OU blog

Personal Blogs

Where have I been thinking?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Sharif Al-Rousi, Friday, 7 June 2013, 14:11
Reflecting on my work in the Open Design Studio, and on online v offline thinking
Four weeks into our Open Design Studio (ODS) activity on the OU's H817 course, and I've just turned a corner with regard to feeling comfortable with the technology we're using. I've struggled with the ODS layout and our Google+ community, both of which I've found rather confusing to navigate or post to. The main gripe, however, has been Google Hangouts, where my participation has been hindered (I think) by my rather inferior broadband connection. As our the third team member joined our conversation, I suddenly lost audio, and that was effectively the end of the meeting for me.
In the event, Catherine and Mariana carried on with at Hangout that was publicly broadcast. In the event, they played host to some unwelcome interlopers. Mariana posted some interesting thoughts afterward on how this had made her feel. One of the things she brought up was the the idea of different strategies for 'online life' (David White, 2011), and 2 contrasting web users: residents and visitors. Visitors tend to go online to find resources, take them offline, and do their thinking there. In contrast, residents do their thinking online through online-social tools.
I have been doing my thinking for this block 'offline' to date. Now by and large any online thinking has been hindered by my unfamiliarity with the technology and getting to grips with this workspace. Incidentally, I've not been anywhere near our Google+ site since the weekend, and I think that's helped me focus on this site, and the tasks more.
In a way, because of the similiarities of this work to offline projects I deal with in my day job, I think I've subconsciously reverted to offline thinking. I feel I had begun to move some of my thinking online in the previous blocks, evidenced by my enthusiasm for blogging, which has been conspicuously (to me anyway) undernourished since the start of this block. Ultimately, I think this whole block has produced feelings of dissonance, compared to the previous blocks, which are rooted in this tension of online v offline thinking.
Reading Mariana's post has given me some comfort about this. Fine - for this task I need to bend the tools to work for me. What's worked this week is shutting the door on the Google+ community, and focusing mainly on offline thinking. That's given me a sense of accomplishment, and from this I hope to re-engage with Google+ at a later date - though because of the shortness of this block, I don't have much time left!
Permalink Add your comment
Share post

New blog post

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Sharif Al-Rousi, Friday, 22 Mar 2013, 14:58

Post in response to #H817open task 4: Priorities for Research in Open Education

"Imagine you are advising a funding organisation that wishes to promote activity and research in the area of open education.

  • Set out the three main priorities they should address, explaining each one and providing a justification for your list. Share this in the Week 1 forum8 and compare with priorities of others.

Thinking about a commercial training context, my priorities would be:

1) Learner Support: My angle on this is about the scaffolding, the signposting and aggregating infrastructure that needs to be in place to help learners organise, sense-make and plug in their own preferred technologies and tools; and then promoting the development of self-directing skills in this area.

There's something about the need for project management tools, to allow for meaningful cooperation activities to take place both synchronously and asynchroously, without some learners being cast adrift.

2) Intellectual rights / Content ownership: I can't see this going away. There needs to be a consideration of how future business models will work. Perhaps the future is that the infrastructure needs in my first point will be met through new models?

3) Recognition / validation: Linked to assessment, I suppose. There needs to be a meeting point between non-accredited, open and fluid learning with the structured formal stuff. Look here for innovation.

Permalink 3 comments (latest comment by Jonathan Vernon, Friday, 22 Mar 2013, 23:20)
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 230158