OU blog

Personal Blogs

Leon Spence

The crisis in Downing Street

Visible to anyone in the world

This is a fascinating piece by Ailbhe Rea, The New Statesman's new political editor, about the current turmoil in the Labour Party and Downing Street itself on the leadership of the Prime Minister.

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2025/11/does-keir-starmer-realise-how-much-trouble-hes-in


There are some astonishing comments in the piece. Rea writes "Some MPs have completely stopped telling their whips how they really feel, putting on a front of loyalty. Instead they tell the New Statesman."

Elsewhere she writes of the turnover in No. 10 "If this new Downing Street machine was intended to give ministers a clearer direction from the centre, elsewhere in government, the reorganisation appears to have had the opposite effect. "You don't know who to talk to any more. If anything, the steer is less clear than it used to be," a government source says, "We're getting no clear political direction and the whole operation appears to be in stasis.""

One former Downing Street departee says of the current set up "There is a bunker mentality. You don't realise when you're in there how bad it is. None of them realise how unpopular we are."

Of course any government has disgruntled backbenchers and sacked ministers, there are always former staffers willing to complain to sympathetic journalists.

But the fact is that there are direct parallels with the latter of days of the last Conservative government. When you hit this level of internal turmoil things just don't start to get better, no matter how hard or what you try.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Leon Spence

There can be little doubt, Andy Burnham is on manoeuvres

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Leon Spence, Wednesday 24 September 2025 at 11:19

As pressure builds on Sir Keir Starmer and the failure of his government to deliver meaningful change in a restive Britain it is surely no coincidence that theĀ cover story of the pre-conference edition of the New Statesman is a fairly obvious 'come and get me' plea from Labour's 'prince across the water', Andy Burnham.

Mr Burnham has been a politician known as being somewhat chameleon like over the years with affinity to Blairite, Brownite and increasingly left wing causes (as well as being a professional Northerner) and has clearly given thought in the interview as to how he can confront accusations of his former flip-flopping arriving at the conclusion that his current ideology of 'Manchesterism' is the authentic him away from Westminster.

Whether that is true or not, or whether it is just the most recent iteration, remains to be seen. As does whether he has the potential to be a saviour to an ailing Labour government.

But passages in his interview do illustrate a coherent reasoning for his success in the Manchester mayorality and potential for a plan for Britain.

New Statesman extract

Burnham's aim is unashamedly for a 'consensual, business-friendly socialism that seeks to retake public control of all essential services, from housing to transport, in order to make life 'doable' for those trapped in the insecure world of Britain's outsourced Serco economy', on a national scale - without the limitations of devolved powers - it is a platform for massive societal change.

It's a platform that calls for admitting the mistake of Brexit, seemingly advocating for proportional representation, and a potentially naive admission (perhaps looking more to internal elections than national ones) that, for him identity means beingĀ 'British first, north-west second, Liverpool third, and English fourth.' Something, no doubt, that Reform UK will be all to happy to leap on?

New Statesman extract

Given the timing and placement of the interview there is little doubt that Mr Burnham is on manoeuvres, he believes that he is the answer to a lacklustre Labour government's problems. A 'look what you could have won' in place of a bland Surrey mangerialism. He will, no doubt, have a receptive constituency.

But in Labour politics machinations rarely come off. Does the fact that he has failed twice before in his leadership ambitions mean that a third time will be more or less successful?

Only time will tell.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 58784