OU blog

Personal Blogs

thoughts provoked by Sterling 2007

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Arwen Bailey, Wednesday, 21 Mar 2012, 05:44

Bateson distinguished three orders of learning and change (no reference given. Grrr. could it be Ecology of Mind) p71

Anyway "a key point is that learning can either serve to keep a system stable, or enable it to change to a new state in relation to its environment" Weakland and Fisch (1980) say "there are two different types of change: one that occurs within a given system which itself remains unchanged, and one whose occurrence changes the system itself" (See Grove, Kibel and Haas)

"change within changelessness" (Clark 1989) "maintenance learning" (Sterling) p71

p74 "need to reconcile people's sphere of concern with their perceived limited sphere of influence through facilitating their ability to engage in change"

A framework for a learning reponse in these circumstances is suggested from Ballard (2005)
  • Awareness of what is happening and what is required
  • agency or ability to find a response that is meaningful
  • association with other groups and networks
  • action and reflection

in critical learning systems (Bawden)

"in essence, sustainability is about conservation of potential and increasing self-organization, resilience and adaptive capacity at all nesting levels within social-ecological systems, and learning - reflexive, experiential, experimental, participative, iterative, real-world and action-oriented - is intrinsic to this process and challenge" p78

This is talking about ecocultural sustainability, but it really rings true to me for the sustainability of the AWARD effect too.

p79 Sterling is talkiing about "an ecological worldview" but for me this is Systems in a nutshell: "[it] yields many different views of the same thing, and the same view of many different things".  I love that!


Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Arwen Bailey, Sunday, 25 Mar 2012, 09:56)
Share post

Thoughts provoked by Glasser 2007

Visible to anyone in the world

good reminder about the importance of design for what happens in the future p36. how we design the alumni program will influence if not determine what happens.

"It calls for educational processes and systems that nurture active citizens and open minds by encouraging wonder, creativity, tolerance, cooperation, and collaboration... It promotes vigorous self-criticism, combats rigidity and apathy, and fosters anticipatory decision-making and adaptive learning... such societies prepare their individuals, organizations and institutions to counteract maladaptive forces and respond to unforeseen challenges and changes that are beyond their control with hope, joy, imagination and unruffledness"p36-37

individual learning and social learning co-dynamic p39

Change can be catalyzed by a crisis or surprise (adaptation p47), or it can be planned and directed (p46). Glasser (and AWARD) are interested in planned change. Planned change and learning seen as inseparable. Actually probably unplanned change results in learning too.

"Any planned directed change by individuals or collectives is built on learning" (p46). I agree. But i wonder what other explanations might be offered apart from 'learning'. To me it is so self evident that I cannot even contemplate another way. FOLLOW UP.

Note that Glasser does not "necessarily believe that learning must necessarily engender behavioural change" This is because:

  1. not all learning warrants behaviour change
  2. sometimes the environment -interests, goals, objectives - militate against change.

"it is only through learning that we acquire our values, attitudes, and concerns along with our conception of reality." p47

p47 Glasser gives five interpretations of social learning. i think Blackmore in her book also gives a list of interpretations. Or maybe it was Ison talking about SLIM. FOLLOW UP

i love having all these interpretations so i can cherry pick the ones i like best at this moment...

"[it] reflects the idea that hte shared learning of interdependent stakeholders is a key mechanism for arriving at more desirable futures. [...]A consistent characteristic of the various approaches is that they advocate an interactive (or participatory) style of problem solviing, whereby outside intervention takes the form of facilitation" (Leeuwis and Pyburn 2002 - FOLLOW UP?) p47

Parson and Clark (1995) talking about the same suggest "the deepest difference is that for some, social learning means learning by individuals that takes place in social settings and/or is socially conditioned; for others it means learning by social aggregates." p48

i think a CoP view of learning sees both as interdependent like Giddens' structure and agency. you need both levels of learning/change.

Regarding change in our fellows, it is interesting what Glasser says about Bandura's social learning theory (1977).

  • Attention: a model behaviour in the environment must grab or capture a potential learner's notice. so this is partly the role modeling, partly the dreaming about one's self and where you want to be
  • Retention: remember the observed behaviour
  • Reproduction: replicate the observed behaviour. This is the skills development in leadership and science supported by mentoring
  • Motivation: the environment must offer a consequence that increases the probability for a learner to demonstrate what she has learned. So these are the institutional settings, but also the Senge 'success breeds success' virtuous circle.

This makes me think how many of the fellows feel the need for an alumni program in order to keep being inspired. I guess you can't have a promotion every day so you can motivate yourself by the 'Attention' part of the model.

p50 Glasser talking of ecocultural sustainability, exemplifies Bandura, which gives an idea of entry points

"Ecoculturally sustainable behaviours are commonly seen as less appealing, so they fail to grab our attention. They are frequently unfamiliar so they are less likely to be retained. They are also often more involved and more compled so they are less likely to be reproduced. Finally they are seen as inconvenient, time.consuming, uncool so there is little motivation to try them out"

Active social learning is change. Glasser breaks it into three categories (p51):

  • hierarchical - predetermined inflexible relationships between teacher and taught
  • non-hierarchical - two way learning between experts in their own right
  • co-learning - based on the above, collaboration, trust, full participation and shared exploration

he claims that 1 and 2 are great for expanding existing knowledge, but 3 also "supports the generation of new knowledge and novel strategies for addressing real-world problems"

"Co-learning supports change, positive change in particular"

so that is the shape we should aim for in the alumni group - co-learning. This is why i have felt a resistance to traditional alumni programs which are vertical built. Yes, they are about sharing information and expertise, but this is a key difference - the creation of new knowledge, which for me is new ways of being and doing and this calls out for co-learning. IMPORTANT

"I posit that the most successful forms of active social learning will result from non-coercive relationships that rest on building a common language, transparency, tolerance, mutual trust, collaboration, shared interests and concern for the common good" (pp52-53)

p55 is the definition I used of social learning in the last assignment: [attempts] to funnel uncoordinated and inharmonious individual actions into collective actions that support explicit goals". Though in the light of what i was thinking above about the new knowledge this is probably a bit of a lite definition.


Permalink Add your comment
Share post

social learning - three levels of change

Visible to anyone in the world

Earlier i was saying that my fellows seemed to be at different readinesses for change: individual change, social change, and societal change - the first two being change within the system, the third change on the system.

I have been hunting around for someone else's thoughts on this. Kitchener is not quite right and i haven't looked up yet the Hyatt and Kaplan Bridget referred to.

Maybe i should add in parantheses that the thoughts in the most recent posts should make it clear that i find social learning and change inseparable - if there is no change then no learning has happened no matter how much teaching or facilitating or knowledge creation has been going on. Aha - So that is why i can use a change framework to describe social learning. I have a great framework regarding levels of change - from EvaLEAD, Grove, Kibel and Haas - individual, social and generative. But i was looking for a three level framework for learning - as something different. Actually maybe this is perfectly adequate then since learning and change are so closely entwined?

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 105185