OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Mind your language

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Thursday 15 January 2026 at 10:06

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  

Caught by your kindness

I should 'zip it'

[ 7 minute read ]

I have a strange medical condition that no medical staff have heard of, and it has never been documented. I talk rubbish to people despite being a fairly bright chap. That is not uncommon; just look in the dictionary under fool, or jester, or simpleton. I would prefer that your dictionary falls open at 'savant' before you get to 'fool' though.

I am not a savant. I am a fool. I picked up a habit of talking to strangers while I was getting used to living in The Netherlands. As soon as I discovered that I could speak English to the Dutch people, I did. In fact, back then I used it as an opener for conversations with women.

In a pub or at a bus stop.

       'Hello, Do you speak English?'

       'Yes, a little.' Which means, fluently.

       'Would you mind speaking English with me for a while?'

       'Okay!'

Even though I only wanted a conversation with a woman, if we liked each other I would have asked for a date. But I was never thinking beyond a chat when I started talking. Now I realise that, to them, I was coming on to them. My approach was likely intriguing to them because, at the time, Dutch men were the wallflowers and the women had to approach the ones they 'liked'. On top of that, the women where I lived had a lot of experience of English men trying to turn a chance into a story.

Now, somehow, I don't like how I was in those days. But this was a while back. In 2002, Shania Twain had a hit with 'I'm Gonna Getcha'.

I went to Genius and stole these lyrics:

[Chorus]
(I'm gonna getcha) I'm gonna getcha while I gotcha in sight
(I'm gonna getcha) I'm gonna getcha if it takes all night
(Yeah, you can betcha) You can betcha by the time I say "go"
(I'm gonna getcha) You'll never say "no"
(I'm gonna getcha) I'm gonna getcha, it's a matter of fact
(I'm gonna getcha) I'm gonna getcha, don't you worry 'bout that
(Yeah, you can betcha) You can bet your bottom dollar in time
(I'm gonna getcha, I'm gonna getcha) You're gonna be mine

Just like I should, I'll getcha good.

In 1992, Bizarre Inc, an electronic music band had a dance / trance track called, 'I'm gonna getcha'. that had the lyrics:

'I'm gonna get you, baby
I'm gonna get you, yes, I am
I'm gonna get you, baby
I'm gonna get you, yes, I am

Why waste your time?
You know you're gonna be mine
You know you're gonna be mine
You know you're gonna be mine.'

Lots of people were 'loved up' in those days having taken ecstasy.

Those weren't the examples I had in mind to illustrate my point; it was Blondie's 'One way or Another' (1978) featured in the 2000 film  'Ugly Coyote' that has the lyric, 'One Way or Another...I'm gonna get you'. and the refrain, 'I'm gonna getcha, I'm gonna getcha', that was in my head.

Blondie's song was used as an example in a radio chat show I heard, that predatory behaviour was publicly legitimised because pop culture influencers sang about it as a desirable quality. I can't remember when it was, probably before 2020 anyway. 

Some things clang in our heads like discordant bells dropped down a belfry. Good Crikeyness! I thought. Really? I had images in my head of young women serenaded on balconies and men persistent in asking for a woman's hand and winning her heart for true love to wash through the rest of their lives. I never considered that stalking is having an idea of wanting to spend some time with someone I am attracted to. I suppose, seeing someone at the water cooler and sighing 'Why won't he or she notice me?' is a lot different to, 'I know what time he / she has a break and I am gonna engineer a meeting with her or him.' which is a long way off from 'I will make you mine.'

I never considered that some people might be offended by me wanting to speak to them and using a short-cut to create an opportunity for that event to occur. Don't be thinking that the Dutch are disadvantaged when faced with a native of a foreign language they are speaking in. The only way I could tell they were not native speakers of English is their beautiful Dutch accent and that they never split the infinitive. (Not split infinitive - To go boldly. Split infinitive - To boldly go).

From being an avid hitch-hiker throughout Europe when I was in my early twenties, I had picked up a habit of just talking to anyone who would stand still for a while, It can get pretty lonely when you are young and no-one speaks English and you don't speak five languages as well as your own.

I have never really kicked the habit of being chatty. The truth is, I have adapted it by including a splash of irony or humour when I speak English to people in England. It sometimes back-fires.

I don't appear, to my neighbours, to live an ordinary life and have ordinary values. That is, they perceive me as being different to them. They have cars, I do not; They are terse with their good morning greetings (if they make them at all to me) while I am effusive; they have a facade for being in public and a private life, while I am just the same inside and out. They are wary of me, and because they are wary of me they are scared of me, and because they are scared of me they don't like me.

The most obvious thing in my speech is that I do not join the dots between comments I make; I just assume the people with their fingers in their ears will do that. If I do join the dots, they think I am being patronising. I have no idea of the mental acuity of people I speak to. To join or not to join?

In my local shop, the shopkeeper was keen to talk to me as soon as I walked in. I would eventually get to the counter so I just 'shopped'. When I went to pay, he said to his wife, 'Here he is. Here comes Martin.' He asked me where I had been because I hadn't been in for a week or so.

       'Hiding from you.'

       'Why? You don't owe me any money.' I never have, and nor will I.

       'You never know.' I blindly said. I didn't really want to have this kind of conversation so I was just glib and evasive.

At the Post Office part of the shop was a chap who lives obliquely across the road from me. 'He lives obliquely' might work in a poem about me. I had drawn his attention to me before the shopkeeper had started his questioning because the shopkeeper left him to come to greet me, and I had said, 'No I will wait. He is my neighbour, He lives in my road.' and 'He knows me.' It wasn't as it seems. I always give way to people whether they are on a lunch break, or if they have children in tow, or if they are in front of me in a queue. The 'He knows me' was the humour part. I know!

There are a number of facets to the scene now. There is a preconception of me held by my 'across the road' neighbour; there is an outward show of favour towards me; there is a suggestion that I might be so poor that I cannot afford food and build up debt; and there is my cross-functional spoken response to the shop-keepers curiousity as to where I had been for the last week. 

Fortunately, this particular chap isn't chatty and he doesn't talk to anyone in our road, as much as I have seen; but I am not a curtain-twitcher.

It could have been quite awkward. My carefully cultured wacky persona swept from its clown-sized feet by a clumsy spoken exchange and replaced with a sad, poverty-stricken idiot. Did I get that the wrong way around through wishful thinking? Perhaps I am not fooling anyone, after all.

To top it off; when I got home I discovered the Ajwain Seeds I wanted to ask the shopkeeper about, such as, 'What do these taste like? And what dish (meal) would you put them in?' were in my carrier bag. I accidentally bought them. They smell like stale Rosemary and Thyme mixed together. Stale smell and taste seems to be a Sri-Lankan thing. If you like WoodApple Jam (My shopkeeper sells it), you might like to try licking sugar from your dishcloth!

Mind your language.

All the lyrics are from Genius online.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Only a fool does not recognise their fallibility

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 25 April 2025 at 07:13
All my blogs:  https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551


silhouette of a female face in profile 

[12 minute read ]

two men either side of text that reads, Half Penny Stories


Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Change by a civilian


A friend I have, knowing that I have a sympathetic ear, cornered me at a conference, with the following thinking as part of his belief system:

       ‘We all live in a rapidly changing world that somehow always manages to be one step ahead of us, at least technically. If you want evidence of this, you only have to look back to the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the steam engine.’

       ‘I’m listening,’ I said.

       ‘I had a model steam traction engine made by Mamod, when I was a child.’ he said.

       ‘Hmm. My brother had a steam roller.’

       ‘Given the right tools, I could build a rudimentary, but still viable, steam engine to power something that requires only a relatively small amount of power. I could even use a flywheel to maintain the power between piston strokes.’

Yeah, not difficult, I thought.

I am not an engineer; not in the strict sense of being someone who has formally studied engineering; electrical, mechanical, chemical, physics, or whatever. I am definitely not a scientist, such as we think mathematicians are and people who work out out how big our universe is. Yet, all of us can be in one or the other of these camps of thinking; I have mentioned this before when explaining a priori and posteriori. An engineering mind takes the facts that scientists have discovered and uses those facts to solve problems in the real world.

When we were at school, we worked in teams. Ostensibly, this was to make the brightest kids in the class take the role of assistant teacher; let’s face it, those brain-boxes had intelligence to spare anyway, and end of school results needed to look good. A communist might be happy with taxing the rich to give to the poor. Schools have done this for decades.

Quentin went on; I knew he would.

      ‘Of course, poor achievers in life have a right to think they should live in luxury. The nanny-state from 1948 to the present has consistently robbed the poor of opportunity, recently.’

Well, I didn’t expect to hear criticism of the Welfare Act 1948 today, but with Quentin, anything is possible.

      ‘When I say ‘poor’ I mean the one’s who received the most help in school from the richest or brightest person in the team. In 1765, James Watt came up with an improvement to Thomas Newcomen’s steam engine. This ‘light-bulb’ or ‘Eureka’ moment could only have come to someone like Watt. People like him are the ones who brought improvement to modern poor people’s lives through the subjugation of their ancestors in weaving mills.’

Blah, blah, blah, I thought, Get to the point!

    ‘James Watt, in a modern school, would be the bright kid helping everyone else in his team to make the leap of discovery or realisation to understand how to come up with a solution to a problem set by a teacher or textbook. Schools then rely on pupils’ memories to be able to award level two and level three qualifications for students at, what is it, sixteen, eighteen years old? After that, Watt would go on to invent things to make himself rich and make utilisers of his inventions rich.’


I wasn’t averse to Quentin’s thinking, and he knew that. I didn’t always agree with him, but I had half-cooked ideas of my own, which left on the back-boiler, were always ready for a stir and some seasoning.

I moved my quite forgotten stew of juvenile thinking forward. In the 1980s, the UK Government decided that everybody should be allowed credit, pending credit checks of course. This meant that the class society was gradually taken from the UK populace. A communist would say ‘Good, Share the wealth and support the people.’

I chucked in Quentin’s mix, piece-meal, and tasted it. A class-less society means supporting people who falsely think they could have been a modern-day James Watt or Thomas Newcomen and are somehow equal to genius or successful risk-takers. ‘I know, I will get credit and be equal to the people next door’. Those people next door, they did not realise, have everything they need without credit. With no credit interest to pay, there is better utilisation of their available income. The ‘haves’ get richer, while the ‘credit-ridden’ get poorer; poorer because they somehow believe they have a right to luxury because the modern ‘James Watt’ helped them at school, and gave them a false sense of hope based on their end of school examinations which are a result of their achievements IN A TEAM with excellent thinkers in it. Take away the spark of initiative, and what do you have?

Quentin watched and waited. I nodded in a head-lolling way, raised my eyebrows, and grunted. He smiled.

Why did, Quentin, my friend, tell me this? It turns out that Quentin has a great deal of money, enjoys amateur dramatics, and has another friend, Alec, who went to the same private school as him, but has always been an under-achiever in the modern world. Alec had, Quentin told me, moved to the very same village I now live in, only two years ago. I had never knowingly met Alec.

Quentin told me that the last time Alec had won something without coming up with a formula to fleece bookmakers at horse races, was when he had bought a single raffle ticket and it was selected. Apparently, he wasn’t a popular sixteen year old in his home village and there was an array of prizes which the master of ceremonies had had to spend considerable time scanning to find the least valuable, or least useful, item. Eventually a sushi rolling mat was chosen against a bottle of wine, a small food hamper, a box of chocolates and about five other expensive things.


       ‘This is what matches your ticket number!’, Alec was supposedly told.


So, when Quentin, in sympathy for Alec’s life of inadequacy and disappointment, ear-holed me at that conference to ask for my help, I came up with an award for his ‘Alec’. Everybody has their ‘Alec’ and nobody likes a Smart-Alec. I congratulated myself on that one, despite it being a little mixed up in its relevance.

Quentin told me that, as a result of our combined efforts, Alec had been nominated for an award, sixty years  after his raffle win. Alec didn’t know what to expect. Of course, he now lives in a different village to his youth, and the locals, by dint of his age, automatically consider him to be greater than any unruly teenager. Of course, I had to meet him and he is, truly, still unbelievably dim. Yes, I am one of those bigots who classify people and thereafter use heuristics to keep them there in my mind. No-one can change their spots or class position. Once a teenager, always a teenager, as far as I am concerned.

The event was to be held in our village hall after the monthly screening of an obscure film by the local film club. After a couple of yawning hours, the crowd cheered up and some were woken by their immediate seated neighbours. At last, the moment that they had came for; the ‘Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Change by a civilian’. No-one in our area had ever been lauded or praised so highly, quite simply because there never had been this award before.


       ‘And now the highest award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Change by a civilian’

      ‘The nominees are Anna Clarke for arranging Council funding for the local Brownies’ trip to Offa’s Dyke, last year; David Brown, our local farmer, for contributing to the new East/West railway with the donation of his farmhouse and re-development of it into a local train station; and Raymond White, for the clear instructions he gives for which side of a cyclist he will overtake on, while on a cycle path.’. That’s me! I realised.

The crowd sat up a little more.

       ‘And the winner is….Raymond White!’

      ‘Bravo’, called the crowd as they threw flowers at me, at ME!

      ‘No!’, I shouted above the din, ‘It should be Alec!’


For years, cyclists had been troubled and confused about which side the faster cyclist approaching them from behind was going to pass them on.

The UK Highway Code under: ‘Annex 1. You and your bicycle

Information and rules about you and your bicycle’, states that:

‘A bicycle should have a bell.’

It does not say must have a bell

Many pedestrians, particularly the older type, think that is law for a bicycle to have a bell. I have always liked to prove that a bell is no longer suitable in the modern world because people wear ear-buds and are listening to music that may include notes of the same frequency of a bicycle bell.


This is what I told Alec. Quentin’s plan was to use his wild bunch of amateur dramatics-loving friends to create a scenario that Alec would unknowingly interact with. I had told Alec to call out, ‘Passing on the right.’ each time he overtook another cyclist on a cycle-path. After a couple of weeks, actors would, unbeknownst to him, race to catch up with Alec from their hiding places along his route back home from work. As they approached him they were to call ‘Passing on your right’ just before overtaking him. The plan was to cause Alec to think that the local bike-riding population had recognised his efforts to be clear and safe, as being something they wanted to adopt themselves. Alec would then pat himself on the back. The award at the village hall was to cement his pride; after all false pride in someone so old as Alec wouldn’t be much of a problem for the young people of today.


I thought that Alec would think this was a sound idea because I already did something similar; to make sure that I was noticed when I approached pedestrians from behind I called out, ‘Bike’, with an expectation that the person in front would move to the side of any shared pavement for pedestrians and bicycles. When they do not hear me I then shout, ‘BIKE BEHIND’. A standard bicycle bell sound cannot be turned up, my voice, of course, can.


According to my diary of near accidents, I have saved over two hundred lives by shouting at pedestrians. But, the best part of shouting at pedestrians is when they stand still and shout back. That way I know they have heard me and I have saved a further one hundred and seventy eight lives because they will not be suddenly stepping to one side or the other.


On occasion, I have had to pick myself up off the floor with a sore face because the clumsy pedestrian, usually men, in turning has allowed one of their hands to fly out from their body at face level. I realised that these accidents could impact on the fomenting of good manners, so that is why I decided to also do what I had told Alec to do.

      ‘Passing on the right!’

Now, in my area, there is no sound of bicycle bells, only calls of intent. Many people are now safer.

According to my log of near accidents, scenarios I have witnessed which I keep at home; all told, I have vicariously saved one thousand, five hundred and five lives in my area by introducing good clear manners to young cycling people.

Alec was grinning ear-to ear.

A woman came over to me and introduced herself as a talent scout from the UK Highway Code legislators. She warmly shook my hand.


       ‘I am going to recommend that the UK Highway Code has an entry that states that cyclists should shout at pedestrians and pedestrians should stand stock still and control their children so bicycles can move smoothly on pavements, unimpeded and safely.’

     ‘This is a breakthrough in progress!’ gushed her companion.


The cheering crowd carried me out of the hall on their shoulders and right back to my house. The next day, I walked back to the village hall to collect my bicycle, and thanked all the cyclists shouting at me as they approached me from behind. A few of them held up a single middle finger to show their support for my first award. They seemed to think I was wearing two hats, at least that is what they were shouting, though running the words together.

The elderly cyclists held up two fingers in a victory sign, but most couldn’t seem to remember whether the palm should face the recipient or not. Perhaps they were showing their support for me to win a second award.


      ‘Thank you so much’, I gratefully called. 


I didn't realise that Quentin had set me up. It was just a joke; a joke on me. Most of the people in the village hall were actual residents in my village.

Quentin has never liked me.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 234127