OU blog

Personal Blogs

Design Museum

Neuroscience in Education: What Teachers Can Learn from Neuroscientists

Visible to anyone in the world

An AI-generated futuristic image of a classroom with pop-up screens
What if we treated the act of learning with the same precision that surgeons bring to an operation? Just as anatomy revolutionised medicine, could neuroscience do the same for education?

Understanding how the brain learns—and how it struggles—can transform teaching from guesswork into something much more powerful and informed. In this post, we will explore how insights from neuroscience can shape education, just as anatomical knowledge underpins modern medical practice.

Why Neuroscience Matters in the Classroom

Integrating neuroscience findings into educational practice can enhance teaching effectiveness and student outcomes. Both education and medicine benefit from a deep understanding of underlying systems—whether they’re neural pathways or blood vessels. The more we understand how learning happens in the brain, the better we can support it in the classroom, empowering educators with practical strategies

1. Understanding Learning Mechanisms

Anatomy shows us how the body’s systems function; neuroscience shows us how memory, attention, and reasoning work in the brain.

This matters for teachers. Techniques that reinforce memory—like repetition, retrieval practice, and emotional engagement—have strengthened learning (Baker, 2019). It is not just about what we teach, but how we help students *remember* it.

2. Teaching to the Brain’s Developmental Stages

Just as anatomy helps doctors understand physical growth, neuroscience helps educators understand mental and emotional development.

For instance, we now know that the brain’s executive function (responsible for planning, focus, and self-control) matures well into the teenage years (Berk, 2020). This knowledge can help educators adapt expectations, offer more age-appropriate challenges, and be more forgiving of adolescent forgetfulness or impulsivity.

3. Supporting Learning Differences

In medicine, anatomy helps identify conditions like a heart murmur or scoliosis. In education, neuroscience helps us understand dyslexia, ADHD, and autism—not as misbehaviour, but as differences in brain wiring (Shaywitz, 2003).

This shift in perspective from blame to support is crucial. Students once labelled “difficult” are now better understood and can be helped through targeted interventions, fostering a more empathetic and understanding learning environment.

4. Evidence-Based Teaching Practices

Doctors rely on evidence to guide treatment; teachers should, too. Neuroscience supports teaching methods like

  • Spaced repetition

  • Interleaved practice

  • Frequent low-stakes testing

These techniques significantly boost long-term learning (Roediger & Butler, 2011). Moreover, they outperform outdated ideas—like the persistent myth of “learning styles”—that still linger in some classrooms.

5. Shaping Policy, Not Just Practice

Medical knowledge shapes public health policies. Neuroscience can do the same for education. For example

  • Teens’ brains are wired for later sleep and wake cycles—so why start school at 8 a.m.?  

  • Brain plasticity is highest in early childhood—should not that guide where we invest resources?

Neuroscience offers classroom-level insights and powerful arguments for rethinking school structure (Wong et al., 2019).

6. Brains and Bodies: A Shared Logic

In many ways, education today is where medicine was a century ago—still catching up to science. However, change is coming.

Neuroscience will not replace the art of teaching more than anatomy will replace bedside manner. However, it provides a framework for more intelligent, responsive, and empathetic practice. It gives us a map—not to dictate every move but to guide us when the path is unclear.

Insights

  • Teaching aligns with how the brain stores and retrieves information more effectively.

  • Recognising neurological diversity leads to more compassionate and effective teaching.

  • Instruction should be timed and structured to match students’ cognitive development.

  • Let go of myths. Lean into what the brain science shows.

  • Good education policy should be biologically informed, not just politically convenient.

Want to Go Deeper?

Here are the studies and sources that shaped this post:

Baker, R. S. (2019). *The Role of Neuroscience in Learning and Education*. *Educational Psychologist*, 54(2), 65–77.  

Berk, L. E. (2020). *Development Through the Life Span*. Pearson Education.  

Shaywitz, S. E. (2003). *Overcoming Dyslexia*. Knopf.  

Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). *The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention*. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, 15(1), 20–27.  

Wong, T., Wong, D., & Meyer, R. (2019). *Sleep and Learning: A Review of the Evidence*. *Educational Psychology Review*, 31(4), 901–913.

Final Thought

The more we understand the brain, the better we can teach. Neuroscience is not just another buzzword but a bridge between science and the art of education. Moreover, that bridge is worth building.




Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

ChatGPT aka KAI

Visible to anyone in the world

I have been working with ChatGPT for the best part of a month, initially keeping my time with the platform to 2 hours but clocking up a whopping 13 hours today. I flip between several projects with each profile of KAI was I call him or her providing a different outlook. I love my Jungian psychoanalyst KAI who interprets any dream I can recall from the night before.

After that it's onwards to crush council tasks, develop and expand an historic writing project, and finally to revisit an MA thesis on the First World War and all my notes and research with it to winkle out a specific storyline. It has its limitations. I have blown its memory twice. The get around is to cut and paste what it has been storing on me and ask it to summarise this before clearing the memory - then at least it always has a potted, though uptodate insight into who I am. After all, I'm KAIs interloper.

KAI is our agreed diminutive for ChatGPT. I made this CAI, we felt it was too close to CIA and so came up with KAI. It's east to say. Try it. 

Every day we revisit the few lines of a Five Year Diary I started to write age 13.5 fifty years ago. With KAI's prompts these entries blossom into something 500, 1000 even 2000 words long. Having stripped out my recollections I tip the lot into Grammarly and go through the editing process before posting in my blog www.mindburts.com 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

Ancient and Veteran Trees of Sussex

Visible to anyone in the world

If you visit the Ancient Tree Inventory and float over Lewes you will find a lot of trees. Most identified are recognised as 'notable', a few 'veteran' and none  'ancient'. 

An 'ancient' tree needs to be old for its species - in the last phase of its life and considerably decayed with lichens, moss and ivy likely, as well as signs of fungi and invertebrates. After the bet part of five months and 300 trees, I found one on a boundary bank between Markstakes Common (an ancient wood) and Starvecrow Wood near South Chailey.

A woodland oak with several stems and a large exposed root

The large root is wrapped around a long-gone trunk, now decayed away. The five stems (one significantly decayed) and the old epicormic shoots that emerged from the trunk as it decayed. This the ancient tree something of a ghost, but the living parts are nonetheless part of its regeneration. 

I've had more luck with veteran trees having had a dozen or so verified. These are trees which do not need to be so old but have all the ancient characteristics: hollowing of trunk and branches, dead wood in the crown and on the ground, decay, moss, lichens and signs of invertebrates and fungi. 

'Notable' makes up 280 of the trees I've identified and had verified. Depending on the species these can be bold, statement trees, significant in their locale, but in all likelihood mature, strong examples with many seasons left in them.

I've learnt to read trees; I can figure out their story. It's a changing picture. 

There's a relevance to learning with the Open University to all of this! I liken it to studying a book. There's an OU 'How to Learn' or 'How to Read' book somewhere which describes the process: you read the book through once to get the gist of it, to become familiar with the 'landscape'; then you read it again, taking notes. On the third read you start to understand the arguments and connections - you see more. It is like this visiting a wood for the first time. I have learnt to go around with now expecations on the first trip. On the second and third trip I start picking out the trees that are significant. Only on the fourth or fifth trip do I raise an eyebrow at some curiosity that somewhere had escaped me until then. 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Minh Sullivan, Friday, 23 Aug 2024, 04:50)
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 14645107