OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

What Does Peter Rabbit Tell Us About a Higher Power?

Visible to anyone in the world


"My son, do not forget my teaching, but keep my commands in your heart, 

for they will prolong your life many years and bring you peace and prosperity."

Proverbs 3:1-2



Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot



So, you know how almost every story we grow up with has a hero’s journey at its core? It’s this classic storyline where the hero, like Peter Rabbit, is warned against doing something—say, sneaking into Mr. McGregor's garden—but goes ahead and does it anyway. Peter’s little adventure lands him in a bunch of trouble, and he's as scared as a dog caught in the act. But at the end of it all, after escaping the scrape, he's back home, safe, sipping camomile tea. That’s pretty much how most stories go, right? They introduce a problem, throw in some drama, and typically end with a satisfying resolution.

Now, why is that? Why do stories often have happy endings or, at least, conclude with a sense of justice being served? Well, I think it boils down to us as humans having this deep-rooted sense of right and wrong. There’s this verse in Jeremiah 31:33 that says, “I will place my law on their hearts and scribe them on their minds.” This line suggests that our understanding of morality isn’t just something we pick up from society; it’s etched into our very being by a higher power.

This idea of inherent morality is crucial when we talk about guiding the young ones. When parents or stories forewarn kids, like Peter was warned, it’s not just about telling them what not to do. It’s about setting them up for the real world, helping them navigate through their own trials and triumphs. It’s about prepping them for life’s garden and the Mr. McGregors they’ll inevitably face.

And then there’s the anti-hero’s journey, which is a bit different. Unlike the clear-cut heroes, anti-heroes walk a murkier path. Their stories are also valuable because they show the messier side of decisions and consequences, teaching that life isn’t always black and white. These tales, too, are crucial because they provide a broader, more nuanced lesson in morality.

In wrapping up, whether it's through heroes or anti-heroes, stories are more than just entertainment. They’re a tool for moral education, helping shape young minds to understand and navigate the complex moral landscapes they’ll encounter in life. And as they grow, the forewarnings we weave into these tales can guide them toward making choices that lead to their own fulfilling stories—hopefully, with as many happy endings as possible.

 


Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

"If you see a tortoise on a fence post..."

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday, 23 Feb 2025, 08:42

 

"If you see a tortoise on a fence post, you know it didn't get there by itself"




 Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot


When I was a child, I would look into the starry sky and conclude that this universe never created itself. Despite only being an infant, something metaphysical was taking place, something existential. This conclusion has become more forceful as I have aged and come to the current knowledge of the majestic earth, its life and the moral fabric that lies behind us humans.

Many people, scientists among them, have concluded like me, that the Earth and the universe were purposefully designed because of how complex and perfectly arranged they are. One of the main points in favour of this idea is the "fine-tuning" of the universe. This means that certain key things, like the force of gravity and the speed of light, have very specific values. If these values were even slightly different, life as we know it wouldn't exist. The chances of these values being perfect by random luck are super low, which makes some people believe that an intelligent being set them on purpose.

Another point comes from looking at how complicated living systems are. Take the human body, for example—it's made up of many parts like cells and organs that work together to keep us alive. The eye is a commonly used example because it's so complex and effective at turning light into the images we see. This complexity makes it hard for some to believe that it all happened by chance through evolution.

Then there's the "anthropic principle," which says that the universe seems specially set up for human life. Things like Earth's distance from the Sun, its atmosphere, and the presence of water are exactly right for us to live. It looks like the universe was made with humans in mind.

From a philosophical angle, the idea of design fits with the teleological argument, which suggests that the purposeful setup of the universe implies there's a designer. Many religious beliefs also support this by saying a divine being created the universe, which offers a neat explanation for its order and design.

Critics, however, point to natural explanations like evolution and the multiverse theory (the idea that there are many universes with different settings, and we just happen to live in one that supports life). They argue that evolution explains the complexity of life through natural selection and random changes, and that the multiverse theory could explain the perfect settings of our universe without needing a designer.

Despite these arguments, those who believe in design say that the natural explanations don't fully account for the extreme unlikelihood of the universe's fine-tuning happening by chance. They think the precise and complex nature of the universe more strongly points to intentional design rather than a random event.

These features of the Earth and the universe, like the exact settings needed for life, the complexity of living systems, and the conditions that specifically support human life, all suggest that there might be an intelligent design behind everything. While there are other views, the idea of a purposeful creator remains a compelling explanation for the wonders we see in the world around us.

“Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power,

for You created all things; by Your will they exist and were created.”

Revelation 4:11 (BSB).


Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Why Do We Say What We Say?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday, 22 Dec 2024, 10:18

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice"

Theodore Parker



Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot


I live in the United Kingdom, a country often regarded as a secular society. Despite this prevailing notion, our actions frequently contradict our professed secular worldview. How so? By the simple act of listening to people’s everyday conversations. Consider some of the common expressions we hear:

- “You wouldn’t believe what she said about me.”

- “Eh, excuse me, but there’s a queue.”

- “That’s not fair!”

- “He deserves better.”

- “You owe me an apology.”

- “What they did was uncalled for.”

- “We should split it evenly.”

Do you see what is happening in all these expressions? They are calling on a universal sense of justice. These statements reveal an innate recognition of right and wrong, fairness and justice, which seem to transcend cultural and religious boundaries.

If we are living in a universe that is nothing more than an accidental bang, where life stepped out of a prebiotic pool with no first cause, then those expressions of injustice would be meaningless because there is no inherent justice in an aimless world. We would all just be dancing to our DNA. But we are not. And there is a reason why: we are subject to a universal law, given by a lawgiver who has stamped these laws into our hearts.

Micah 6:8 encapsulates this universal principle beautifully: "He has shown you, O man, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you but to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God?" This biblical passage emphasizes that acting justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly are not merely religious edicts but profound human imperatives.


Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Two things fill the mind with ever-increasing wonder...

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday, 19 Nov 2024, 14:59


Image Generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot


"Two things fill the mind with ever-increasing wonder and awe, 

the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me"


In Immanuel Kant’s famous words above, we find a truth both stirring and profound. Kant identifies the night sky and the sense of morality as two things that reveal the vastness and the mystery of our existence. But he also implies something more: both the cosmos and the moral compass inside us speak of an origin greater than ourselves. The order in the universe and the sense of right and wrong within us do not come from us, yet they define us. For me, this is one of the reasons I believe in objective morality—a moral law that is not subject to individual preference or societal consensus but is embedded in our being, given by a moral lawgiver.

As a young boy, I often found myself awestruck by the stars. Looking up from the small garden in my Scottish neighbourhood, I wondered what it all meant, feeling an inexplicable sense of reverence for the vast stretches of stars, each seemingly unchanging yet moving in perfect order. It was my first encounter with something beyond the everyday, a humbling reminder of my smallness. I could not have articulated it then, but I sensed that the stars spoke of something powerful and intentional. Later, when I began studying the Bible, I found words for that feeling. Scripture tells us, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands” (Psalm 19:1). The universe, both grand and orderly, seemed to bear witness to something beyond itself—something beyond me.

At that time, I also began experiencing the pull of another kind of law, one I couldn’t escape even if I wanted to: the moral law within. No one had to tell me that some things were wrong—hurting others, taking what wasn’t mine, dishonouring my parents; they all seemed wrong before I knew why. Even without knowing God, my conscience spoke with a clarity that required no outside approval. But unlike the laws of nature, the moral law demanded something from me: it required my response. Over time, I came to understand this law not as a collection of cultural rules but as something embedded within me, pointing to a higher standard that existed beyond human opinion.

Reflecting on Kant’s words, I find that both the heavens and the moral law point us in the same direction. The stars obey physical laws, while we are subject to moral ones. Just as the planets follow their orbit in accordance with the laws of gravity, so, too, do I believe we are called to follow a moral law written into the fabric of our being. If gravity and physics testify to the order of the natural world, then the moral law testifies to the order that should govern our hearts.

For many people today, the idea of objective morality is a stumbling block. Our culture values individual freedom and autonomy, and people often believe that morality is relative or subjective. Yet even in the most liberal societies, there is still an understanding of justice, kindness, and fairness. Certain principles—like the value of human life, or the wrongness of murder and betrayal—transcend cultures and religions. To me, this universal understanding points toward an objective morality, a standard that is unchanging regardless of circumstances or opinion.

The need for objective morality became real to me in times when I saw profound injustice or felt the ache of someone else’s suffering. If morality were simply a construct, then every moral outrage would be nothing more than a personal irritation or an arbitrary preference. But my conscience tells me otherwise. When faced with injustice, I know that something greater is being violated, something more than just my own feelings. The injustice itself, the wrong, exists independently of how I feel about it. It is not a construct, but a reality that demands a response, whether we like it or not.

 For me, objective morality is not only real but necessary. Without it, there would be no ground for judgment, no reason to expect others to act justly or kindly. Without it, we could not cry out against injustice or celebrate goodness, because those ideas would lack substance. My belief in objective morality affirms that life, dignity, and integrity are not simply useful or preferred; they are good because they reflect the nature of the One who made us.

To believe in objective morality is also to believe that there is a purpose for human beings beyond survival or pleasure. Our moral sense points us toward something—or Someone—who has written His laws within us. Like the stars that proclaim His power, the moral law within us whispers of His nature: just, loving, and pure. To ignore this inner law is, in a way, to ignore our very selves.

Perhaps this is why Kant’s words resonate with me so deeply. They remind me that both the starry heavens and the moral law are not ours to control; they are there to be observed, to humble us, and to remind us of something greater. Both reveal that we are part of a created order, called to live not for our own desires but in response to the truth placed within us. And it is this truth—the objective reality of right and wrong—that I believe points us home.

Unshackled Faith Bible Study and Discussion Group - DownToMeet


Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 429136