OU blog

Personal Blogs

The First Art and Storytelling as Philosophy

Visible to anyone in the world

Art is older than writing, older than farming, older even than settled life. It is the most ancient form of human communication beyond speech - a means of transforming the fleeting moment into enduring form. When the first humans painted animals onto cave walls, carved lines into ochre, or shaped fertility figures from ivory, they were not merely expressing themselves - they were articulating their world, questioning it, revering it, and giving it shape. Long before the emergence of formal philosophy, art was already serving its function: to reflect on existence, to challenge perception, and to communicate abstract truths. In this way, the earliest art and storytelling must be understood not only as aesthetic or ritual but as deeply philosophical - a living testament to the dawn of human metaphysical thought.

The evidence for early artistic expression dates back at least 100,000 years. Ochre-processing kits discovered at Blombos Cave in South Africa (~100,000 BP) suggest the deliberate preparation of pigments for symbolic or decorative use (Henshilwood et al., 2011). By 75,000 BP, engraved ochre pieces from the same site show patterns that were likely communicative or mnemonic. These engravings are not utilitarian - they serve no functional purpose in hunting or tool-making. Instead, they suggest that early humans were already capable of abstract visual representation - a hallmark of symbolic consciousness and possibly of metaphysical rumination.

As the Upper Palaeolithic period unfolded (~50,000–10,000 BP), the archaeological record becomes increasingly rich with visual and performative art. The Chauvet Cave in France, dating to approximately 36,000 years ago, houses some of the most exquisite and well-preserved prehistoric paintings known to archaeology. Lions, mammoths, rhinoceroses, and horses are depicted in motion, often layered to suggest temporal progression. The sophistication of shading, use of perspective, and positioning within the cave’s architecture indicate not mere depiction, but intention - a planned engagement with space, perception, and perhaps even audience.

What these painted animals represent has long been debated. Some scholars, such as David Lewis-Williams (2002), interpret them through the lens of shamanism - as visions experienced during altered states of consciousness, induced by sensory deprivation or ritual trance. Others argue that the paintings served as totemic or instructional devices - a form of hunting magic or social storytelling. Whatever their function, their form reveals philosophical thought in its embryonic state: the contemplation of being, movement, spirit, and the sacred.

Sculpture, too, appears early. The Venus figurines - such as those from Willendorf, Hohle Fels, and Lespugue - date between 35,000 and 25,000 years ago and are characterised by exaggerated sexual features. These figures have been interpreted as fertility symbols, ancestral icons, or even expressions of body awareness and identity. The Lion Man of Hohlenstein-Stadel, dated to around 40,000 years ago, merges human and animal form, indicating not only imagination but metaphysical synthesis - the capacity to conceive of beings that exist outside empirical experience. This is no mere art object. It is ontological creativity: a reflection on what it means to be human, to be animal, to be something else entirely.

Alongside these visual forms, we find growing evidence of storytelling. Language, oral performance, and memory likely co-evolved with symbolic cognition. While no prehistoric story survives in its original spoken form, the structure of later oral traditions - from Aboriginal songlines to Homeric epic - points to ancient roots. These traditions preserved not only genealogies and survival strategies, but moral lessons, cosmologies, and existential reflections. The structure of myth, as identified by scholars such as Joseph Campbell (1949) and Claude Lévi-Strauss (1969), often revolves around fundamental binaries: life and death, chaos and order, nature and culture. These binaries are not arbitrary. They reflect the earliest human attempts to make sense of a world that was, and remains, unpredictable, fragile, and profound.

Storytelling, then, served as the first moral and philosophical system. Through narrative, early humans explored justice, betrayal, sacrifice, and transformation. Heroes descended into underworlds; animals spoke; ancestors returned in dreams. These were not hallucinations or superstitions - they were thought experiments. They were the first theories of mind, soul, and community. In a world without writing, storytelling encoded collective wisdom, taught empathy, and negotiated the boundaries between the real and the imagined.

Performance was likely inseparable from these stories. Music, rhythm, dance, and mimicry were not entertainment but embodiment - the lived philosophy of a people whose understanding of the world was deeply relational and sensory. Bone flutes from sites like Hohle Fels (~40,000 BP) are tuned instruments, capable of producing scales and melodies. Music, like myth, was a way of patterning emotion and time - a metaphysical technology that could stir memory, hope, or transcendence. Rhythmic repetition, chanted invocations, and group participation may have bound early communities together in shared meaning, much as liturgy does in later religious traditions.

The philosophical implications of early art and storytelling are profound. Here, in caves and on bones, we see the birth of concepts: beauty, death, eternity, kinship, mystery. These are not modern abstractions imposed on ancient evidence - they are latent within the very structure of the artefacts themselves. The capacity to symbolise is the capacity to reflect. To draw a bison is to imagine not just a bison, but the idea of one - its movement, spirit, role in the world. This is the beginning of metaphysics, of ontology, of aesthetics.

The first artists were not “primitive” by any measure that matters. They were not merely copying nature but interpreting it, transforming it, and embedding it with intention. Their work was both material and immaterial - pigment on stone, yes, but also memory in mind, myth in voice, spirit in gesture. Their art was philosophy in motion - not written in books, but in caves, rituals, and blood.

In this light, the story of early humanity is inseparable from the story of art. Before law, there was song. Before doctrine, there was dance. Before nation, there was myth. And before philosopher, there was artist - painting in darkness, imagining in silence, carving being out of absence.

To study the first art is to glimpse the first thought. And in that thought, we recognise ourselves.


Permalink Add your comment
Share post

Prehistoric Culture, Language & Spiritual Thought

Visible to anyone in the world

Long before cities rose or empires clashed, before writing carved memory into stone, there existed a world shaped not by walls or armies but by rhythm, symbol, and silence. Prehistoric humanity - anatomically modern yet temporally distant - was not primitive in mind, only in artefact. The absence of written records does not mark an absence of civilisation. On the contrary, the Palaeolithic world teemed with complexity: a network of evolving language, belief systems, symbolic rituals, and cultural memory passed not through parchment but through gesture, pigment, and song.

The archaeological record of early Homo sapiens - emerging fully anatomically around 300,000 years ago (Hublin et al., 2017) - points toward cultural behaviours far earlier than once assumed. The notion that culture "exploded" around 50,000 years ago in Europe (the so-called Upper Palaeolithic Revolution) has been challenged by a growing body of evidence from Africa and the Levant. Sites like Blombos Cave (South Africa) reveal ochre engravings and perforated shell beads dating to c. 75,000 BP, while at Pinnacle Point and Sibudu Cave, the use of pigment, bone tools, and plant bedding point toward complex cognition, symbolic behaviour, and environmental mastery tens of thousands of years before such artefacts appeared in Europe (Henshilwood et al., 2002; Wadley, 2010).

These early symbolic acts - painting, engraving, adornment - are not trivial. They reflect a decisive leap in abstract thought: the ability to represent concepts, encode memory, and create shared meaning beyond the immediate needs of survival. The use of red ochre, in particular, appears to transcend utility. Found in burials, used in rock art, and often associated with ritual, ochre may have symbolised life, blood, fertility, or transcendence - early indications of what would later become religious and spiritual expression.

Language, though archaeologically invisible, underpinned these developments. Most linguists agree that complex, fully syntactic language likely emerged in tandem with behavioural modernity, possibly well before 100,000 years ago (Fitch, 2010). The neurological and anatomical capacities for speech - including the descended larynx, increased brain lateralisation, and Broca’s area development - were likely present in Homo sapiens from our emergence, if not earlier (Lieberman, 2007). Even Neanderthals possessed a hyoid bone similar to ours and may have had limited speech capability (Arensburg et al., 1989). However, what distinguished modern humans was not the vocal tract alone but the symbolic sophistication with which language was used. Language became not only a tool for instruction, but for myth, poetry, command, remembrance, and reverence.

Spiritual thought - the search for meaning beyond the material - emerged as a natural extension of symbolic cognition. The earliest known intentional burials, such as those found at Qafzeh and Skhul Caves in Israel (~100,000 BP), contain grave goods and ochre, suggesting some notion of afterlife, ancestor reverence, or spiritual transition (Bar-Yosef & Vandermeersch, 1993). These burials were not accidental; they were curated, planned, and emotionally significant. The very act of burying the dead marks a conceptual shift: the recognition that death is not merely biological but existential.

Later sites across Europe and Asia reinforce this trend. The Shanidar Cave in Iraq revealed a Neanderthal burial surrounded by pollen from medicinal flowers, interpreted by some as evidence of ritualistic behaviour and care for the deceased (Solecki, 1975). Although this remains debated, it highlights the growing recognition that spiritual thought may not be exclusive to Homo sapiens. What is clear, however, is that our species embraced it as central to life.

By 40,000-30,000 years ago, the cultural record explodes with symbolism: the Chauvet Cave paintings (~36,000 BP), the Venus figurines of the Gravettian period, and musical instruments such as the Hohle Fels flute (Germany, ~40,000 BP) made from bird bone and mammoth ivory. These artefacts are not mere art for art’s sake. They reflect ritual, performance, social bonding, fertility cults, and cosmological narratives. The cave was not a canvas – it was a cathedral. The painted bison, horses, and shamanic figures speak of worlds layered atop the visible: ancestral spirits, totems, transformation. These were not secular spaces. They were sacred, echoing with the breath of early gods.

Spirituality, it seems, preceded theology. It did not require priests or temples, only the sense that there was more than what could be touched. Early religious thought likely revolved around animism - the belief that nature is infused with spirit - a view still present in many indigenous cultures today. The Palaeolithic hunter likely saw the animal not as prey alone, but as kin or emissary of spiritual realms. This reciprocity - between human and animal, earth and sky, life and death - formed the basis of early moral codes and cosmologies. Religion, in its earliest form, was experiential rather than doctrinal.

Oral tradition served as the primary vehicle for cultural memory. Through myth, early humans encoded collective knowledge - seasonal rhythms, ecological dangers, ancestral origin stories - into narratives that could be remembered and performed. These myths, passed down through generations, evolved into cultural identities, reinforcing group cohesion and survival strategies. Claude Lévi-Strauss (1969) described myth as “a logical model capable of overcoming a contradiction,” bridging the gap between the known and the unknowable. For prehistoric humans, myth was not fiction - it was the architecture of truth.

The spiritual and cultural practices of prehistoric humanity reveal a sophistication often denied by earlier scholars. The so-called “primitive” mind was no less capable of metaphor, memory, or wonder than our own. It is a modern conceit to imagine ourselves more advanced simply because we possess metal or code. What early humans lacked in cities they made up for in symbolism; what they lacked in alphabet, they carved in bone and pigment.

The prehistoric world was not pre-human. It was deeply human, rich with nuance, emotion, and expression. Culture, language, and spiritual thought are not appendages to our species. They are its definition. They arose not from luxury but from necessity - the need to bind people together, to survive through time, to face the abyss of mortality with meaning rather than despair.

Before temples, there were caves. Before theology, there was awe. Before history, there was the human spirit - already alive, already singing.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 588