carefree as memory makes them, nor every summer day as golden. Childhood was no more immune to disappointment then than it is now.

But memory's failure to reproduce the past exactly does not make it false. Memory tells another kind of truth. It tells us what mattered.

Something about those summers made people seem more open to one another. Time moved differently. Nobody appeared to be measuring every hour for its productivity. There was space to wander, to talk, to sit beside a fire, to watch the sea or to do nothing of consequence at all. For a few weeks each year, ordinary people seemed permitted to inhabit their lives rather than constantly hurry through them.

The cabins are gone now, and most of the voices I associate with them have long since fallen silent. Still, when I walk through that landscape, absence does not feel entirely empty. Places absorb our stories. A path remembers us in its own way, even when grass eventually covers it. A field once filled with laughter cannot literally retain the sound, yet we retain it on the field's behalf.

This is one of the strange gifts of landscape. We imagine ourselves passing through places, but places also pass through us. They become part of our interior geography, and years later a smell, a quality of evening light, a bird call or an old song can suddenly open the door.

Time is cruel in that it takes away the world we knew, but it is generous in another sense. Only after something has gone do we sometimes understand what we were given.

That has changed the way I think about home.

I once imagined home should be the place from which you came, a homeland capable of producing the deep certainty I heard in my Mongolian friend's voice. I do not think that way now. Some people inherit a profound sense of homeland, while others discover home in fragments. It may be scattered across landscapes and years, held in people, rituals, sounds and moments of inexplicable peace.

For me, part of it will always lie on Bute: in the walk to the well, in the suspicious cows, in my father's voice reading by paraffin light, in pancakes and jam, in campfire smoke and in a little boy staring through a cabin window wondering whether children on the other side of the world were looking at the same stars.

I could return to the exact coordinates, but I could never return to that place. Not really. The place I long for exists at the meeting point of landscape and memory, and time has closed the road back to it.

Yet I no longer think that makes it less real.

Home may not always be somewhere we can remain. Sometimes we recognise it only after leaving. Sometimes it survives as a collection of moments in which, for reasons we barely understood at the time, life felt whole.

And sometimes it returns as an old song, heard in youth, carrying us across the years to somewhere we thought we had lost.

One final, rather lovely footnote: five years ago, I met a woman who had been taught English by Clifford T. Ward. Somehow that small connection pleased me enormously. A man whose song had accompanied my memories of home had once stood in an ordinary classroom, teaching English to someone I would eventually meet.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Stavanger in a Time of Innocence: Thoughts on the Eclipse

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 13 August 2026 at 07:50

sketch.png

Stavanger in a Time of Innocence:

Thoughts on the Eclipse

I watched the eclipse over Stavanger last night. Wow.

My wife and I went down to Troon beach, hoping to witness it ourselves, but heavy cloud robbed us of the view. Yet perhaps because I could not see it with my own eyes, watching that celestial wonder unfold over Norway stirred something even deeper in me.

I became intensely nostalgic. What a beautiful gift you were given. I wished I could have been there. The last eclipse was August, 1999 and I knew exactly where I was.

It seems half a lifetime ago now, and yet Stavanger in Norway still holds some part of me in its strong arms. Watching the eclipse, the years seemed suddenly to collapse, and I found myself returning to another evening, another sky in a cabin in Randaberg in Norway.

An evening opened before me like a colourful book. I stood watching the water breathe its slow, silver rhythm, staring across the distance towards home. Enigma’s Return to Innocence moved through the air—a song that felt, in that moment, like memory singing to itself.

And joy settled beside me, gentle as a hand upon the shoulder.

Then came the vision I have never quite forgotten: a great golden sphere, heavy with light, drifting across the vastness, as though the earth itself had released some ancient secret into the heavens.

Perhaps that is what such moments give us. Not merely beauty, but a sudden awareness of our own existence within something immeasurably larger. For a few fleeting minutes, past and present touch. The person we were stands beside the person we have become. Distance disappears. Time loosens its grip.

And we realise that the places we have loved never entirely release us.

Last night, beneath the shadow of the moon, Norway reached across half a lifetime and held me again. But still, we are all children under the same stars with hopes of eternity and many other celestial wonders. John 3:16.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 2674242