OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Thanks for the moment

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 11 August 2026 at 16:10

moment

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

Cadwell NOT Caldwell

 

Thanks for the moment

[3 minute read ] 

Opinion and Reflection

Isn't it strange that we can get more than we bargained for, or hoped for, simply because we are 'on the list'. Suddenly we are taken seriously and the choice of words we hear from voices in the group are so much more pertinent to us than they might otherwise have been. Indeed, there are seemingly specific people within the milling crowd who are there for such a purpose as to guide more effectively than others may be able to do so. 'Ah, good evening Mr Bond! We were expecting you.'

I think it is the relevance of an approach that makes our ears 'prick up'. 'Oh, I think you are talking to me in a language you expect me to know, be interested to know, or will by default through a continuance of expected action come to know'.

Plainly, I am reluctant to outline where my experience of this focused intent is located. It is a worthwhile secret. Keeping secrets is a little bit against my deliberate attitude towards openness and honesty. However, I do understand that The Open University has good reasons for making sure its students are not too brazen with their truth. 'Woo hoo! I am on target for a first!' is wholly inappropriate, since that level of achievement is, I suspect, unusual, and so publicly celebrating one's ability to succeed is bound to cause other students to feel disappointed with their own work or ability. In any case, anyone who brays their celebration loudly is likely to alienate themselves from a group; quite simply through demonstrating a crassness that most of us consider to be an abomination.

I am not on target for any level of achievement. 'I have always despised the saying, 'That was then; this is now'. Yet, today I find it kind of fits, but only if I wrestle it to the ground and hold it still long enough to be able to deconstruct it. 

       'We used to be good friends,'

       'Yeah, that was then; this is now.'

I think the intent is to shrug off the underlying and forthcoming question of, 'Why don't you like me?' which requires a detailed explanation. 'That was then and this is now' carries with it a sentiment that the speaker considers that things have changed; time has passed and their emotions have evolved and are now directed towards more current and more emotionally rewarding issues. However, in the deconstruction of this statement I find that I can reconstruct it as 'This is now; it is not the future.' This might be said by someone sharing a bed with a person they hooked up with at a nightclub the previous night, when the other person asks for a phone number the next morning. It keeps the interaction between the two people in the present. And, just like there being a ruined expectation of a present based on the past (That was then...) there is a null expectation of a future; any imagined or expected future based on the present is quashed. Hence, anyone who says, 'I am on target for...', needs to rapidly realign their thinking. (This is now....)

Often, I would get into trouble on student forums for writing cryptic comments that, once the student has untangled their own confusion as to the task they need to undertake, may have made retrospective sense of them. No student as far as I could tell, ever figured out my clues. Of course, they would never have been allowed to offer a translation of my coded message in a forum, and it is disruptive to other students to acknowledge perspicacity and accuracy in a comment that appears not to be lucid. It may even inadvertently encourage too much time being allocated to attempting to deconstruct my code, when all it was there for was to act as a reassurance that the student had independently and correctly figured something out. The trouble came not from tutors or moderators, but from students reading my comments. 'Shut up! You are confusing us with your philosophical drivel.' is one attitude I encountered. Stop reading it then! I thought. 

It is a terrible thing to be confused. I do not have the skill and ability to leave a trail of carrots into a stable to encourage a donkey to go where it needs to be. I think it is Amazon who have the 'If you like this, you might also like this.' statement on their website. In some recent feedback I received, there were groupings of words used as focus points that indicated an education beyond my own in my chosen field of study. I know the words and I understand the meaning when they are grouped in a particular way. These focus points act as 'carrots'; not to encourage me into a smelly stable but instead out into fresh air and with new eyes to see new horizons with fresh curiousity. It makes me feel valued. I never seek validation for my efforts, and I am surprised that it snugly fits. I actually consider that to be a weakness in me in that I, for a moment or two, held onto the soft comfort of being the recipient of someone's respect. Thanks for the moment. I suppose that is not much different to 'This is now; it is not the future' but that is not the drive behind my gratitude and it is not an indication of any intended redistribution of my focus; just thanks for the time and effort that was put into the feedback; feedback that was clearly constructed with an idea of what I need and carried with it a good deal of respect. 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Russell Larke, Tuesday 11 August 2026 at 17:26)
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Teams, Feedback, Leadership, Magic and Learning of Requited love.

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Wednesday 9 April 2025 at 14:50

Blog address for all the posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

black and white image of a female face in silhouette


Confidence

At some point we are all asked to give feedback to at least one person. Many of us lie to our most intimate persons. ‘We ask OURSELVES what does this person want me to tell them? ‘You are a great singer, Ingrid, you should go on Britain’s Got Talent!’ Of, course Britain’s Got Talent is very well produced, so we really have no idea whether Ingrid really can sing, or if she has been set up by her malevolent family team. Yet, what if Ingrid lives at home with her parents and she is tone deaf and just will not shut up.

       ‘Shut up, Ingrid!’

       ‘But I love singing, and Vicki says I am really good.’

Her parents looked at each other, popcorn en-route to their mouths, and eyes rapidly returning to the dance troupe on the telly.

      ‘What she needs is a shock to set her straight.’

      ‘Yeah, let’s apply for Britain’s Got Talent on her behalf.’


It could happen. If Ingrid trusts her friend Vicki, who let’s face it, is not so pretty as Ingrid and works well as a wing-woman when they are out on the pull (you know, as a less attractive foil); then Ingrid is the leader of their team, while Vicki is always trying to keep up with the standards of someone she is convinced is superior to her, merely by dint of Ingrid’s looks getting more attention from intoxicated boys on Friday nights than Vicki normally gets.

Some years ago, I was very fortunate to be a secret player in an impromptu game I suddenly sprung on a young woman, Donna, the one who got the most attention from boys, and her friend Carla. Our first meeting was brief and we only swapped names; and, yes, I spoke to Donna before I addressed Carla that time. However, I knew we would meet again another weekend. ‘Carla’, I thought, ‘Remember her name! Carla.’

A couple of weeks later, Donna was more than a little bewildered the next time we met, when I spoke to Carla first.

      ‘Hello, Carla’

      ‘You remember my name!’ Eyes wide, bless her.

       ‘Of course. Who’s this?’ I already knew.

       ‘I’m Donna……!’

I interrupted her.

      ‘So, Carla, what you been up to? Do you wanna a drink?’


Such fun. Carla really was good to be with that night. I thought she would be. Unfortunately, she was in a team in which she was never the leader and her candle was always burning with a guttering flame. Her position, I am sure, is what she, not consciously, felt she deserved; to be eternally in second-place. I think she might have had some control, though, in not letting another good looking friend also join her and Donna's team.

A couple of years before I met Carla and Donna, I was already interested in magic; the type of magic that makes someone yawn when someone else yawns. I had also seen a teenage girl transform from an evergreen ivy to a beautiful lily because she felt loved; her love, she suddenly realised, was requited. Oh, how she tried to be kind while she struggled with her secret desires, and how vulnerable she felt until he one day said, ‘I really like you’. That is the type of magic I like. So, I was delighted to throw some magic at Carla, years later. She didn’t know it, but I was on her team and the leader of her new team, working behind the scenes with nobody recognising me or my efforts; but this was only for one night. Very much a Cinderella event. I hope Carla woke up the next day feeling at least a little bit special. If she did, she would, I suspect, have got a lot more deserved attention from then onwards.

What shape would you like feedback from your peers to take? We know that words with letters that have a hard sound to them serve to cause our minds to consider the thing associated with the sound of the word to have a similar shape. The sound of a ‘k’ for example is hard and jagged. It is, I am convinced, why we ‘see’ a sharp angle when we hear the word, ‘kink’. We also know, that the order that single words are used to describe a person changes our perception of that person.


Word Order

‘Interrogative, pedantic, diligent, focused, intelligent, inquisitive, open’

is a different person to:

‘Open, inquisitive, intelligent, focused, diligent, pedantic, interrogative’.

Yet the word order is the only thing that has changed.


Let us imagine these two characters in a story. Both are book-keepers. Plainly, the first is crotchety, irascible, and terse. The second, is polite, a good listener, and reliable. Given a task to impress a new manager who would get the team-leader role? And, who would find it hardest to recover from a problem that is ultimately revealed to the boss? I can hear the sneaky first person. closeted in a corner, quietly grumbling about the second one. ‘Oh, get a life’, I say, ‘You are grumbling about yourself. YOU have chosen which personal attribute you promote above another.’ 

If you discovered each of these attributes one by one over the course of a few chapters in a book, or scenes in a film, I think you might think these are two very different people.


In feedback to team members, then, we might look to a martial art style, from Chinese philosophy. Something like: Retreat, Strike, Defend, or Yin, Yang, Yin, which could be considered to be soft, hard, soft, though that is not the proper translation for Yin and Yang. In the Western world, we think of this as sandwiching a hard criticism between compliments. 

In returning to the earlier order of words to describe someone, which go from hard to soft for one person and soft to hard for the second person; and we change those words into insults and actual physical violence, and if we consider the hardest word to be an actual physical blow on a work colleague, it would be difficult to keep your job if you started with this action, but your point is painfully made. However, if the second person, in our scenario, is building towards this physical blow, the recipient may get the message of warning long before they are punched; both the work colleagues then get to keep their jobs.





Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 750495