OU blog

Personal Blogs

Design Museum

Learning how to learn

Visible to anyone in the world

We need to get off our devices. A decade or more ago I swore in favour of all things digital. I wouldn't read a book; it had to be on an iPad. Now I want the physical artefact. I didn't want to travel to a lecture; I wanted a Zoom call or Webinar. Now I want to make the journey, meet the prof, eyeball my fellow students and talk over the topic before and after the talk. I do not want 'slides' after the PowerPoint. Ideally, there is no slide show anyway - we are expected to take notes and do so - pen on paper, not furiously typing into a laptop or recording it on a phone. That is not engaged. It is delayed interest. 

We have to learn how to learn, learn how to read, learn how to take notes. 

I think 'Learning how to learn' should be a class taught throughout the first term of every new school year, from primary school to university. Postgraduates need it too.

We spend years teaching people what to learn without spending nearly enough time teaching them how learning works, or why we do all these strange things called lessons, homework, projects, fieldwork, tests and exams.

So teach that first.

Explain why classes matter. You are not simply there to receive information from a teacher. You are listening, questioning, comparing what you think with what other people think, discovering what you have misunderstood and learning to articulate an idea.

Teach people how to take notes — and, more importantly, what notes are for. They aren’t a transcription of what the teacher said. The act of deciding what matters, putting it into your own words and connecting it with something you already know is part of learning.

Explain homework. It isn’t punishment for having spent the day at school. It asks you to retrieve, practise, extend and apply something without the teacher standing beside you.

Explain tests. A test isn’t merely there to produce a mark. It tells you what you can retrieve when the book is shut. Getting something wrong can be extraordinarily useful if you discover why you got it wrong.

Explain why projects matter. They make you plan, investigate, select, discard, organise, create and finish. Explain why fieldwork matters. The map, textbook or screen is not the territory. Go outside. Look at the river, building, rock, tree, factory, street, coastline or community. Measure something. Interview somebody. Discover how untidy reality becomes when it refuses to behave like the diagram in the textbook.

Explain exams too. There is value in sitting alone with a blank sheet of paper and discovering what you can summon, organise, argue and communicate without assistance. Then reflect on the result. What did I know? What couldn’t I retrieve? Where was my argument weak? What will I do differently next time?

Teach people to learn from one another. A classmate may explain something in a way that suddenly makes sense because they have only just understood it themselves. A teacher brings another perspective. Another teacher brings another one. Books, lectures, conversations, documentaries, museums, podcasts, videos and the internet approach the same subject differently. Learning from multiple sources teaches us something enormously important: knowledge does not arrive through a single authorised pipe.

And now we have AI.

It should be part of learning how to learn in 2026 because pretending it doesn’t exist would be absurd. Teach students how to question it, challenge it, check it, use it to explain something differently, interrogate an argument, generate questions, practise retrieval, explore counterarguments and find gaps in their understanding. Teach them that getting AI to produce the answer is not necessarily learning. The important question is: what can I now understand or do that I couldn’t understand or do before?

Teach languages across subjects too. I once heard that in Germany you could study Geography in English. I would have loved to study History in French or German. Imagine studying the wars and religions of Europe partly through the languages of the people involved. Language would cease to be a sealed-off school subject and become another way into history, geography, politics and culture. The additional difficulty might be precisely what makes some of it unforgettable.

And teach the biology and psychology of learning.

Sleep matters. Nutrition matters. Exercise matters. Attention matters. Curiosity matters. Friendship matters. Family life matters.

Laughter matters enormously.

Fear may produce obedience, but it is a rotten foundation for curiosity. Threats and punishment can make a child desperate not to be wrong when education should be giving them the confidence to discover why they are wrong. Teachers therefore have to coach as much as teach: observe, question, encourage, challenge, give feedback, adjust the task and gradually make themselves less necessary.

Perhaps most important of all, teach children how to ask questions and how to live for a while without an answer.

What do I know?

How do I know it?

Where did that information come from?

What evidence would change my mind?

What don’t I understand?

Who sees this differently?

What happens if I try it?

Can I explain it to somebody else?

Can I use it somewhere completely different?

And what have I learned about the way I learn?

That last question should follow almost everything: the lesson, homework, field trip, project, conversation, failure, success and examination. Learning followed by application followed by reflection becomes another round of learning.

We used to say it takes a village to raise a child. Perhaps it takes the world to educate one now.

The classroom, teacher, friends, family, library, playing field, laboratory, landscape, museum, workplace, another language, another country, books, films, conversations, the internet and AI are all available to us.

Use them.

The purpose of education shouldn’t be to produce someone who has finished learning.

It should be to produce someone who knows how to continue.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Russell Larke, Tuesday 11 August 2026 at 17:33)
Share post
Design Museum

Better out than in

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jonathan Vernon, Thursday 18 September 2014 at 07:26

No gadget or software or App will do your learning for you; you have to get the right content into you brain where it can be applied and added to. Garbage in, is garbage out and information you abandon will fester - not die, but transmogrify or lay dormant.

There are both techniques and Apps that that help you to get 'stuff' into your brain.

Take good notes from lectures and books, including TED lectures and Internet based 'linear' content, as well as eBooks and multimedia.

Use your notes for essays

Use your essays and notes from which to revise

The ONLY App I have come across that has been tested with a randomized controlled trial and had a dozen or more papers published on it is a platform developed at Harvard Medical School, now called QStream, though developed and tested as 'Spaced-Ed'.

I'm writing this after a THREE HOUR stint from the early hours extricating and sorting 'digital' information from the computer into a format that my head can deal with: sheets of paper, cards, lists ... 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Design Museum

The last of the bunch: daisies that think they are assignments gone wrong

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jonathan Vernon, Friday 2 May 2014 at 14:22

The exotic essay. What happens if you choose an elective that isn't your cup of tea. So you write about what interests you hoping that you'll get marks for being obtuse.

I think I'm losing the plot now or getting into my flow: Olympics, Wimbledon, Grand National, Grand Prix. There are many occassions when NOT to write an assignment.

 

A podcast. Who needs the written word when you can say it with a smiley voice?

Lost the plot. Bitty. Random notes with. No beginning, middle or end.

An odd thing. A poem perhaps? Or an essay with a split personality that wasn't much improved by putting bells on it.

 

 

 

Any excuse will do: gone fishing, got a cold, computer ate it, dog ate it, parents unwell, children unwell, busy at work, made redundant (again) ...

Permalink 4 comments (latest comment by Jonathan Vernon, Wednesday 11 January 2012 at 06:07)
Share post
Design Museum

The Girl at the Lion d'Or

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jonathan Vernon, Friday 25 November 2011 at 13:34

Girl%252520at%252520the%252520Lion%252520Dor.JPG

Having enjoyed 'Birdsong' by Sebastian Faulks I not only went on to read many other Faulks' novels, I also went on to read much of Pat Barker too (for the First World War setting), and Ernest Hemmingway. Indeed, written at the time, HGWells take you to a similar place.

I find myself reading 'The Girl at the Lion D'Or'.

As is too often the case I realise half way through I have read it before; I should know the characters and recall the events and outcome: I don't. In fact, I am compelled as much to read it for the story as to satisfy this nagging feeling I know something dreadful or beautiful is about to happen. We get a little of each. And some wonderful interludes, as if Faulk's wove in some short stories that weren't going to endure as novels. (There's a nifty idea).

I want to talk about this lovely story, how Anne comes from Paris to work at the Hotel Lion D'Or. Who and what she is touches many lives, she is a catalyst for misbehaviour, action and change.

But I can't help but reflect on how I read, or skim read. I simply do not take it in, or rather, my mind leaves it on the surface, like a conversation overheard on a train. My mind, my kind of mind at least, or how it has formed, through a combination of genetics and experience, treats all readying as frippery. The consequence of this is that when I have academic reading to do it takes a huge effort to get anything at all to stick.

Reading on its own is pointless.

Historically I took notes long hand of everything I read. Historically, at school and university this would become an essay, the essay would be discussed in a small tutor group, filed, then looked at again months later for an exam. This kept that knowledge for the required period. Today I take notes through a QWERTY keyboard and upload. I am toying with adding pen to paper again. Then what? So long as I return to the notes and develop them the topic may become a living thing. Best of all, for me at least, are the vibrant tutor groups, or some online forums where I can find them. I need to wrestle with a topic, to agree and disagree, to read more, to seek out my own heroes and villains from further references. Then, and only over a period of months, if not years, do I make any sense of it, do I feel a sense of conviction about what I have picked up, understood or misunderstood.

I'm coming to apperciate why 'scholarship' takes time.

I don't take notes when reading a novel; perhaps this allows me to enjoy the second or third reading. You discover new things, you pick up the detail, nuances that weren't apparent the first time round. You may even get a better sense of the author's voice and purpose.

Can anyone recommend a good read?

I feel a novel a week inbetween OU reading and employment would be a good tonic for my mental well being. I beleive I work and think better too, but escaping from it all regularly.

You can immerse yourself in a subject and drown.

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 21415805