OU blog

Personal Blogs

Learning technology at work

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Stefan Install, Sunday 22 May 2011 at 14:01

This week, we have been asked to look at the use of learning technologies in our own contexts; therefore, in my case, what is used at work.

Probably the most visible use of technology for learning at work is the webinar i.e. the use of audio/vidio conferencing tools like MS LiveMeeting, Adobe Connect etc which essentially work in a similar manner to the Elluminate tool used by the OU.  While the tools used are primarily used for online meetings, there are a number of training and education sessions run on a regular basis that usually involve some form of presentation by an expert and then a question and answer session from the participants.

Perceptions of these sorts of events vary; there are those who seize them as an opportunity they would not otherwise have (travelling to offices for face-to-face sessions is less likely to happen on a regular basis for cost and time reasons), some are grateful they can learn from their desk and then there are those who see them as the company being 'too cheap to train people properly.'  The fact is however that face-to-face training still takes place and that most of the webinars were sessions that would have run anyway for a handful of people but that are now being opened up to hundreds or even thousands of people simultaneously and for this reason alone I think the webinar is making learning more easily and widely available within the organisation than would otherwise be the case.  With so many distributed staff and home-workers, this is the only practicable way of providing training and education on a range of topics.

Teacher perceptions are likely to vary considerably depending on their levels of comfort with using web techologies and also with training people.  The technology could be seen as a barrier or a risk to those who are comfortable with face to face trainng; conversely it could be seen as a buffer or enabler to those uncomfortable with addressing large numbers directly or those for whom travelling and the demands of setting up a physical training session are undesirable.

The biggest potential benefit of these technologies that I can see however are not being fully exploited to my mind and that is the ability to embed learning in work and vice versa.  In my experience, not many people are using these online conferencing tools to manage their day-to-day or project work but are instead reserving it for mass communication.  However, with a large and widely distributed workforce, these tools-if used to more widely to actually do collaborative project work-would allow more people to participate, more experts to be involved (as travelling would not be an issue) and thereby better facilitate sharing of information and understanding.  I firmly believe that corporate learning should not replicate the paradigms of education but rather embed learning within work and use it to underpin actual performance.  We're getting there slowly but too many are wedded to the course and the certificate which are of dubious value in most working contexts.

Permalink 3 comments (latest comment by Angela Rizzo, Monday 27 June 2011 at 22:34)
Share post

Technology vs Culture

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Stefan Install, Tuesday 22 February 2011 at 21:47

The second instalment of this blog's look at the themes of H800 addresses some of the points looked at in week 2 namely that covered by looking at some cases studies of the implementation of distance learning in Nepal and Bhutan with a view to improving levels of higher education there and also the use of radio in Canada and South Africa to deliver distance learning.

Hypothesis

Effective distance education can be implemented even when the technology itself is limited (by today's western standards).

Learning technology can deliver great benefits but the learning culture is as big if not a greater factor and if that is ignored or not considered the endeavour will fail.

Discussion.

Radio, the example used in two case studies in week 2, has effectively delivered learning since the early 20th century but only when the infrastructure is far reaching (national and even international), learner equipment is affordable and efforts are co-ordinated and funded to provide a broad-ranged multi-channel strategy. Radio alone will not deliver broad education or performance benefits. These lessons are obviously applicaable to more modern learning technologies such as podcasts and virtual learning environments.

Nepal and Bhutan have cultures where the teacher is revered and so learner centred approaches meet with limited success and, as with other cultures with a similar outlook, excellent students can struggle when they are in a more self-determining environment be that a western university or an innovating commercial organisation.

Conclusions

If you are going to use distributed learning, ensure the technology works and is readily available to the learners. Ensure that you do not rely on one method of delivery; just as the primary teacher users talk, play and activity to teach so should the learning organisation use formal instruction, collaboration and reflection mediated through a number of channels.

In most circumstances, implementing new technology is a lot simpler than changing the learning culture but unless the two are at least aligned if not in harmony the net result will not be satisfactory.  Sometimes it pays to forget the technology and focus on the people and their preconceptions and needs.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Deirdre Robson, Wednesday 23 February 2011 at 20:49)
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 20118