OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Sold

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 31 March 2026 at 05:21

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile 

[ 2 minute read ]

 

Sold

I want to be fooled

I recently read that it is almost impossible to make someone want something they don't already desire. I studied marketing for two reasons: because I needed it in my business, and I wanted to be able to undo the work of the nasty, puppet-masters in the shadows. 

I read that people cannot be forced to buy anything they don't desire. I don't believe this for one minute. I think it is a short-sighted fool who believes this. I never desired a mobile phone (cell phone) or a home computer until they were marketed. When farmers were polled at the turn of the nineteenth century as to what they desired, they said, 'a faster horse'. Henry Ford sold them the internal combustion engine. Now, farmers want better tractors and trucks. Offer a fast horse to a farmer and he thinks about whether he has a daughter or a sporting neighbor, or not.

I still don't relish having a mobile phone (cell phone) and I never crave a faster computer; just smaller operating systems. I desire what we had in the past. That is called nostalgia. We all get it; it is incurable. 

It is true that I would not be forced to buy a time-machine to go back in time and do nefarious things to make sure the mobile phone never evolved beyond a phone without a wire plugged into a wall. I MUST own a mobile phone because they were so successfully sold to the world in the first place, by marketers. I am not forced by today's marketers to buy a new amazing mobile phone (cell phone); I am forced to buy a second-hand phone both because we now have to all have one, and because I absolutely do not want any phone that has A.I. in its operating code from the outset. There is no reset that eliminates and removes all the crazy updates that new phones allow, to reset it to A.I. free, because its code positively seeks more A.I. updates.

Modern marketing seems to be ever-seeking the next thing to sell. It doesn't seem to try to sell us what we once had. Go into any UK village in 2026 and you will see a bunch of outsiders updating the village. They don't preserve it. They visited and loved the village. Oh wow! they said, This is heaven. Lets change it!

The dispensing pharmacist at my local doctor's surgery wanted to talk to me about my blood-pressure and cholesterol levels and how I could have stats (an update or a patch to fix a bug in my human software?) I have high blood pressure because I am stressed and don't get appropriate treatment. Even if I do have high cholesterol levels, it is probably because I eat too many free eggs. Of course, the 'chat' was necessary to the pharmacist because I was weighed by my doctor more than three years ago, and I was very slightly overweight according to the Body Mass Index (BMI) chart. Most people are so used to aimlessly being updated that they think they desire it. I don't think they do. I think it is like asking an alcoholic if they want a drink; they will invariably shake their heads as they say yes, we just can't process two things at the same time. 

     'Are you in a relationship?'

     'It's complicated.'

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Who wins?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 1 May 2026 at 20:05

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile 

 

[ 3 minute read ]

Just let me pay

I have a website that is hosted by IONOS, a German company. I chose IONOS as the site host because they are German. 

From my IONOS web site hosting account:

'Your sovereign workspace, hosted entirely in Europe

Email, word processing, spreadsheets, chat and more:

IONOS Nextcloud Workspace contains everything you and your team need for your work – with full control over your data, completely independent of US corporations.'

A while ago, I discovered that the EU was considering passing personal data to the USA when EU citizens fly to the United States of America, supposedly for visa-free travel. That same personal data is, due to the extent of the GDPR, not available to EU businesses. Make no mistake, the USA wants everyone's information, if only for targeted marketing purposes, but also, like every country around the world, for security purposes. We thought that China was a bit strong in banning certain persons from shops and areas by using facial-recognition technology. That attitude, I suggest is pretty widespread now. The IONOS statement (above) deliberately mentions US corporations as though IONOS expects its customers to know how gossipy US companies are.

I am reluctant to close my we hosting account with IONOS because they do appear to be sound. But I recently missed a payment and it developed into a real problem for me. Their policy is to have the account holder change the direct debit payment to a re-iterating card payment. As we know, you can't stop card payments and any entity that has out 16 digit long number and the three digit security code along with the expiry date can take any amount of money whenever they like. I balked at this and all hell broke out. I could not pay the arrears because IONOS had no other way to accept payment that actually worked. Their own security protocols prevented me offering my card details. I suppose that is a good thing. I had already checked with my bank that it was not the bank disallowing a single card payment to IONOS. Eventually I used my PayPal account to directly pay (from my card) directly to IONOS. 

Now, even though my web hosting account is free from debt and the content is accessible I have an invoice for £0.00, which replaces the £13.20 that should be taken by direct debit later this month. I think IONOS may be doing the usual thing and, recognising their mistake in not realising that UK citizens may not be able to pass their EU card payment scrutiny (which EU citizens have passed elsewhere in the EU), have decided not to charge me for this month. It just goes to show that card payments in the EU seem to be far safer than in the UK.

I shall have to make another PayPal (American) interim payment (in converted US dollars that IONOS have to pay to reconvert into Euros) just to make sure I don't run into problems with arrears. I don't think it is safe to make any online card payments, and I loathe having to do so. I really prefer entities to just stick to the rules and abide by the agreed contract details. Instead, I have had to have lengthy conversations that ultimately results in more confusion and potential card fraud.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Do spirits and Superheroes have mass?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 9 January 2026 at 09:02

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  

[ 6 ½ minute read ]  195 words per minute

Spirits unite against Laws of Physics

A placard I saw in a dream of a protest

A fun conversation I saw on an online learning platform is on researching fantasy. I noticed a comment that mentioned that the commentator is an academic writer and wonders about researching fantasy, ostensibly to assist her in writing fantasy novels. A while ago, I wrote a short story, on the fly, with almost no editing, as is my style. It was about visiting the spirit world. It never occurred to me that I might do any research before I wrote that.

It is easy to assume that one is fey or in some way connected or directly associated with some kind of spirituality, even having a direct link with a supreme being. It is not for me to make any argument as to whether anyone does have a link or is fey. I recognise that when we are alone in the dark and things rustle in hedges we might not be rational and momentarily think that it is a spirit or ghost or something. We might assume it is a rabbit or badger or rats. But, it is not rational to assume. Making assumptions is really using heuristics as adults, summing up blocks of acquired information to make a decision; which I suppose, is why the younger that children are, the more nightmares they have; they don't have enough experience to have built enough mental tools to allay confusion and fear.

It crosses my mind that as adults we might never see fairies and only see faeries. Good luck is much harder to discern than bad luck. While some of us might arrive at work early and cognisant that all the traffic lights were green, most of us, I believe, will only recognise that all the lights were green because we arrived early. If we are running late, and before we arrive somewhere, we tend to notice every red traffic light in real-time. My point is that we notice bad things more readily than good things. Finding a one pound coin or a dollar, is less impactful than losing one and not having enough to pay for our shopping. But, the thinkers among us will notice that there are other factors involved. In economics, the missing pound may have more value than an extra pound (its 'utility' is different). Not only that, green traffic lights have no impact on our driving, we just keep going, whereas red traffic lights have a consequential pattern of action that needs to be performed at every single one of them. Being early to work has little impact on our lives, but being late means having to catch up, or explain ourselves to someone (which means weakening our position).

Fantasy stories, I concluded from the safe discussion elsewhere, still abide by the Laws of Physics we are all aware of. When Superman punches a super-villain, the punch connects with a body of mass and force is definitely obvious as the mass hits a solid building; bits fall off the building. Flying without wings, however, means that there is either no mass or very little mass. When something with very little mass punches something else Newton's Third Law of Motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, tells us that the body of low mass should move away from whatever it has punched. Superman does not move away; so, the Laws of Physics are suspended. 

The spirit world, I suggest, is nothing like what we assume it to be. Even if we don't know, or have never heard of Newton's Third Law of Motion, we all know that there will always be consequences for everything we do, or don't do, and these go right down to every decision we make. In marketing, I came across a paper that stated that we make a decision about half a second before we realise we have, and we actually tell ourselves that a decision has been made. It is somewhere in one of my laptops and since I am not trying to convince anyone of anything, I am not going to hunt for it in order for me to cite it or reference it appropriately. However, a very quick online search gave me a paper in which the abstract matches my statement. I have set the link so it opens in a new page:

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10001129/1/Wiliam2006Half-second71.pdf

Telling ourselves we have made a decision half a second after we have made a decision would fit into a fantasy story. A whole half a second to interrupt the message is a really long time to act. (Such is my wont to not edit, I am leaving the tautology of having a whole half right there). But interruption isn't outside of the realm of possibility in today's technological world; perhaps eye movement gives clues as to the decision-making process. In a fantasy story however, telepathy might be used to prevent a purchase being successfully conducted. 'No decision has been made!'

In Contract Law, there is an offer and acceptance. If the offer is made there is still half a second before the person selling something realises they have made a decision to accept the offer. If we sum the transaction up in terms of available time for thought interference, a nefarious entity would have a whole second to play with, to prevent the transaction being finalised. 

       'Hmmm, I don't know' while standing before a display of clothes in a clothes shop doesn't necessarily mean you haven't made a decision; it means you haven't told yourself that you have made a decision. If you are delaying in making purchases for too long (is there 'too long' in retail therapy?) you might want to look around for someone staring at you; but then you might not see something with no mass. It might only be a disappointed wisp that fell from someone who lost some money, who passed you by earlier. Their decision to buy, thwarted by the physical inability to complete a purchase.

From psychology: cognitive dissonance is the feeling we experience when we have bought something and are, quite soon after, disappointed by its use or aesthetic value, its utility. It is less valuable to us then we first thought it to be. 

Not being able to buy something because we thought we had enough money and then discovering we do not (disappointment), mirrors cognitive dissonance in that, from economics, the assumed utility (value to us) of the contents of our purse or pocket is less then it really is (we are disappointed by the utility of our available money). Because money is money, a single unit of currency can buy a number of things, so its utility does not change. It is when it cannot buy what we desire that its utility is considered to be inadequate. £10 (ten GB pounds) buys less than £9 (nine GB pounds), so it is the sum of the money and its utility that changes and not the individual unit of currency.

The indecision to buy something comes from experience of being disappointed and we use heuristics to help us decide what to do; in this case, empiricism. A young child sees something and buys it because they like it without knowing that they could be disappointed. How many parents notice that their children played with something for an hour and then never again? Young children, I suggest, find disappointment and cognitive dissonance difficult to process, so they make decisions to buy quite readily. 

Initially, I thought that the academic people who professed a desire to research fantasy [stories] were on a fools errand, but now I am not so sure. I can't decide.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Luxury Discount Store

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Wednesday 7 January 2026 at 15:28

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' Take note of the position of the minus sign to eliminate caldwell returns or search for 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  

[ 8 minute read ]

A luxury discount store

When there is no marketing knowledge

Of late, I have been remiss in keeping abreast of how things are going in the high street and online trends. I used to know who owned whom; which investment group was asset-stripping which ailing business. I used to know how to write web sites and how to market my services. How come I feel that I am again adrift in a maelstrom sea of uncertainty and ignorance?

I was always one step behind the times. As fast as I caught up with how to do things some clever-clogs re-invented it and I had to learn a new software language or change a marketing avenue to suit a new trend born out of a new technology and innovation. I used to cry, 'Just wait a bit. There is no need for change', and 'Stoppit!', quite a lot. In those moments that was me being childish and for some alien reason thinking that 'It is my ball, and I am going home!' might convince the world to stop running rings around me. It was me in my twenties and thirties. 

I should have realised that there were strange things afoot when a long time ago, I bought my niece a web domain for her fledgling photography business for her birthday. She rudely ridiculed it. 'Why would I want that? I have Facebook!' At the time I had a passive website that generated a lot of business for me. If you want something enough you look at all the prospects of acquiring it. When you need to trust a service you go to somewhere that shows its integrity by them actually spending some valuable and billable time on an online presence, like a website. What I failed to understand was that my niece had no experience of how to find trustworthy partners or stakeholders in her route to achieving success.

My brother-in-law said something that has stayed with me. He has said a lot of other things that one day a trigger will bring forth to my attention, but here is one thing he said, paraphrased, of course.

       'If you met your partner in a pub, or when alcohol was involved, you can expect problems because where there is alcohol there is trouble.'

Of course, he gave no room for change, and what he really meant was, if the partying continues in the same way there will be disagreements, and things will be said that can't be unsaid and things will be done that can't be undone. He is a gentle sort and thoughtful but not a seer or philosopher. It just makes sense....in hindsight. We might say, start as you mean to carry on, but that requres knowing how the world will be before you start anything. In the 1990s and early 2000s, 'Agile' strateges started to become more interesting to manufacturers. Essentially, that means adapting quickly to changing markets. My brother-in-law inadvertently told me that unless both parties curtail their drinking habits there will be strife, and at the same time if they do moderate their partying, and they inevitably will when new responsibilites arise, they will be markedly different people and possibly not compatible with one another. 

Placing a bar to improvement isn't where I was heading but it is useful in at least nodding to its acquaintance with diversion and what happens when we do the same thing and expect different results.

My local shopkeeper had puzzled me until a couple of weeks ago. We get along quite well. I have failed to convince him that he could utilise my marketing knowledge. I have gently pointed out some obvious mistakes. He sells 2 litres of milk for £1.69. In Tesco and Sainsbury's it costs £2.10. Amazingly, £1.85 in Marks and Spencer's and £1.75 in the Co-op (7th January 2025 online prices) My shopkeeper does not tell anyone about his milk. Every morning I am there people lean across me at the counter to drop a token or coupon and leave with a newspaper. I don't think all these people drink black tea or coffee or are lactose intolerant, so I expect they buy milk somewhere. They DO NOT buy milk from my friend. They have no idea what the price of milk is in his shop.

My shopkeeper rebuffs all my attempts to help him. I gently point out how footfall and traffic reveals itself in his shop; how customers face one way and turn around only to their right or left. His response is to do nothing until he gets Premier to supply him; he has done nothing for over eighteen months now.

       'Once Premier are here we will work together on marketing, Martin.'

Too late! Marketing involves market research and targeting a specific group of people. Premier is owned by Tesco as is Booker, the cash and carry place, and their website says they handle all the marketing. However, despite their statement that shops under their umbrella can stock their stores as they like, another local shop-keeper has told me that you cannot stock what you like. I think my shopkeeper wants to sell cheap products when he should be selling luxuries, or optional discretionary goods.

Co-op are pretty well-established in my village. It is what is known as a 'top-up' store; no frills shopping but with store discounts for members. In fact, in the couple of years it has been here I was surprised to see a shopping trolley (the shallow kind) yesterday. It was being used by a disabled person and had three items in it. 

Not everyone wants to be a member though. There is an obvious refusal to be known to big conglomerates; to be targeted in some way.

Taking on a business on their home ground, I was taught, is futile. Co-op is an interesting example. Recent history gives some clues as to what kind of competitor they are in the 'top-up' store market. But even without knowing their recent history, it is enough to know that both Tesco and Co-op make sure that the public know they directly compete with ALDI, who, if you are not yet aware, replaced Morrison's as the fourth most successful food retailer in the UK, a couple of years back. Morrison's operated a vertical integration approach to retail but was sold to investors, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, in October 2021, who loaded Morrison's with billions of pounds of debt. The interest almost exceeds the revenue but the investors are richer so who cares. it will always happen; shareholders get older and want to cash in sooner or later before they die.

Financial Times:

https://www.ft.com/content/52dcd047-6f3b-4180-953f-751f3708e227

There are so many factors that make not visiting my local shop in favour of just going to the Co-op that I am certain a case study for marketing students could be made. Premier are demanding he convert some of the shop-floor into a storage area so thereby reducing his product range; there are car-parking restrictions; low observance of the shop and distraction by a no-signal crossroads, so no marketing is clearly seen. There is also a local shop in the next village that almost all the cars from the city must pass before getting to my village. Co-op have a member discount scheme which is accessible online (Without online presence they would lack credence). Even pet food is sold at the Pet Shop within the local petrol service station a mile and a half away. The list goes on. Overall, in my head is my experience of what a Premier store sells. My village is not a run-down council estate in the 1990s. I think my shopkeeper thinks it is. Kids do not drink cider in the park here, though some do get stoned. There are no teenage pregnancies and no-one is gathering in clumps smoking cigarettes.

While I may be considered to be harbouring negative opinions, my experience of Premier shops is exactly that; they live in run-down areas in the 1990s because they sold cheap products that contained a lot of additives. People now recognise that discount food is not always as good for them as they once conscientiously ignored.

In the same group of activity as Premier were McColls or Martins, who were recently picked up by Morrison's through administration;

Price  Waterhouse Coopers: https://www.pwc.co.uk/services/business-restructuring/administrations/mccolls.html)

and Somerfield (once Gateway) who acquired Kwik Save in 1998. Somerfield, in turn, was bought by Co-op in 2009. Co-op closed many of those sites.

Facts for Kids: https://kids.kiddle.co/Somerfield

I don't get my information from kids sites. I have contacts in the industry.

I am certain my shopkeeper has missed out on a golden opportunity to make something of his shop, he has a unique background. Yet, if he lacks understanding he will inevitably be rolled over by even the smallest amount of technology and shopping trends.

If I use my brother-in-laws advice as an analogy: My shopkeeper met and married his view of 1990s retailing, and now that the party is over one of them has given up drinking; retailing is different now - you can't just open a shop and hope for the best. In order for him to be happy, he has to go cold-turkey from his timed-out views and sober up a bit.

In trying to research the price of milk I discovered large retailers spend a lot on money on marketing their home delivery services. I live in a cul-de-sac of fifty homes and I see only two home delivery trucks deliver to only four homes between them each day. For my neighbours, the luxury desire for convenient home delivery is overwhelmed by the inconvenience of having to be at home to receive the goods. 

I think I might be able to express myself better by giving an example. Many years ago I pondered starting my own business. I had many ideas. When I finally understood spreadsheets I realised none of them would have worked. In order to get a business loan for a new business a Business Plan is necessary. Typically, they seek answers to what revenue and profit can be expected over five years and where are the costs? Even with a spreadsheet; and I am quite good at them, I have seen the difficulties of actually making a viable Business Plan. It can be quite disappointing to see oneself fail on paper. It is devastating to experience it in real time. It is a mental illness you cannot escape from, because your whole life depends on everything working as you hoped it would. 

Perspicacious people might recognise that there is an underlying stream of thinking in my words. I am convinced the local shop will fail. It is leased from the failed shopkeepers of two years ago and it will be expensive to turn it into a restaurant. Only someone who understands marketing would try to make money from a restaurant because the profit margins are so slim. We are not so wealthy here to enjoy a good restaurant and decadence and luxury is becoming obsolete, that is except for the black SUV drivers who park in the disabled spots and across the lines in the local Co-op car park.

Of course, I have simply overlaid templates over templates and held them up to the light to see where any light shines through. Here is one compilation dated 1990 when discount stores were strong, and one dated 2025 where luxuries have any price. Ooh! Pretty!

If you are interested in supermarkets you might like to research Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG).

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Access Denied

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 12 September 2025 at 06:58

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 5 minute read ]

Access Denied

There is a 1992 sci-fi horror film called 'The Lawnmower Man' with Jeff Fahey (Jobe) as an intellectually-challenged gardener and Pierce Brosnan as a scientist who tries to enhance Jobe's intellect using virtual reality simulations and drugs. There is a scene in which Jobe is somehow locked into a computer program and had become malevolent. Jobe tries different routes to escape the software and escape into the real world. 'Access Denied; Access Denied; Access Denied', hundreds of times.

Buying a new phone on monthly terms is the same. I have two Sim plans. I don't want any more plans. I intend to get rid of one Sim and its plan in favour of an unlimited plan. Great! A new phone with an unlimited plan with my existing service provider. Can't do that. Access Denied. I have to buy the phone with a useless 50GB data plan. Quite simply, I would throw that Sim away and buy a Sim elsewhere for less per month that has unlimited everything. 

I am beginning to understand how wretched the world's population is. Even I, who have absolutely no need for a SmartPhone have to buy a 5G device in case 4G becomes obsolete in the next ten years. I, however, insist on a phone with no A.I. installed as standard. Nor can it be a Google thingy. Any phone I have will be exclusively used for texts and voice, but I don't want any voice recognition technology listening to me or the other person I am talking to. Access Denied.

Look at it this way. Now that we have A.I. we all need to security vet our closet relatives every time they call or text us, even face-time us. Our voices and our faces, from those photographs on your phones, can be reproduced and animated, to fool even our own mothers, spouses or partners, and our children to make them reveal secrets to A.I. Your A.I. reproduced face can be used to face-time your children and tell them to meet you somewhere remote. Of course, you could set up security safe words but you would never be able to use them because it would be one of your character attributes that a bad actor using A.I. would definitely use. There are no photographs of me beyond the age of eighteen, and even that one is an oblique view of me. Any guesses why? I don't use MS Teams or speak or have my webcam on in Forums or Tutorials. Unfortunately, last year, I was compelled to talk in real-time to my tutor. Serious security breach! People are uneasy if they cannot build some rapport by also making other people vulnerable though. Nobody needs to see me to understand what I am saying. 

My bank tells me it is removing an extremely secure way for me to log in online that only allows me to see the balance. I cannot do any transaction other than cancel Direct Debits. I would never want full online access to somewhere where my money is. Soon, I will need to keep my money under my mattress. Before the end of the year, the only way to access my bank account online will be by using an app that provides full access and allows any transaction including money transfers. Maintain Good Security - Access Denied.

I have to get a SmartPhone to safeguard against future rubbish that someone cooks up as being healthy living. 3G is being switched off by the end of the year. Phone Security - Access Denied.

How horrendous it must be to recognise that this is the life we live, in which we cannot have peace because other people do not know peace. We cannot have good security because other people are caught up in a frenzy of revealing their own information by storing personal stuff on SmartPhones, and a blanket and SIMPLE way to protect them is necessarily thrown over all customers of digital services. This is a nightmare. I am wondering if it might make me feel bullied rather than steered towards purchasing stuff I absolutely don't want. Later, I will have to talk to someone in Customer Service, who has little customer service training, at my phone service provider, to TELL them what I want. I will, inevitably have to have a discussion on my needs. I don't want a discussion and if any marketing is attempted I will change service providers at the end of the contract in November. I tell them this, but the marketing goes on and on. I could end the contract early, today, for £23.83. I don't even care if I lose my phone number.

I don't get addicted to anything, except maybe sugar which would take me about two months to give up. I can gamble, get drunk or smoke cigarettes and then just stop, and never crave a return to them. Advertising has zero effect on me. I sometimes hear what is being advertised, but I never buy it. NEVER! I am immune to desire and want. I am only compelled to have what is necessary to freely exist in a crazy world of greedy clamour and chaos.

I am beginning to understand how difficult it is for people to conduct normal lives, when they are forced to have superfluous conversations when a simple click online would be easier. Access Denied. Businesses are too far ahead of themselves. They cannot provide something that they want to sell. No wonder it takes so long to get through to talk to someone in customer service or the 'tech' department. Everyone is forced to go into lengthy detail about what they want. Oh no! Maybe people don't know what they want, and so they are 'guided' into catering to their 'want' and desire for things they previously did not know exists. Oh no! How sad! 

You know, I am not particularly interested in being social for the sake of sociability. I definitely do not need to incessantly chat or be in contact with anyone. In that, I am wholly fortunate. There are so many ways to avoid customer service rubbish calls. Take 'roaming' for example. I would never upgrade my plan. I would simply buy a monthly unlimited plan for £20 upfront somewhere, and then never allow more payments. Job done. Or, like I normally do, buy a Sim in the countries I am in and put it in an unlocked phone. I can't understand why anyone would voluntarily want to mess with a phone or Sim plan, ever. 

A long time ago, when people went into supermarkets there wasn't much choice between products. Take breakfast cereal for example. There is a whole aisle of poison to confuse shoppers these days. The list of ingredients on one product has only one line. 'Wheat'. I actually haven't looked at Shredded Wheat boxes but an advert told me that a couple of days ago. In Shredded Wheat there is only wheat. Simple living.

I studied marketing at FHEQ level 6 because I wanted to understand how people are fooled into making purchases. The overall driving force for purchasing is family, friend, school and work colleague, famous person  influence. Parents are the major influencer. The marketer's job is more than halfway done before they even get out of bed.

Such is my frustration. I almost bought a phone with a Sim plan that I would pay for, but never use, simply to get the phone and be able to get on with my day. I can buy a Sim plan that I actually want separately. Is that what people do, to get what they want? Pay through the nose for stuff that is useless but is essentially tacked on to something they do want?

I have a dumb-phone but because the world has SmartPhones My security protocols must be compromised by upgrading to a device that will inevitably replace Chip and Pin that is already replacing money transactions. Even though I won't be using the SmartPhone, I have to buy it now because all SmartPhones will have A.I. installed as standard. That then, will be the time to throw all your talking and viewing devices away. However, I suspect no-one will, so I won't be able to either.

Thanks a lot!

At 8 o'clock this morning I will have to talk to someone about getting something I fear and loathe; ultra-connectivity to entities I detest.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

The march of digital obfuscation

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 28 November 2025 at 16:33

This is a rant and not worth reading unless you are really bored. There are references to marketing and web design that somehow float in my head, lonely and in need of fresh air.

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 5 minute read ] 

The march of digital obfuscation

This post refers to an article 'We'll make it home together', on France 24

France 24 - https://www.france24.com/en/

'We'll make it home together' - 

https://webdoc.france24.com/nous-rentrerons-ensemble-suzanne-simone-camp-ravensbruck/friendship-at-ravensbruck.html

Web Documentaries on France 24 - https://webdoc.france24.com

The march of digital obfuscation goes on. There is an 'article' on France 24 https://www.france24.com/en/ that just plain abuses my sensibilities. Aarrgh! The story starts safely enough with a picture / thumbnail of what might be considered to be the front cover of a book about women deported from France to Ravensbrück, Germany. Yet, when I clicked on it, and expected to be able read it, I was disappointed. This is cognitive dissonance at the very first moment when the PACKAGING is revealed. Nobody in marketing wants that! Slightly confused, I worked on the mouse wheel, as one does as a automatic response to nothing happening on screen. You know, the website has loaded but the cookies banner has not yet, or the website designer has included time delays in the code for smooth transitions (waste of time).

There is an introduction, and then, by continuing to scroll, a series of chapter links; yes links! that scroll up. More delay and more action needed. This is interaction for the sake of it. What is the point of writing about kidnapped women during the second World War if it is not to help people to understand their plight, or make money? Either let us read it or reward us somehow. I am so out of touch with reality that I cannot fathom why people might feel rewarded if they have to continually click, click (as Ssniperwolf says at the end of her YouTude videos). Click, click, click, to be able to read something. Why not pause for a round of Bingo, while we are at it?>

Right! The screen has links to chapters. These could have been static icons on the first page as an aside or, I think, in website making terms, an article within the web page. As I scroll, each chapter link replaces the next, completely obscuring the previously shown button. It stops at chapter five. Now, surely, I can begin to read the story. No. More cognitive dissonance and wasted time. I have to scroll back up to get to Chapter One, and click the link to start reading Chapter One (Part One). Once that is loaded, there is a link to chapter two, and chapter two has a link to chapter three, and so on. The website creator calls these chapters 'parts'.

Each one of these 'parts' is a separate web page. Now, even though I have a web site but don't really bother with Search Engine Optimisation for Google indexing, I am aware that 'stickability' was once a metric that Google used. The longer a person spends on a web page determines how interesting it is deemed to be. So include a diversion such as a video that plays really, really really, slowly. Obviously Google is aware of that tactic. So, stickability is not so useful as a metric. So, it seems there is no reason to have web pages that take a long time to read or absorb or something (a guess). Yet, my new web site analytics measures bounce rate AND stickability, and entry points, and stuff such as the operating system used by the viewers and other stuff. I don't really care.

But let's not get bogged down in that. France 24 is the host website and the piece about Ravensbrück is a subdomain of France 24, titled 'webdoc', as in https://webdoc.france24.com (Web documentaries on France 24)

Something is going wrong when the fuss of a web site means that, for me, it can only be a taster, I won't continue with it, and I will seek information on the subject elsewhere. Except I am wrong. The whole purpose of existence in the modern world is not to communicate, or be good at it; it is to show that you can be considered worthy in that we have impressed some computer code that ranks our work as relevant. Surely, it is only relevant to narcissism.

In reality, I will get an idea that I know something about French women locked up in concentration camps, but because I am used to getting thrill after thrill I will never seek to actually learn anything by looking for relevant information. I blame MTV for that. They are the ones who put ticker-tape style messages across the bottom of our TV screens, when we were watching music videos in the 1980's.

What would I do differently? If having multiple pages is important to be highly ranked, I would have all the links to the parts on the same page, and all the links to all the parts on every page as an article to the side of the page. As someone who wants to go back in text to check for relevancy or as new ideas come into my head, I might want to go back to a part/chapter with a link and not as backward steps. The bounce and entry metrics would show this more accurately to the webmaster and adjustments could be made by them to suit - as in why did the viewers go back? Did I leave something out?

My last thought? A classic case of worshipping digital technology as being greater than analogue humans or God(s).

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Needs and Motives

Visible to anyone in the world

A black and white image of a female silhouette

Marketing

What is the difference between need and motive?

Henry Murray (1893 – 1988) was the originator of the motive approach to personality. In the 1930’s he differentiated between two types of need; primary and secondary. Primary needs, he proposed, are biological needs such as the need for food, water and sex. Secondary needs, or psychogenic needs, he accorded, are needs derived from our biological needs, like the need for power and achievement. Later, in 1943, Abraham Maslow set out an hierarchy of needs following along from Murray’s work.

Motive theorists propose that needs don’t operate on their own to influence behaviour. Motives, they say, are thoughts and feelings that drive someone to enact certain behaviour to satiate their needs. To elucidate slightly on this: whereas someone may have a biological need for food, it is the subjective feeling of hunger that drives the action to eat or seek food. Theorists also believe that there is a third influence, external conditions, which they, and Murray, call ‘Press’, which contributes to someone’s actions to satiate a need. Such a press in the case of the need for food which is signified by the feeling of hunger could be the smell of food; this could come from a meal being cooked by someone else in the kitchen at home.

Theorists also propose that people do not always openly show their motives but may however project them onto something else. It is this area that marketers need to focus most acutely on to accurately target chosen segments. Not only do people mask their motives they also have individual differences in specific needs, such as power, achievement and affiliation. One only has to give a rudimentary glance at social media to be able to recognise the need for affiliation (forming groups and making friends) and the need for power (social influence and prestige), and, with further research, realise that there is indeed a difference in the extent to which people feel these needs – easily recognised in the absence of many people from expressing opinion on social media sites.

Essentially, then, there is a biological need (something that all people have) and a psychogenic need (differing degrees of relevance in each person) and a subjective feeling or motive which together cause an action to be initated in order to satiate the biological need or psychogenic need. The subjective motive is coloured by preferences which historically, for the individual, have proved to be useful in assuaging a feeling of loss, inadequacy, or lack of achievement, in other words – assuaging a need, both biological and psychogenic.1

In conclusion, a need is universal throughout all humans and is so fundamental in humans that it has no preferences, and a motive is entirely subjective, is shaped by past experience, and may discriminate against other means of satisfying a need.


What are the basic assumptions in Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs?

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory rests on the following assumptions: He assumes that a person’s behaviour is derived from his or her own needs; that there is a series of sets of needs that need to be satisfied; that an already satisfied need does not motivate the person to seek further assuaging of that need; that the next need in the series, or another need in the set, will cause a person to be active towards assuaging that need; and that a person cannot move from one set in the series to a higher one until all the needs in the set have been satisfied.

An alternative approach, preferred by some, to understanding the assumptions in Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is to distill his research down into TWO assumptions:

1) Humans are a species that experience needs that pertain to what they already have. This is incorrect as needs are not recognised by the individual until a subjective feeling of inadequacy is experienced. The assumption continues thus: A fulfilled need is not a motivator. Since there is a difference between needs and motivators this statement is only partially correct – we need to remove the word ‘fulfilled’ from the statement - a need is never a motivator, fulfilled or otherwise, because a motivator is a stimulus that gives a recognition of a need or want, also a need is never a ‘want’ yet may be perceived to be by an individual.

This assumptions continues: Behaviour can only be influenced by needs which have not already been satisfied. This is at best simplistic and incorrect because behaviour is influenced by various motivators and needs. For example, an inadequacy of food in a human will not influence any behaviour; it will however be recognised by the nervous system and, in a reasoning human, a motivating feeling will occur, which sets up a process of organised thoughts with a focus on satiating a hunger, however, not always healthily. The last part here is that the need for food may not be adequately satisfied whereas the feeling of hunger can be.

2) Maslow proposed that all needs can be ranked as being more, or less, important than another and placed them in sets of needs. He believed that all reasoning humans are compelled to always strive, and move, towards a greater goal from the most basic biological needs to a higher brain function psychological need, such as self-actualisation. Not only that, but also the higher brain function needs cannot be satisfied until the most fundamental ones are satiated. Yet we are aware of starving artists in the garrets of buildings who have satisfied a need to be creative while not satisfying an innate need for food – indeed starving people in very low socio-economic areas, such as can be found on the African and Asian continents, will create very fine pieces of art, furniture, and other items in order to sell them, solely to be able to buy food, and will create such finery even when almost starving because they have no alternative to accruing sufficient money from other means of action.


Wait! What?

It should be noted that ‘functional Magnetic Resolution Imaging’ (fMRI) has given rise to Neuro-marketing, the use of neuro-technology to improve marketing decision making. From this research it is understood that the brain activity for an action takes place about half a second before a person consciously decides to take an action. This suggests that we are not consciously making a decision so much as becoming aware that a decision has been made. 2


1   From a paper by Silvana Romero on ‘Needs and Motives’, academia.edu/9413085/Needs_and_Motives which references:

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2004). Perspectives on personality. Boston, MA: Pearson Education (Chapter 5)

Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2002). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. Boston, MA: McGraw­Hill. (Chapter 8)

2   Principles of Marketing, 5th European edition, Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong, Veronica Wong, John Saunders, Prentice Hall, 2008.


Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 696757