OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Laugh and the World laughs with You

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Monday 3 August 2026 at 10:25

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

Cadwell NOT Caldwell

If you believe in meritocracy, you can leave now.

[2 minute read ] 

The philosopher David Hume held that we are saddened by other people's sadness because other people make us, by their sentiment and action, sad or happy; happy people make us happy. Perhaps this is why I heard on LBC that there is an idea that the CV (curriculum vitae) is considered by some recruiters and employers to be insufficient in securing an interview.

Certainly, whenever I have had job interviews in the last ten years the interviewer seems keener to understand how much I will contribute to the fun factor at work. The LBC radio show host was floating an idea that employers and recruiters are potentially seeking social-media style videos from job applicants. I suppose this provides an opportunity for the candidate to impress upon others their sociability and cheerfulness while gushing about how excited they are about a potential opportunity to work in a field that they would 'just die for'. I don't 'do' social media. I think you can tell. However, if I follow Hume's drift (above) I can understand that it is better to have 'smiley' people in the workplace than moping and morose people who scowl from corners; it is better for morale and that means greater overall work-output. But is that really what is behind the interviewer's incessant probing into job applicant's ability to brighten a room with witty conversation? I think not.

I have been an employer and whenever I conducted job interviews I was concerned about honesty and integrity foremost. Will this person come to work when they are needed? Can I rely on them to do the job? Can I leave them to just get on with it, or will someone have to waste their own time babysitting them? Once that is established I would decide how much contact the potential employee would have with customers and in what fashion. Then I would train them for that specific position, or entreat them to defer any inquiries made by customers to another member of their team. My approach was, if everyone is there to work and not stand around chatting then it really doesn't matter if someone is miserable. Today's employment is mindful of the impact it has on work-sociability. A strange fish to me.

I believe in meritocracy which should mean high quality output. I think most of the UK, today, believe in 'It will do!' so long as everyone is happy, so employ the friendly average-ability person.

       'Yeah! I like this person.'

       'Can they do the job?'

       'They'll learn. They'll have a friendly team around them to show them the ropes.'

       'I suppose you are right. And in any case who wants to come to work and be miserable during the slack periods. No, we must make sure that the workers when they are idle are comfortable; that they enjoy being idle and will divide their attention between productivity and seeking fun.

Well, Ring-a-Ring-a-Roses!  Too harsh? I expect many people would think so. I, however, have worked in a number of countries in which I have not known the languages very well. You just get on with your work and gain satisfaction from that. I am also someone whose parents disappeared when I was sixteen. I can never understand how relevant social interaction is to some people; most people. I forget that people need to feel validated and find comfort in being important to others on an emotional level, and that even at work people cannot put aside their craving for social interaction. 

I fail at job interviews with a single sentence: 'I don't bring my phone to work.' I immediately see the interviewer inwardly scratch their head as they try to process why anyone would not want to be available for an aimless chat; why they have no need to be boosted by the attention of others, or why they would take a job that doesn't bother them enough for them to need to seek emotional succour outside of their own work satisfaction. I watch them leap at the mental hurdles and fall. They only seem to fall once before they make a decision. They don't get up and try again. 'Oh, that doesn't sound like me at all!' they think. 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

She Smiles

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 8 July 2025 at 07:57

silhouette of a female face in profile

.

[ 5 minute read ]

.

Her mouth moves up

.

I have a neighbour that has a really cute smile. She doesn’t smile often, at least not at me. But, like most women, if I smile at her she smiles back. Maybe a psychologist would say she doesn’t want to give me the wrong signal. I have never really understood why smiling is the wrong signal. No, I tell a lie; I had a girlfriend that many men found alluringly attractive. She, maybe because she is Columbian, smiled a lot. It turns out she was a lot of men’s temporary girlfriend for an hour or two. Yeah, okay, I understand that a woman’s smile aimed at a man might be construed / misconstrued as ‘Would you like me to be your temporary girlfriend?’

.

My neighbour lives next door and we sometimes talk, mostly about plants and trees. We are mature like that. She sometimes gossips a bit and I try not to.

.

I had hurt my knee and had trouble getting my bicycle out of my front door. It goes in forward and comes out backwards and needs to be turned around without touching the ground as it comes out to avoid the plants. This meant that I had to take all my own weight and the bike’s weight on my soggy knee and rotate one hundred and eighty degrees. I can normally do this in one because human bodies can be facing a different direction to the direction the feet are facing, but it does mean twisting our knees a bit.

.

       ‘Urgh! Urgh! Aahh!’ I panted quite a bit too ‘Pant, Pant’, because I also had Atrial Fibrillation (the heart doesn’t beat as it should or misses beats) caused by too much caffeine and too much stress. Mine goes away and I only rarely get it. This urgh and pant went on down the garden path until I reached the road, where I carefully got on my bike from the elevated position of the pavement. Now, most of my weight is on the bike saddle and the movement of my knee will not include any twisting. Much less pain.

.

I started to ride and THEN I noticed my neighbour in her garden; she had been hidden by her hedge a bit, and my own inability to recognise the presence of other people being around. That was a temporary issue because I am ‘blessed’ with hyper-vigilance. Most people with PTSD are cursed with it; that’s what makes them jumpy, I think. After decades of it, I have somewhat turned it into a super-power. Okay, a power. Well, maybe an AA battery power. It is actually pretty binary in how it manifests – super-aware and not shockable, or jumping out of my skin.

.

       ‘Hello, Sally!’ I cheerfully called.

.

She had heard me huffing and puffing and oohing, aahing, and ughing before I got on my bike, and then noticed me calmly cycling past her like a magnificent, tall and handsome swan in human form. I am like that. She plainly thought that I had been aware of her and had pretended to be in pain or out of breath. She turned her head towards me, away from her bird feeder, and smiled her wonderful smile. This one said, ‘You had me fooled, you rascal.’ Thinking about it as I cycled on, I wondered what she might do if I dropped down dead in front of her. That would be a real shame because I would miss her smiling at me. So later, I told her I was not acting; you know, not ‘crying wolf’. She just looked confused. It was a couple of days later and I don’t figure in her life as a memorable entity, so I think she had forgotten my act / actual pain.

.

I am unusual in that most things I come across are not particularly interesting to me. I have a ruthless streak and use it on myself. I will deny myself practically anything for the sake of the tiniest cause; most of the time the cause is driven by how can I be more lazy or how can I reduce spending money. They don’t always segue together well. Take cycling instead of catching a bus or driving, for example.

.

Advertising and marketing have absolutely zero effect on me. I mean zero. I even studied marketing to find out why, but I am none the wiser from solely that. So I studied mental health and there, by extrapolating stuff and making my own recipe I came up with a passable understanding of myself. And it is only today thinking about Sally’s smile, that I understand why photographers of clothing models make the models mould their bodies into certain shapes while they click away.

.

If I was a photographer and Sally was a model, I would trick her and then reveal the trick to her. She would squint a little and that smile would move her cheeks a bit, more than Mona Lisa’s, her mouth would move up a bit, and I would be able to ‘see’ Sally thinking, ‘Sneaky.’

.

So now, I can recognise three smiles, the smile that says ‘Sneaky’ the Duchenne smile (genuine and reaches the eyes) and the ‘Pan Am’ smile (false for customers and cameras); four if I count my Colombian ex-girlfriend’s smile that says. ‘Want to have fun?’ I can’t help thinking that, HER smile is just a natural smile and European men, surprised by it, think it means, ‘Let’s do it’. I know SHE never turned it off because she once said to me. ‘If it happens, it happens.’ It’s a good attitude but it didn’t really make me happy. Young, carefree and heading for complication, but she felt good from the male attention.

.

I wonder if there is a smile that just says, ‘Good Morning, keep walking and forget about me.’

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 641193