OU blog

Personal Blogs

Collaboration, innovation and other 'tions

Visible to anyone in the world

Whilst discussing our current e-tivity activity [Week 16 see previous post] Elizabeth and I discussed how socialisation and collaboration were current challenges in our roles.

With Elizabeth's help I pinpointed my challenge of getting input & buy-in on forums from part-time, face-to-face learners to be in Stage 2 of Salmon's 5 stages. Interestingly, it goes beyond the elearning element and originates in the lack of socialisation in the class environment, and thus is more pronounced in the online environment.

Elizabeth discussed her workplace where restructuring has led to once competitive teams being expected to work and therefore collaborate together. She noted that because there is Communicative technology in place that this is expected to be intuitive. But there are a lot more barriers to working and communicating effectively then just infrastructure, I would guess there will be baggage, emotive and psychological barriers appearing. Trust in our people is great, and it's something people recognise and even expect of their managers. But trust is not a one-time purchase of cookies on discount in your supermarket - it's the bread and milk you go back for every couple of days.

Further insights here: http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2011/05/embedding_collaboration_from_t.html

Permalink
Share post

H807 Week 16 E-tivities

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Karl Duff, Monday, 23 May 2011, 21:26

Over the next couple of weeks we're looking at the design process of elearning and in particular designing what Gilly Salmon referred to as E-tivities. This area is probably the area I am most interested in, I gained a lot of feedback and insight in H800 covering this area.

I recently, coincidently, re-visited Salmon's 5 stage model of moderating for TMA03. Something triggered in my mind about my current night course that I teach on, I hoped I would come back to it but didn't expect it to be this week!

A bit of background, I teach a supervisory management course over 11 weeks, one night a week, 3 hours per session. I ask the learners to set up a gmail address and I add them into a Google group. From there I post discussion activities pre and post lecture. I try to use video, audio or ask about their own experience, the criteria I use is short, simple and different [from the class]. Over 3 courses I have achieved varying degrees of failure. I have reflected on this and made some changes but in truth I have not planned this out properly. It fails on 3/5 of Salmon's criteria for all interactive activities.

I have some barriers to overcome, this course is not an elearning or blending learning course, the micro community is an innovation I have developed myself. Therefore learners are unaware of this aspect when they sign up to the course. We average about 10 learners on a course, should this be easier to manage or more difficult? as every learner counts.

I think stage 1 is probably the most important of the 5 stages closely followed by 2 [naturally enough], I feel this is where I'm falling short. I need to spend some time on Access and Value, address technical issues, get them to play around and really sell it. There have been some learners that have taken to it, but without the support of colleagues it lacks purpose.

What I noticed recently though, and it demonstrated some tunnel light, is that an audio piece I uploaded had some technical glitch, everybody commented to me at the next class that it wasn't working - maybe managers make great lurkers!!

Karl

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Deirdre Cijffers, Monday, 30 May 2011, 10:32)
Share post

TMA02 Reflective points

Visible to anyone in the world

In section 2 of TMA02 I will be reflecting on the following points:

Planning & preparation of TMA02

Linking themes from block 1

Choice of Interviewee

Selection of Interview method

Questions used

Answers received

Writing of TMA02 including feedback from TMA01

 

Permalink
Share post

H807 TMA01

Visible to anyone in the world

The reflective process involved in part 2 of the TMA has involved assessing our approach to writing this report. It is challenging as having completed an assignment often the last thing we want to do is to think about it!

I have enjoyed and benefited from the theme of reflection that exists on all the OU courses I have completed, I believe my submissions have increased in quality as a result. It has also helped in sharing thoughts with colleagues, and finding tools to aid the reflective process. I think the course may benefit from a post-TMA thread where reflections can be shared.

Having used a mind-mapping approach on this TMA to document some thoughts and help with structuring a short word count, I decided I would pop them up here:

mind mapMIND MAP

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Karl Duff, Tuesday, 5 Apr 2011, 11:07)
Share post

H807 Week 2 Act 2 GAMING IN BUSINESS

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Karl Duff, Thursday, 17 Feb 2011, 23:20

In Case Study 3 I looked at Simulation Gaming in Business from the University of Glamorgan. As I'm from a management background this took my interest, also I'm aware of the gaming approach used in many business programmes but was interested to view an innovative approach.

Firstly, the innovators looked for an alternative to the spreadsheet dominated financial gaming processes and looked to something that could be advanced in other subject areas [it has since been used in Nursing & General Induction].

The approach of this innovation is similar to that of the University of Swansea's Podcasting in Archaeology, in that they identified a learning need or gap and created an intervention to address this. In this case it was a common difficulty in conceptualising the difference between large and small businesses and how they operate. Like many elearning developers / innovators they were worried about motivation of both staff and learner.

The motivational worries seem unfounded and they received largely positive reposnse when learners were asked to compare this "gaming" approach to traditional case studies. Staff also presented a positive response to this intervention.

It is clear from this case study that this project was literally from "scratch" and required input from a large and varied team including student volunteers, over an extended period of time. The innovative nature of this project required this and it is anticipated in the future that role out would require less technical input and time commitment.

K

Permalink
Share post

H807 Week 2 Act 2 PODCASTING IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Karl Duff, Thursday, 17 Feb 2011, 23:18

I'm delighted with this week's focus on case studies on elearning, following on from our discussions on innovation.

The first case study I looked at was on the use of Podcasting in Archaeology in Swansea University. I selected this case as I'm a big fan of podcasting in general, whether for entertainment, general interest or work. I have used podcasts in my Instructor role to add a "different voice" to the input.

Elizabeth Mullet has already analyzed this case study so I'll avoid repeating her detailed observations but rather focus on the potential and limitations of podcasting in this environment.

Podcasting with images was introduced to give a more engaging and personal input from the lecturers rather then the generic content that can be sourced from text books. The lecturers took advantage of their archaeological visits to sights of interest by recording images and adding commentary. In effect they were customising and personalising the learning experience for the learners, many of whom would not have had the opportunity to visit such sites.

What's interesting about this innovation is that it addressed and succeeded in improving on a lack of site recognition amongst learners. It is "learner-centred" and encourages collaboration amongst learners even on different courses. This has expanded into the faculty whereby they share with colleagues outside of their university.

It is clear that the podcasts create an element of "authenticity" to the learner environment and encourage reflection amongst learners. It is an opportunist innovation though, as the podcasts are created in tandem with site visits but what if there were no site visits or how can the same benefits be gained outside of this subject area. The case study also mentions learners have an interest beyond "PowerPoint", have published on-line themselves and have used web 2.0 technologies in their own assessed work. What if the audience were not so accepting of technology? possibly a more traditional learner would this innovation achieve the same level of success?

K

Permalink
Share post

Block 3 and other events!

Visible to anyone in the world

I have often used my blog as a method of unleashing some frustration that I have been unable to release in our on-line environment. But today, Father's day, it's all positive. Hannah-Rose joined the Duff clan 2 weeks ago at 5.30am on Friday the 5th of June - she is just perfect!

So yes I am using the few hours of me-time allotted to me annually on Father's day to catch up on my OU, please note Dave!

In week 18 we were asked to read Weller's paper on the on-line learning environment and how learning organisations incorporate change. Firstly, I enjoyed reading the paper and I think it's one I'll be re-reading and drawing on in the future.

Secondly, a few notes: I like Weller's approach and it sync's well with a belief I have formulated of the course of my study where I have come to conclude that elearning is not learning online! It may be part of learning as a whole but it is not the same process just in the OLE, it represents different ways of learning and therefore different challenges. A key example of this is that practitioners cannot simply go on-line and replicate the success they had in the classroom.

Weller claims when new tech is available we often replace existing activities with the same activity just incorporating the new tech, and it takes awhile before we really see the potential of the new tech (radio on TV). For me this is what Technology Enhanced Learning is all about. Are we just going to tweet instead of txt? or write on somebody's wall instead of emailing? In the classroom we have to understand the potential, engage it in the learning design rather then just getting learners to blog as a straight replacement for writing.

The concept of the Long Tail appealed to me as I was familiar with it from its business mgt origins, I think it's a great analogy to describe how we will learn and develop in the future. Personally I can't see myself locking into a taught degree in business where I have to learn marketing, finance, HR as well as the mgt module I enrolled for. The long tail could be thought of as consumer/learner driven but practitioners can drive this change and org's engage with it. My Business Mgt course has been streamlined from 26 weeks to 10, where we cover just mgt.

Weller's argument of higher education trying to enculturate learners hit a nerve too, accessibility is an objective of all educational org's yet most are guilty of enculturation.

This is not to say that the answer is barnstorming into facebook to enage with the "yoof" culture, as I pointed to before in TMA2. If this is learner led then we need to listen to the learner voice is block 2 ended on.

Cheeryo Karl

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Les Hereward, Thursday, 9 July 2009, 09:38)
Share post

January Up-date

Visible to anyone in the world

Well it seems everything is happening at the moment, but I'm proud to say I am up-to-date having just posted my core activity for Unit 9.

The forums are quiet at the moment so I'm guessing most our focussing on their ECA, for me though I felt I had to get up to speed first before I can throw myself into it. I have read the instructions several times and the next step is to plan my approach, for some perverse reason I'm quite looking forward to getting stuck into it!

I feel I am just getting a handle on this course, the activites, the online environment, the facilites [wiki, blog, forums etc] study times and now the course is near it's end.  Well at least this change in my behaviour and performance is a clear indication of some of the learning objectives I have achieved.

I have also dipped into the ECA forum, but find the questionning and suggesting is somewhat confusing the matter for me. I will come back to them though.

In the new year I got the good news of my result from TMA02 where I got 67%. As mentioned previously I struggled to base this assignment on activites in my work environment i.e. elearning, in which I am not involved. So I am happy with my mark. I got similar feedback on my academic style. I feel I write well and use approriate referencing, but it seems my arguments superseed my referencing, and I need to make the link between argument and reference clearer.

Onwards and upwards from here!

Permalink
Share post

Core activity 8.1 Podcast

Visible to anyone in the world

Hi All

I am going to make a few comments about my experience of podcasting during Unit 8.

I was initially very eager to get stuck into this activity, it's no secret that the practical elements of this course have stood me well, where the theoretical elements I have had a harder time of handling. Obviously things like e-portfolios, wiki's and podcasts have an immediate impact on my skill and knowledge base, presenting immediate opportunities of intergration to my classroom. The theory will stand me in good stead for the future I know, but not working in an elearning role I am finding it hard to link it in.

I was also a bit apprehensive that the Christmas holidays would eat into this unit. However, shortly after Christmas I followed the podcasting instructions, downloading Audacity. I have never used recording software before but I'm very capable in the windows environment so a few clicks and I had test project complete. I noticed a buzzing sound in the background and deducted that it was because I was using the built in microphone - I made a mental note to seek out the mic I bought on ebay! I also registered with switchpod, all this stuff is quite time consuming, so any learner with previous podcasting experience was at a distinct advantage.

Next, I attempted to download the mp3 conversion software required, I constantly got a 403 message. I checked the tech forum which was full of issues and decided to post to our own Unit 8 forum. I got no reply, well not for ages, I went back to the tech forum to see if there was anything else I missed, there was a lot going on. I took a break from the laptop and starting thinking about what I could podcast on. I wanted the topic to be interesting even if I wasn't!! I also wanted to personalise it and give further insight to where I coming from which is all important in this online community. I decided upon the area of introducing elearning activites into a traditional training context. A lot of our study thus far is based around courses specifically set up in an elearning context, what about the challenges involved in introducing elearning into a course that has always been instructor led?

Catherine posted the zip folder for me and within a few minutes I was up and running. Many thanks. From recording a radio station as a kid I knew I would hate my voice, so I decided to write a loose script seperated into chapters. I targeted 6-8 minutes as an easy listening duration. I made myself comfortable as I believe your posture, position, alertness etc. can all affect the tone and pitch. I spoke slowly and distinctly as if I was talking to my brother in Oz. I stopped and listened after each chapter.  I thought what a pity it was that other users were not able to use the Audio option in the pre-Christmas chat we had. Towards the end of the recording I felt I spoke more naturally, emphasizing important phrases etc. rather then the rather robotic start.

I set up the file with no issues in switchpod and posted the link in the Course Wiki. I remebered there were certain rules or guidelines as to how we post on a wiki but I couldn't recall them so I hope I didn't make any faux pas.

Although, I am an avid podcast listener as I love the radio, creating a podcast itself was completely new to me. This meant I had an opportunity to think about how it can be involved in elearning and blended learning. I agree it's no "silver bullet", but one area where I will find it useful is in the area of listening to experts, that would otherwise be unavailable to the learners. Before this activity I dirercted my class to the Business podcast on RTE Radio 1 http://www.rte.ie/radio1/thebusiness/index.html , as 2 widely recognised business people were to be interviewed. I recently ran a Guest Speaker day where 3 senior managers spoke with my class, it was an excellent event but a lot of work. Imagine if i had recorded this event for future classes!?

I am eager now to move onto to 8.2 before I fall to far behind on Unit 9.

Karl

 

 

Permalink
Share post

post assignment calm

Visible to anyone in the world
Well, how good a feeling was it to get the first real assignment in. A great relief for me! Except for the usual self sobatage of course on the monday I made a mess of uploading it, gladly Lesley was on the ball and pointed me in the right direction.

I started reading Unit 5 on the tuesday, obviously I was delirious from the work on TMA01 !! Then I promptly forgot all about it until now, funnily enough even though I should be reading my case studies I was eager to post a blog tonight! I think it must be like surrogate class colleague, whereas normally I would have a chat with a friend about the course now all I have is good auld trusty blog!

I read some of Mr Waba's comments in his group work for Unit 5, he mentioned he had no "feeling" on how to write, in University he was very used to the style expected but here he's not too sure. I agree 100%. I usually have a good idea what mark/grade I'm heading for but in the OU context I'm not sure. I'm happy with the work I put into it and the resulting essays so we'll just have to see.

Another surprise was the work I had to put into the reflection part, and what a challenge it turned out to be. i was probably over-confident having written reflective pieces before, the difference hear is that we are being guided on our reflection, whereas before its been based on my initiative.

Finally I think I am still finding the online context of our research a definitive challenge. I've never used the Internet for formal research, I am much more comfortable with books. The Internet is a great tool obviously but not somewhere I've looked for "deep learning" (Moon, 2001), [that's a TMA01 joke smile ].There maybe something sub-conciously saying books are more real or serious, Lesley if you're watching I'd love your thoughts on this.

Talk later

K
Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Katherine Pisana, Wednesday, 8 July 2009, 23:36)
Share post

catching up! caught up

Visible to anyone in the world

Hi

Well my study plan seems to be going to eh.... plan!? Despite being busy with my current course of 20 learners, I have factored in some time to check forums, post contributions etc. I get a half day on Fridays, so this afternoon has been dedicated to OU. It means that I do my reading of printed material and typing the 500 word essays at home with none of the tech problems I have mentioned. It has the added bonus of organising time with my young family.

I am a bit worried about the TMA01 [don't you just love all the codes!] in terms of I haven't had a chance to look ahead as was suggested. Hopefully Unit 4 will be linked to the assignment. I sound like a worrier! not my style at all! Claudia commented on my last post that she has never been able to keep up on her previous OU courses - thanks for the re-assurances! I wonder then has a learning culture developed in OU where it is not really expected to keep up but rather a goal to keep up?

I'm still concerned that; with all the activity related to the course, is there much of the deep learning going on that has been mentioned?? My own educational background has often involved understanding theories, looking at case studies and relating it all to current events or circumstances. I don't seem to get that same deep understanding.

On other other hand the activity based training methods mean the course is very practical, and as a trainer I am already noting avenues of interest in terms of course design etc. which is why I came onto this course.

Enjoy your w-end


K

Permalink
Share post

Reflection on first 2 weeks

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Karl Duff, Tuesday, 6 Jan 2009, 22:05
This is my first blog and therefore my first blog post.

I have found the first 2 weeks of the course a real mixed bag. On a positive note it is great to be back into formal [ish] learning. For many years as a trainer I have being doing short skills based courses and a rather large amount of development. Career wise the development has been extermely beneficial and has an immediate impact, but as I said it's great to be back at, if not in, college!

Another positive element has been the challenge of elearning, having to check websites, mails and forums for all the information is new to me, and has given me a new insight into my career goal of setting up a blended learning program with my employer.

Finally it has given me a renewed interest in the Internet, I used to love the web but using it as a tool for work has taken the fun out of it, I do use facebook but generally do not use many of the "new internet applications".

I find the OU website slow and am having difficulties with the FirstClass software, but I guess these maybe just tech issues relating to Vista and my b-band connection.

As a trainer though, I am constantly assessing training methods, learning objectives and the organisation of training. I was initially apprehensive having not used the OU or elearning before, but I was rest assured when I spotted others in the same boat. I did find it tricky though in terms of the answer to everything seems to be to set up a forum! So I log on to do a bit of study but spend the best part of an hour bouncing around forums reading endless posts etc. There was also a bit terminolgy flying around, "lets set up a wiki!" I firmly believe that if elearning is to transgress away from highly technical people to the general learning public, this jargon based style will have to change, we can't be slaves to forums, we should be using them!

I was on holidays last week and I felt under pressure having to complete a group activity online with strangers, while still getting used to the elearning culture, suffering tech issues and on a subject completly new to me: eportfolios. I stayed up to 1am Friday morning to submit work to my group, but realised that not everybody was doing it, in fact people were still joining the course! What's that all about? Maybe we should create a forum about it!!

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Lesley Shield, Friday, 3 Oct 2008, 09:53)
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 71097