OU blog

Personal Blogs

Design Museum

Learning how to learn

Visible to anyone in the world

We need to get off our devices. A decade or more ago I swore in favour of all things digital. I wouldn't read a book; it had to be on an iPad. Now I want the physical artefact. I didn't want to travel to a lecture; I wanted a Zoom call or Webinar. Now I want to make the journey, meet the prof, eyeball my fellow students and talk over the topic before and after the talk. I do not want 'slides' after the PowerPoint. Ideally, there is no slide show anyway - we are expected to take notes and do so - pen on paper, not furiously typing into a laptop or recording it on a phone. That is not engaged. It is delayed interest. 

We have to learn how to learn, learn how to read, learn how to take notes. 

I think 'Learning how to learn' should be a class taught throughout the first term of every new school year, from primary school to university. Postgraduates need it too.

We spend years teaching people what to learn without spending nearly enough time teaching them how learning works, or why we do all these strange things called lessons, homework, projects, fieldwork, tests and exams.

So teach that first.

Explain why classes matter. You are not simply there to receive information from a teacher. You are listening, questioning, comparing what you think with what other people think, discovering what you have misunderstood and learning to articulate an idea.

Teach people how to take notes — and, more importantly, what notes are for. They aren’t a transcription of what the teacher said. The act of deciding what matters, putting it into your own words and connecting it with something you already know is part of learning.

Explain homework. It isn’t punishment for having spent the day at school. It asks you to retrieve, practise, extend and apply something without the teacher standing beside you.

Explain tests. A test isn’t merely there to produce a mark. It tells you what you can retrieve when the book is shut. Getting something wrong can be extraordinarily useful if you discover why you got it wrong.

Explain why projects matter. They make you plan, investigate, select, discard, organise, create and finish. Explain why fieldwork matters. The map, textbook or screen is not the territory. Go outside. Look at the river, building, rock, tree, factory, street, coastline or community. Measure something. Interview somebody. Discover how untidy reality becomes when it refuses to behave like the diagram in the textbook.

Explain exams too. There is value in sitting alone with a blank sheet of paper and discovering what you can summon, organise, argue and communicate without assistance. Then reflect on the result. What did I know? What couldn’t I retrieve? Where was my argument weak? What will I do differently next time?

Teach people to learn from one another. A classmate may explain something in a way that suddenly makes sense because they have only just understood it themselves. A teacher brings another perspective. Another teacher brings another one. Books, lectures, conversations, documentaries, museums, podcasts, videos and the internet approach the same subject differently. Learning from multiple sources teaches us something enormously important: knowledge does not arrive through a single authorised pipe.

And now we have AI.

It should be part of learning how to learn in 2026 because pretending it doesn’t exist would be absurd. Teach students how to question it, challenge it, check it, use it to explain something differently, interrogate an argument, generate questions, practise retrieval, explore counterarguments and find gaps in their understanding. Teach them that getting AI to produce the answer is not necessarily learning. The important question is: what can I now understand or do that I couldn’t understand or do before?

Teach languages across subjects too. I once heard that in Germany you could study Geography in English. I would have loved to study History in French or German. Imagine studying the wars and religions of Europe partly through the languages of the people involved. Language would cease to be a sealed-off school subject and become another way into history, geography, politics and culture. The additional difficulty might be precisely what makes some of it unforgettable.

And teach the biology and psychology of learning.

Sleep matters. Nutrition matters. Exercise matters. Attention matters. Curiosity matters. Friendship matters. Family life matters.

Laughter matters enormously.

Fear may produce obedience, but it is a rotten foundation for curiosity. Threats and punishment can make a child desperate not to be wrong when education should be giving them the confidence to discover why they are wrong. Teachers therefore have to coach as much as teach: observe, question, encourage, challenge, give feedback, adjust the task and gradually make themselves less necessary.

Perhaps most important of all, teach children how to ask questions and how to live for a while without an answer.

What do I know?

How do I know it?

Where did that information come from?

What evidence would change my mind?

What don’t I understand?

Who sees this differently?

What happens if I try it?

Can I explain it to somebody else?

Can I use it somewhere completely different?

And what have I learned about the way I learn?

That last question should follow almost everything: the lesson, homework, field trip, project, conversation, failure, success and examination. Learning followed by application followed by reflection becomes another round of learning.

We used to say it takes a village to raise a child. Perhaps it takes the world to educate one now.

The classroom, teacher, friends, family, library, playing field, laboratory, landscape, museum, workplace, another language, another country, books, films, conversations, the internet and AI are all available to us.

Use them.

The purpose of education shouldn’t be to produce someone who has finished learning.

It should be to produce someone who knows how to continue.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Russell Larke, Tuesday 11 August 2026 at 17:33)
Share post
Design Museum

When Online Learning Becomes Online Administration

Visible to anyone in the world

As a graduate of The Open University's MA in Open and Distance Learning, I have spent much of the past year experiencing another form of professional education from the learner's side.

I have been completing the Senior Club Coach programme: a 12-month qualification involving three phases of assessment and worksheets delivered through Google Classroom, two intensive residential weekends at Loughborough, some online tutor contact and several poolside observations.

The experience has left me thinking about a familiar distinction in online education: the difference between delivering content and designing learning.

The course has been academically and professionally substantial. Its weakness has not principally been what was taught, but how the learning was designed, supported and socially mediated.

A strong and relevant curriculum

The programme addresses the right areas for senior swimming coaches:

  • annual planning and periodisation;

  • physiology and training intensity;

  • individualisation;

  • athlete profiling;

  • technical and skill analysis;

  • competition and race planning;

  • coaching philosophy;

  • professional development.

Its central intellectual demand is valuable. I have repeatedly been required to explain why I designed a particular set, session, microcycle, mesocycle or annual plan rather than merely demonstrating that I could produce one.

The programme also recognises that athlete development is not simply physiological. Its frameworks consider independence, resilience, self-regulation, emotional intelligence and support networks. The coach is presented not just as a technician, but as a person, practitioner and leader.

This is coherent, contemporary and professionally relevant material.

Authentic assessment—and a great deal of it

The assessments are rooted in genuine coaching practice. I have worked with actual swimmers, attendance patterns, injuries, competition data, race performances and amendments to an annual plan.

My final assessments have required me to use race-process objectives, athlete reflections, coach evaluation and individual race models. This is considerably more meaningful than responding to hypothetical case studies.

Authenticity, however, does not automatically make an assessment design effective.

Across the three phases, the work has sometimes become repetitive, administratively heavy and dependent upon interpreting ambiguous templates. Too much effort has been directed towards completing boxes rather than demonstrating a clearly scaffolded progression from supported learning to independent mastery.

I have frequently wondered whether the same professional evidence could have been gathered through a more integrated and concise portfolio.

Valuable face-to-face contact, concentrated into four days

The two weekends at Loughborough were among the strongest elements of the programme. They brought specialist expertise, energy and immersion. Interaction with tutors and other coaches was excellent.

Yet four long lecture days represent a very small amount of direct teaching within a 12-month programme.

The format also risked cognitive overload. A great deal could be presented during a day-long lecture, but presentation is not the same as processing, practising or retaining. Some participants appeared to rely on receiving the slides rather than actively making and organising their own notes.

There was also little initial exploration of who we were as learners. Our academic backgrounds, professional experience and existing understanding were not meaningfully established, nor was much guidance offered on how we might best learn from the programme.

A more effective design might have distributed some of the residential content across shorter workshops linked to each phase. Each workshop could then have been followed by practical application, peer discussion, tutor feedback and revision of practice.

That would have created a learning cycle rather than a sequence of delivery events.

Google Classroom as repository rather than learning environment

The online element was the clearest weakness.

Google Classroom worked adequately as a repository for documents, instructions, worksheets and submissions. It did not become a learning community.

Over the year, I experienced virtually no interaction with other members of the cohort. We did not routinely compare annual plans, interpretations of training zones, responses to injury, race models, athlete-management dilemmas or session evaluations.

This matters because coaching knowledge is highly contextual. There is rarely one universally correct training set, taper, annual plan or technical intervention. Professional judgement develops partly through hearing another experienced practitioner say:

“I would interpret that differently.”

“What evidence supports that decision?”

“How did the athlete experience it?”

“Was that adaptation genuinely appropriate?”

“What might another coach have done?”

Without those conversations, reflection risks becoming solitary and self-confirming.

The course materials themselves emphasised reflection, shared vision, connection and professional discussion. The delivery model did not consistently embody those principles.

I was fortunate to be completing the programme alongside another coach at my club. Our weekly discussions across the season were invaluable. There was, however, no comparable correspondence or sustained interaction with other members of the course.

For a senior professional qualification, that represents a considerable missed opportunity. I lost access to peer challenge, contrasting club environments, alternative coaching philosophies, shared problem-solving, informal reassurance and professional networking.

The platform supported administration. It did not adequately support collaborative professional learning.

Tutor observation: potentially the most powerful element

The poolside tutor visits were among the most professionally valuable parts of the course.

Observing a coach in practice makes it possible to examine communication, lane management, swimmer engagement, technical diagnosis, adaptation under pressure and the relationship between a written plan and its actual delivery.

Yet two or three visits can provide only snapshots.

Coaching performance changes according to the squad, the purpose of the session, attendance, pool space, proximity to competition and familiarity with the swimmers. Observation becomes developmental when it forms part of a cycle:

observation → specific feedback → agreed action → further observation → evaluation

Without repeat observation, it is difficult to establish whether feedback has altered practice.

The visits were authentic and useful. They did not amount to sustained mentoring.

The integration of theory and practice

One of the strongest aspects of my experience has been the continuous relationship between the course and my coaching.

Throughout the programme, I have worked with performance swimmers for at least four hours each week, often considerably more. I have been able to connect the coursework directly to individual athletes and to the realities of their seasons.

One swimmer broke his wrist and spent a month training in a waterproof splint, requiring significant adaptation and an increased emphasis on kick work. Another has managed a persistent shoulder problem. Others have required different levels of emotional support, autonomy, challenge and space.

The annual plan could not be treated as fixed. It had to remain a working document shaped by injury, attendance, progress, competition results and the needs of each athlete.

This is precisely the kind of individualisation that the programme seeks to develop.

However, much of that integration depended on my own initiative, previous experience and persistence. As someone with a master’s degree in education, I am familiar with reflection, learning design and the relationship between theory and practice.

A less experienced or less educationally confident candidate might complete the same paperwork without developing the same depth of understanding.

The practical integration was strong in my case. I am less certain that the course design reliably guaranteed it.

Developing judgement—or documenting it?

The programme has certainly required me to articulate my coaching decisions more explicitly.

I now possess substantial evidence showing:

  • why I selected particular training intensities;

  • why individual swimmers required different race models;

  • how injury led to amendments to the annual plan;

  • how athlete development includes personal as well as performance dimensions;

  • why training outcomes must be evaluated rather than assumed.

That represents genuine professional development.

For an experienced coach, however, the programme may function less as initial instruction and more as a framework for organising existing knowledge. It provides a reason to document what one already does, a vocabulary for explaining decisions and external validation of senior-level practice.

All of that has value.

The difficulty is that the relationship between administrative labour and genuinely new learning has not always felt well balanced.

An experienced coach should finish a year-long programme with more than a completed portfolio. I would expect to leave with a demonstrably expanded professional network, stronger observation and feedback skills, greater confidence in complex decisions and substantial exposure to alternative coaching systems.

My documentation has certainly expanded. My professional network through the course has not.

What might a stronger model look like?

A redesigned programme would not necessarily require more content. It would require more deliberate learning architecture.

I would retain the authentic club-based assessments, specialist residential teaching and poolside observations. I would then connect them through:

  • smaller, spaced online workshops;

  • structured cohort discussion;

  • peer review of plans and coaching dilemmas;

  • regular tutor dialogue;

  • clearer integration of the three assessment phases;

  • repeated observation and feedback cycles;

  • fewer, better-designed assessment templates;

  • explicit induction into the learning process.

The essential shift would be from using the online platform primarily to distribute and collect work towards using it to create sustained professional dialogue.

Final reflection

The Senior Club Coach programme has offered relevant high-level content and authentic assessment rooted in real coaching practice.

Its strongest features have been its planning, individualisation and athlete-development frameworks, together with the requirement to justify decisions using real swimmers and competition data.

Its principal weaknesses have been fragmented delivery, a heavy dependence on independent worksheet completion, limited tutor contact and the near absence of cohort interaction.

Google Classroom has operated more as a submission platform than as a genuine online learning environment.

The course has tested my ability to operate as a senior coach and has helped me organise, explain and validate my practice. I am less convinced that it has systematically developed that ability through sustained mentoring, peer dialogue and collaborative challenge.

For those of us concerned with open, online and distance education, the lesson is familiar but worth repeating.

A collection of resources, assessments and submission points may constitute an online course.

It does not, by itself, constitute an online learning community.

The argument can also be sharpened into a shorter, more provocative OU-style thought piece with a stronger emphasis on learning design and social presence.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

How AI has greatly enhanced  the way I coach age group County, Regional and National swimmers 

Visible to anyone in the world

How AI has greatly enhanced  the way I coach age group County, Regional and National swimmers 

An AI-generated image of the author staying away at a swimming gala

If you’d asked me a few years ago what coaching swimming looked like, I’d have said: stopwatch, laptop, whiteboard, instinct, and experience. That was the craft. And it still is, at its core.

But now?  AI has fundamentally reshaped how I coach, not by replacing me, but by amplifying everything I do. It's like having the most eager, brilliant and insightful assistant coach at my side. 

From Seasonal Guesswork to Precision Planning

One of the biggest shifts has been in annual and macro planning.

I now map out the season with far greater clarity, aligning training blocks to competition demands, physiological development, and athlete readiness. Using structured calendars and planning tools, I can see exactly how a swimmer progresses from 

September aerobic work to a championship taper.

That long-term structure used to live partly in my head. Now it’s explicit, dynamic, and constantly refined with eqse. I can connect a Tuesday night session in October directly to a race in May—and justify every metre in between.

Even something as detailed as training zones is no longer just theoretical knowledge. I actively apply models of aerobic capacity, threshold, and lactate tolerance to ensure sessions hit the intended physiological targets. And I do this with charts using 

Designing Better Sessions, Faster

Session planning has become sharper and more purposeful.

Take a typical P2 session: I’m designing sets that deliberately target A2 aerobic development, pacing discipline, and skills under fatigue—not just “a hard set,” but a clearly defined outcome.

AI helps me:

  • Generate variations of sets aligned to specific energy systems

  • Check progression across a week or cycle

  • Balance volume, intensity, and skill focus

What used to take hours of manual thought, I can now iterate quickly—and more importantly, improve. I’m not starting from scratch each time; I’m refining a system.

Individualisation at a Completely New Level

Where technology has really transformed my coaching is in individual athlete work.

I can now build detailed profiles of swimmers that go far beyond times. Using structured frameworks like the Person → Athlete → Performer model, I’m looking at:

  • Behaviour and mindset

  • Physical and technical development

  • Race execution under pressure 

For example, when analysing a swimmer who is a National Qualifier, I’m not just noting that they have strong IM and butterfly. I’m identifying:

  • Aerobic gaps in distance freestyle

  • Opportunities to convert near-miss qualifying times

  • Behavioural patterns like consistency and training habits 

AI helps me synthesise all of that into clear, actionable priorities.

It’s like having an assistant coach who can process everything instantly—yet the decisions remain mine.

Solving Problems More Effectively

Coaching is constant problem-solving.

Why is a swimmer plateauing?

Why are they dropping stroke length under fatigue?

Why are they missing race execution?

Previously, those answers relied solely on experience and reflection. Now, I can interrogate those problems more deeply:

  • Compare training data against expected adaptations

  • Generate hypotheses quickly

  • Explore alternative approaches

Even reflections—like when a session doesn’t quite land—become more useful. I can analyse what happened, adjust communication, or redesign sets with more clarity.

Race Planning and Performance Detail

Race planning has also evolved massively.

Instead of vague instructions like “go out strong” or “build the back end,” I now create detailed race models:

  • Split targets

  • Stroke-specific cues

  • Tactical intentions

For a swimmer, that might look like:

  • Controlled fly → build back → precision breast → aggressive free

  • Exact split expectations across each 50

This level of detail transforms how swimmers understand performance—and how consistently they can execute it.

Supporting Younger Swimmers More Effectively

Technology hasn’t just helped with top swimmers—it’s arguably even more impactful with younger athletes.

For 10–12-year-olds, I can design structured progression plans where:

  • Every session has a clear objective

  • Skills are reinforced consistently

  • Confidence is deliberately built

For example, an 18-session gala preparation plan ensures that every swimmer understands starts, turns, and race skills—not just fitness.

That level of consistency is hard to maintain without support. AI helps me stay disciplined in my own coaching.

Becoming a Better Learner Myself

Perhaps the most important change is how technology has affected me as a coach.

I’m no longer limited to what I already know.

Alongside formal learning through the Institute of Swimming, I’m constantly:

  • Exploring new coaching ideas

  • Testing different physiological models

  • Reflecting on my own behaviours and decisions

The expectation now is continuous development. The Optimal Coach Development Framework reinforces that coaches must be students of the sport, always evolving and refining.

AI accelerates that process. It challenges my thinking, fills gaps, and sharpens my approach.

The Balance: Technology + Coaching Instinct

Despite all this, one thing hasn’t changed.

Coaching is still about people.

It’s about:

  • Reading a swimmer on the poolside

  • Knowing when to push and when to hold back

  • Building trust and belief

Technology doesn’t replace that. It enhances it.

The best way I can describe it is this:

AI gives me better questions, better structures, and better options. I learn on the fly; just in time, at the point of need. 

But the coaching—the judgement, the relationships, the environment—that’s still human.

And always will be.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

Learning Online once more

Visible to anyone in the world

I started distance learning with the Open University on 2001. I’m a better student than I am an employee sad ADHD and assorted challenges probably having something to do with it - I’m unduly suspicious and untrusting of people and easily bored. A happy working life for me means juggling three or four part time jobs and paid or paying hobbies.

Meanwhile I’m back in Coursera and onto the third of five modules on Project Management. I’m impressed with the content and the pedagogy. It’s pleasing to see how learning online has evolved and how practices that become apparent in my time have been adopted. Technological advances, relentless improvements and experience means that the science of learning is understood - you are made to listen, take note, struggle, be tested and as a result the knowledge being shared slowly accrues. I want to apply practical tips on project management into my Town Council work, maybe in a task & finish group for the swimming club and perhaps even getting myself back into video production which I so loved in the 1980s and 90s. On verra.

I have up social media a month ago. No X, Facebook or Instagram, no doom scrolling. If the BBC doesn’t stop quoting Elon Musk every time he makes an arse of himself on X I am going to ditch BBC news as well. 

Permalink
Share post
Design Museum

New blog post

Visible to anyone in the world

The end of year does this to me. 

I come into it with ideas to achieve a few things, change behaviours, get better, be better. 

I'm forever in my late 20s mentally so I don't give a flip about my age even if others do. There are roles and jobs for people in their 60s and 70s. Volunteer work is a pushover, but being a Town, District or County Councillor requires 'putting yourself out there' and in competitive seats being a 'known as a contributor and pragmatist who gets things done solving problems and dealing with challenges'. I can do this. I do this anyway. 

This can tie in with my interest in the environment and trees, an interest in 'youth' and sports development, my interest in the arts and the power and joy of creativity.

I could have been marking 15 years at the Open University. 

There's a story. We're just back from that part of the world ... almost. I could never have moved the family from our lovely Lewes in East Sussex to Milton Keynes, but we may have forged a new life in somewhere like Banbury. 

Another life, another time. All that counts is the next hour (the introduction to the Project Management Course I have signed up to on Coursera); the rest of the morning on some DIY in our leaky shed/workshop at the top of the garden; a woodland walk (if the rain stops), and hopefully some art (the large pen and ink drawing or relief print I am doing of Dover House, Barton on the Heath before making supper, watching a movie and settling down to a second reading of Ely Green's autobiography 'Too Black, Too White'.

And so a plan is made.



Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

My only link to postgraduate learning

Visible to anyone in the world

Online providers have developed, and potentially stumbled if AI interferers. For now, I cannot see anything less than human engagement from a tutor/tutors, and fellow students as a motivation to stay the course. That said, I can totally see how the trials and tribulations over six months or more to get a dissertation out of me from a tutor could have been dealt with over a weekend by Chat.AI. It was a case of de-scrambling my multiple, mass ideas and references from soup to a spaghetti with coherent lines of argument. 

Meanwhile, if you Google 'Lewes District Council' you will find where and what I've been at for the last 9 months. I've learnt that for all my love of digital nothing beats a piece of paper through the letterbox, and a conversation tipped to listening to the resident with a problem, complaint or an idea. 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

Learning Online!

Visible to anyone in the world

Here's something rare? Something about e-learning, or learning online, or simply 'doing a course online'.

A slide from a presentation by Hollie Fields on 'How to teach diving'

I have done two of them recently, both for Swim England, both a speaker online with a set of slides, Zoom and break out rooms. No assessment included at all, so I could just as easily had the camera off and watched telly. 

Both were show and tell slide presentations, one better than the other, both perfectly informative. I didn't have to take notes, I did. I didn't have to take screenshots, I did. I didn't have to write one of them up on 'How to teach diving', but I did. And I'll write a 'poolside guide' too.

Anyone with enthusiasm for a topic and a nifty line in Slides/PPT skills can teach online. A lesson is a meeting online; we've all done hundreds of those now.

It's no longer e-learning is it? Or even distance learning.

It's why I orientated towards teaching (I have a Cert.Ed) - my first year towards a PGCE, Teaching online is simply a skill that teachers should have in their toolkit. The class could be small, or large, anywhere in the world, and at anytime. A recording and a set of questions in a quiz are easy enough to conjure up. 

Game over? Is the MAODE still taught.

Me? I'm after a course on Environmental Sustainability to go with my Green councillor and activist credentials, maybe something more to keep me up to date on creating and managing content for websites and social media. I attend classes on life drawing and printmaking. 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 21426272