OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

The Empty Words of the Gossiper: A Universal Story

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday, 19 July 2025, 16:03

 

 

sketch.png

Image generated with the assistance of ChatGPT

 

The Empty Words of the Gossiper: A Universal Story

I have blogged now and again about the subject of of Gossip and slander. It gets a considerable amount visitors which indicates many are hurting out there. So, I return to this matter.

Gossipers wear many masks—some colourful, some clever, some cunning—but beneath each is the same crooked smile. Across languages and cultures, the act of speaking ill of others behind closed doors (or wide-open mouths) has a universally negative connotation. Whether passed on in whispers or laughter, gossip’s damage is rarely denied, only disguised.

In Urdu, the word khabarcheen captures the essence of a “news-spreader”—but it is not the noble herald of truth. Rather, the khabarcheen is a figure of mistrust, lurking in social corners with ears pricked and mouth eager. In Cuban Spanish, the phrase Radio Bemba—“lip radio”—offers a biting metaphor: our mouths become unwelcome broadcasters, tuned into the private lives of others and transmitting with no regard for truth or tenderness. The names change, but the ugliness stays.

Even in the warmth of friendship or familial settings, gossip sneaks in during sobremesa, the Spanish term for that leisurely time after a meal when stories are shared. Yet how quickly sweetness sours. The shift from connection to cruelty is subtle, like honey left too long on the tongue.

Gossip rarely presents itself as evil. Like she­momedjamo, the Georgian word for “I accidentally ate the whole thing,” it is indulgence disguised as innocence. One might begin with a simple observation—harmless, surely—and before long, the feast of someone else’s misfortunes is consumed with relish.

Children are taught early to beware of the sharp tongue. Snow White’s downfall is plotted not through swords but through whispers—“Who is the fairest of them all?” The Queen’s envy finds voice long before it finds poison. In The Emperor’s New Clothes, it is not just the emperor who is mocked, but an entire society complicit in falsehood, gossiping behind closed doors rather than speaking with courage.

The brothers Grimm were moral cartographers, warning of wolves not only in forests but also in hearts. Little Red Riding Hood is taught to beware the stranger—but in many ways, the more insidious danger lies in the idle chatter that leads her off her path, that lulls her into complacency.

Gossip is the wolf in slippers.

In Hinglish, we call it badmouthing, a hybrid term that bridges two cultures, neither of which approves of it. In Inuit, iktsuarpok describes the anticipation of someone’s arrival—a word not for gossip, but akin to it in the way we itch for updates, unable to sit still until the latest scandal walks through the door. We act as though we await news, but often we await blood.

Even languages known for restraint, like Swedish, cloak criticism in civility. Lagom, meaning “just the right amount,” suggests balance and moderation—but someone who gossips disturbs this harmony. They upset the balance of the room, the respect in the air. In Japanese, wabi-sabi reminds us to accept the imperfections of others. Gossip is its antithesis: it rejects grace and replaces it with scrutiny.

From Easter Island, we have tingo, meaning to slowly borrow things from a neighbour and never return them. It mirrors gossip’s theft: taking someone’s reputation, piece by piece, and never giving it back.

Even in drag culture, where humour and drama dance hand in hand, the word kiki—a gathering for laughter and gossip—is only joyful until someone becomes the punchline. The smile fades when it is your name under their tongue.

Gossip is a virus disguised as a voice.
It is smoke from a fire you didn’t light—yet it chokes you all the same.
It is a feather pillow torn open in the wind—impossible to gather once released.

The Bible itself warns that the gossiper isolates themselves by losing close friends.

A perverse person stirs up conflict, and a gossip separates close friends.” (Proverbs 16:28)

The Hebrew tongue calls the gossiper a rachil, literally a merchant—peddling information for social currency. It is telling that gossip is treated like trade: a transactional act, not a relational one.

Every culture knows it. Every language finds a word for it. And every word is, whether wrapped in humour or habit, an ugly one. There is no beautiful term for gossip, because gossip is, at heart, the betrayal of beauty. It mocks all that is good. It fractures trust. It takes what is private and parades it as entertainment.

As a child I was told, “If you don’t have something nice to say, don’t say anything at all.” A nursery saying, but a profoundly grown-up truth.

Because in the end, the tongue can set fire to a forest (James 3:5), and we must choose—daily, deliberately—whether we will be arsonists or architects.

Make the world a better place and walk away from those who gossip. When we listen to them, we reward them and it becomes their addiction. 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

A Heart of Mercy Overshadowed By Human Structures

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday, 22 July 2025, 11:41

sketch.png

Lagom: The Balance We've Forgotten or Need to Learn

There’s a quiet wisdom in the Swedish word Lagom. It means “not too much, not too little—just the right amount.” It’s not a flashy word. It doesn’t demand attention or trumpet moral superiority. It simply sits in the middle, content, steady, and sufficient.

The older I get, the more I believe that this modest idea holds the key to many of the world’s problems.

We live in a time of grotesque excess and tragic scarcity. One man buys a second yacht for prestige; another man dies of dehydration beneath a cracked sky. Supermarkets throw out tonnes of food while mothers queue at food banks. We hear it every day—and we grow numb to it. But the problem isn’t the earth. The problem is people.

I’m not an economist. I’ve never studied graphs or economic theory. But it doesn’t take a degree to see that the planet has enough to go around—if only we lived with Lagom in mind. Enough land. Enough food. Enough energy. The imbalance is not in resources; it is in the human heart.

The unwillingness to part with wealth lies at one end. We cling, hoard, defend, justify. Accumulation becomes a virtue. And at the other end of the spectrum lies the inability to steward wealth wisely when it is given. We squander. We chase appearance. We mimic the rich with no deeper sense of purpose or restraint. And the pendulum swings wildly, never quite settling at centre.

The Bible, in its practical brilliance, gave us something worth remembering: the Year of Jubilee. Every fifty years, land was to be returned, debts forgiven, and slaves released. It was a divine reset—a rebalancing of the scale to prevent generational injustice and runaway inequality. Can you imagine the courage it would take to actually do that now? But perhaps Jubilee wasn’t just a social policy. It was a heart policy. A call to Lagom. To learn how to have enough—and let others have enough too.

That’s the trouble, isn’t it? The very idea of “enough” is a threat to those whose identity is tied to more. We fear Lagom will lead to lack. But in truth, it’s the path to peace.

I don’t believe in enforced equality—the kind that flattens character and erases individuality. But I do believe in chosen balance. I believe in the spiritual discipline of contentment. I believe in the holy rhythm of restraint. And I believe, deeply, that we would heal much of the world if we stopped asking how much we could have and started asking how much we really need.

Nature teaches us this. It grows in cycles. It rests. It renews. It yields just enough—until greed disturbs it. The earth is not unkind. It’s generous. But it expects us to live in rhythm with it, not against it.

Lagom is not mediocrity. It’s maturity. It’s what happens when we see the world not as a competition, but as a shared inheritance. When we live not for the temporary thrill of abundance, but for the quiet joy of sufficiency.

If there is any hope for society, it will be found not in another revolution, nor in another market correction—but in men and women who learn how to say, “This is enough. And I will share.”

 

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 757497