OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Don't even bother complaining

Visible to anyone in the world

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

Cadwell NOT Caldwell

silhouette of a female face in profile

Don't even bother complaining

[3 minute read ] 

I read in a student forum a post in which the student used TurnItIn to check her written assignment for plagiarism. Of course, the references at the bottom of the page she submitted will always be so common that they will be considered to be evidence of plagiarism, so the response she got from TurnItIn was that some of her assignment seemed to be plagiarism.

She re-submitted her work to TurnItIn and the response was that more of her work is considered to be plagiarism. She did it again and even more of her work was deemed to be plagiarism.

She was actually plagiarising herself in greater amounts.

I don't use any checking software at all. I have no intention of submitting my work to train software on what is normal. I suspect that, eventually, the average person will, even though they have never used it, be considered to have used grammar-checking software.

The awful thing about all this, is that if an action has become so embedded in our culture that it is normal practice for bodies and organisations to use or do it, any complaint will, inevitably, fail. I offer an example such as breach of the GDPR in which an organisation provides personal details to a third party.

Our email addresses and telephone numbers are our personal details. These details are not necessary for delivery businesses to be able to complete a delivery; they only need the delivery address, not even a name. A name on a letter or parcel is only for the occupants at the delivery address to know for whom the delivery is for.

However, third-party delivery businesses are commonly given the email addresses of the intended recipient. If this indicates a breach of the GDPR no complaint will ever succeed. The reason for this, is that the entire UK would be able to make a claim for financial recompense. The result would be that all delivery companies would go into administration overnight. The UK would be in the stone age. No organisation that deals with this kind of complaint can allow it to succeed. This means that formal complaints may be a thing of the past, and a threat to reveal a mistake or poor action to the world through social media and other outlets may become more desirable. The extent of the this is such that it may however, be considered to be blackmail. I will reveal all if you don't compensate me.

I think it is important to consider the wider context when making a complaint. I am definitely not saying 'Suck it up'. I would always say 'Stand up for yourself' but there are things that we just have to accept. Something like changing a mistake that is systemic, I think, takes a group; a group that is persistent and vastly superior to an individual. Their vitality lies in mutual support, fresh approaches and energy, and importantly experience and knowledge.

However, I am not suggesting that there should be class actions or protests. I am suggesting that universities rely on AI for a great deal of their normal activities. This considered complaint, I suggest, is loose evidence that AI has become so widespread that none of us can really tell where it begins or ends. As such, it is systemic to treat students as guilty for using text-generative software, and this is the first hurdle modern students face; but this is because many students will cheat with text-checking software. Ultimately, this could mean that we must spy on our friends and reveal them as cheats.

If your assignment or dissertation appears to be an example of homogenisation, it is because you have emulated AI which emulates all of us.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Seagull and Chips please

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 10 March 2026 at 11:25

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

How are you? How do I look?

[ 5 minute read ]

Ruining running

Let me give you an example of why only some people should be in charge. The fun-run I got irritated by on Sunday was run in a city close to me. I had to get to the other side of the city, and that meant passing through runners so drugged up with endorphins that they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves. For a while, for them, life only meant putting one foot in front of the other, until someone tells them to stop. I am not knocking them, but with someone who celebrates the super-power of hyper-vigilance (when it is controlled) I cannot understand why people take away their perception skills. I also cannot understand why pedestrians wear ear-buds on paths that are shared by pedestrians and cyclists.

Part of the running course on Sunday was on a road into the city. Only one side of the road was closed for runners to occupy. This means that the organisers had deemed that the use of half a roadway is sufficient for the runners to not fall over each other, while still allowing residents along the course to enter the city.

In the city, pedestrians and cyclists need to move cross-wise through the runners. So, I propose the organisers do the following:

Since only one carriageway is closed for the runners, anyone who wants to pass cross-wise through them, who is on a cycle-path that the runners have bisected, should be gathered in the middle of the road, where the broken white line is. Then the marshals should 'shoo' the runners onto the other side of the road, thus emptying the previously full side of runners. They can do this with two marshals. The pedestrians and cyclists can then cross and the people who want to cross the other way can move into the middle of the road and wait for the marshals to chase the runners back to the now empty side again. So simple, but it might mean it can only be done where there are traffic islands, such as at the approach to roundabouts and T-junctions.

It is not difficult to do this, or even come up with safe ways to let people move around in a city during a mass running event.

I think I should only moan or complain if I have a solution to a problem. Even if my solution is half-baked or unworkable. I think that attempting to understand a problem is a pre-requisite for making a complaint. If there is no suggested solution in a letter of complaint, it means the letter should be immediately and summarily 'binned' by the recipient.

     'Ooooh! We've got a good one here!'

     'What's it about?'

     'The run in the city. This person says that people trying to cross the road when there are runners on it should be able to rent seagulls and buy sticky chips. The chips should be thrown at the runners and the seagulls released. While the gulls are being fought off, a gap will appear in the stream of runners and people can cross.'

     'That's a great idea! I think we should take the complaint seriously.'

At the event, on the roadside, at regular intervals, long queues of people at odd looking stalls: 'Seagull and chips, please.'

If all the 34.2 million working people above the age of sixteen in the UK gave the Government £1 a week for a year, the Government would get just short of £1.8 billion to give back to the working people as tax cuts. Or the workers could be taxed 3 pence for every hour of work they do (a pay deficit or reduction of 3 pence per hour) this could give £1.7 billion to the Government for every 37.5 hours of paid work per week per person.

     'Here's one!'

     'Go on!'

     'Every week the UK government should spend £1 million doing the Euro-millions lottery.'

     'Brilliant! But I have just opened a letter here that has a better idea.'

     'Let's hear it.'

     'Sell London Bridge and a tin of gold paint to Donald Trump for his Mar-a-Largo home.'

     'I love it!'

One of the reasons I don't drink in pubs is because people are too serious about their problems. There is always a funny thing to say but it might take a mind not dulled by alcohol to be able to formulate it properly.

A long time ago, I used to drink too much. I drank to be unconscious and the drinking would go on for days. Being self-employed meant I only had to answer to myself. Drinking like that is only a temporary relief from mental problems. One day, it was about eight in the morning and I asked for a bottle of vodka in a shop near me.

     'It's a bit early, isn't it?' Even though any customer can be refused service in the UK for any reason at all, it really isn't for the checkout person to comment on any customer's purchases. I could have said, 'None of your business you nosy, snivelling guttersnipe.' I didn't.

     'It is for my guinea-pigs. You should hear them sing when they get drunk. Weeeeek, Weeeeek, Weeeeek!'

The poor lad didn't know whether to laugh or not.

Even longer ago, I was served at a checkout by a young woman.

     'Oh wow!,' she exclaimed, 'You look just like Olly!'

I waited until she was handing me my change.

     'Is he good-looking?, I innocently asked. It is a trick question.

     'Oh, he is gorgeous!'

I smiled at her suddenly red-cheeks when she realised what she had just said.

Complaining and encountering obstacles to progress shouldn't be all bad. Of course, we are emotionally invested and charged by something we do not like or agree with, but, I hope one day, I can take a moment to make a joke about it, instead of invective or negative statements.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 627482