OU blog

Personal Blogs

Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki

Pluralism, The Principal-Agency Problem - Shareholders, Line Management, and Employees

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki, Thursday, 30 Jan 2025, 18:14

Road to 100k

Thanks for the 80,000 blog views. Guess what? Only 20k more to a whopping 100,000. Wow!

Anyway, so, this morning, I was prompted to reflect on personal pursuits by Dr Kaul in our meeting. One thing about pursuits, both academic and professional, is that these endeavors have become relatively narrow and streamlined in recent years. The only paid work I have ever applied for or been in for have been executive staffing roles, mainly because as anyone who knows can testify, staffing is a sector I am quite interested in, alongside Learning and Development (B814), and Employee Relations (B813). 

However, as the fit notes era is well and truly behind me, I have become quite "choosy" in my adult years concerning opportunity (I guess some of us have to be) and in terms of my outlook and career potential. 

In utopia, I tabled the pursuit (it is much rather an aspiration) of becoming a Research Assistant (Post-Doc) to a prominent Professor of HRM at London Business School or King's College's Department of Human Resources, which is a bricks-and-mortar University, which I greatly admire. 

However, even I had to acknowledge to Dr. Kaul, that there is a very small caveat that this career path inherently has. Though strikingly rich in vernacular and academic esteem, I may choose its course (spotting gaps, conducting original research, co-authoring, etc) and live to realize it was perhaps a feat only a lucky few could accomplish in their careers in academia.

That got me thinking. Whatever happened to good old shareholder capitalism

A major element of Tianxi Wang's module is controversial. We all know what shareholder capitalism is though, right? Well if you didn't, I'll briefly explain. This term generally describes theories that deal with the concern of investors as owners of corporations (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) which are equally important to the rise of startups and smaller enterprises. It aims to answer the question: How can shareholders, who have the long-term value and ownership of the firm at heart, best delegate the control of decisions made by managerial actors who are entrusted to maintain this value, to varying degrees of stewardship? This is often called the 'separation of ownership and control' in the United Kingdom and other countries.

In Jensen and Meckling's (1976) abstract, we find the familiar problem of principal agency. It reads: "We define the concept of agency costs, show its relationship to the ‘separation and control’ issue, investigate the nature of the agency costs generated by the existence of debt and outside equity, demonstrate who bears costs and why, and investigate the Pareto optimality of their existence.What exactly do Jensen and Meckling mean here by the use of the word "costs"? 

Well, Prof. Edmans, and others such as Varela (2017), have argued, that they mean agency costs, which "arise when the firm is run by a manager who owns less than 100 percent of the company—so there’s a separation between shareholders (the ‘principal’) and the manager (‘agent’) who acts on their behalf. Agency costs arise when there is a ‘divergence between the agent’s decisions and those decisions that would maximize the welfare of the principal’. Human Resources as a function, are therefore quietly implicated in a very real sense in ideas that go above and beyond the importance of something as simple and simultaneously as complex as strategic planning. We are talking more along the lines of what value, governance, and stewardship on behalf of the principal owners of a firm, are, and in what Prof. Edmans refers to - as the overall "welfare" of the firm. To sum up, shareholder capitalism is of great importance to our perceptions of pluralism in Human Resource Management as a discipline and should be given more credence and granted more clemency. 

References

1. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) 'Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure', Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305-360 - Available at https://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/jensen-meckling.pdf

2. Edmans, A. (2021) 'What Stakeholder Capitalism Can Learn from Jensen and Meckling'. Oxford Law Blogs - Available at https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2021/05/what-stakeholder-capitalism-can-learn-jensen-and-meckling

3. Varela, O. (2017) "Agency costs” when agents perform better than owners, Finance Research Letters, 23, pp. 103-113 - Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.019

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki

Exploring Democratic Approaches to Leadership and Management

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Alfred Anate Bodurin Mayaki, Sunday, 4 Feb 2024, 16:11

According to Dr. Teresa Bejan of Oxford’s Department of International Relations, in Ancient Greek democracy, Isegoria (Bejan, 2017is often used to describe the equal rights of citizens to participate in public debate in the democratic assembly. Why is the concept of Isegoria important to an HR academic? It is important because it is a critical attribute in democratic forms of leadership. Furthermore, in what Revd. Dr. William Lamb (2021) also of Oxford University refers to as a ‘spiritual exercise’ as opposed to a ‘rhetorical device’ another form of free speech is mentioned. Parrhesia or ‘expressive freedom’ is witnessed most visibly during Jesus's spoken interaction with the Pharisees and Sadducees in the Gospel according to Matthew. How does this famous instance affect our view of democratic forms of leadership?

In the words of Collinson et. al (2018), where the Raelinian notion of Leadership-as-Practice (L-A-P) or ‘Leaderful’ practice is referenced to define the norms of ‘democratic tradition’ as enshrined and embedded in practice, or demokratia per se[1], Collinson explains that Raelin is referring to ‘participatory’ and ‘deliberative’ process. In this view, leadership is democratic and "holds an inherently positive connotation associated with certain democratic norms of equality and freedom to participate”. These are the 4C’s that constitute Raelin’s model of L-A-P: Compassion, Collaboration, Collectiveness and Concurrency.

What we refer to as leadership, in theory, can be impacted in a variety of ways by team dynamics. According to a 2023 article published online by management consultancy firm, Bain & Company, entitled, “At the Top, It’s All About Teamwork”, there is a notion that “effective teams” exhibit what the article refers to as ‘collective behaviours. As an example of the application of this form of leadership to teamwork, Benjamin Higgens, MD of Human Resources at Société Générale Group, one of France’s largest corporate and investment banking institutions by AUM, featured in a 2023 article published by The People Space, demonstrating how the bank’s collaboration with a leading workplace culture and behaviour consultancy led to a 'participatory engagement' which included 89% of its current workforce in London. 

The article demonstrates how through authentic inclusion, potential agents of change, senior leaders, and other employees, were able to acquire knowledge on effective decision-making and behaviours. How does this link back to the democratic concepts of Isegoria and Parrhesia? I may go into that linkage in more depth later in another Open blog. But for now, I thought I'd share these references and articles on the topic as a formal introduction.

References

1.       Bejan, T. M. (2017) ‘Dr Teresa Bejan writes about the two clashing meanings of freedom of speech‘, University of Oxford – Available at https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/dr-teresa-bejan-writes-about-two-clashing-meanings-free-speech (Accessed on 26 January 2024)

2.       Collinson, D., Jones, O. S. and Grint, K. (2018) ''No More Heroes’: Critical Theories on Leadership Romanticism’, Organisational Studies, 39(11). pp. 1625-1647 [Online] (Accessed on 26 January 2024)

3.       Foucault, M. (1983) ‘Lecture 6: Discourse and Truth: The Problemitization of Parrhesia’, University of California at Berkeley

4.       Gan, X., Jia, J., and Le, Y. (2023) ‘Transforming Vertical Leadership into Shared Leadership in Infrastructure Project Teams: A Dual-Pathway Perspective’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management [Online] (Accessed on 26 January 2024)

5.       Raelin, J. A. (2003) ‘Creating Leaderful Organisations: How to bring out leadership in everyone‘, Berret Koehler Publishers [Online] (Accessed on 26 January 2024)

6.       Revd. Lamb, W. (2021) ‘Parrhesia, Openness, Boldness and Accountability’, Vacation Term for Biblical Studies 2021 [Online] (Accessed on 26 January 2024)

7.       Womack, K. (2020) ‘A Study of Leaderful Practice in Church Organizations’, University of New Hampshire Scholar’s Repository – Available via https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=ms_leadership (Accessed on 26 January 2024)


[1] 'Demokratia' is the Grecian concept analogous to modern Western democracy

----

This post was written by Alfred Anate Mayaki, a student on the MSc in HRM, and was inspired by an Organisational Studies article written by Collinson et.al. (2018) entitled 'No More Heroes’: Critical Theories on Leadership Romanticism

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 90756