Personal Blogs

The Puppet on a String: What Will We Leave Behind?

Henning Mankell had a rare gift for uncovering profound truths in the ordinary. In The Puppet on a String, he reflects on an archaeological discovery in the Czech Republic: the remains of a human being who lived some 25,000 years ago. Beside the skeleton lay something unexpected. Not a weapon. Not jewellery. Not a monument to power. Instead, archaeologists found 'a doll. A marionette. A puppet on a string.'

Mankell is deeply moved by this fragile object. To him, it is more than an artefact; it is a greeting across centuries.  A simple toy survives to whisper that the people who fashioned it laughed, imagined stories, entertained their children, and delighted in creativity. The puppet becomes a testimony that humanity has always been more than a struggle for survival. It reveals that even in the harsh world following an ice age, human beings made room for play, imagination and affection.

This is where the essay becomes profoundly existential. Mankell asks us not simply to admire the past but to confront the future. Every generation leaves something behind. The question is not whether we shall have a legacy, but what kind of legacy it will be.

His conclusion is deliberately unsettling. 'Those of us living today will not be sending puppets on a string into the future. Our legacy is nuclear waste.'

The contrast is devastating. One civilisation leaves behind evidence of its humanity. Another leaves behind evidence of its destructive power.

Whether one agrees entirely with Mankell's conclusion or not, the challenge is impossible to ignore. Modern society measures success by technological achievement, economic growth and scientific advancement. Yet the object that moves us most from prehistory is not an invention that conquered nature but a humble puppet that reminds us of the human heart. Progress has given us extraordinary abilities, yet it has not necessarily enlarged our wisdom.

Mankell's observation raises questions that lie at the heart of existential philosophy. What gives a human life significance? Is our purpose merely to consume, build and dominate, or is it found in the relationships, imagination and beauty we pass on? Long after our names have disappeared, what silent testimony will remain of the kind of people we were?

As a writer, I find these questions deeply personal.

If I were asked what I hope to leave behind, it would not be wealth or possessions. It would be words. Essays that encourage someone to think more deeply, to appreciate beauty, to wrestle honestly with truth, and perhaps to draw nearer to God. Unlike the puppet discovered beside that ancient skeleton, words leave no physical trace in the soil. Yet ideas have always possessed a strange resilience. They travel through books, conversations and memories, often outliving the buildings and empires that once appeared permanent.

There is, however, another dimension that Mankell leaves unexplored. The Christian Scriptures suggest that our greatest legacy is neither objects nor achievements but the influence our lives have upon other people. The apostle Paul spoke of believers themselves as 'letters... known and read by everyone' (2 Corinthians 3:2). Our character, our kindness and our faithfulness become a living message long before they become a written one.

The puppet on a string reminds us that people have always sought meaning beyond mere existence. The fact that a toy could survive centuries of burial and  touch modern hearts suggests that humanity possesses an enduring hunger for beauty, creativity and relationship. These are not accidental features of our species. They point to something woven into our very nature.

Mankell's final sentence is intentionally pessimistic. Yet history is not finished. Every generation still chooses what it will leave to those who follow. We may indeed leave behind polluted landscapes and dangerous technologies, but we can also leave behind compassion, wisdom, courage, truth and hope.

The ancient craftsman who carved that little puppet could never have imagined that people twenty-five thousand years later would smile at his work. In the same way, none of us knows how far the quiet influence of a thoughtful book, an act of kindness, or a life lived with integrity may travel.

That may be the deepest existential lesson of Mankell's remarkable reflection. Our lives are always speaking to the future. The only question is what they will say.

Sweden to Govan: The Circus That Found Us

In his book Quicksand: What It Means To Be A Human Being, Henning Mankell wrote of a childhood moment in Sveg, Härjedalen, when the circus arrived. It did not arrive grandly, not in a blaze of light and splendour, but in a battered, rickety truck that looked as if it might give up before it reached the town square. Its timbers groaned, its tarpaulins flapped, its wheels wobbled under impossible weight. And yet to the children who lined the roadside, wide-eyed in the chill northern air, it was nothing short of miraculous.

That weary truck carried with it a promise. A secret world was rattling into town—clowns daubing their faces, jugglers testing their balance as the vehicle lurched forward, the smell of greasepaint and sawdust waiting to spill out. Mankell confessed that often the anticipation was greater than the performance itself. What mattered was not the ring, nor the tricks, but the mystery of what lay hidden behind the planks, that portal into a world where the everyday was briefly suspended.

I knew that same hunger in Govan.

Our backdrop was different; an industrial heartland where ungroomed dogs prowled the closes, where tenement walls hemmed in the sky, and where winter pressed down like a heavy hand, making the mornings as dim as the evenings. But just as in Mankell’s Sweden, the promise would arrive. Not on a truck, but on the walls. Posters appeared overnight, splashes of colour against the soot-stained stone. Painted clowns with impossible grins, lion tamers frozen in their daring, trapeze artists suspended mid-flight. To a boy in Glasgow, those images were more than ink and glue. They were invitations.

And then came the Kelvin Hall.

To step through its doors was to cross a threshold. Even before I entered, I could smell the sawdust, hear the brass warming up, feel the charge of something other breaking into the ordinary. The lights, the animals, the spectacle—yes, they dazzled. But like Mankell, I discovered the real enchantment lay in the longing that preceded it. The ache of expectation, the way imagination filled in the gaps before the first drum roll struck.

For a few hours, life lifted above its greyness. We were transported, lifted beyond tenement smoke and shipyard clang to a place where marvels reigned. But the marvels never lasted. When the show was over, when the crowd spilled out into the cold night air, a sadness fell, the kind of hush that follows laughter too soon ended. The posters would curl in the rain, the animals would be packed away, the truck would head down another road. And the streets of Govan, like the streets of Sveg, would return to themselves.

Yet the echo remained.

It was not the circus itself that endured, but what it awakened; a reminder of how deeply children hunger for something extraordinary to pierce their days. Mankell and I, strangers in different lands, carried the same memory: that the circus was not a show, but a promise. A fleeting glimpse that life could, for a moment, lift its veil of greyness and dazzle us with wonder.

Image generated by Copilot