“Debates around terminology and definitions often generate more heat than light with their length and ferocity almost indirectly proportional to their usefulness.” Weller (2007:4)
Whilst true it is difficult to accept another person’s definition of an invented word whose meaning shifts constantly and means different things to different people.
“It was through the rise of the Internet that the ‘e’ prefix came into popular usage, and in line with e-commerce, e-business and e-government, it is the internet that is really the defining technology in e-learning.” Weller. (2007:5)
If it is the case the Internet (capital ‘I’ anyone?) is the defining technology of e-learning, then it isn’t e-learning, it should be i-learning. Or was that term nobbled in the 1980s for ‘interactive’ learning.
What about www-learning?
It’s suitably polysyllabic to appeal to the academic community and no more unpronounceable than some of the terms academic writers feel it necessary to construct.
‘E-learning. Any learning experience that utilizes internet-related technologies to some extent.’ Weller. (2007:4)
Imagine this definition blown into a party balloon then let loose into the atmosphere of cyberspace; it will buzz about who knows where until it loses itself in the multitude of tools ‘out there.’
Will we reach a stage where we return to the more established global term ‘learning?’ that would embrace all these Is, Es and Ms.
Or as Weller, it’s not worth the trouble, just run with it, as we must run with podcasting and iPod, iPads and googling and so much more. Banned though should be the polysyllabic babble that academic writers prefer to use in favour of a couple of words in plain, unpretentious English.
The word I loath more than all, too often used by certain authors with abandon in relation to e-learning, is ‘enculturated.’
I don’t think much of ‘situated’ either.
Weller, M. (2007) Virtual Learning Environments. Using, choosing and developing your VLE
It is the holidays, so this norming I read Michael Faber's 'The Fifth Gospel.'
Fun and quotable. And this easy and quick to read. A 3 hour train journey would do it.
Over the previous few days I have read Stephen King's 'Cell,' which begins like a text book, 'throw them out of the aerolpane' thriller but turns into such daftness I skim read the last half at great speed. You must admire his hutzpah.
Over the previous week I have not been enjoying Simon Schama's 'History of Britain' as I feel I'm getting too much of him and not enough history (He's very good on Caravagio though) ... while Andrew Marr's 'The Making of Modern Britain' at least had some micro-factoids to interest in a journalist sort of way.
Then I found my old copy of Norman Davies 'The Isles' which I read a decade ago and plan to read again ... followed by his History of Europe.
Unsure why I'm trying to pack my brain with such stuff, but it is in part due to my mind being re-awoken from a period of slackness courtesy of the OU.