OU blog

Personal Blogs

Christopher Douce

Arts and Humanities Day School 2025

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Monday 10 November 2025 at 13:45

On 8 November 2025 I wore my metaphorical student hat and went to one of the Arts and Humanities day school. There were a number of these happening across the UK; last year I went to the one hosted at Milton Keynes. This year, I went to the one that took place in the London School of Economics. 

London School of Economics auditorium showing it filled with OU students.

What follows is a quick blog summary of the event, which might be of interest to other fellow arts and humanities students. There were a number of strands to the day: art history, creative writing, English literature, history, classical studies, religious studies and music. I firmly stuck to the English lit strand.

English Literature Study Skills

The first session was facilitated by Peter Lawson. Peter highlighted key documents and resources to look to: the assessment guide, module guide, and the English Literature toolkit (which can be useful when preparing for the writing of TMAs). He took us through some of the key learning outcomes from the English Literature programme, highlighting the top level categories of knowledge and understanding, cognitive skills, key skills, and practical and/or professional skills.

Some key (and necessarily obvious) points that relate to the writing of assignments include: time, reading the question, reading the guidance notes, stick to the word count, reference correctly, and submit by the deadline.

Tips for planning an essay include, begin by taking notes (on set text and critical sources), plan before writing, and ‘always provide a logical argument and evidence to support your position’. An important point is that it is okay to disagree with critical sources. I’ve tried to get critics to ‘talk with each other’, whilst putting myself in the middle of the conversation, but I’m not quite there in being able to do this.

Other tips included: it is important to have a clear introductory paragraph, and consider applying PEAL, where each paragraph makes a point, shares evidence, does some analysis and evaluation, and then provides a linking sentence to the next paragraph. Do explain why you have chosen a particular quote. This relates to a point that a tutor shared with me, which was ‘don’t end a paragraph with a quote; explain why you have chosen it, rather than letting it stand on its own’.

There was a comment about the close reading assignments which begin every module. You might approach it thematically, or a line by line basis. Which makes me wonder about how good the assignment I have just recently submitted!

Write Now: Getting started on TMA writing

The next session was all about what to expect from a ‘write now workshop’. The session also shared some strategies and approaches to help with starting to write your TMA by applying a technique known as structured freewriting.

There was a short discussion about barriers; what gets in the way of our writing, and what strategies do we apply to overcome those barriers? Some tips that were shared included: plan your study time and writing, break down tasks, ‘ditch perfectionism’ which means ‘give yourself permission to write a rubbish bit of writing’, break the process down into different stages by separating out the process of writing and the process of evaluating.

Another point was: find a study buddy; someone who might be studying on a similar module who lives close to where you live (which can be difficult to achieve, especially since so much is done online).

You and your library team

This session was a recorded lecture that was shown in one of the LSE lecture theatres. It took us through a range of different resources that are available in the OU library, such as the Oxford English Dictionary and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB), both of which I have used in earlier literature assignments. A useful tip with the ODNB is that you can broaden your search for a particular name or author, to see who else might be associated with them.

Using Dickens as a case study, we were guided through a short sequence of primary and secondary sources. Primary sources may include the Bridgeman Image Collection, or Early English Books online (EBO). Secondary sources, namely, journal catalogues are available by going to the Selected Resources for your Study part of the library.

To conclude, the sessions offered by the library were highlighted which you can find by going to the ‘training and events’ heading. A notable example was the ‘using library search for your assessment’.

Five things to know about English Literature

In this fifty minute session, facilitated by Tim Hammond and Liz Ford, we were collectively politely provoked into answering five questions:

  • What is literature and what does it do?
  • What does literature look like?
  • What does literature sound like?
  • Can other disciplines help us to understand/enjoy literature?
  • Is literature good for you?

Although I had been to a similar session before (where I had won an OU pencil in 2023, a prize for being arrogant, for presuming to be able to define ‘literature’ in a sentence) this session was a lot of fun. Each question yielded a lot of discussion. I didn’t offer any pithy definitions and didn’t win any pencils, which might reflect a change or refinement in my thinking over after five years of study. 

The future of reading

Earlier this year, I got chatting with a former English teacher (who had left the profession to take up stand-up comedy). He said something interesting, which was ‘the kids are not reading anymore’, which I found quite worrying. I had this conversation in the forefront of my mind during Shafquat Towheed’s presentation, which creatively explored ‘the future of reading’.

Two important quotes I made were ‘humans shape the way we interact with technology’ and ‘we will only use technologies if they remain useful to us’. We were given a reassuring reflection, that ‘the contemporary paperback is not dying’. A reason for this is that ‘books are persistently usable’ in the sense that what they contain can persist for a very long time. It was suggested that books can survive societal ‘extinction events’ and political upheaval.

Another quote I noted down was ‘the future of human centred reading is about us, not about technology’. The implication is that reading technologies come and go, but there will always be reading. I’m not sure whether I caught this word for word, but the following really resonated with me, the idea that books do ‘the heavy lifting that tell you who you are’, since ‘reading is about your own personal discovery’. Reading gives us immediate benefits. It allows us to have increased empathy, reduce anxiety, develop our sense of self, reduce isolation, increase our educational level of attainment, and others; I didn’t catch all of the points that Shaf shared. I learnt a new term that was related to all this: bibliotherapy. I also noted down the points that we read for emotional satisfaction, for pleasure, and for self-worth.

I’ve been working with technology, computers, my entire professional life. A book is the ultimate technology. I’ve seen different computing technologies come and go. The point was made that books are not going to go anywhere.

Reflections

When you’re studying at a distance face-to-face events are a ‘shot in the arm’ in terms of motivation. Students (like me) can pick up loads of useful hints and tips. Although a lot of the content was familiar, now that I’m coming to the end of my degree, the repetition and reinforcement was helpful. It also offers helpful reassurance too. It was also really nice to speak with other students, which is one of the benefits that is harder to quantify. I had some nice chats with a fellow student who is the admin of the module Facebook group, of which I’m a member. We face similar challenges of fitting study around life.

I really enjoyed Shaf’s presentation on the future of reading; it offered reassurance. I also picked up a few new practical pointers from the library session.

After the event, I did ask myself the question: why doesn’t the STEM faculty run events like these? It turns out that they do. Apparently, the Mathematics and Statistics school runs one for students, across all levels. I’ve also heard that Life, Health and Chemical Sciences runs one too. What about computing? I’ll ask some questions. Leave it with me.

Past events

I've been to a few of these events. Now that I'm on my final module, I've realised that this might have been the last one. It depends, of course, on whether I'll get through my final module. I'll do the best I can. 

Here are blog summaries of the previous events I've been to:

Acknowledgements

Due acknowledgements are extended to all facilitators and everyone involved in the delivery of this day school. Thanks are also extended to the LSE team, who helped me to find my way to the right room.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Christopher Douce

Arts and humanities day school 2023

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Monday 10 November 2025 at 08:50

On 14 October 23, I went to part of an OU Arts and humanities day school, organised by the Faculty of Arts and Social Science (FASS) which took place at the London School of Economics.

There are a couple of reasons to write this short piece. The first is to remember what happened during the event and to be able to share some of the points from the session with fellow students. The other purpose is to share with other faculties and schools what the FASS faculty has managed to do.

Although the session was run for the whole of the day, I only attended the afternoon session, which was all about literature. The morning session was all about study skills. For students who need advice of study skills, I do recommend the OU skills for study website.

Part 1: Things to know about literature

There were two parts to the English Literature strand. The first session was all about discussing what literature was all about, what is it for, and how is it studied. It was facilitated by staff tutors and cluster managers, Tim Hammond and Liz Ford.

During this session, we were asked some questions, and were encouraged to speak with fellow students to attempt to answer the question, or arrive at some definitions.

What follows is a summary of those questions, and some of the key bullet, or takeaway points that emerged from both the group and plenary discussions.

What is literature?

It is about storytelling; there are characters, plots and narrative.

It is about words, texts and the structure of language, but it can also be about oral communication, such as drama and plays.

It is also about responding to and interpreting texts. Also, a point of view is important.

Literature can be used to create new worlds.

It can also be used to develop and maintain culture.

Also, the notion of THE CANON was mentioned. There will be more of this a bit later.

What is literature for?

To entertain, to educate, and to suggest or facilitate change, to consider different worlds, and to make a record of something.

There are also some negative reasons: it can be used for propaganda.

Literature can be used to share experiences, and to expand horizons.

One point was emphasised: entertainment. Although it sounds frivolous, entertainment is important!

Why do we study literature?

To understand different ways of communication, to understand what is considered to be important (which links back to The Canon).

Through studying literature, we become more critically aware, become better writers, and can more readily contribute to academic debates.

It allows us to gain a deeper understanding of texts, and how they are constructed.

Understand different points of view.

How do we study literature at the OU?

The OU approach is to have interpretive journeys through texts. I made a note of something called reception theory, which will be explored in level 3 modules in more detail.

During the modules, there will be texts that you have never heard of, and texts that have been translated.

Students will understand how books (text) may come into being, in the sense that books exist within a context and within an economy. Texts now exist within a digital world.

Within the modules, there is a lot of optionality and choices when it comes to the assessment, leading to more flexibility in level 3.

What can you do with literature?

One of the points made in just was: you could (potentially) become a bestselling novelist! (This was made in jest, since it is very difficult to become a best selling novelist).

Due to time was short, a key point was made: do speak with the careers office; they have a wealth of advice to offer.

Part 2: Evaluating negative responses to reading in life and in fiction

The second bit of the day, presented by Shafquat Toweed, who is the chair of A334 (and has written some of the materials for A233, which I’m currently studying) had the feel of being a research talk.

Shaf’s research is all about reading in literature (which does gets mention in A233). In an EU project he mentions, members of the public are invited to send in post cards that relate to their experiences of reading.

I found Shaf’s presentation fascinating since I have never been to a research talk about literature before. I have heard that ‘presenting a paper’ in the discipline of literature is a little different to ‘presenting a paper’ in the sciences.

I learnt that there is something called the UK Reading Experience database. Shaf also mentioned an EU project, called Read-it: Reading Europe Advanced Data Investigation Tool.

Towards the end of his presentation, he took us through the plot of a story, where reading of fiction led one of the main characters to an untimely demise. One must emphasise that this was fiction, about fiction, and this isn’t anything we should be unduly worried about.

Reflections

I went to this event since I needed to give myself a motivation boost.

I have a lot on at the moment and I worry about my studying of A233 will become subsumed under everything else I need to do. I’m studying literature for a number of reasons: it may add something to the other work I’m doing, it is something that I’ve always wanted to do.

During the first session, I won an OU pencil! 

Admittedly, I won it for being “arrogant”, and was encouraged to “join the scientists” for claiming that I was able to define, without any difficulty, what literature was all about.

Upon reflection, the answers that everyone shared in the plenary discussions were a whole lot more nuanced than the answers that I gave. Whilst I do predominantly align myself with the scientists, I am aware that I need to be more comfortable with nuance and opinion.

There was a real buzz about this face-to-face event. It was also something that got booked up really quickly, which suggests that there was a lot of demand for events like these. It was also notable that these events only take place in two locations: London and Glasgow. I really liked that I was able to chat with fellow students; we spoke about levels and texts, and shared some practical study skills.

It was also notable that students who were not able to attend this event have been asking what happened during the day school. In some senses, this blog aims to act as a bit of bridge. Sharing online what happened during face-to-face sessions underlines my belief that face-to-face, when done well, has the potential to help all students, irrespective of whether or not they are able to attend.

Well done FASS for running such a useful event. One day, I hope that I will be able to run an induction session for all our new computing students. Face-to-face is important. We need it to come back.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 3220484