OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

In the Stillness of Morning

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 15 March 2026 at 07:56

sketch.png

In the Stillness of Morning

There is a moment before the day properly begins when the world seems to rest in its own breath. The streets are quiet, my mind has not yet been crowded by the noise of the day, and thought moves more gently through me than it will later. It is in that hour that I often find myself sitting to write.

Writers have long recognised something of this hour. Emily Dickinson once wrote that “the brain is wider than the sky,” and in the quiet of early morning one begins to understand what she meant. When the world is silent, thought opens in unexpected directions. T. S. Eliot suggested that even in stillness there can be a kind of movement — “the still point of the turning world.” In silence, something continues to move inwardly, though nothing outward seems to stir.

For me, writing often begins there.

What appears on the page in those early moments is rarely polished or carefully arranged. It is usually made up of the thoughts that rise naturally when a person sits quietly long enough to hear them — reflections on faith, memory, small observations about life, and the kind of passing impressions that might otherwise slip unnoticed through the day. Writers across centuries have done something similar. From the meditations of Marcus Aurelius to the letters of Rainer Maria Rilke, there runs a quiet tradition of turning inward, listening carefully, and allowing thought to take form in solitude.

Yet the stillness of morning carries a deeper value than reflection alone.

There is a wisdom in beginning the day before God. The Psalmist captures it with simple beauty: “In the morning, Lord, you hear my voice; in the morning I lay my requests before you and wait expectantly.” There is something profoundly right about that order. Before striving, before speaking to the world, the soul first turns toward its Creator.

Morning silence makes room for that turning. It is an hour when prayer can rise plainly and without effort. The mind has not yet been scattered; the heart has not yet been pulled in many directions. One simply brings one’s voice before God and waits.

That waiting is part of the holiness of the hour. The Psalm does not rush past it. The Psalmist lays his requests before the Lord and then waits expectantly — not anxiously, but with quiet trust. It is a reminder that before we act, endure, or attempt to shape the day ourselves, we are first called to stand in His presence.

Perhaps that is why the morning feels so well suited to writing as well.

In that silence, words seem to come less from effort and more from listening. What begins as prayer often continues as reflection. Thoughts gather slowly, like small stones found along a quiet path — some random, some wholesome, some searching, yet each carrying something of that deeply human moment when the soul is given space to speak.

Writing in such an hour becomes less about producing something clever and more about paying attention. Faith, thought, and language meet quietly on the page. The act itself becomes a kind of gathering — of memory, of reflection, of those inward stirrings that remind us what it means to be human.

If these pages hold any value at all, it is not because the thoughts are remarkable, but because of the hour from which they come.

The early morning remains one of the few times when the world feels unhurried, when prayer rises more easily, and when thought can unfold without pressure. It is a small and gentle space before the day claims its attention — a place where the soul can turn toward God, and where a few quiet words may find their way onto the page.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

If I Can Stop One Heart from Breaking

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 12 December 2025 at 08:32

sketch.png

If I Can Stop One Heart from Breaking

If I can stop one heart from breaking,
I shall not live in vain;
If I can ease one life the aching,
Or cool one pain

Emily Dickinson 1886

 

 

Forgive my indulgence in sharing one of my favourite poems, but the poem acts as a apt epigraph for what I am writing  There is a quiet terror in realizing how far the sacred sometimes feels from ordinary life. We build temples and churches—structures meant to summon heaven to earth—yet the ache of existence still greets us in kitchens, hospital rooms, alleyways, and crowded sidewalks. Faith, for many, becomes a pilgrimage always postponed, a distance always just out of reach.

Emily Dickinson does something radical in seven short lines: she collapses that distance. No sanctuary is named. No ritual is required. The measure of a life is reduced to a single trembling question—Did you ease one pain? Did you stop one heart from breaking? Meaning is no longer hidden in grandeur. It is hidden in mercy.

This is not sentimental comfort. It is existential realism. The world does not wait for our theology to mature. Pain arrives before certainty. Hunger speaks louder than doctrine. Loneliness outpaces liturgy. And Dickinson dares to suggest that a life need not solve the mystery of the universe to be meaningful—it need only lessen suffering somewhere along the way.

Christianity, at its most dangerous and beautiful, agrees.

The Book of Acts describes a community that treated property as temporary and people as eternal. Believers sold what they owned and laid the proceeds at the apostles’ feet—not for spectacle, not for piety—but so that “there were no needy persons among them” (Acts 4:35). This is not polite charity. It is economic rebellion driven by love. It is the renunciation of security for the sake of solidarity. It is faith made visible and therefore vulnerable.

This thread runs far deeper into Scripture. In Exodus, God’s voice thunders not on behalf of kings or institutions but for widows and orphans:

“You shall not take advantage of any widow

or fatherless child.

If you take advantage of them at all,

and they cry at all to me…”

These words struck me with a profound poignancy when I left the supermarket tonight and had a few words with a family from Syria, a mother and two children and I wondered about their missing father. God leans forward at the sound of suffering. A God's compassion over broken people.

Philosophically, this confronts us with a frightening truth: meaning is not something we merely believe—it is something we enact. Faith that remains internal is indistinguishable from illusion. The early Christians understood this with terrifying clarity. To follow Christ was not primarily to agree with a creed, but to reorder one’s life around the vulnerable.

Even now, this ancient moral gravity still bends history. We see it in churches that run food banks for those trapped in addiction and poverty. In Christian medical missions that enter forgotten places where profit would never go. In orphanages, shelters, prison ministries, soup kitchens, and in the quiet acts of mercy that never make headlines. These are not accessories to the gospel. They are its spine.

And yet, we must confess the other truth: religion often feels far away. The church too entangled. The institution too slow. The language too abstract. For many, faith has become conceptual while suffering remains brutally concrete. Dogma can feel louder than compassion. Moral certainty can feel colder than love.

This is why Dickinson’s poem still burns. When the sacred feels inaccessible, holiness becomes portable. It must travel light. It must take the form of a cooled pain, a mended heart, a small rescue that no one else applauds. A single life steadied. A single burden lifted. A single trembling soul helped back to its nest.

Jesus himself lived this answer. He did not build institutions; he disrupted them. He healed outside sanctioned spaces. He touched what was declared unclean. The sacred, in his life, was never confined. It spilled into streets, homes, and sickrooms. It moved wherever pain lived.

This gives faith its unbearable weight. If God is found among the broken, then indifference becomes blasphemy. To ignore the suffering neighbour is not merely a social failure—it is a theological one. As Christ himself said, what we do to “the least of these,” we do to him.

This is why the Epistle of James sounds almost violent in its honesty:

If a brother or sister lacks food and clothing,
and we offer only words without action,
what kind of faith is that?

The answer is uncomfortably clear. It is dead.

So, we should be careful when someone claims the name “Christian.” The test is not vocabulary but visibility. Not how loudly faith is confessed, but how tangibly it is lived. Not what we believe about God, but what our neighbour experiences because of us.

In the end, the most authentic act of worship available to us is not only performed in rows of pews or beneath vaulted ceilings. Maybe it is performed on sidewalks, in shelters, in hospital wards, in kitchens where the last loaf of bread is broken in half.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

6 Degrees to 4.7 Degrees of Separation and Narrowing

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 1 January 2026 at 16:27

 

"The soul should always stand ajar..."

— Emily Dickinson 

sketch.png

One summer afternoon, my wife and I found ourselves wandering through the heart of Edinburgh. The city was alive—the Edinburgh International Festival in full swing—its streets a river of faces, music, and colour. As we strolled along The Royal Mile, weaving through the crowds, I glanced around at the endless tide of people and turned to my wife.

"It's strange," I said, "but we're connected, somehow, to everyone here."

I was thinking about the old idea of six degrees of separation—the notion that, at most, six social connections link any two people on Earth. It first caught public imagination back in 1929, when Hungarian writer Frigyes Karinthy penned a short story exploring the theory.

But our connection to strangers, I realised, isn't just about having some ancient Celt in our family tree, waving a claymore across the misty glens. It’s something closer, more immediate. The idea that through friends, colleagues, or even a neighbour's brother-in-law, we are just a few steps away from anyone on the planet.

And sometimes life offers moments that make you believe it.

2008: An Auspicious Coincidence

It was during the depths of the British recession. I had flown to Krakow, Poland—my first time there—with the heavy purpose of visiting Auschwitz. One evening, sitting in a bustling square, I shared a meal with some friends, the laughter and chatter of other diners surrounding us like a low tide.

Across the way, I noticed a young man—maybe 22—stealing glances at me. He watched, hesitated, and finally stood up, slipping on his jacket. As he made to leave, he veered toward me, almost awkwardly.

"Excuse me," he said. "Did you give a lecture in the Scotland about young people in crisis?"

I blinked, surprised. "Yes," I said. "How on earth do you know that?"

He smiled and explained: he had a copy of the lecture on CD, passed to him by a friend of a friend.

"It was your voice," he said. "I recognised your voice."

Six degrees of separation? Sometimes, it feels like only one.

In 2011, Facebook researchers analysed the entire network of Facebook users — over 700 million people at the time — and found that the average separation between any two users was only 4.74 degrees. That’s even closer than the original theory suggested! It was living proof, using modern data, that the world really is incredibly connected.

Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 1932592