OU blog

Personal Blogs

Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki

How would you implement Aguilar’s PESTLE outer context model in an organisational setting?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki, Friday, 9 May 2025, 10:32

B811 – Tutorial 1 – Human Resource Management in Context

How would you implement Francis Aguilar’s outer context (PESTLE) model in an organisational setting?

Introducing the term: Strategy Map

Question: What exactly is a strategy map?

Short answer: It's a four-stage approach to understanding context in HR:

  1. Select the first PESTLE component
  2. Identify trends that may influence the organization in this context
  3. Discuss the potential impact of PEST on your organisation with teammates
  4. Create, record, and append a strategic hypothesis with each PESTLE component, in an operational and practical way
  5. Process the next PESTLE component

Step No. 4 – the strategic hypothesis – should be used as a chance to create and develop a strategy map (based on PESTLE) and to demonstrate how your company officials aim to convert company resources, including intangible assets, such as culture and employee knowledge, into desirable outcomes – it’s a visual representation of strategy.

  1. Define your corporate mission, vision, and values
  2. Define your four perspectives that will drive organizational growth (one or more of these may be HR specific - i.e., learning and development)
  3. Set your strategic objectives and priorities (SMART)
  4. Define your objectives in cause-and-effect relationships
  5. Communicate and cascade the strategy map to HR and other employees
  6. Regularly review and update (once quarterly or once biannually)

References 

Pirnay, L. and Burnay, C. (2022) ‘How to build data-driven Strategy Maps? A Methodological Framework Proposition’, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 139, pp. 102019-. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102019 (Accessed on 08 May 2025)


Permalink
Share post
Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki

Internal (Pricing) Decisions vs External (Supply Chain) Factors

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki, Friday, 9 May 2025, 09:26

B811 – Tutorial 1 – Human Resource Management in Context

Internal (Pricing) Decisions vs External (Supply Chain) Factors

Introducing the term: VUCA

Something very interesting has come up in the tutorial slides from Week 0 of B811. The term VUCA has emerged and is being used broadly to describe external influences on the functioning of the organisation, which translate as volatile, uncertain, complex or ambiguous (VUCA) influences. Phonetically, it may sound like a slightly graphic cross-reference to an insult and movie title where Ben Stiller was cast, but in fact, VUCA is anything but in nature, as we will come to see it is a reasonably productive abbreviation. One that may very well dictate the analysis of (external) threats in a corporate SWOT matrix.

PESTLE and STEEPLE

In Tutorial 1, the introduction to our module, we’re given the example of a high-fashion store offering clothes for sale that use fabrics sourced from ethical suppliers. Let’s refer to this store’s business as Firm X. We’re asked to critically analyse a situation where business pressures create the need to evaluate whether disbanding the value of its ethical brands, which would be categorised as being under the STEEPLE factor – which is just PESTLE with an ethical dimension – could save Firm X enough by way of its manufacturing, and production process to yield a greater level of profit.

Where do we start with this? My approach is basically to look at two aspects of the scenario and by extension, two further aspects which may inform our thinking on strategic decision making.

  • Look at: Ethical constraints and the possible depreciation of brand value (Internal)
  • Look at: Strategic matters concerning business decision-making (Internal)
  • Observe: Market size for ethical brands in fashion (External)
  • Observe: Price elasticity in ethical consumption (External)

What dynamics are at play here? Well, aside from the obvious theories that may apply (that of Ronald Coarse's theory of the firm and Milton Friedman's imperative on Firm X as a profit-seeking entity) if we focus solely on the latter two aspects of our second approach, we find various factors may come to fruition, namely, a hypothetical dichotomy arising from the timely distinction between import restrictions (relevant for US based emporiums) and logistics and supply chain synergies from the procurement of domestic ethical fabric brands.

By extension, local currency valuations also become a factor of relevance. How do foreign exchange rates for overseas ethical brands compare to procurement from domestic brands that offer similar value?

Approaching the topic like this essentially narrows the issue of effective pricing decisions to the influence of supply chain factors. How does Firm X address this practical assumption? One way is by looking at evidence-based models of price elasticity using a package such as R, where Marshallian (uncompensated) price elasticities and Hicksian (compensated) price elasticities can be estimated. Assuming a price vector that combines a dataframe reflecting sale prices and quantities.

Q: Can you think of any scenarios where there may be a conflict or tension between volatility and regulation affecting Firm X?

This is a great warmup question to get the loins gurgling. Not only is the topic of volatility a matter for globalisation, but it is also a matter for regulation. Take, for instance, the example of Credit Suisse Group and its case as a defendant in a trial where the Group and its then Chief Executive Thiam Tidjane were wrongly accused of manipulating a key market volatility benchmark (the inverse VIX). The V in VUCA also reminded me of what the Canadian environmental activist and writer, Naomi Klein, eloquently refers to as ‘Beyond Borders’ in a 2001 conference speech come New Left Review article entitled: ‘Reclaiming the Commons’. I am reminded at this juncture of Prof. Alan Barrell’s use of the same language in his presentations on ‘Entrepreneurship Without Borders’.

Q: Any crossover between external factors affecting Firm X and internal factors?

  • External: PESTLE - environment (COVID-19’s HR response given treatment of racial discrimination in frontline occupations in England and Wales).
  • Internal: Strategic changes/Managerialism (Al Mahameed, Yates, & Gebreiter, 2024)
  • Africa and Nigeria – where studies focused on the link between 1) trade union survival strategies, 2) the new employment relations climate, and 3) the subject of globalisation (Betchoo, 2013)

References 

Al Mahameed, M., Yates, D., and Gebreiter, F. (2024). Management as Ideology: “New” Managerialism and the Corporate University in the period of Covid‐19. Financial Accountability and Management40(1), 34-57 (Accessed on 04 May 2025)

Betchoo, N. K. (2023) ‘Youth empowerment as a human resource development strategy in Mauritius’, Issues in Business Management and Economics, 1(8), pp. 218-229. Available at: https://journalissues.org/ibme/abstract/betchoo/ (Accessed on 04 May 2025) 

Holbrook, P. and Beadle, H. (2025) ‘B811 - Human Resource Management in Context Tutorial 1 - introduction’, Open University Business School (Accessed on 03 May 2025)

Klein, N. (2001) ‘Reclaiming the Commons’, New Left Review, Available at: https://newleftreview-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/issues/ii9/articles/naomi-klein-reclaiming-the-commons (Accessed on 04 May 2025)


Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 98793