OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

This Age of Exposure

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 18 September 2026 at 10:14

A person known for discretion can become a place of refuge

sketch.png

This Age of Exposure

It is easy to imagine that people who enjoy exposing others must simply be cruel. Sometimes that may be true. Some people use humiliation to gain attention, power, or a sense of superiority.

But often the people caught up in a culture of exposure are ordinary people. They have been drawn into a world where attention can feel like righteousness, and public outrage can feel like moral courage. They may be sincere, passionate, and convinced that they are standing up for what is right.

Yet something vital can disappear along the way: mercy.

Without mercy, justice can become a spectacle.

And there is a cost to living this way. People soon learn not to trust someone who turns the failures of others into public information. A person may gather thousands of followers and still have very few people who feel safe enough to come close.

One may gain followers and yet lose fellowship.

The Bible speaks powerfully into this tension.

“Love covers a multitude of sins,” writes Peter in 1 Peter 4:8.

Proverbs 17:9 carries a similar wisdom: “Whoever covers an offense seeks love, but he who repeats a matter separates close friends.”

This in my own case has caused me to be careful whom I share private thoughts with.

This does not mean pretending that wrongdoing never happened. The Bible is never careless about sin. But it makes an important distinction between confronting wrong in order to put things right and exposing someone simply to shame them.

Jesus gives a clear example in Matthew 18. If someone sins against you, the first step is not public exposure but private conversation. The aim is to win the person back. Restoration comes before publicity. Redemption, not humiliation, is the goal.

This pattern of covering runs deep through Scripture. Even in Eden, after Adam and Eve have sinned and become ashamed of their nakedness, God clothes them. He does not ignore what they have done. There are consequences. Yet even in judgment, their shame is covered.

This is not permission to hide evil. There are times when wrongdoing must be brought into the light, especially when others are in danger. Covering should never become a shelter for abuse or injustice.

But where love rules, exposure is never enjoyed for its own sake.

There is another cost to a culture of exposure: loneliness.

Relationships grow where people feel safe. If we fear that our failures, foolish words, or weakest moments may one day be broadcast to others, we learn to hide ourselves. We may remain friendly, but we stop being known.

Real friendship requires something more. It requires the confidence that our weaknesses will not be turned into weapons.

A person known for discretion can become a place of refuge. A person known for exposing others can become a place of danger.

That is why restraint has become such a beautiful quality in an age obsessed with revelation. The person who refuses to spread every rumour, repeat every failure, or join every public shaming may never attract much attention.

But they attract something better: trust.

They become the sort of person others can speak to without fear. They become the friend to whom someone can admit, “I got this badly wrong,” knowing that confession will be met with truth and mercy rather than revelation.

The struggle between exposure and covering is not only something happening in society. It reaches into the small choices of everyday life.

Someone tells us a rumour. Do we pass it on?

Someone fails badly. Do we make sure others know, or do we hope and pray for their restoration?

A crowd gathers around another person's shame. Do we add our voice, or do we refuse to join in?

The Islamic idea of satr—covering the faults of others—and the biblical principle of covering meet at an important human truth: another person's dignity should matter to us.

We should guard it as we hope someone would guard ours.

This does not ask us to call evil good, remain silent when someone is in danger, or protect those who continue to harm others. Mercy and truth belong together. But not everything that is true needs to be broadcast, and not every wrong needs an audience.

In an age that can turn shame into entertainment, restraint is a quiet form of courage.

So the deepest question may not be why some people expose others.

It may be what our own habits are making of us.

Every time we handle another person's weakness, we are becoming a certain kind of person. We can become people who collect failures and spread them, or people who know when truth requires speaking and when love requires silence.

A society built on exposure teaches people to hide.

A community shaped by wise covering gives them room to be known, corrected, forgiven, and restored.

And in the end, that choice shapes more than our culture.

It shapes our souls.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Living on Borrowed Light

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 28 June 2026 at 17:58

sketch.png

Living on Borrowed Light

 

Centuries ago, humanity often lived by the law of the stronger hand. In a metaphorical sense, people went around clubbing one another, driven by appetite, revenge, tribal loyalty and the thirst for power. Into that world, God chose Israel and worked with them, not because they were morally flawless, but because they were to become a people shaped by righteousness, justice, mercy and reverence for God. Yet as a nation, they failed repeatedly. They became, in many ways, a mirror of the human condition.

Then Jesus came onto the scene.

In him, justice, love, mercy, forgiveness, humility, truth and compassion were no longer abstract virtues. They were embodied. He showed what humanity was meant to be. The Sermon on the Mount was not merely religious instruction; it was a revolution of the human heart.

Over time, nations influenced by the Bible began to embed many of these principles into law, education, charity, family life, human dignity, hospitals, conscience, care for the poor, and the notion that every person bears worth before God. The West did not always live up to these principles — far from it — but the principles were there, often rebuking the West when it failed.

Now, having inherited the fruit of Christianity, many wish to abandon the root. We still want compassion, equality, justice, freedom, dignity and human rights, but increasingly without the God who gave these words their deepest meaning. And once the foundation is removed, the structure begins to tremble.

This is where Nietzsche’s madman still cries in the marketplace. He saw, perhaps more clearly than many Christians, that the death of God would not simply remove church bells and prayers. It would unmoor civilisation itself. If God is gone, then meaning, morality and human worth must be reinvented — and reinvented things are often fragile.

The West is not merely becoming less religious. It is becoming forgetful. It is living off a moral capital it no longer knows how to replenish. And the slippage is evident: confusion over identity, the loss of shared moral language, the weakening of family bonds, the suspicion of truth, and a colder public square.

The question is not whether the West was ever perfectly Christian. It was not. The question is whether the best things in the West can survive when severed from the Christian vision that nourished them. Nietzsche heard the echo before many others did, and we are hearing it now and the world is noticing.

I am the light of the world. Whoever follows Me will never walk in the darkness,but will have the light of life.'

 (John 8:12)

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Do You Worry About What People Say and do to You?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 23 August 2025 at 11:08

 

Will not God bring about justice for His elect who cry out to Him day and night? Will He delay in helping them? I tell you; He will promptly carry out justice on their behalf.”

Luke 18:7,8 (BSB).

 

sketch.png

Image generated with the Copilot

 

 

I’ve spent many years of my life trying to make sense of how people treat one another. It’s not always been easy, especially when unkind words or actions from others have caused stress. But now, at this stage of my life, I find that I see things more clearly. It’s not that I’m immune to hurt or injustice, but I’ve come to realize that the key lies not in the actions of others, but in how we respond to them.

The core of the issue, I think, is our inherent desire for justice. We all seek it, whether we consciously acknowledge it or not. There’s a quiet principle embedded in us, guiding our lives toward what is right and just. We may not always see it at the moment, but in time, justice has a way of coming to light. It is a principle we can trust—one that has existed long before our individual experiences and continues to shape the course of human history.

The English jurist William Blackstone, many years ago, penned words that resonate deeply with me. He said,

 “God has woven into the constitution of every individual a principle which, in its natural state, leads him to seek his own happiness. This is the foundation of the law of nature, and it is through this law that every creature, in accordance with the Creator’s will, is directed to his own well-being.”

What strikes me about Blackstone’s words is the simplicity of the idea—how God has placed within each of us a fundamental drive to seek happiness through goodness, and how this drive aligns with divine law. This is not some abstract notion of justice, but a guiding force that shapes the very nature of human existence. By following this internal compass, we not only improve our own lives but contribute to the order and harmony of creation itself, as intended by the Creator.

It’s easy, in times of trial, to feel that the scales of justice are unbalanced—that the wicked seem to flourish while the just suffer. But I believe the reality is different. It’s only a matter of time. The principle of justice, like the principle of happiness, operates in its own way, often in ways we cannot fully understand in the moment. Some may receive their judgment in this life, in the natural course of things. Others will face it in the future judgment, when all things will be made right.

I find peace in this, not as an excuse to dismiss wrongdoings or to ignore the pain others may cause, but as a reminder that life has its own rhythm. Those who act wickedly will face the consequences, whether sooner or later. That’s the quiet justice of life—a principle deeply embedded in the universe, aligning us with a greater purpose.

So, when faced with unkindness or injustice, I try not to let it consume me. I don’t have to rush to fix the wrongs of others, because ultimately, their actions will be measured by a higher standard than any I could impose. And in the meantime, I can focus on the happiness I’m meant to seek—a happiness rooted in goodness, in striving for my own well-being in alignment with that divine principle. The pursuit of this happiness isn’t just a personal journey; it’s a contribution to the greater order of things, the good that God intended from the start.

In the end, we can trust that justice will be done. We may not see it immediately, but it is there, quietly shaping the world in its own time.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 2666370