OU blog

Personal Blogs

Christopher Douce

Arts and Humanities Day School 2025

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Thursday 20 November 2025 at 08:53

On 8 November 2025 I wore my metaphorical student hat and went to one of the Arts and Humanities day school. There were a number of these happening across the UK; last year I went to the one hosted at Milton Keynes.Ā This year, I went to the one that took place in the London School of Economics.Ā 

London School of Economics auditorium showing it filled with OU students.

What follows is a quick blog summary of the event, which might be of interest to other fellow arts and humanities students. There were a number of strands to the day: art history, creative writing, English literature, history, classical studies, religious studies and music. I firmly stuck to the English lit strand.

English Literature Study Skills

The first session was facilitated by Peter Lawson. Peter highlighted key documents and resources: the assessment guide, module guide, and the English Literature toolkit (which can be useful when preparing for the writing of TMAs). He took us through some of the key learning outcomes from the English Literature programme, highlighting the top level categories of knowledge and understanding, cognitive skills, key skills, and practical and/or professional skills.

Some key (and necessarily obvious) points that relate to the writing of assignments include: time, reading the question, reading the guidance notes, stick to the word count, reference correctly, and submit by the deadline.

Tips for planning an essay include, begin by taking notes (on set text and critical sources), plan before writing, and ā€˜always provide a logical argument and evidence to support your position’. An important point is that it is okay to disagree with critical sources. I’ve tried to get critics to ā€˜talk with each other’, whilst putting myself in the middle of the conversation, but I’m not quite there in being able to do this.

Other tips included: it is important to have a clear introductory paragraph, and consider applying PEAL, where each paragraph makes a point, shares evidence, does some analysis and evaluation, and then provides a linking sentence to the next paragraph. Do explain why you have chosen a particular quote. This relates to a point that a tutor shared with me, which was ā€˜don’t end a paragraph with a quote; explain why you have chosen it, rather than letting it stand on its own’.

There was a comment about the close reading assignments which begin every module. You might approach it thematically, or a line by line basis. Which makes me wonder about how good the assignment I have just recently submitted!

Write Now: Getting started on TMA writing

The next session was all about what to expect from a ā€˜write now workshop’. The session also shared some strategies and approaches to help with starting to write your TMA by applying a technique known as structured freewriting.

There was a short discussion about barriers; what gets in the way of our writing, and what strategies do we apply to overcome those barriers? Some tips that were shared included: plan your study time and writing, break down tasks, ā€˜ditch perfectionism’ which means ā€˜give yourself permission to write a rubbish bit of writing’, break the process down into different stages by separating out the process of writing and the process of evaluating.

Another point was: find a study buddy; someone who might be studying on a similar module who lives close to where you live (which can be difficult to achieve, especially since so much is done online).

You and your library team

This session was a recorded lecture that was shown in one of the LSE lecture theatres. It took us through a range of different resources that are available in the OU library, such as the Oxford English Dictionary and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB), both of which I have used in earlier literature assignments. A useful tip with the ODNB is that you can broaden your search for a particular name or author, to see who else might be associated with them.

Using Dickens as a case study, we were guided through a short sequence of primary and secondary sources. Primary sources may include the Bridgeman Image Collection, or Early English Books online (EBO). Secondary sources, namely, journal catalogues are available by going to the Selected Resources for your Study part of the library.

To conclude, the sessions offered by the library were highlighted which you can find by going to the ā€˜training and events’ heading. A notable example was the ā€˜using library search for your assessment’.

Five things to know about English Literature

In this fifty minute session, facilitated by Tim Hammond and Liz Ford, we were collectively politely provoked into answering five questions:

  • What is literature and what does it do?
  • What does literature look like?
  • What does literature sound like?
  • Can other disciplines help us to understand/enjoy literature?
  • Is literature good for you?

Although I had been to a similar session before (where I had won an OU pencil in 2023, a prize for being arrogant, for presuming to be able to define ā€˜literature’ in a sentence) this session was a lot of fun. Each question yielded a lot of discussion. I didn’t offer any pithy definitions and didn’t win any pencils, which might reflect a change or refinement in my thinking over after five years of study.Ā 

The future of reading

Earlier this year, I got chatting with a former English teacher (who had left the profession to take up stand-up comedy). He said something interesting, which was ā€˜the kids are not reading anymore’, which I found quite worrying. I had this conversation in the forefront of my mind during Shafquat Towheed’s presentation, which creatively explored ā€˜the future of reading’.

Two important quotes I made were ā€˜humans shape the way we interact with technology’ and ā€˜we will only use technologies if they remain useful to us’. We were given a reassuring reflection, that ā€˜the contemporary paperback is not dying’. A reason for this is that ā€˜books are persistently usable’ in the sense that what they contain can persist for a very long time. It was suggested that books can survive societal ā€˜extinction events’ and political upheaval.

Another quote I noted down was ā€˜the future of human centred reading is about us, not about technology’. The implication is that reading technologies come and go, but there will always be reading. I’m not sure whether I caught this word for word, but the following really resonated with me, the idea that books do ā€˜the heavy lifting that tell you who you are’, since ā€˜reading is about your own personal discovery’. Reading gives us immediate benefits. It allows us to have increased empathy, reduce anxiety, develop our sense of self, reduce isolation, increase our educational level of attainment, and others; I didn’t catch all of the points that Shaf shared. I learnt a new term that was related to all this: bibliotherapy. I also noted down the points that we read for emotional satisfaction, for pleasure, and for self-worth.

I’ve been working with technology, computers, my entire professional life. A book is the ultimate technology. I’ve seen different computing technologies come and go. The point was made that books are not going to go anywhere.

Reflections

When you’re studying at a distance face-to-face events are a ā€˜shot in the arm’ in terms of motivation. Students (like me) can pick up loads of useful hints and tips. Although a lot of the content was familiar, now that I’m coming to the end of my degree, the repetition and reinforcement was helpful. It also offers helpful reassurance too. It was also really nice to speak with other students, which is one of the benefits that is harder to quantify. I had some nice chats with a fellow student who is the admin of the module Facebook group, of which I’m a member. We face similar challenges of fitting study around life.

I really enjoyed Shaf’s presentation on the future of reading; it offered reassurance. I also picked up a few new practical pointers from the library session.

After the event, I did ask myself the question: why doesn’t the STEM faculty run events like these? It turns out that they do. Apparently, the Mathematics and Statistics school runs one for students, across all levels. I’ve also heard that Life, Health and Chemical Sciences runs one too. What about computing? I’ll ask some questions. Leave it with me.

Past events

I've been to a few of these events. Now that I'm on my final module, I've realised that this might have been the last one. It depends, of course, on whether I'll get through my final module. I'll do the best I can.Ā 

Here are blog summaries of the previous events I've been to:

Acknowledgements

Due acknowledgements are extended to all facilitators and everyone involved in the delivery of this day school. Thanks are also extended to the LSE team, who helped me to find my way to the right room.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Christopher Douce

Arts and Humanities Study Day 2024

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Monday 10 November 2025 at 08:49

On 18 October 2024, I attended an Arts and Humanities study day which took place at the OU campus in Milton Keynes. There were a couple of other versions of this day, which took place at other locations. I think there were events Wales (I think in Cardiff), and another one in Scotland (I think in Glasgow), and another in Belfast, but I don’t know the specifics.

This 2024 event follows the study event that I attended in 2023 which took place at the London School of Economics. I attended this event whilst wearing a couple of metaphorical hats. The first was, primarily, as an A334 literature student (I can scarcely believe that I’ve just started my first level 3 module, which I’m a bit worried about), and second as someone who works in the STEM faculty; I was there to see what the FASS faculty was getting up to.

The event began with an introduction by Donna Loftus and Tim Hammond. I remember Tim from last year, perhaps because he gave me a pencil and offered a gentle jokey implication that I might ā€œjoin the scientistsā€. Anyway, I missed Tim’s introduction, since I got lost on my bike ride from the Milton Keynes train station. Apologies Tim!

Study Skills Session

The first session I attended had the title L2&3 English Literature which was facilitated by Peter Lawson. He opened with a comment about the broad skills that are needed: ā€˜a sensitivity to language, an ability to spend time reading, intelligence to connect sentences, plots and narratives’.

There were some useful practical pointers: make sure we know our way around the assessment guide (and make sure that we read it properly), the module guide, and be aware of the English Literature Toolkit.

Peter took us through some learning outcomes that were from A335, but also apply to some of the other modules too. OU learning outcomes are divided up into a number of different categories (and these categories apply to all modules, science modules as well as arts modules): knowledge and understanding, cognitive skills, key skills, and practical and/or professional skills.

Breaking this down further, knowledge could include knowledge of genres, set texts, contexts, use of different types of media, and understanding the processes through which text can become canonical. Cognitive skills relate to the comparing and contrasting of texts, reading articles for scholarly voices, identifying texts for further study, relating texts to their historical and cultural contexts. Key skills: building arguments (or, preparing a well written discussion), and selecting of resources to create your argument (discussion), development of independent study as well as collaborative working. Regarding professional skills: effectiveness of communication, using a range of different tools, planning and time management.

Peter shared some important practical tips that can be easily overlooked, since they sound very obvious: read the question more than once, look for any accompanying guidance that relates to the question, be mindful about the word limits, note the referencing format, make targeted notes to help you answer the question, and set aside time for planning.

It was also interesting (and reassuring) that the abbreviation PEAL was highlighted, which can help with the writing of essays. Each paragraph should begin with a Point, provide Evidence (which could be a quotation to, or reference of a text, or a point that a critic has made), a sentence that Analyses the text that has just be shared, and then offer a Link back to the question. Another use of L I’ve heard, is to provide a Linking sentence to the next point of an argument (or discussion). A related (and very obvious, and very simply) tip that I’ve remembered is that a paragraph should only present or share a single point.

Another tip was, when it comes to TMAs, avoid any unnecessary ā€˜waffle’. In other words, don’t be rhetorical.

Finally, before you submit something, check a submission for errors, checking for spelling and grammar. My own approach is to read through a double-spaced printout a day before I submit, covering it with my own red pen. I’ve been thoroughly astonished at how much nonsense I’ve very nearly submitted to my tutor.

It’s interesting that the TMA 1s for all the literature modules explore a similar skill: close reading a fragment of text. Some further tips: check the set text from where your bit of text has come from, get a printout, and add a whole load of notes. On the topic of notes, I noted down that on A334 TMAs 3 and 5 require evidence of sources from outside the module materials. In other words, have a look to the library.

Write Now!

Next up, was a return to the Berrill Lecture Theatre, which was were the introduction had taken place. This shorter session was all about the Write Now! online sessions, which are designed to, well, get everyone writing.

We were asked to complete a couple of structured freewriting activities, having been asked a couple of questions. The first question was: ā€˜how do you feel about being an OU student?’ The second was: ā€˜what are your goals for developing your skills as an academic writer doing your studies this year?’ Following Peter’s session, I wrote down ā€˜using other resources, using opinions of critics and understanding what they are’.

I made a note of a couple of closing points: many arts and humanities modules are running the Write Now! sessions. Also, writing isn’t easy. It can take time what works best for you, which means being open to new ideas and approaches. Finally, accountability can be useful.

I interpret this final point to mean: it can be useful to set yourself targets, but equally, it may well be useful to tell other people that you’re doing studying for certain periods of time.

Five things to know about literature

This next session was facilitated by Richard Jones, Head of Discipline, English Literature and Creative Writing. Underpinning his session, he had a key question: what does it mean to study literature? What follows is a summary of his headline points, which I’ve summarised from my own notes. Any mistakes are my own, rather than Richard’s:

1) Form

When it comes to literature, forms could be categorised as poetry, prose, and dramaĀ 

Within these forms, there is the notion of genre, which relates to ā€˜a type of something’ where a reader has a set of expectations about ā€˜the forms’ that are used.

Breaking this down further, poetry can contain rhymes, rhythms and patterns, use imagery, employing techniques such as metaphor and personification. (I’m expecting to find out a lot more about all this in the second half of block 1 of A334). Prose can be, of course, novels and short stories. Dramas are, of course, plays.

2) Nuance

Texts can be read in different ways. There is ambiguity within literature.

3) Time (or history)

Literature has been created during a particular time. Reflecting on this point, literature can be performed, interpreted, and used within different times. There’s a point here about the use of language, and that meanings of words can change over time.

4) Words (or language)

We’re inside language, which means that we’re studying language and its use very closely.

5) Work

This can have an ambiguous meaning. It can mean the work of writing, or it can be ā€˜a work’ of art having been produced. It can (of course) be hard work to figure out what a text means. Also, the work of others find their way into other works.

Special interest talk: Ekphrastic approaches

The final session of the event had a curious title: Working with artists - ekphrastic approaches, which was given by Joanne Reardon. Apparently ekphrasis means ā€˜writing about art’, which is a word that was completely new to me. In some respects, this final talk was about writing practice and how writing and art can be connected together.

During this session I scribbled down a few points on my notebook, which paraphrase. These are that ā€˜writers can make excellent collaborators’, and that ā€˜a writer is always looking for what isn’t there’. Also, when writing or considering works of art, a great question to ask is ā€˜what emotional impact does it have on you?’

Reflections

The sessions of the literature stream all relate to an interesting theme: the work of writing. Peter’s session focussed on skills that relate to our work of writing TMAs, Richard’s session explicitly mentioned the notion of work in its different forms, and Joanne’s reflections on her own work as a writer offers a nice conclusion to the day.

There were a couple of bits that I skived off from: the music bit, which was open to everyone, and the library session (I’ve been to quite a few of those). It was really nice to meet with fellow students, which really underlines the importance and value of face-to-face events.

On this final point, it would have been nice to have more discussions. It would also be useful to share experiences of study between the different levels. As a new third level student, I’m not (yet) entirely sure what I have in store for this forthcoming academic year.

Many thanks to all the organisers and facilitators. A really helpful set of sessions. As mentioned in the final paragraph of the summary of the 2023 event: face-to-face is important.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Andy Murray, Monday 21 October 2024 at 18:52)
Share post
Christopher Douce

Arts and humanities day school 2023

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Monday 10 November 2025 at 08:50

On 14 October 23, I went to part of an OU Arts and humanities day school, organised by the Faculty of Arts and Social Science (FASS) which took place at the London School of Economics.

There are a couple of reasons to write this short piece. The first is to remember what happened during the event and to be able to share some of the points from the session with fellow students. The other purpose is to share with other faculties and schools what the FASS faculty has managed to do.

Although the session was run for the whole of the day, I only attended the afternoon session, which was all about literature. The morning session was all about study skills. For students who need advice of study skills, I do recommend the OU skills for study website.

Part 1: Things to know about literature

There were two parts to the English Literature strand. The first session was all about discussing what literature was all about, what is it for, and how is it studied. It was facilitated by staff tutors and cluster managers, Tim Hammond and Liz Ford.

During this session, we were asked some questions, and were encouraged to speak with fellow students to attempt to answer the question, or arrive at some definitions.

What follows is a summary of those questions, and some of the key bullet, or takeaway points that emerged from both the group and plenary discussions.

What is literature?

It is about storytelling; there are characters, plots and narrative.

It is about words, texts and the structure of language, but it can also be about oral communication, such as drama and plays.

It is also about responding to and interpreting texts. Also, a point of view is important.

Literature can be used to create new worlds.

It can also be used to develop and maintain culture.

Also, the notion of THE CANON was mentioned. There will be more of this a bit later.

What is literature for?

To entertain, to educate, and to suggest or facilitate change, to consider different worlds, and to make a record of something.

There are also some negative reasons: it can be used for propaganda.

Literature can be used to share experiences, and to expand horizons.

One point was emphasised: entertainment. Although it sounds frivolous, entertainment is important!

Why do we study literature?

To understand different ways of communication, to understand what is considered to be important (which links back to The Canon).

Through studying literature, we become more critically aware, become better writers, and can more readily contribute to academic debates.

It allows us to gain a deeper understanding of texts, and how they are constructed.

Understand different points of view.

How do we study literature at the OU?

The OU approach is to have interpretive journeys through texts. I made a note of something called reception theory, which will be explored in level 3 modules in more detail.

During the modules, there will be texts that you have never heard of, and texts that have been translated.

Students will understand how books (text) may come into being, in the sense that books exist within a context and within an economy. Texts now exist within a digital world.

Within the modules, there is a lot of optionality and choices when it comes to the assessment, leading to more flexibility in level 3.

What can you do with literature?

One of the points made in just was: you could (potentially) become a bestselling novelist! (This was made in jest, since it is very difficult to become a best selling novelist).

Due to time was short, a key point was made: do speak with the careers office; they have a wealth of advice to offer.

Part 2: Evaluating negative responses to reading in life and in fiction

The second bit of the day, presented by Shafquat Toweed, who is the chair of A334 (and has written some of the materials for A233, which I’m currently studying) had the feel of being a research talk.

Shaf’s research is all about reading in literature (which does gets mention in A233). In an EU project he mentions, members of the public are invited to send in post cards that relate to their experiences of reading.

I found Shaf’s presentation fascinating since I have never been to a research talk about literature before. I have heard that ā€˜presenting a paper’ in the discipline of literature is a little different to ā€˜presenting a paper’ in the sciences.

I learnt that there is something called the UK Reading Experience database. Shaf also mentioned an EU project, called Read-it: Reading Europe Advanced Data Investigation Tool.

Towards the end of his presentation, he took us through the plot of a story, where reading of fiction led one of the main characters to an untimely demise. One must emphasise that this was fiction, about fiction, and this isn’t anything we should be unduly worried about.

Reflections

I went to this event since I needed to give myself a motivation boost.

I have a lot on at the moment and I worry about my studying of A233 will become subsumed under everything else I need to do. I’m studying literature for a number of reasons: it may add something to the other work I’m doing, it is something that I’ve always wanted to do.

During the first session, I won an OU pencil!Ā 

Admittedly, I won it for being ā€œarrogantā€, and was encouraged to ā€œjoin the scientistsā€ for claiming that I was able to define, without any difficulty, what literature was all about.

Upon reflection, the answers that everyone shared in the plenary discussions were a whole lot more nuanced than the answers that I gave. Whilst I do predominantly align myself with the scientists, I am aware that I need to be more comfortable with nuance and opinion.

There was a real buzz about this face-to-face event. It was also something that got booked up really quickly, which suggests that there was a lot of demand for events like these. It was also notable that these events only take place in two locations: London and Glasgow. I really liked that I was able to chat with fellow students; we spoke about levels and texts, and shared some practical study skills.

It was also notable that students who were not able to attend this event have been asking what happened during the day school. In some senses, this blog aims to act as a bit of bridge. Sharing online what happened during face-to-face sessions underlines my belief that face-to-face, when done well, has the potential to help all students, irrespective of whether or not they are able to attend.

Well done FASS for running such a useful event. One day, I hope that I will be able to run an induction session for all our new computing students. Face-to-face is important. We need it to come back.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Christopher Douce

Experiencing a T216 Cisco day school

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Christopher Douce, Friday 20 February 2015 at 14:13

On 17 January I found the time to attend a T216 (OU website) day school that was hosted at London Metropolitan university.Ā  T216 is a module that is all about Cisco networking and, in some respects, it’s a little bit different to other OU modules, but it’s different in a good way.Ā 

Students who study T216 can gain credits towards their degrees whilst at the same time taking a set of vendor exams that allows them to gain a widely recognised industrial qualification.Ā  You study one module, and have the potential to gain two different outcomes.

Labs

Another way that T216 differs to other OU modules is that students are required to attend a number of compulsory lab sessions.Ā  These lab sessions are opportunities for students to get their hands on real Cisco equipment: the same type of equipment that powers much of the internet.

I have to confess that I’m not a network engineer, but have been a student of networking in the past.Ā  I first studied it as an undergraduate (when things were very different) and then briefly went down the Microsoft systems engineer certification route, but I’ve always known that the official Cisco certifications are a whole lot more demanding.

When I worked in industry, I once made a case to develop a product that could be used to help to teach the fundamentals of computer networking, using a set of tiny PC-like computers.Ā  When I was heading to this event, I remembered these old ideas and I had two questions in my mind. The first was: what is the Cisco way of teaching networking and, secondly, what might happen in a Cisco lab.

The teaching bit

I met my colleague in the foyer of the university and I was quickly taken to teaching lab where a lecture was taking place.Ā  I found a seat at one of the empty workstations and started to listen, hoping I would understand something.

ā€˜How do switches learn mac addresses?’ our instructor asked.Ā  The class was still pretty quiet: the students hadn’t yet warmed up yet.Ā  I knew what a ā€˜mac’ address was: it’s a unique id that is used to identify a network node.Ā  You can have them on either Ethernet cards and are used by wireless devices (as far as I know), but in this context, the lecturer was only talking about wired networks.Ā  I also knew what a switch was too: it’s a device that decides where different signals (or frames) should be transmitted to.Ā  Switches have ā€˜ports’, which are linked to physical cables (if I’ve got this right!)

The answer was: the switch populates the CAM tables, and if it doesn’t know where to send something, the switch transmits everything on every port by doing a broadcast, so it gets to behave a bit like a ā€˜hub’.Ā  Broadcasting also happens if a CAM table gets full, and this is something that hackers can exploit.Ā  To deal with this, there’s also something called port security.Ā  To make things even more complicated, there are different types of port security too.

Within fifteen minutes, my head was exploding with in-depth technical detail.Ā  I was also reminded about the different layers of the ISO 7-layer networking model (ā€˜a switch is a layer 2 device whereas a hub is a layer 1 device’): I was being reminded about parts of my undergraduate studies.

During the teaching part of the day, we were introduced to the concept of a VLAN and its benefits, and the concept of ā€˜VLAN trunks’. I also made a note of the glorious phrase ā€˜a router on a stick’.Ā 

On the subject of packet routing and routers (which was a ā€˜level 3’ device, apparently), other concepts were introduced, such as a ā€˜routing table’ and different types of dynamic routing protocols, which had names like: EIGRP (enhanced interior gateway routing protocol), OSPF (open shortest path first) and RIP (routing information protocol).Ā  These protocols were different in terms of the extent to which they were connected to vendors, and the way they approached ā€˜cost’.Ā  Cost, in networking terms (it seemed) could be considered in terms of networking distance, or state (or quality?) of a link.

I appreciate all this sounds pretty hard-core technical, but what does all this mean?Ā  Routing protocols (as far as I understand) are important, since they convey the status of the network to the other magic devices that keep the internet working.Ā  If there is a bit of the internet that stops working, it’s important that other devices know about it, so they can channel packets around the bits of it that are having problems.

During this part of the class, I had another flashback to my undergrad years, where I studied different types of computer algorithms.Ā  One of those algorithms, called Dijkstra’s Algorithm, was all about finding the quickest path through a network.Ā  His algorithm can be used to help your satnav to find the shortest route to a destination, or to find your way around the London Underground Tube map.Ā  It can also be used to direct internet traffic.Ā  If you’re interested in this kind of stuff, I recommend you have a quick look at M269 Algorithms, Data Structures and Computability.Ā  In computing (as with networks) everything is connected (in one way or another!)

Other ā€˜teaching bits’ included information about something called an ā€˜access control list’ (which allows for network filtering), DHCP (an abbreviation for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) and NAT (network address translation).Ā  This connected to the point that there are two different internet standards: IPv4 and IPv6.Ā  Please don’t ask me about IPv6, because I don’t know too much about it, but what I do know is that NAT is like a ā€˜fix’ to get around the problem that there are more internet enabled devices in the world than there are IPv4 internet addresses.Ā  There’s also something called PAD, or port-address translation (but I don’t know too much about).

In essence, we were being taught about the nuts and bolts of the internet and how it worked.Ā  It’s all very well hearing theory, but nothing beats actually playing with physical hardware.Ā  That’s when the lab session comes in.

The playing bit

We had a task to do: we had to connect three different routers together, configure them, and get them talking to each other.Ā  The routers (along with ancillary hardware, such as racks of switches and cabling) were situated in different parts of the lab.Ā  After our tutors described our task, we were all encouraged to go up to the racks to try to figure out what was what: we had an opportunity to eyeball and touch real physical Cisco hardware.

I followed the cables between the different devices and asked some questions about the various interfaces.Ā  I could see how it was set up.Ā  I was also informed that the hardware was set up in ā€˜a raw state’ that meant that we had to send commands to them, to try to get them speaking to each other.

I sat down at a computer workstation.Ā  I then figured out that a workstation had a link to one (or more) of the routers.Ā  Each workstation was pretending to be a really old ā€˜dumb terminal’, which was the kind of interface you needed to use to talk to the router.

Our tutors gave us a handout, and a glossary of commands, and it was left up to us to figure out how to get the routers working together.Ā  Thankfully, I was paired up with someone who knew how to issue the device with instructions.Ā  Between us, we figured out how to send a ā€˜reset’ command and give it a name.

After quite a bit of head scratching, asking questions and mild cursing, I suddenly understood what was going on.Ā  There were three routers.Ā  Each router was connected to a separate terminal (or workstation) where we had to issue different sets of commands.Ā  I was trying to be clever and think that you could do everything from a single computer – but, there were clear pedagogic reasons why it was designed this way: to keep it simple, so we could more easily figure out what was going on.Ā  (Or, at least, this was my hypothesis!)

Half an hour later, we had all the routers (pretty much) talking to each other, which was our first assignment (which was what everyone would have done at the end of the previous day school).Ā  Other groups in the lab session (who were more familiar with the commands that they needed to issue) were storming ahead, spotting mistakes in the script, and forging a path to the next assignment.

Since I was there just to observe and to learn, and I was becoming increasingly confused (and I had another appointment), I decided to call it a day.

Final notes

The teaching bit was great, and the lab bit was good fun, but there was a huge amount of detail to take in over a very short period of time.Ā  I managed to understand some stuff, but quite a lot of the detail passed me by – especially when it came to working with the actual hardware.Ā  This, of course, relates to the importance of the labs.Ā  Nothing really beats an opportunity to work with real kit (and also to work with other students who are going through the same learning process that you are).

Although I left early, I did feel that I would be able to master a lot of what was being covered during the day school.Ā  This made me wonder: I wonder if the other day schools might be different.Ā  Also, since I found the stuff so geekily interesting, I had another question, which was: could I find the time to officially study this module?Ā 

At the moment, time, is a challenge.Ā  I’m currently embroiled in writing up three different teaching and learning research projects.Ā  Once I get these out of the way (and another couple of side projects I’m working on), I’m sorely tempted to give T216 a go.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 3266201