Cyclamens at Anglesey Abbey in Cambridgeshire,30 September 2023.

## Personal Blogs

Someone asked “What’s that funny hair on your upper lip?” I was like “Not got time to explain right now. Must dash.”

Last night photoed this rather attractive moth in my local. It's pretty, but it's an invasive and harmful species.

By chance my brother snapped one of these the day before and sent me the pic and an ID. So I recognised it at once as a box tree moth.

They are native to China, Japan, East Russia, India and neighbouring regions, where there is biological control from, from example, hornets. But in the last few years they have spread, I imagine with human help, to Europe, then Britain, and now to the Cambridgeshire village where I live. And we have no natural controls.

The caterpillars live on box hedges or trees as the insect's name tells us, and they are hugely destructive; they may completely defoliate the bush, leaving just twigs. The moth may lay three sets of eggs in a season and so many people are losing their prize hedges, including many of my fellow villagers.

If you look at these old hedges at Audley End you can see what a huge legacy is under threat.

The RHS article about the moth is here; you might find it interesting reading, and, if you see the moth in your locality, report the sighting to the RHS.

See

https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=261570Rachmaninov lived about 70 years, which is approximately 2.2 billion seconds. The quoted number of notes was 7.5 *billion* billion. So the composer would have needed to have written more than 3 billion notes for every second of his life.

I watched a YouTube video which said Rachmaninov wrote 7.5 x 10^{18 }notes during his lifetime as a composer. Could this be true?

I watched a YouTube video which said Rachmaninov wrote 7.5 x 10^{18 }notes during his lifetime as a composer. Could this be true?

I only wish I could post the scent as well as the picture.

See:

https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=260010

I found this in a puzzle book and thought it would be not too hard, but it was more tricky than I expected. Making sure you haven't missed any triangles, or double counted any, is quite slippery.

Here are the possible kinds of triangle:

Each of these can occur in five positions, so I thought at first the answer is 6 x 5 = 30, but I was mistaken, because config. e has chirality, i.e. handedness; the triangles can be aligned right or left, and so we get a total of 35.

After more investigation I found a fairly recent paper which gives a general formula for a regular polygon with any numbers of sides, but for larger numbers it gets quite complicated.

I liked this problem, for the original pentagonal case, because it is easy to grasp, less simple than appears at first but is still solvable with some careful working.

I'll post a link to the paper about the general case for anyone interested.

See https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=260011

I found this in a puzzle book and thought it would be not too hard, but it was more tricky than I expected. Making sure you haven't missed any triangles, or double counted any, is quite slippery.

Here are the possible kinds of triangle:

Each of these can occur in five positions, so I thought at first the answer is 6 x 5 = 30, but I was mistaken, because config. e has chirality, i.e. handedness; the triangles can be aligned right or left, and so we get a total of 35.

After more investigation I found a fairly recent paper which gives a general formula for a regular polygon with any numbers of sides, but for larger numbers it gets quite complicated.

I liked this problem, for the original pentagonal case, because it is easy to grasp, less simple than appears at first but is still solvable with some careful working.

I'll post a link to the paper about the general case for anyone interested.

Opening the mouthwash

Was like a tiny obstacle course.

Designers, are you listening?

How many triangles can you find in this diagram? I don't just mean ones whose vertices liu on the outer pentagon, I mean *all* the triangles visble.

How many triangles can you find in this diagram? I don't just mean ones whose vertices liu on the outer pentagon, I mean *all* the triangles visble.

*Nominative determinism* is the idea that a person's name might somehow influence their career choice.

The term was popularised in New Scientist magazine in 1994, and was intended humorously. It attracted many examples, such the book *The Imperial Animal *by Lionel Tiger and Robin Fox and *Pole Positions—The Polar Regions and the Future of the Planet*, by Daniel Snowman. You can find lots of similar examples in the Wikipedia article here.

There is even an intriguing possibility that is it more than a series on coincidences, that these is really something in it, and it has been seriously discussed by a number of psychologists, although it would be hard I think to0 establish any real effect.

Be that as it may, I have just been reading the history of Anglesey Abbey in Cambridgeshire and in the Wikipedia article about it I came across this advertisement from 1926. Bidwell and Sons auctioneers, eh?

Autumn's arrived—

Just hearing that

I'm cold already.

*Issa*

With apologies to Raymond Smullyan.

When you tread on grapes,

They let out a little whine.

But don’t worry,

It’s only sham pain.

Nobody told me

The warp drive was not reversible

Now I’m kinda stuck.

My brother photographed this beautiful moth.

Old English for oak was ek, I think (German is Eiche) but that has mutated into oak in Modern English. The “corn” bit presumably means seed, and so why don’t we call it an Oakcorn?

Try saying it at normal voice level, Oakcorn.

Try whispering it. Is that different?

Why?

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.