OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

Seeing is Believing

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday 14 April 2026 at 14:56

sketch.png

Seeing is Believing

The human eye has often been described as one of the most striking examples of complexity in the natural world. It is not merely that it allows us to see, but that it does so through a finely balanced cooperation of parts—each one necessary, each one precisely suited to its role. From a Christian perspective, this complexity is not simply impressive; it raises deeper questions about origin, purpose, and design.

The eye functions as a complete system. Light enters through the cornea, is regulated by the iris, focused by the lens, and then received by the retina, where specialized cells convert it into electrical signals. These signals travel along the optic nerve to the brain, where they are interpreted as sight. Remove or damage any one of these essential components, and vision is diminished or lost altogether. The system depends on the presence and proper function of all its parts.

This leads to what is often called irreducible complexity—the idea that certain systems cannot function if even one key part is missing. From this viewpoint, the eye does not appear to be something that could develop gradually through small, unguided steps. A partially formed eye, lacking coordination between its components, would not provide meaningful vision. Without vision, such intermediate stages would seem to offer little advantage.

It is here that a simple metaphor is often used to express the intuition behind this argument: if you see a turtle sitting on top of a fence post, you immediately know it didn’t get there by itself. Turtles do not climb fences, nor do they balance neatly on posts. The most reasonable conclusion is that something—or someone—placed it there.

In the same way, many Christians look at the eye and see something that appears “placed” rather than assembled by chance. The coordination of its parts, the precision of its function, and the depth of information required for it to operate all suggest, to them, the involvement of an intelligent cause. The eye is not just complex; it is organized complexity, working toward a clear purpose—sight.

This perspective is not rooted only in observation but also in belief. Scripture speaks of a Creator who forms and gives understanding. When Christians read, “He who formed the eye, shall He not see?”, they hear an echo of what they observe in nature—that such intricate structures reflect a designing mind.

At the same time, the argument is not merely about biology; it is also about meaning. The eye allows us to encounter the world in a rich and immediate way—to see beauty, recognize faces, and perceive light itself. For many believers, this is not incidental. It reflects a world that is not only structured but given, not only functioning but meaningful.

There are, of course, different views among Christians. Some accept evolutionary explanations while maintaining that God works through them. Others hold that systems like the eye were created directly and fully formed. Yet for those who emphasize irreducible complexity, the eye remains a powerful illustration of design.

Like the turtle on the fence post, it invites a pause—a moment of recognition that some things, when truly considered, seem to point beyond themselves. And in that quiet recognition, many Christians find not just an argument, but a sense of wonder at the possibility that the world, in all its detail, has been carefully and intentionally made.

Top of Form

 

Bottom of Form

 

It is often said that the UK is becoming a secular society. We hear it in headlines, in political conversations, and in the quiet assumptions people make about the modern world. Churches are closing, attendance is falling, and the old rhythms of Sunday worship no longer shape national life in the way they once did. On the surface, the conclusion seems obvious.

But that story is far too thin for the reality we are living in.

Because if we look more closely, the evidence does not point to a truly secular society—it points to a society in transition.

Take the numbers themselves. In the 2021 UK Census, around 46% of people in England and Wales still identified as Christian, and when you include Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, and others, well over half the population continues to profess belief in God or a religious identity. A genuinely secular society would not look like that. It would not carry such a weight of belief, even in cultural form.

And beyond formal religion, the picture becomes even clearer. Surveys by organisations like YouGov and Pew Research Centre consistently show that large numbers of people still believe in some kind of higher power, spiritual reality, or moral order beyond the material world, even if they do not attend church regularly. Many describe themselves as “spiritual but not religious.” That is not secularism—it is displaced or reshaped belief.

What we are witnessing is not the death of faith, but a quiet protest against what faith has become.

I have felt this myself for a long time. Religion, as it is often practiced today, can become too focused on itself—its buildings, its systems, its internal concerns. It risks losing sight of what it once was in the first century: a lived, breathing way of life rooted in love, humility, and service. And people sense that loss.

They are not rejecting God. They are rejecting what feels like a hollow version of devotion.

You see it everywhere, if you pay attention. People are tired—“churched out,” as I would put it. They are weary of structures that seem to have drifted from their purpose. But instead of abandoning faith altogether, many are stepping outside those structures and living it more directly.

They volunteer. They care for neighbours. They give their time quietly, without recognition. They speak about meaning, about goodness, about something deeper than themselves. These are not the habits of a secular people. These are the marks of a people still searching for God—perhaps more honestly than before.

Even the rise of informal gatherings—home groups, online fellowships, small communities—suggests not decline but relocation. Faith has not disappeared; it has simply moved. It is less visible, less institutional, but no less real.

A truly secular society would be indifferent to God. It would not wrestle with belief, or reshape it, or carry it into new spaces. It would simply forget.

But that is not what we see in the UK.

What we see is a nation still deeply marked by belief—historically, culturally, and personally—even as it questions the forms that belief has taken. The language of compassion, dignity, and moral responsibility still carries unmistakable Christian roots. Our charities, our sense of justice, even our idea that every person has inherent worth—these are not secular inventions. They are the long shadow of the Gospel.

So perhaps it is more accurate to say this:

The UK is not becoming secular. It is becoming disillusioned with institutions, while remaining quietly, stubbornly spiritual.

Faith is not vanishing. It is returning to something simpler. Something closer to its beginning.

And in that, there is something deeply hopeful.

Because when faith moves out of buildings and back into lives—into homes, into streets, into ordinary acts of kindness—it begins to look again like what it was always meant to be.

Not a system to belong to, but a way to live

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Astrophysics and the Search for Water

Visible to anyone in the world

Rain whispers on leaves,

a slow dance of drips and dreams—

thirsty earth sighs, full.



Image provided by https://unsplash.com/@nasa



The Existential Quest in Astrophysics: Beyond the Search for Water

As part of the National Astronomy Week in United Kingdom, the subject of water on other planets came to the fore. Astrophysicists' pursuit of water on distant planets often signals a quest for life beyond Earth. At its core, this search raises profound existential questions: Why are we searching for life elsewhere? Is it merely for potential colonization? Man is reminiscent of two baboons squabbling over a banana while destroying the garden around them? Humanity has already left indelible marks of ruin on Earth; if we were to inhabit another planet, how long before we replicated the same fate there?

Alternatively, if our motive is to uncover the origins of life, why then do we overlook the narrative of creation presented in Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning..."? Detractors may argue that incorporating God into scientific discourse is unscientific. Yet, history tells us that many of the greatest scientific minds believed in a divine architect. The intricate laws of physics, the fine-tuning of cosmic constants, and the complexity of life often suggest to some the hand of a deliberate designer—a higher intelligence they may identify as God.

Science, while a potent tool for decoding the natural world, inherently possesses limitations. It does not venture into metaphysical realms or tackle the existence of the supernatural. For believers, science enhances the understanding of what they perceive as God's creation, supplementing rather than negating their faith.

Moreover, the inner richness of personal  experiences and the elusive nature of human consciousness are not wholly accounted for by scientific means, hinting at a spiritual or divine dimension to our existence. Such experiences frequently bolster the belief in a higher power, enriching the spiritual tapestry of an individual's life.

Importantly, science alone does not lay the foundations for morality and ethics. The presence of objective moral values, which many argue necessitates a moral lawgiver, is another point where discussions about God frequently emerge.

While the scientific community remains divided—with many contending that scientific findings are neutral or even oppose theistic views—the conversation between science and religion continues to thrive. For those who discern a connection, the integration of science and faith offers a more comprehensive understanding of reality than either could alone.

Lastly, we must ponder: if life exists outside our solar system and if it were superior both in power and morality, what would it think of humanity? Our history of adultery, deceit, aggression, environmental destruction, corporate greed, and profound inequalities paints a troubling portrait. What would these beings think of the race called mankind?

In our relentless stride toward cosmic exploration, these reflections remind us of the profound moral and philosophical implications of our scientific endeavours, urging us to look inward even as we reach for the stars.


Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 1892086