“Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don’t be afraid.
Frederick Buechner
Returning to Twilight
What is my most beloved poem? I ask myself. Goodness, it feels like choosing a favourite Haribo. Too many shapes, too many colours, too many moods. To name one above the rest feels impossible without consulting others.
Still, if pressed, I can name a poem I return to often. It is not ornate. It does not dazzle, and it’s not like unpacking a double helix. On the surface it appears modest—just a captured moment. Yet each time I step into it, I’m led further inward. Its simplicity is not shallow; it is spacious.
That admission says something about how poetry lives with us. The poem that matters most is rarely the grandest in the canon or the one that demands scholarly admiration. It is often the one that waits patiently. The one that does not exhaust itself in a single reading. The one that appears small at first glance but opens, quietly, like a door into a larger room.
For me, that poem is Longfellow’s The Children’s Hour.
It opens at twilight, that suspended space between daylight and darkness. Longfellow sits in his study and hears the approach of his three daughters. Their steps down the corridor carry conspiracy and delight. They burst into his room and overtake him, laughing, binding him in what he calls their “living chain.” He offers no stern resistance. Instead, there is that “gesture of peace and silence,” that “murmur of soft persuasion.”
Those lines are the key. The poem’s tenderness rests not only in the children’s energy but in the father’s response. Authority softens into affection. The study—a place of intellect and responsibility—yields to embrace. Work gives way to love. This is not chaos; it is interruption welcomed.
Yet twilight matters. Evening suggests transition. Just as day folds into night, childhood folds into maturity. The hour is beautiful precisely because it is passing. Longfellow frames the children almost as mythic beings, bandits and spirits slipping through the house, as though he senses how briefly enchantment lasts.
Here is where the poem deepens for me. Beneath the laughter lies a quieter question. Did Longfellow worry about his daughters’ future? Did he wonder what sort of world awaited them beyond the lamplit safety of his study—what kind of women they would become? He lived in a century unsettled by moral upheaval and approaching civil war. He knew personal sorrow. Innocence, for him, could not have been naïve; it must have felt fragile.
When the children bind him in a “living chain,” the image is playful. Yet he vows to keep that chain fastened in the “round-tower” of his heart. Why preserve a chain unless one knows it will loosen? Children grow. Their arms one day fall away. The father stores the moment because he cannot store the season.
The poem does not speak anxiety aloud, but longing hums beneath it. Every parent, if honest, asks the same questions. Will these lively spirits become responsible, loving, kind adults? Will the gentleness they display in play survive a harsher world? Can affection form character strongly enough to endure disappointment and temptation? He does not know how his children will turn out. They have free will. We have no guarantees; scripture tells us the human heart is treacherous.
Longfellow offers no forecast. Instead, he shows formation through atmosphere. The children are learning what love feels like: secure, joyful, reciprocal. The father allows himself to be captured. Authority bows without humiliation. In that exchange lies education deeper than instruction. Character grows not only from warning but from warmth. A home where laughter interrupts labour becomes soil rich with moral possibility.
The poem honours the privilege of childhood, that rare stretch of life where trust flows easily. At the same time, it acknowledges impermanence without naming it. The future cannot be controlled. The world into which children step will always exceed a parent’s reach. But the heart that steps into that world can be shaped.
That is why I return to this poem. It is not merely nostalgic. It is searching. It suggests that love, given freely in an ordinary hour, may become compass and anchor later on. The living chain may fall from the body, but not from memory.
Perhaps that is why choosing a single cherished poem feels so difficult. We do not choose lightly what has shaped us. Language has many chambers, and I hesitate to close doors. Yet this twilight scene continues to draw me. It reminds me that simple lines can hold deep questions. That laughter can carry longing. That the quietest poems sometimes speak the furthest.
And in that suspended evening hour, I hear more than children’s steps. I hear a father storing light against the coming dark, trusting that what is planted in affection will, in time, bear fruit.
The children's Hour
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44628/the-childrens-hour-56d223ca55069thanked
Image by Copilot