OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Just Get it Right

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 30 January 2026 at 19:02

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  

Just Get it Right

[ 5 minute read ]

Could and Should

Like many other Open University students, I recently received notification of the marks awarded for my latest attempt in a Tutor Marked Assignment. 

       'You could have included this and that.' To be entirely honest the feedback probably doesn't include the word 'could'. I made it very clear to my tutor that 'could' just means there were options and I didn't choose the right one to impress you. Yes, I 'could' have written about this or that, or not included this or the other, but I didn't. Why don't you just tell me why I 'should' have done something different? What different outcome would be achieved?

On a different learning platform, the students can offer tidbits of their writing (within the course criteria) and other students get to review it and make comments. You can't review anyone's work if you have not submitted your own. In other words, if you are not naked you can't look at the naked people on a nudist beach. You really shouldn't do that anyway. I wonder, do people who follow fashion (clothes and accessories) go to nudist beaches?

So, it is about how exposed we will allow ourselves to be, that helps us hone our ideas into a format which we are happy to then share. That is the drive in conformity, isn't it? Yet, many of us are afraid that someone will publicly abate our intentions; not like an enabler does, more like a deliberate desire to twist our words; to make our words and actions ridiculous. 

Often, we don't have the support we want in times like these. I told my tutor not to tell me what I have done right in my Tutor Marked Assignments because I don't want to change those bits. 

       'Just focus on what I did wrong.' I pleaded. Yes, you can guess what the response to that might be..'There is no.....' Not at all helpful. I am not five.

So, like a tight-rope walker, I expose myself to risk and have no safety net to catch me. If the feedback says. 'It is utter rubbish!' There are no words of encouragement to save me. '[...] but you write well.' Great! I am really good at writing rubbish. It is really easy to be misunderstood if we rush writing a review or even get the words in the wrong order. At the beginning of my TMA feedback my tutor put 'You write well' at the very beginning. Exactly the right place for it to avoid it being a consolation. How many times have we thought in a heated argument that the other person is just putting words in our mouth? It is, however, a tactic, a poor one that is easily disrupted or beaten, but it is a tactic, even if it is to wound or discombobulate someone with an opposing thought, idea or concept.

I had a couple of reviews to write yesterday evening on an online learning platform. There doesn't seem to be a lot of people on our course, but I am only going by how many people contribute in the little comment boxes and submit assignments in the course. There 'could' be hundreds and there should be. I skipped writing reviews on two other assignment contributor's work for two reasons:

1) The first was way better than I might do, and I had already written a comment on making sure that we are up to the task of being honest, impartial and accurate. I was tired and felt that I would not be able to do the writer's piece justice with my review. Maybe someone without a conscience will review it. The philosopher Immanuel Kant would be staring at me right now. 'Did you not understand what I meant by duty? If you think that someone else will give a mean or sharp review, it is your duty to try as hard as you can and put as much effort as you can muster to review that piece!' 

2) The second one was written by someone whose work I had already critiqued as a review to an earlier assignment. I felt it would be best if she got a different person's opinion this time. My opinion may be fundamentally flawed AND I may not be in her target market.

The problem I can't overcome is not knowing if their work has already been critiqued. Most people will offer thanks to the reviewer in later posts. If they don't do this, I am compelled to keep reviewing assignments until I have reviewed four or five, because there is a possibility that someone's assignment never gets a peer review. 

I can't bear the thought that someone is sad because they think they were ignored or overlooked. When we offer our hard work we are, of course, looking for praise and wonderment. It really is disappointing if no-one hears our voice. To me, it is not too far off a cry for help; 'Help me. I need encouragement!' Feeble and pathetic it is not! 

       'Am I doing what I need to do to conform? The world and your opinion is so important to me!' That is it pretty much laid out bare; but with my ruthlessness, I am able to completely smash that sentiment as having come from a weak person. Some people may hold the cry for approbation as weak because they harbour an idea of success that is driven by a need for them being in control, power and money. Indeed, this is what satiates them. Realistically, I can't help feeling that many people over-achieve in order that they are not considered by other entities to be weak or feeble or stupid; even when other entities don't care. Paradoxically, I suggest, they are both insecure and weak. Weak? How so?

I think, sometimes we forget that the most important thing in our lives is to just get it right without cheating, and the second most important thing is to show that we know how to get it right. 

I don't seek a degree to show it to people. I am doing a degree because I need to know stuff to just 'get it right.'

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Approbation and appropriation, in my words

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Saturday 26 July 2025 at 14:17

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 7 minute read ]

Approbation and appropriation, in my words

My brother was older than me when he died; he drowned. When we were very young, if I had an idea my brother who could run faster than me, would claim it as his own. When my ideas were good he was lauded as being clever and imaginative. By the time I reached the applauding crowd, unaware that my brother had claimed the applause, when I told them of my idea they thought I was a plagiarist, a stealer of ideas. By taking advantage of the order of events, as they unfold in time, my brother effectively, publicly undermined my intelligence, and worse still, my honour and integrity. It did no good to protest that it was my idea and my brother stole it. The damage was done.

       'You could not have thought of it, because you have no claim to being special. You are young; inexperienced, and this is a strong and clever idea. You are not able to think like that. You must have heard it from elsewhere.'

I don't believe in blowing one's own trumpet. Unfortunately, my brother stole the tunes from a trumpet I never learnt to play. I always thought that if I picked up my trumpet and blew, the sound would be wrong. 'This is my song' would be heard as, 'Shut up and listen because I am about to fool you into thinking I am special.' I have never wanted to deceive.

Because I have, falsely, been the victim of public denouncement as a fraud, a copier of ideas, a cheat; when I was not; and when I was undermined by someone else to hide their weakness; their incapacity to excel; I find self-promotion to be despicable behaviour, particularly if it involves hanging onto the coat-tails of other people; 'appropriation'.

I love writing because I like words. Like playing with Lego blocks, it is the countless concepts that combining words in specific orders that pleases me; with each word a single block that makes a larger block, or phrase. If you tell me a story, I am compelled to never repeat it, without making it clear it is not my story and I did not create the magic.

I came up with the phrase, 'I like vinegar on my cake' to mean something distinct from 'sweet and sour'. I have a greater understanding of spoiling a sweet cake with vinegar, than relishing sweet and sour pork balls as a takeaway Chinese restaurant dish. I believe that it is impertinent to subsume anyone's carefully created concept and overshadow it with a claim to being the first to discover it.

The correct thing to do, if you find someone’s idea interesting is to wait until it is secured in history and then revive it, preferably by referencing it or asking for permission to reproduce it. This is integral to study with the Open University, or any university.

I think there are people who are inspired by others, yet have no recognition of it and claim any new idea as their own. The idea that has entered their head through someone else’s careful placement of words acts as a key for them to understand something they are consumed by. Such is their unseeing nature that it is their own narcissism that presents themselves as the true conceiver of knowledge, ideas and concepts. My brother was a narcissistic psychopath. He actually thought that he was being noble by making speeches such as, ‘I am nothing without the people around me.’ as he waved an encompassing and, to him, magnanimous hand over the assembled family members. I would think, ‘You are actually nothing, because you are a parasite of ideas. You steal excellence and drain the energy from everyone around you, for your own need to promote yourself’. Such promotion always revealed him to me as a fraud.

I was once quite a good artist. I write that in the past tense because I was pleased with my work and other people showed their appreciation by buying my pictures, designs, logos, and paintings. I had a portfolio that I carried from country to country as I moved around, to show people how wonderful I am. One day, I realised that I had not added anything to the collection, and realised that the only honest statement I could make about my creations was that I was once good at art. I could not make up a lie that related to my current ability. I gave all my pictures away. I had never painted them specifically to sell, and I only sold anything if people begged me to let them own it. If I am still a good artist, I decided, I can paint all of them again and I will do that, if I want to have fun. All of those paintings were me, or a part of me; they no longer are. Now, I rarely do that kind of creative activity. It is possible that I am a fantastic artist. I cannot say that I am. Because I sold some paintings, I can only say I WAS an artist. If I have a completed painting and have not sold it, I can only say I have a hobby. It is different for musicians because they provide entertainment for others in any number of spaces; band members; jam sessions; or serenading someone. If they only play in their own home and no-one hears them or their lyrics; it is a hobby, they are not musicians – they like and perhaps understand music.

Just to make it clear – I am not an artist, a musician, a writer, or a yachtsman. I can probably still make pictures; I try to like and understand music; I love writing words and sentences; and I once owned some yachts.

In a story I posted, about how I understand what ‘Love’ is, I made up some expressions or collided some ideas for effect. I came up with ‘The knowledge was like discovering there were ants in a lemon meringue pie, or a sharp strawberry tart at a picnic, but only after he had taken a few bites’; and ‘it is for the people who are wearing roller-skates on the thin ice of a lake, like Mimie, and are trying to reach the edge, but can only see the ice shrinking from the shore’; and ‘This is for the people who need vinegar on their chocolate cake, and for the people for whom love once washed through an open ended street, but now for them, stops in a cold cul-de-sac that no longer has a path out the other end; a dead-end that no amount of bulldozing with love will open again’.

Anyone can use these if they are not put in your books, plays or films, or other creations that you claim as being totally your own work, I CAN currently make new phrases and while I will use these few again, I am not about to show you how limited I am and use them anytime soon, except maybe ‘vinegar on my cake’ or its variants. It is pithy enough to be useful. But help yourself, just don’t consider yourself to be creative.

Anyone who followed the ‘evolution of love’ story, I posted, will probably know that I tried to use a template of the English seasons on which to guide how the love in the story unfolded and was expressed. That is what I do, independent of outside influence. I have never heard of anyone doing that before, or something like that, but I am not arrogant, conceited, or narcissistic, so I cannot claim to be the first to do it. 

I don’t expect that I will ever be a writer. I am delighted if someone is happily distracted, or enlightened, or positively influenced by my attempts to make sense of the world. I don’t need applause or to be lauded. I don’t want to be famous or rich. I don’t measure success in those ways. Selfish success, for me, is to be true and robust. Selfless success, I think, for me, is removing my ego, so someone else can positively shine, but I will NOT be diminished, while I am in the process of re-building myself; nor will I allow my goodwill or creativity to be tarnished or sullied, especially not by temporal means.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 281147