OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Jagged and Jarring Doomsayer

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Saturday 27 December 2025 at 08:59

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  

[ 4 minute read ]

Jagged and Jarring Doomsayer

I have so much more to learn

I recently came across someone who had written a piece in the second party narrative. In case you don't know what that is I shall demonstrate, though clumsily because it is really difficult for me:

You got out of bed, looking un-rested, and rubbed your face. Each morning you felt the same, confused and curious simultaneously. You knew you had been somewhere and you always know that everyone else knows where, but you can never remember. Your daily new tattoo told you nothing, but today the black dragon on your right thigh jogged one of your memories.

First person narrative would be this: I got out of bed, looking un-rested, and rubbed my face. Each morning I felt the same, confused and curious simultaneously. I knew I had been somewhere and I always know that everyone else knows where, but I can never remember. My daily new tattoo told me nothing, but today the black dragon on my right thigh jogged one of my memories.

There is an edginess to the same piece when it is written in the second person narrative, that is simply not there when it is written in a form we are, as readers, strongly familiar with, such as first person narrative (above)

(A thought came to my head just then that in verbal arguments, bickering between two people, saying 'you' is usually accusatory. Of course, 'you' is also used in complimentary statements). 

In linguistic typology, there is also an order to where we place the 'subject'; 'verb'; and 'object'. In British English, this is SVO (subject; verb; object) - 'I eat custard'. In Star Wars, Yoda that ugly little wise thing - I have never seen any Star Wars film - uses a different  order (OSV) - 'Custard you eat'. This is not an uncommon order; it is only appealing or wonky, however you find it, in English. Those of us who have English as a first language instantly know that we are speaking to someone who does not have English as a first language if they do not use the appropriate order. There is also VSO, I think.

ThoughtCo has this: 'The initialism SVO represents the basic word order of main clauses and subordinate clauses in present-day English: Subject, Verb, Object.' 

If you are not into linguistics, or creative writing, you probably won't ever be interested in mixing second person narrative written in English with a different SOV word order. That is something that I find impossible because my command of prepositions, articles, clauses and other stuff, educated I was not! I know there are a few people who read this who are able to do this; I am not one of them.

Well, that went well!

I used to buy magazines of logic puzzles. In today's world, solving the mess above with A.I. would have meant me just buying the answers at the back of the book. There is no fun in that. I would suggest a jaded mind who has no wish to learn buys answers. When I was in the second year of Primary school we had Beta Book 2 for our maths (Am. 'math') text book. In W.H. Smith, a UK high street stationers, I bought the Beta Book 2 answer book. I got caught cheating and it was confiscated from me. I wonder ff the school thought I had stolen it. I never heard from my parents one way or the other. Thinking about it, I suspect that the teachers never needed an answer book and so there were never any in the school anyway. Buying answers is cheating.

I feel like an old sex worker, retired from 'knowing' many clients; though, for me, less of the physical contact and more of the knowledge. I might throw a blanket description over the Western World, of how some of us might consider an experienced sex-worker once they have retired (it is an expletive). Let me elaborate a bit.

There are somewhere around 8.23 billion people living on the planet this morning. 3% of us, all have an IQ of 130 and above. China has around 1.14 billion citizens. That means there are 34.2 million Chinese with this extraordinary level of brilliance to choose from, to educate; select for suitability; and put into power, tyrannical or not. Of course, many of the Chinese population have SO FAR not been sufficiently nourished in the womb or throughout their lives to develop their full potential. So, maybe there is a viable group of 5% of that 34.2 million. This means that 1.71 million Chinese workers with an IQ of 130 or above may already have been deemed suitable for powerful roles in the Chinese Government. Does that sound like the right amount to run China? Of course, for that number to be used they need to work from birth to death.

Compare that to India which has more people than China. Not so advanced we think. Has anyone heard of BRICS by any chance (The economic group which was initially made up of Brazil, Russia, India and China and still contains these countries)?

Just saying, right?

Jagged and Jarring Doomsayer

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Teams, Feedback, Leadership, Magic and Learning of Requited love.

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Wednesday 9 April 2025 at 14:50

Blog address for all the posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

black and white image of a female face in silhouette


Confidence

At some point we are all asked to give feedback to at least one person. Many of us lie to our most intimate persons. ‘We ask OURSELVES what does this person want me to tell them? ‘You are a great singer, Ingrid, you should go on Britain’s Got Talent!’ Of, course Britain’s Got Talent is very well produced, so we really have no idea whether Ingrid really can sing, or if she has been set up by her malevolent family team. Yet, what if Ingrid lives at home with her parents and she is tone deaf and just will not shut up.

       ‘Shut up, Ingrid!’

       ‘But I love singing, and Vicki says I am really good.’

Her parents looked at each other, popcorn en-route to their mouths, and eyes rapidly returning to the dance troupe on the telly.

      ‘What she needs is a shock to set her straight.’

      ‘Yeah, let’s apply for Britain’s Got Talent on her behalf.’


It could happen. If Ingrid trusts her friend Vicki, who let’s face it, is not so pretty as Ingrid and works well as a wing-woman when they are out on the pull (you know, as a less attractive foil); then Ingrid is the leader of their team, while Vicki is always trying to keep up with the standards of someone she is convinced is superior to her, merely by dint of Ingrid’s looks getting more attention from intoxicated boys on Friday nights than Vicki normally gets.

Some years ago, I was very fortunate to be a secret player in an impromptu game I suddenly sprung on a young woman, Donna, the one who got the most attention from boys, and her friend Carla. Our first meeting was brief and we only swapped names; and, yes, I spoke to Donna before I addressed Carla that time. However, I knew we would meet again another weekend. ‘Carla’, I thought, ‘Remember her name! Carla.’

A couple of weeks later, Donna was more than a little bewildered the next time we met, when I spoke to Carla first.

      ‘Hello, Carla’

      ‘You remember my name!’ Eyes wide, bless her.

       ‘Of course. Who’s this?’ I already knew.

       ‘I’m Donna……!’

I interrupted her.

      ‘So, Carla, what you been up to? Do you wanna a drink?’


Such fun. Carla really was good to be with that night. I thought she would be. Unfortunately, she was in a team in which she was never the leader and her candle was always burning with a guttering flame. Her position, I am sure, is what she, not consciously, felt she deserved; to be eternally in second-place. I think she might have had some control, though, in not letting another good looking friend also join her and Donna's team.

A couple of years before I met Carla and Donna, I was already interested in magic; the type of magic that makes someone yawn when someone else yawns. I had also seen a teenage girl transform from an evergreen ivy to a beautiful lily because she felt loved; her love, she suddenly realised, was requited. Oh, how she tried to be kind while she struggled with her secret desires, and how vulnerable she felt until he one day said, ‘I really like you’. That is the type of magic I like. So, I was delighted to throw some magic at Carla, years later. She didn’t know it, but I was on her team and the leader of her new team, working behind the scenes with nobody recognising me or my efforts; but this was only for one night. Very much a Cinderella event. I hope Carla woke up the next day feeling at least a little bit special. If she did, she would, I suspect, have got a lot more deserved attention from then onwards.

What shape would you like feedback from your peers to take? We know that words with letters that have a hard sound to them serve to cause our minds to consider the thing associated with the sound of the word to have a similar shape. The sound of a ‘k’ for example is hard and jagged. It is, I am convinced, why we ‘see’ a sharp angle when we hear the word, ‘kink’. We also know, that the order that single words are used to describe a person changes our perception of that person.


Word Order

‘Interrogative, pedantic, diligent, focused, intelligent, inquisitive, open’

is a different person to:

‘Open, inquisitive, intelligent, focused, diligent, pedantic, interrogative’.

Yet the word order is the only thing that has changed.


Let us imagine these two characters in a story. Both are book-keepers. Plainly, the first is crotchety, irascible, and terse. The second, is polite, a good listener, and reliable. Given a task to impress a new manager who would get the team-leader role? And, who would find it hardest to recover from a problem that is ultimately revealed to the boss? I can hear the sneaky first person. closeted in a corner, quietly grumbling about the second one. ‘Oh, get a life’, I say, ‘You are grumbling about yourself. YOU have chosen which personal attribute you promote above another.’ 

If you discovered each of these attributes one by one over the course of a few chapters in a book, or scenes in a film, I think you might think these are two very different people.


In feedback to team members, then, we might look to a martial art style, from Chinese philosophy. Something like: Retreat, Strike, Defend, or Yin, Yang, Yin, which could be considered to be soft, hard, soft, though that is not the proper translation for Yin and Yang. In the Western world, we think of this as sandwiching a hard criticism between compliments. 

In returning to the earlier order of words to describe someone, which go from hard to soft for one person and soft to hard for the second person; and we change those words into insults and actual physical violence, and if we consider the hardest word to be an actual physical blow on a work colleague, it would be difficult to keep your job if you started with this action, but your point is painfully made. However, if the second person, in our scenario, is building towards this physical blow, the recipient may get the message of warning long before they are punched; both the work colleagues then get to keep their jobs.





Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 235005