OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

Why We Walk the Wild Places

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

Why We Walk the Wild Places

 

There is a mystery to long walks in the world’s grand places. Across continents and cultures—from the dusty paths of the Camino de Santiago to the granite spine of the West Highland Way, from Norway’s wind-scoured coastlines to Austria’s Alpine passes—people set off with boots laced and packs loaded, drawn by a longing that resists easy explanation. It is more than tourism. More than exercise. The terrain seems to speak to something older than language.

Something in us recognises these places.

We might call it instinct, or memory, or something spiritual. The Japanese word shizen (自然) gestures toward this: not simply “nature,” but the sense of things as they are, unforced and unmade by human intention. To walk in wild places is to step briefly back into that order. Another word, komorebi (木漏れ日), describes sunlight filtering through leaves—an ordinary miracle that, on a long walk, feels like revelation.

We live surrounded by noise—notifications, deadlines, expectations. The mind is rarely still. Yet research in environmental psychology shows that time in natural environments reduces cortisol, lowers heart rate, and restores attention. “Attention Restoration Theory,” pioneered by Stephen and Rachel Kaplan, suggests that nature holds our focus gently, without demanding it, allowing the mind to recover from fatigue.

There is also shinrin-yoku (森林浴)—“forest bathing”—a practice named by Qing Li. His research shows that time among trees can boost immune function, improve mood, and reduce anxiety. The forest, it seems, is not merely scenery. It is medicine.

But the healing of long walks goes deeper than physiology.

There is a loneliness in modern life that is difficult to name—not the absence of people, but the absence of depth. On the trail, something shifts. Strangers become companions. A shared stretch of path becomes a shared story. You meet someone over a cup of tea, compare the ache in your legs, and within an hour you are speaking of things that would take months elsewhere.

You have known this yourself—on the slopes of Goat Fell, along the West Highland Way, in Norway’s quiet expanses. There is a particular kind of friendship that forms in these places—unguarded, unforced. Perhaps because the usual markers of identity fall away. No one asks what you do. Only where you’ve come from, and how far you’re going.

And somehow, that is enough.

But there’s another dimension to walking in nature. The Japanese word yūgen (幽玄) speaks of a subtle, profound beauty—something felt rather than fully understood. Long walks are full of this quality: a ridge dissolving into mist, the hush before rain, the way the land stretches endlessly, indifferent yet welcoming. These moments resist explanation, but they shape us nonetheless.

The natural world has always been a setting for encounter. Not because God is confined to wilderness, but because we are less distracted there. As a Christian, I find myself walking with God in nature. I look at the colours, the beauty of a creature like a butterfly, the majesty of mountains rising from the water and I am filled with awe and appreciation.  The Celtic tradition spoke of “thin places”—landscapes where the boundary between heaven and earth feels porous. Walking through such places, one does not necessarily find answers, but one becomes more open to them.

Walking itself becomes a kind of prayer.

Not the structured, spoken kind, but something quieter. Each step a rhythm. Each breath a line. The body moves, and the mind follows. The noise recedes. What remains is presence.

And in that presence, we begin to see more clearly.

Long-distance walking strips life to its essentials. You carry only what you need. Every unnecessary item becomes a burden. This reveals the weight we carry off the trail—the obligations, expectations, and identities we cling to. Out there, these things loosen. You are no longer the role you perform. You are simply a person moving through a landscape.

Vulnerable. Dependent. Alive.

Without distraction, the mind turns inward. Old memories surface. Grief, long deferred, finds space to breathe. But unlike forced introspection, walking allows these things to move. You are not sitting still with them—you are carrying them forward, step by step.

This is why walking heals.

Not because it solves everything, but because it creates the conditions in which healing can begin. Movement becomes metaphor. The path becomes possibility.

Modern research increasingly points to awe as a transformative emotion. Psychologists like Dacher Keltner describe awe as something that diminishes the ego and expands our sense of connection—to others, to the world, to something larger than ourselves. Wild places are uniquely suited to evoke this. Standing on a ridge, looking out over miles of untouched land, one feels both small and deeply held.

It is a paradox that comforts rather than diminishes.

The great irony of pilgrimage is that it often begins as escape but ends as return. We leave behind the noise of life only to rediscover what mattered within it. Somewhere along the trail, we meet a version of ourselves that had been obscured—not lost, but waiting.

The child who marvelled at the sky.
The soul that still longs for meaning.
The quiet voice that had been drowned out.

We come back carrying something difficult to explain. Not answers, exactly, but a reorientation—a sense that life is not merely something to manage, but something to walk through attentively.

The trail does not end when we return home.

Perhaps this is why people return to the trail again and again.

Not to conquer distance, but to remember something essential:

That we are not separate from the world, but part of it.
That solitude need not mean loneliness.
That friendship can arise in unexpected places.
That the soul, like the body, needs space to move.

The world’s grand places—its mountains, coastlines, forests, and open paths—do not demand that we understand them. Only that we walk.

And those who do understand something wordless, something enduring:

That the journey outward is also a journey inward.
And once begun, it never truly ends.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Freedom of Being Truly Seen

Visible to anyone in the world

“The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound,
but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes.
So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.”
— John 3:8 (ESV)

sketch.png

The Freedom of Being Truly Seen

There is a trembling need in every human soul that no creed, policy, or borrowed certainty can satisfy. Beneath all our questions and weariness lies an ache for something real, personal, eternal, something like the wind, unseen yet unmistakably felt. I found myself in that place some years ago, standing in the quiet where the soul finally admits its hunger.

If you’ve left a high‑controlled religion, or if you’re searching for truth with empty hands, you already know this ache. You’ve felt the pull of something truer than the system you were given. Perhaps you felt imprisoned,  not because you lacked devotion, but because the structure around you left no room for your soul to breathe. You spun and strained, trying to find a centre that didn’t collapse beneath you.

And here is the liberating wonder: Jesus, the One appointed as judge, looks not at your labels or your pedigree or your ability to impress others. He looks at your heart; the place where the Spirit’s wind stirs.

Cornelius in Acts 10 is a witness to this. A Roman centurion, a Gentile, a man every religious insider would have dismissed. Yet God saw him. his sincerity, his reverence, his quiet goodness. Into his ordinary life came a radiant message: “Your prayers and your acts of compassion have come up as a memorial offering before God.” That was enough. Cornelius was already known. Already loved. Even Peter had to let his assumptions fall away as he realised, “God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean.” Cornelius had no credentials except a willing heart — and that was more than enough for God.

This is the way of Jesus. He meets you where your humanity is most tender, in your longing for authenticity, in your hunger for something enduring in a world of shifting sands. When He calls Himself “the way, the truth, and the life,” He is speaking to that deep ache for a centre that does not move.

Strip away the noise, the fear of men, the pressure to conform, and what remains is a simple desire: to be seen, to matter, to touch the eternal. And Jesus answers that desire with a promise: “Whoever comes to me I will never drive away.” He looks into the hidden places — the wounds, the fears, the unspoken longings — and welcomes you as you are. Not into a system that suffocates conscience, but into a friendship that frees it. Into a life that transcends the brittle rules of men.

When you embrace that invitation, you begin to taste what John called “the light of life,” a light that reaches into every dark corner and whispers that you were never alone. That light tells you that your honesty matters more than perfection, your trust more than having all the answers, your desire to do good more than your ability to perform. Even your aching questions matter, because they reveal a heart still alive.

Stepping away from control is not stepping away from Christ. It is stepping toward Him — toward a life grounded in your own lived experience of His presence. Many who walk this path describe a dizzying freedom. I know the ache for devoted Christian community; I’ve searched for it too. But in the meantime, I pray without fear. I read Scripture as if receiving a personal letter. I find Jesus in quiet, ordinary places — around the dinner table, under the stars, in whispered hopes and tears. And in the Christians I meet along the way, the ones Christ sends with words that meet my need at just the right moment.

This is what it means to live by the Spirit, to let the wind move you, even when you cannot trace its origin or predict its path. So take heart. Wherever you are on your journey, whoever you are, Jesus already sees you — not through suspicion or legalism, but with deep, tender compassion. You do not need to earn what was freely given. You do not need to hide the fragile parts of your soul. You do not need to chase a polished image of religious acceptability.

You were made for more. You were made for Him. And when you lean into that deep, soul‑level hunger — that quiet pull toward what is real and good ; you will find Him already leaning toward you, already guiding you, already breathing life into your steps. That is salvation. That is belonging. That is the wind of the Spirit, carrying you where you need to go.

“The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.”
— John 3:8 (ESV)

 

“Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV), copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.”

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Day You Choose to Begin Again  

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 5 April 2026 at 21:00

 

You need to turn from your past,

and you need to pray

 that the Lord will forgive

 the evil intent of your heart.

—Acts 2:22

The Voice Bible

sketch.png

 

Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby is a reminder of what happens when a person becomes captive to their own pride—racist, unfaithful, entitled, and convinced of a greatness he never earned. He wounds others without remorse, blind to the decay within him. Fiction, yes—but fiction often mirrors the truths we’d rather not face.

There is a sorrow that settles in when life drifts off-course. You may not speak of it, but it stirs in the quiet moments—those early hours when the world is still and your thoughts grow honest. Perhaps anger has lived in you too long. Perhaps resentment has become familiar. Perhaps you’ve believed the world owes you something because of what you’ve endured.

But what if that belief has been leading you away from life, not toward it?

What if the deeper truth is this: you’ve been avoiding the weight of your own choices—the harm you’ve caused, the apologies you’ve postponed, the entitlement you’ve mistaken for worth? Maybe someone once overindulged you, meaning well. But somewhere along the way, you learned to expect the world to bend around your wounds. You learned to justify the very things that kept you from growing.

Yet Easter tells a different story.

It tells us that worth is not inherited, and it is not owed. It is given by a God who sees us fully—our failures, our pride, our hidden sins—and still chooses to love us. It is shaped by how we respond to truth, how we turn from darkness toward light, how we allow ourselves to be remade.

And here is the truth Easter refuses to let us ignore: no one finds peace while hiding from themselves.

The world cannot hand us joy when we sow bitterness. It cannot give us peace when we refuse to offer it. And we cannot stand before God with a heart that clings to hatred, manipulation, or unconfessed harm.

But Easter is the declaration that this is not the end of your story.

The blood of Christ tells us that sin is real, and costly. The empty tomb tells us that grace is stronger still. This moment—this breath—can be the beginning of resurrection in your own life.

You were made for more than secrets and self-deception. More than the fragile armour of superiority. You were made for love, for being loved, for peace with God and peace with your neighbour. And yes, even for forgiving yourself once you’ve faced what needs to be faced.

Scripture says God is near to the broken-hearted (Psalm 34:18). That includes those broken by their own choices. Tears are not weakness; they are the first cracks through which resurrection light enters.

You cannot rewrite your past, but you can choose a new direction. You can acknowledge your wrongs. You can apologise, even if forgiveness doesn’t come. You can stop blaming others and begin becoming the person you were always meant to be.

This path asks for humility. It asks for honesty. But it offers something priceless in return: a quiet mind, a steady heart, and the deep joy of living rightly.

Don’t wait for the world to change. Let the change begin in you. And you may find that the risen Christ—the One who walked out of the grave—is already walking toward you with mercy in His hands.

God has not given up on you. Easter is proof of that. Today is a good day to rise again; a day to begin.

Verse quoted from The Voice Bible Copyright © 2012 Thomas Nelson, Inc. The Voice™ translation © 2012 Ecclesia Bible Society All rights reserved.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Marching Mystery

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 3 April 2026 at 19:11

sketch.png

The Lewis Chessmen: British Museum

Marching Mystery

It is April 2026, and once again I find myself wandering the busy halls of the British Museum. I have been here many times over the years, yet something draws me back, as though there are things still waiting to be understood.

I stand before these small, carved figures—these sorrowful little characters—and linger longer than I intended. There is something in them that resists a passing glance. The queens sit with their heads in their hands, burdened in a way that feels strangely familiar. The kings sit upright, rigid, almost defiant, their swords held close, as if readiness itself were a kind of comfort. Around them, warriors remain poised for action, caught forever in a moment before movement.

The Scottish songwriter Dougie McLean once wrote a song titled Marching Mystery. It feels like the right name for these figures. They were discovered in 1831 on the Isle of Lewis, in the Outer Hebrides of Scotland—found, it is said, in a sandbank at Uig, as though they had come ashore from another world. One can almost imagine them rising from the sea, silent witnesses to centuries long forgotten. How they came to rest there remains unknown, and perhaps it is better that way. Some things seem to lose their meaning when fully explained.

They are carved from walrus ivory and whale teeth, materials that speak of colder places—the Arctic, the long northern waters. Experts suggest Scandinavia, perhaps Trondheim in Norway, as their origin. And yet, wherever they began, they have ended here, behind glass, far from the hands that shaped them.

What holds me is not their history, but their faces.

Each one is different. Some seem anxious, others stern, and a few carry something close to humour. There is a humanity in them that feels too deliberate to ignore. It makes me wonder whether these were ever simply game pieces at all, or whether they were always meant to say something more. Somewhere between craft and storytelling, the line begins to blur.

I find myself returning to the queens. Their hands press against their heads—not in thought alone, but in something heavier. Grief, perhaps. Or a quiet resignation. I wonder what the craftsman had seen, or known, to shape them this way. Was he remembering something? Or someone?

Grief has a way of echoing across centuries, finding its own reflections in unexpected places. It leads me, unexpectedly, to a memory that has never quite left me.

It's 1973 and there is an image making front page. Phan Thi Kim Phuc—a young girl, no older than nine, running along a road near Trảng Bàng in Vietnam. Her village had just been struck by napalm. She had torn away her burning clothes as she fled. I remember seeing this image in 1973, when I was seventeen. I remember the shock of it, the helplessness. I remember feeling like crying.

And I find that I am no different now.

I think of her parents—of the weight they must have carried, the kind of grief that has no language. I imagine them, at times, holding their heads in their hands, just as these carved queens do. Across time, across cultures, the gesture is the same. It seems to belong to us all.

War leaves behind many things—ruins, stories, names—but also something quieter, something that settles deep within the human heart. A shared sorrow, passed from one generation to the next.

And so I stand here, looking at these figures, aware of the movement around me—people passing, pausing briefly, then moving on. Most do not linger. Most do not see what I think I see.

But I cannot look away so easily.

Because in these small, silent faces, I do not just see history. I see something enduring. Something unresolved. A reflection, perhaps, of ourselves.

And the mystery remains, not of where they came from, but of who we are.

Note

Photo reproduced for non- commercial use: Visitor guidelines and conditions of entry | British Museum

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Quiet Certainty of Life

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 2 April 2026 at 13:08

sketch%20%281%29.png

The Quiet Certainty of Life

One thing that strikes me regarding Biblical Hebrew is the clarity and conciseness of the language. Take the word בִּטָּחוֹן (bitachon). It carries with it an entire world of thought fay beyond the concept of the translator’s pen. It’s “trust,” “confidence,” or “assurance.” It finds its roots in the verb batach: to lean upon, to feel safe in, to rely on. It’s more about posture than emotion. Like resting on an unshakable object. This something is not luck, human ability, or philosophical mainstream though, but the living God.

Is there something deeply troubling you as you read this? The psalmist speaks from experience in coping with life’s curve balls, “When I am afraid, I put my trust in You… In God I trust; I shall not be afraid” (Psalm 56:3–4).

Here that word bitachon is not denial of fear in some kind of magical thinking exercise but the decision to place it all in God’s hands. Isaiah 26:3 frames it as a state of peace: “You keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on You, because he trusts in You.” It is a settled spirit, anchored in the character of God.

For me, this trust has become more than an abstract truth. During my life, I have learned that God’s reassurance often comes in ways so personal, so specifically timed, that they cannot be dismissed as coincidence. There are moments when a verse of Scripture arrives unbidden. It may be a passage I was not looking for, and yet, yet it speaks directly into the difficulty before me. At times, the guidance is not merely comforting; it is practical, offering a clear course of action.

It is in these small, precise miracles that confidence grows. Each time I see His word meeting my need so specifically, my confidence in His care deepens. Like an ancient mason laying stones into the wall of a fortress, each answered need, each unexpected provision, strengthens the structure of trust. Over time, trust becomes less of a conscious effort and more of a reflex; an instinct to look to God first, knowing He has never failed me.

In the ancient Jewish mind, bitachon was not a vague optimism. It was the tranquillity of one who has entrusted his life to God’s wisdom, believing He will do what is right. My own experience affirms this. There are days when His reassurances are subtle — a single phrase from the Psalms that lifts the heart. Other days, they are bold and unmistakable, like an open door that had seemed sealed shut. The more I lean on Him, the more I recognize His fingerprints.

In the end, bitachon is not the absence of uncertainty but the presence of Someone greater amid it. It is knowing that the God who sends the right word at the right time is the same God who governs the unseen workings of the universe. I rest secure because I am in His care — and I have learned that when He whispers reassurance, it is not merely to comfort me in the moment, but to train me for a deeper trust tomorrow.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Feeling Trapped in Plato's Cave

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 2 April 2026 at 12:02

sketch.png

Stepping Out of Plato's Cave

It happens like this, a video pops up — Intolerance, political drama, social injustice, indoctrination or whatever. It's all there like the Woolworth's pick 'n' mix counter, inviting you to taste. You succumb. Minutes later,  feeling that sense of outrage. Then another video appears. And another. Hours pass, and you’re still there, eyes fixed, brain buzzing like a bees hive with righteous indignation, unable to pull away from this hobbit cave.

You finally switch off, but your mind doesn’t. The anger and fear linger, replaying in your thoughts like a bad song on repeat. Sleep becomes difficult. Even in the morning, the heaviness hasn’t lifted. You feel more irritable but don't know why. 

Emotional contagion the psychologists call it. When we constantly consume content designed to provoke outrage, the brain’s stress systems fire repeatedly like a faulty engine. Cortisol, the stress hormone, stays elevated. Our nervous system is on high alert as if the danger is in the room with us. Over time, this erodes mood, memory, and even physical health. The same happens with soap operas or high-tension dramas. They may not be political, but they keep the mind braced on fight or flight mode.

The truth is, we were not meant to live in this  constant state of agitation. We need periods of calm, of forest bathing, of relaxation for our thoughts to settle and our emotions to reset. But outrage-driven media hijacks the brain’s reward system, giving us little hits of dopamine every time we click for the next shocking reveal. It’s a loop that leaves us exhausted yet craving more. We are addicted.

But there are other implications. I was reading up on the philosophy of Plato's Cave; it's one of the big players in philosophy courses. Plato warned us about this side of our nature long before the age of social media.

In his allegory of the cave, prisoners are chained underground, forced to watch shadows flicker on a wall. They believe these shadows are reality because it’s all they’ve ever seen. Today, we sit in a different kind of cave. The assumed reality  isn’t from firelight but from out computer screens. The shadows are videos curated by algorithms, designed to feed us only what will keep us watching.

Like Plato’s prisoners, we can mistake this narrow stream of images for the whole of reality. We get a distorted view of what is truth; it's like being in the Mad Hatter's Tea Party. We come to believe the distorted reality that the Mad Hatter and the March Hare are trapped in six-o'clock. And, like the prisoners who resist leaving the cave, part of us fears stepping away. After all, what if the world outside feels less thrilling, loveless, worrying?

But freedom comes when we use our critical thinking and turn away from the shadows and walk toward the light, when we choose real conversations over virtual, reflection over theatrical presentations . The sunlit world, a walk in nature, a conversation with a stranger may not give us the same jolt of adrenaline, but it gives something better. Besides, it reduces those cortisone levels that have us on hyper alert 

The most radical thing you can do is close the laptop, step outside, and remember that the world is more than the shadows dancing on your screen.

"Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think on these things. Whatever you have learned or received or heard from me, or seen in me, put it into practice. And the God of peace will be with you." Philippians 4:8 BSB.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Skin Care in Ordinary Moments

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 4 April 2026 at 11:09

sketch%20%281%29.png

Skin Care in Ordinary Moments

One morning recently—or perhaps it was late afternoon; the light was soft enough to be either—I found myself in the supermarket aisle lined with olive oils. A young Indian couple stood there too, and somehow, we slipped into conversation, as strangers sometimes do when the moment allows it.

I had watched a YouTube video on choosing good olive oil, and suddenly I was an expert. Dark glass bottles are best, I said. Better still, a tin. Olive oil is sensitive to light.

They already knew. The young woman told me she takes a spoonful every day for her skin. And she had the kind of skin that made you believe her—smooth, luminous, almost as if it held its own light. Olive oil has been used for centuries as a simple, natural way to nourish the skin, and standing there beside the shelves, she was living proof of that quiet tradition. I almost said so, but her husband was beside her, and some compliments are better left unspoken.

When I got home, I told my wife the story. She suggested I buy her a good-quality olive oil and take a teaspoonful each day myself.

The funny thing is this: every morning I sit with my Bible and ask God to reveal something—some small truth I can carry into the day. And today, reading Psalm 104, a line rose from the page as if it had been waiting for me.

“Oil to make the face shine.”

In the ancient world, oil had many uses—cosmetic, medicinal, ceremonial. To make the face shine was not vanity; it was care. A way of restoring dignity, softening the harshness of life, and offering a visible sign of inner well-being. A kind of quiet blessing poured over the skin.

It feels almost intimate. Not survival, but tenderness. Not just existence, but being tended to.

I know God didn’t reveal anything profound. And yet the ancients, under inspiration, left us something we often overlook: that even in the smallest things—oil, light, skin, care—there is a quiet grace woven through the world.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Don’t Do That, It Hurts

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 1 April 2026 at 15:18

 

sketch.png

Don’t Do That, It Hurts

One lesson I learned earlier in life is that you cannot contend with a proud person.

Pride is strangely resistant—it doesn’t bend when confronted; it hardens. When someone is set on protecting their own image, which is the bottom line with pride, even obvious truth can feel like an attack. So instead of yielding, they defend, deflect, or deny. Trying to “win” against that kind of posture only deepens the divide and will make you feel low with a sense of injustice.

And then there’s the proud person who comes back and apologises every time they damage the equilibrium, only to do it all over again—never changing. On the other hand, there’s the type who rallies others who have some gripe against you and, in an “honour among thieves” kind of way, find evidence that they are right.

What you begin to realise—often after frustration—is this: you can’t force humility into someone else. It has to grow from within them, often through their own experiences, not through being corrected.

“When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with humility comes wisdom.” (Proverbs 11:2)

That verse carries a quiet weight. Pride leads to disgrace—not always immediately, but eventually. Proud people eventually lose out in many aspects of life. But more importantly, the Bible says that God distances Himself from the proud and draws close to the humble. Humility—that’s where wisdom lives. Not loud, not defensive—just steady and open.

There is also a kind of peace in stepping back from the need to prove someone wrong. It doesn’t mean pretending they’re right. It means choosing not to wrestle with something that won’t yield.

It drains you to keep pressing into someone who will not listen. It slowly pulls at your peace. And if you’re not careful, it can begin to change you—making you defensive, frustrated, drawn into the same spirit. It may mean that eventually you have to step away and change those you associate with. This may involve life-changing decisions—a boyfriend, a girlfriend, a family member, or others. Otherwise, what’s the alternative?

Scripture gives both patience and a boundary:

“Warn a divisive person once, and then warn them a second time. After that, have nothing to do with them.” (Titus 3:10)

There is space to try—but not endlessly, otherwise we get wound up by their arrogance. I’ve known people who have never said, “I was wrong.”

This is not always simple. The person may be a workmate, a family member—someone you cannot avoid. But even then, you can withdraw in how you engage. You can step back before you find yourself becoming like them, as Scripture warns.

That distance gives space—for you to keep your peace, and for them, perhaps, to reflect.

But don’t despair if they don’t change. Some never do.

Your path is still clear.

You can walk in wisdom. You can protect your heart from unnecessary harm. You can let truth stand without forcing it.

And sometimes, the wiser choice is not to win—but to step back, and remain whole, unhurt.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

A Heartfelt Confession

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 30 March 2026 at 18:43

sketch.png

 

Last evening, my wife and I sat in a small restaurant here in London. At the table beside us was a young tourist, alone. There was something open about her, something quietly searching, and before long we found ourselves in conversation.

It did not take long before the conversation deepened. With a kind of honesty that only strangers sometimes offer, she told us she had never found the love of her life. There was no drama in her voice—just a quiet ache, familiar and human.

In moments like that, words can feel very small. What can one say that does not sound rehearsed or hollow? Almost instinctively, I found myself asking, “Have you prayed to God?”

It is a simple question, but behind it lies something I have come to feel more deeply over time.

When I walk—whether through a park, along a beach, or beneath a winter sky scattered with stars—I cannot escape the sense that I am surrounded by intention. This world does not feel accidental. It bears the marks of a wise and benevolent architect. There is order, beauty, provision—things given not sparingly, but generously.

And if that is so, it leads me to wonder: would a God who crafted such a world make all these provisions, and yet remain distant from the very people capable of noticing them?

There is a quiet reassurance in the words recorded in Acts 17:26–28:

“From one man he made every nation of humanity to live all over the earth… so that they might look for God, somehow reach for him, and find him. Of course, he is never far from any one of us.”

That last phrase lingers—he is never far from any one of us.

Not far. Not hidden beyond reach. Not indifferent.

But there is something else in those words too. We are invited to look, to reach, even—some translations say—to grope for him. There is an honesty in that language. It suggests that faith is not always neat or immediate. Sometimes it is tentative. Sometimes it is searching in partial light.

And yet, the promise remains: he can be found.

Perhaps this is where comfort truly begins—not in having every longing immediately fulfilled, not even in finding the love we hope for when we expect it—but in knowing that we are not alone in our searching.

God is not a distant mechanism, not a prayer wheel to which we attach a request and then forget. There is something more relational, more personal. Seeking him involves a turning of the heart, a willingness to draw closer, to listen, to shape our lives gently in response to what we find.

And maybe, just maybe, in that quiet seeking, we begin to discover a deeper kind of companionship—one that steadies us even in the spaces where human love has not yet arrived.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Hinterhältig: The Shape of Hidden Harm

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 30 March 2026 at 18:18

It was not an enemy who taunted me—then I could have borne it

I was you, my companion, my familiar friend.”

 Psalm 55:12

sketch.png

There is a particular kind of disappointment that does not arrive loudly. You begin to notice small fractures—words that don’t quite align, silences that feel deliberate, a subtle shifting of tone when you are absent. And then, with a kind of weary clarity, you understand: something has been happening behind your back.

What makes it most disturbing is not simply the betrayal itself, but the strange normality with which it is carried out. There is no sense, among those involved, that anything is amiss. Their behavior is reinforced by the presence of others doing the same—echoing, affirming, multiplying the harm until it becomes almost invisible within the group. In such an environment, deceit is not an exception; it is a shared language.

The German word hinterhältig captures this with unsettling precision. It speaks of a hidden malice, a quiet treachery that operates beneath the surface of politeness. It is not loud or dramatic. It smiles, it nods, it participates—and all the while, it undermines. There is something especially corrosive about this form of behavior because it depends on disguise. It borrows the appearance of goodwill while hollowing it out from within.

And so, you withdraw.

Not out of arrogance, as they may suppose. Not out of coldness, or pride. But out of necessity. There is a point at which remaining present becomes a form of self-betrayal. To stay, fully exposed to such quiet harm, is to allow something essential within you to be worn down. Withdrawal, then, becomes an act of preservation—a careful reclaiming of your own interior ground.

Yet this, too, is misunderstood.

Your distance unsettles them. It disrupts the unspoken agreement that everyone will continue as before, participating in the same patterns without question. And so, what was once subtle often sharpens. Pride begins to stir—how dare you step away? Anger follows close behind—who do you think you are to refuse what others accept? The behavior, once hidden, can take on a more deliberate edge.

But beneath this escalation, there is something else—something quieter, and far more tragic.

For those who live in such a way, who normalize deception and quietly injure those around them, do not escape unscathed. There is a gradual hollowing that takes place. A loss of depth. A thinning of the soul’s capacity for joy. It is not always visible at first, but over time it becomes unmistakable. Relationships lose their substance. Moments lose their meaning. Life itself begins to feel strangely empty, as though something vital has slipped away unnoticed.

And so you stand at a distance.

Not in triumph, and not in bitterness, but in a kind of sober clarity. You watch—not with a desire for their downfall, but with an understanding of its inevitability if nothing changes. There is a slow disintegration that follows such patterns, as steady and unremarkable as erosion. No single moment marks it. But over time, what once seemed whole begins to come apart.

There is a grief in this. A quiet mourning, not only for what was done, but for what might have been—had honesty taken root where deception was allowed to grow.

And yet, there is also a measure of peace.

Because in choosing distance, you have chosen not to become what you have seen. You have refused the quiet corruption that presents itself as normal. You have stepped away, not only from others, but from a way of being that would have cost you something far greater than their approval.

In the end, that is not withdrawal.

It is a form of keeping your soul intact.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Writing to Someone Somewhere

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 1 April 2026 at 19:31

sketch%20%281%29.png

Writing to Someone Somewhere

 When I was younger, I liked having pen pals. There was something quietly meaningful about writing to someone you had never met, and yet, in time, came to know in a way that felt more honest than most everyday conversations.

Recently, I felt the pull toward that idea again.

But when I went looking, I found very little of value. Most pen pal sites feel thin. Conversations begin, but rarely continue. Words are exchanged, but not really meant. There is a lack of commitment, a sense that people are passing through or using it as a dating site rather than settling into anything real.

It made me wonder—what happened to good old letter writing?

Each day, this blog is read by thousands. Somewhere between four and fourteen thousand people pass through here daily. And yet, very few ever stop to say hello. It’s a strange thing, when you think about it. You return, which must mean something resonates. We must share something in common.

Is it the writing?
The reflective thoughts?
Something spiritual, perhaps?
Or simply a quiet place to read while travelling through a world that feels increasingly shallow?

If I had to guess, I’d say it might be the last of these—but perhaps it’s a little of everything.

The kind of pen pal space I would value is simple. Not dating. Not language exchange. Not performance. Just people who are willing to write for the sake of human connection. Nothing more complicated than that.

I remember being on holiday in London and meeting people from all over the world. Senegal, Belgium, Uzbekistan—places I knew very little about, yet the people themselves were open, warm, and willing to connect. There was something uplifting in those brief encounters.

It makes you wonder why that same openness so often fails to translate online.

Perhaps the problem is not the medium, but the way we approach it.

A gentler way might be this: write as if you’re writing a letter you care about, not just a message.

Dear Friend,

I don’t know your name, or where this will find you, or what kind of day you’ve had. But I wanted to write as if this mattered—because I think it does.

There’s something strange about trying to reach across distance like this. Not just miles, but the quiet distance between two lives that have never touched. And yet, here I am, hoping that somewhere, someone might read this slowly, and not rush past it as just another message.

I suppose what I’m really looking for is not just conversation, but a kind of presence. The sort that doesn’t demand anything, doesn’t perform, doesn’t pretend. Just a voice that is honest, even if it’s simple. Especially if it’s simple.

Life feels very loud these days, doesn’t it? Everything seems to move quickly, and yet very little feels like it settles. Words are everywhere, but meaning feels thin. I think that’s why I still believe in letters—because they ask something different of us. They ask us to pause. To choose our words. To mean them.

I won’t pretend I have anything profound to say. Most days are made up of small things—thoughts that come and go, quiet observations, memories that surface for no clear reason. But I think those are the things worth sharing. Not the polished parts, but the real ones.

If you were sitting across from me, I imagine there would be an ease in the silence too. Not the awkward kind, but the sort that doesn’t need to be filled. That’s something I miss—being able to simply be, without explanation.

I wonder what your days are like. What you notice. What stays with you when everything else fades. I wonder if you feel it too—that sense that something in the world has become a little too hurried, a little too thin—and that perhaps, in writing like this, we might recover something of what’s been lost.

If you choose to write back, take your time. There is no rush here. I would rather wait for something real than receive something quick.

If you need a place to begin, tell me your happiest moment. Tell me what music stays with you. Tell me where you go, in your mind or in the world, when you need a little distance from everything.

Until then, I hope this letter finds you in a quiet moment.

Yours,
A fellow traveller

blogger2026ou@gmail.com

 

 

Why it Works?

 

Perhaps this approach works because it does something very simple.

It treats the reader as real.

It doesn’t try to impress, persuade, or extract anything. It offers something instead—a tone, a space, a different pace. It invites rather than demands. It allows silence. It trusts that meaning doesn’t need to be forced.

In a world full of hurried words, that alone may be enough.

And if even one person writes back—not quickly, but sincerely—then perhaps the old idea of pen pals was never lost at all.

Image by Copilot

Joseph, who was renamed Barnabas by the apostles which meant son of comfort— Acts 4:3

A friend once asked me, "Who is your favourite character in literature, Jim?"

Oh dear, that’s like  choosing a favourite child. But let me see, there's Bruno from Striped Pyjamas, Aslan from The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz, and Joe from Great Expectations..."

     "Your absolute favourite, Jim?"

     "Okay, it has to be Prince Myshkin."

     "Prince who?"

     "Prince Myshkin, from Dostoevsky’s The Idiot."

     "Why him?"

     "He was simply too good for this world."

All my life, I’ve been drawn to stories that feature inherently kind characters—perhaps because they possess qualities I aspire to, despite many personal failings. This is why I cherish the word 'Tattimbet' from the Kazakh language. It signifies not just being a decent person but being a source of comfort to others. There’s no equivalent word in English that carries the same depth.

Reflect on the books I mentioned; all their protagonists exemplify this quality. And we could list many more: Beth from Little Women, Atticus Finch from To Kill a Mockingbird, Samwise Gamgee from The Lord of the Rings, Miss Honey from Matilda, Jean Valjean from Les Misérables, Ma Joad from The Grapes of Wrath, and, of course, Anne Shirley from Anne of Green Gables.

Isn’t it peculiar that in a universe seemingly devoid of purpose, we find ourselves drawn to kindness? Kindness, love, and self-sacrifice seem out of place in a purely evolutionary world, yet, contrary to popular belief, the arc of the universe does bend towards goodness.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Teipinophresene: The Quiet Strength Within Marriage

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 29 March 2026 at 17:38

Teipinophresene: The Quiet Strength Within Marriage

sketch.png

Someone once asked me who was newly married if there was a single piece of advice that could help hold a marriage together and strenghen it. 

I remember pausing, not because there was nothing to say, but because there was too much. All the little lessons life presses into you over time rarely come as neat answers. But one word kept rising to the surface, quiet and steady.

Teipinophresene.

The person had Greek roots, so I offered it gently, knowing it might feel familiar even before it was understood.

Teipinophresene—ταπεινοφροσύνη—is a rich and beautiful word. It means humility of mind, a kind of lowliness of heart, though not in any way that diminishes a person. It is not about shrinking oneself or thinking poorly of who you are. It is something far more balanced, far more honest.

It is seeing yourself truthfully—neither inflated nor diminished.
It is letting go of the restless need to be right, to be seen, to stand above.
It is becoming gentle, teachable, and quietly mindful of the other.

In marriage, this becomes something living.

Not an idea, but a daily posture.

It shows itself in the small things—the tone you choose when you are tired, the way you listen when you feel misunderstood, the willingness to step back when every instinct tells you to press forward and defend yourself.

There is a moment, in nearly every disagreement, where pride waits just beneath the surface. Teipinophresene is the quiet decision to leave it there.

The word appears in the New Testament, in places like Philippians 2:3 and Colossians 3:12, where it describes the spirit we are called to carry. And it is seen most clearly in Jesus Christ—not as weakness, but as a quiet strength that never needed to prove itself.

That is what surprised me most when I first came to understand it.

This humility is not fragile. It is not uncertain. It does not come from insecurity, but from a deeper knowing—a groundedness before God that frees a person from the need to elevate themselves above another.

A simple way to hold it in your mind is this:

Strength without arrogance.
Confidence without self-glory.
A heart willing to bow, not because it is lesser, but because it knows what truly matters.

And if there is one place where such a spirit matters most, it is in the closeness of marriage, where two lives meet without distance or disguise.

I told them, as simply as I could: if you can learn this—imperfectly, patiently, over time—you will have something that steadies everything else.

Goodness, if the whole world practiced Teipinophresene, it would indeed be a gentler place.

But the world is large and difficult. A marriage is smaller. Closer. And perhaps that is where such things are meant to begin.

Not all at once.
Not perfectly.
But in the quiet choosing, again and again.

Don’t let selfishness and prideful agendas take over.

 Embrace true humility, and lift your heads to extend love to others.

Phillipians 2:3

The Voice Bible

Scripture taken from The Voice™. Copyright © 2012 by Ecclesia Bible Society. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Journeys of the Heart

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:41

sketch.png

Journeys of the Heart

“We laugh, we cry, we care about characters on screen—not because we mistake them for real, but because what they stir within us is real.” — Anonymous

Sir Walter Scott once journeyed to Stratford-upon-Avon. In another time, Li, a Business Studies student in Glasgow, set out with friends to glimpse the Glenfinnan Viaduct. That same year, Kioko, a widowed woman from Tokyo, boarded a flight to Canada; years before, her mother had travelled from the same city to Edinburgh.

At first glance, their stories seem unrelated—scattered across continents, shaped by different lives. Yet beneath the surface, they are bound by a quiet, shared impulse. Each was drawn by something unseen yet deeply felt, engaging in what psychologists describe as a parasocial relationship: a one-sided bond with a person, place, or story that has nonetheless left a genuine imprint on the heart.

Scott sought the home of Shakespeare, a figure who had lived in his imagination long before he stood at his door. Li and her friends travelled to a viaduct made famous not by history, but by fiction—the imagined passage of the Hogwarts Express. Kioko crossed oceans to visit the setting of Anne of Green Gables, while her mother had once made her own pilgrimage to the hometown of the Bay City Rollers.

I recognise the same impulse in myself. In the late spring of 2017, my wife and I travelled to the Lake District. There, almost without planning, we found ourselves drawn to Grasmere—the village where Wordsworth had lived, and where so much of his poetry had quietly taken root.

The morning we arrived felt strangely hushed, as though the village were holding its breath. Sunlight lay gently over the stone cottages, yet the stillness gave the place an almost ghostly air. We wandered slowly until we reached Wordsworth’s cottage.

Then, quite suddenly, the silence broke. A group of visitors appeared—forty or fifty in number: professors, teachers, poets, lovers of literature. They had come from Delhi, Kerala, Gujarat, Hyderabad. Standing there, I felt a quiet astonishment. What had drawn them so far, across distance and difference, to this small, unassuming place?

I managed to speak briefly with one man from Delhi, himself a poet. Pressed for time, he could offer only fragments, but I asked him the question that has lingered with me ever since: Why do we make these journeys? Why do we travel so far to stand where our favourite writers once stood, or to see the landscapes that shaped imagined worlds?

I asked it as “we,” because I am no observer standing apart. I, too, am caught in this gentle, persistent pull.

Yet even as we spoke, the answer seemed to slip just beyond reach. We circled it, touched its edges, but never quite entered its centre. And so I left with the same quiet sense I had carried in: that something important remained unspoken—something still waiting to be understood

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Quiet Reward of Reading

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:44

sketch.png

The Quiet Reward of Reading

I must have been eight when the janitor at St Anthony's in Govan brought in a big box of brand new books. The teacher handed us all a copy and I sat and got lost in the pages of mine. Many of the pupils got bored with theirs and asked for a change. "Look at McCrory" the teacher said, "He is enjoying his." The truth is, it was boring, but I got on with it and persevered. And if the truth were told, it was the only compliment I ever got from a teacher.

In Selma Lagerlöf's The Wonderful Adventures of Nils, a profound yet straightforward insight is introduced: “The more things that come into your head, the more room there is for others.” This notion implies that the mind, unlike any physical space, expands with its contents. It grows ever vaster with each new thought, idea, or dream. Reflecting on this concept, I recognize its resonance in my experiences, especially in my interactions with others—both enriching encounters with individuals who read and think deeply.

My journey through life has often meandered along paths lined with books, through landscapes rich with paragraphs and ripe with rhetoric. Along these paths, I have met kindred spirits—people whose minds, like mine, seem to thrive on the endless nourishment of words and ideas. There is a palpable depth in conversations with these individuals, a shared understanding that reaches beyond the spoken word, facilitated by our mutual expeditions through literature.

This literary journey does more than just broaden our knowledge; it enhances our capacity for empathy. Like the trees I observe from my window in winter—prepared and eager for the abundance of spring—our minds, fertilized by myriad narratives and perspectives, grow branches and forge connections. Each book, each story, adds a layer of understanding, enabling us to relate more profoundly to others' feelings and experiences.

Moreover, empathy—a quality deeply tied to our ability to understand and share the feelings of another—seems enhanced by reading. Literature serves as a rehearsal space for empathy, inviting us into the minds and lives of others, promoting understanding across boundaries of time, culture, and circumstance. Without this engagement, my capacity to empathize would be stunted.

Reflecting on Lagerlof's wisdom, the more we fill our minds with thoughts, ideas, and emotions, the more expansive they become—not crowded, but enriched and deepened. Those who abstain from reading deny themselves not just the knowledge and entertainment books hold but also the chance to expand their cognitive and emotional capacities.

As I continue to navigate a world populated with both types of individuals—those open to the endless possibilities of thought and those closed off—I strive to advocate for the value of reading. Not just as a source of information, but as a vital exercise in building bridges between minds. My hope is that more people will discover the joy and value of reading, not only for their enrichment but for the greater empathy and understanding it fosters within our communities.

Thus, my journey, much like that of young Nils, remains an inward as much as an outward adventure—an endless exploration where the more I discover, the more I realize how crucial it is to encourage others to open the books, open their minds, and by doing so, open

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

What Lies Beyond the Grave?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:44

sketch.png

What Lies Beyond the Grave?

One Saturday about a year ago, I spent some time in the British Museum, moving quietly among its displays. It struck me how many of the objects recovered from graves, tombs, and burial chambers once belonged to people who clearly believed life continued beyond death. In certain cases, pharaohs and others of high status were laid to rest alongside their servants, as though they expected to carry their comforts—and their way of life—into whatever lay beyond.

Yet one burial in particular has stayed with me this week. It was uncovered by chance in 2021 near Břeclav in South Moravia, in what is now the Czech Republic. Dating back roughly 4,500 years to the Bronze Age, it contained something quite unusual: a puppet-like figure with a ceramic head. The body, likely made of wood, has long since disappeared, but the head remains, marked with carefully incised geometric patterns. There is something quietly compelling about it, hinting at meaning—cultural, symbolic, or even spiritual—that we can only try to piece together.

Still, I find myself cautious when it comes to interpretation. Archaeology, for all its careful study, often relies on inference, and even well-informed conclusions can be debated. So I wonder if this figure might have been more personal than ceremonial—something tied to the individual’s livelihood, a means of storytelling or entertainment. After all, a puppet can carry a voice, a craft, even a small piece of a person’s identity. And what more fitting way to be remembered than through something that once brought hippieness to others? Perhaps children?

These practices open a deeper line of thought about the human heart. Why does there seem to be such a persistent sense that life does not simply end when we close our eyes for the last time? Across cultures and centuries, people have spoken of Paradise, Heaven, a New World, Valhalla, Fiddler’s Green, the Elysian Fields, Tian, Jannah, and many other names besides. Wherever one looks, the idea of an afterlife appears again and again, as though it has been quietly written into us.

Scripture tells us that humanity was originally given the prospect of everlasting life, before sin entered and death followed in its wake. Through Jesus, that hope is opened again to those who trust in him. That is why he could say to the repentant man beside him, "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die.” (John 11:25)

Coming back to that burial, it led me to consider what I might choose to leave behind. What single object could speak, however faintly, of who I was? For me, a writer’s notebook feels close to the truth—a small collection of thoughts, unfinished and searching.

And you—what would you leave for those who come after, something that quietly tells them who you were?

“He will wipe away every tear from their eyes,

and there will be no more death

or mourning or crying or pain,

for the former things have passed away.”

Revelation 21:4 (BSB).

 
Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Care for the Human Family

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 25 March 2026 at 11:01

sketch%20%281%29.png

 

 

Care For the Human Family

 

 

I popped into the supermarket this morning for a few bottles of Scottish spring water ahead of a long train journey. I’ve always begrudged the price of water in stations and cafés—it feels like such a small necessity made unnecessarily costly. So, I stood there, bottles in hand, quietly satisfied with my small act of thrift.

At the checkout, the man in front of me was searching his pockets, his wallet, his coat—his loyalty card nowhere to be found. There was a kind of gentle frustration about him, the sort we all recognise.

“I did that recently,” I said, almost without thinking. “Got all the way to the checkout and realised I’d left my credit card at home.” I smiled. “A woman behind me insisted on paying for my shopping.” I continued.

The cashier looked up and nodded. She spoke about how often she sees small kindnesses like that—quiet, unannounced, but real. For a moment, the three of us were strangers sharing something unseen but understood.

But then, as these things sometimes do, the conversation shifted. It deepened.

We spoke about the world as it is—fractured, hurried, often self-absorbed. And there was an unspoken question hanging between us: if kindness is not taught, not lived, not passed on, then where will it come from? Who will show the next generation what it looks like?

It felt less like a complaint and more like a calling.

There was something about the cashier—not dramatic, nothing outwardly remarkable—but a quiet sincerity. The kind you recognise not with your eyes, but somewhere deeper. I found myself mentioning a book my wife had listened to a few months ago.

“It’s about human kindness,” I said. “It’s called A Knock at the Door.”

I encouraged her to look it up, though I suspect what mattered more was not the title itself, but the idea behind it—that kindness is not abstract. It is lived. It arrives, often unexpectedly, in the ordinary spaces of life. A checkout queue. A passing conversation. A moment where someone chooses to care.

And so I extend that same invitation beyond that small exchange.

To you, the reader.
To my family.
To my friends and neighbours.

Pause, if only for a moment. Seek out something that reminds you of what it means to be human in the best sense. Let it reshape how you see the world—not as it is at its worst, but as it might yet become through small, faithful acts of kindness.

In thinking about that book, I came to learn more about its author, Rob Parsons. Years ago, he founded a charity called Care for the Family. It stands quietly in the background of people’s lives, offering strength where it is most needed.

Rooted here in the UK, yet reaching far beyond it, their work is centred on walking alongside families—particularly in moments when life feels fragile or uncertain. They support parents, couples, and those carrying the deep and often silent weight of loss.

Sometimes that support comes through gatherings or courses. Sometimes through a voice on a podcast. And sometimes, perhaps most powerfully, through the simple presence of someone willing to listen.

What they offer is thoughtful and accessible, shaped not just by theory but by lived experience—by an understanding of how complex and tender family life can be.

And just as importantly, they invest in others. They equip those who care for families—whether in formal roles or in quiet, unseen ways—to do so with greater confidence and compassion.

It is, at heart, a work of coming alongside.

Steady. Practical. Deeply human.

And that is what stayed with me most as I left the supermarket, water bottles in hand, stepping back into the ordinary rhythm of the day.

Kindness does not need a stage.
It only needs a willing heart.

And maybe, just maybe, that is how we begin to mend what feels broken.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

New blog post

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 27 March 2026 at 12:46

Tìng yǔ tīng xīn 

sketch.png

Do You Feel Empty?


Ting yǔ tīng xīn – Listening to the Rain, Listening to the Heart

There are days when the world seems full of colour, movement and laughter, and yet you walk through it feeling grey and weightless. Like a ghost among the living. You pass people chatting, joking, caught up in the momentum of their lives, while something inside you quietly asks, Is this it? Why do I feel so empty?

If that sounds familiar, you are not alone.

In Chinese, there is a phrase that speaks into such moments. Tìng yǔ tīng xīn. It means listening to the rain, listening to your heart. It suggests not rushing past the ache but letting it fall, like the rain does—softly, steadily, insistently—until you notice what it is trying to tell you. Often, when life goes quiet and questions rise, that is when we begin to hear what is really going on inside. And it is in these pauses that the deepest questions begin to surface. Why are we here? What is life really about? Why is there so much evil in a world that longs for good? What does the future hold? And why do I feel so far away from peace?

That emptiness you feel is not a sign that you are broken beyond repair. It may in fact be a sign that you are human. That you are awake.

The Bible speaks directly to this. Not with slogans or empty platitudes, but with honest recognition. The writer of Ecclesiastes observed that God has set eternity in the human heart. That is not an easy burden to carry. It means we are wired for something more than the material. More than schedules and status updates and surface-level living. It means we are made to long, to wonder, to ache for a home we have not yet reached. Your emptiness is not a flaw in the design. It is part of the signal that you were made for eternity.

And yet we live in a world that often pretends otherwise. The modern rhythm urges us to stay distracted. Work more. Scroll more. Laugh more. Buy more. But beneath all the noise, the soul still whispers, Something is missing. When the distractions fade, when illness or loss or silence fall upon us like rain, that whisper becomes a roar. And in those moments, many wonder if something is wrong with them—why they feel so heavy, so hollow, so out of sync with the joy they see on other people's faces.

But the truth is, the world is not as it should be. Even creation, Paul wrote in Romans, was subjected to frustration. It groans, as if in the pains of childbirth. In other words, you are not strange for noticing that something is wrong. You are simply paying attention.

Jesus never promised an easy life. But he did say, Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Rest not in the sense of avoidance, but in the sense of soul-deep peace. A return to something true. Not religion for its own sake. Not ritual or reputation. But relationship. He saw people’s emptiness. He wept at gravesides. He touched lepers. He noticed the people others ignored. And he said, I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry. Whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

That promise is not about material success. It is about fullness in the soul. The kind of fullness that is not shaken by disappointment or rejection or the news cycle. A fullness that comes from knowing you are loved—now, already, eternally.

You may feel unworthy. You may feel like you have failed too often or wandered too far. But the very heart of the gospel is that grace meets us there. In our emptiness. Not after we have tidied it up, but in the middle of it.

Feeling empty, then, is not the end of the road. It may be the beginning of something sacred. Something honest. A turning point. The Psalms are filled with voices crying out in despair. Why, Lord, do you stand far off? Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble? But those same voices often find their way to hope. Yet I will praise you. That shift from pain to praise does not always happen in a single moment. Sometimes it is slow, like dawn after a long night.

Still, it comes.

So when you feel empty, do not rush to fill it with noise. Sit. Listen. Let the rain fall. Let your heart speak. And know this. You are heard. You are seen. You are not alone in your emptiness. And your longing is not in vain.

For in the silence, there is a Voice.
And that Voice says, I have loved you with an everlasting love.
Let that truth fall upon your soul like gentle rain into dry earth.
And listen—not just to the rain, but to your heart

Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

On Shyness and Missed Chances

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

On Shyness, Missed Chances, and Learning to Speak

The Yaghan people of Tierra del Fuego—such a beautiful name to say—have a word I’ve always loved: Mamihlapinatapai. It describes that fleeting moment when two strangers catch each other’s eye, both longing to speak, yet neither finding the courage to begin. The Owl of Minerva flies at dusk, as the philosophers say, and the moment slips away. A small tragedy.

I know that feeling well. My early childhood was spent in a kind of solitary confinement—those were the days before nurseries—and most of my hours were passed alone in the back yard. By the time I reached high school, I had already attended four different primary schools. It’s no surprise, then, that I grew up painfully shy, missing opportunities simply because I didn’t know how to step forward.

At eighteen, I bought a book on shyness, and it changed everything. So often shyness is not a lack of desire to connect, but a lack of material—not knowing what to say, not having anything to draw from. I know people who never read, who spend their evenings drifting through television or the cyber-hive of video games and social feeds. Then, when they meet others, they have little to offer beyond the same recycled lines. Conversation becomes a loop, and boredom follows.

Reading changed that for me. Books give you worlds to bring into the world.

And conversation, like any craft, can be learned. A few simple openers can unlock remarkable encounters:

  • “I see you’re reading a book—what’s it about?”

  • “That’s a great camera. Do you have a website for your photos?”

  • “Is this your full-time job, or are you studying as well?”

I’ve had some of my most memorable exchanges with complete strangers using questions like these. Think of the countless scenarios where a gentle prompt could open a door. Go on—bite the bullet. You never know what might happen when you do.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: A Law Without a Voice

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday 24 March 2026 at 07:11

Why are some morals objective?

sketch.png

A Law Without a Voice

 

The queue barely moves as my wife and I  wait for our flight to Sweden to visit old friends.  Suitcases edge forward by inches, then stop again, wheels turned at slight angles as if they’ve grown tired of straight lines. A child sits on the floor, tracing the grooves in the tiles with one finger. Somewhere behind, a man exhales loudly, not quite a sigh, more a signal to anyone listening that time is being wasted.

Then the couple arrives.

They don’t rush. They don’t rush, they saunter then look at the queue with surprise. Then, they notice familiar faces near the front—laughter, “How are you both? Goodness, it must be about ten years?”  A brief pat of shoulders—and drift inward, folding themselves into that small circle as though they had always belonged there. It is done lightly, almost gracefully. But the effect ripples outward. Conversations stall. Eyes lift. A woman flabbergasted shifts her weight and looks down the line then looks at those around as if to say, “Did you see that?” No one speaks, yet something shared has been disturbed.

It is difficult to name what exactly has been broken. No rule has been written on the airport wall forbidding such movement. No official steps in. Still, the tension is unmistakable. It settles in the space between strangers, in the way people avoid looking at one another for too long.

We live as though this instinct requires no account of itself. It feels native, like balance or hunger. Yet it carries a peculiar authority. It does not present itself as preference. It does not say, I would rather things were different. It speaks more plainly: This is not right.

That distinction matters.

If such responses were only habits formed by convenience, they would bend more easily. They would shift with circumstance, soften under pressure. But they resist. Even when inconvenient, even when costly, they remain. A person may ignore them, silence them, argue against them—but not without effort, and never without some remainder.

There is a passage, written long before airports and council offices, that describes something similar. It speaks of those who have not received formal instruction, yet still act in accordance with a standard they seem to recognise. Not consistently, not perfectly, but often enough to suggest that the awareness precedes the teaching.

That idea lingers.

If our responses were the product of accident alone, it is difficult to see why they would carry this weight. Survival might explain cooperation, or even restraint, but not the quiet insistence that certain actions are wrong regardless of advantage. The person who steps into the queue gains time. Yet the reaction of others does not disappear simply because someone profits.

Perhaps this is why such moments feel larger than they are. A queue at an airport is not a court of law, but with an awareness that seems already present.

Consider the following quote from a book,

 “Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.”

Ponder on that. If we are products of a blind evolutionary process, why would “nature” drive us towards a sense of justice? The book quote is from the Bible; from the book of Romans chapter two.

The Christian understanding does not treat this as an accident. It suggests instead that what we experience in these small disturbances’ points beyond them. That the quiet protest we feel is not self-generated, but received. Not invented, but recognised from an external source.

If that is so, then the unease in the queue is not merely irritation. It is a faint echo of something steadier. The dissatisfaction at unequal treatment is not simply preference. It is a response to a pattern that does not align with what we sense to be fitting.

And if such awareness is indeed given, then it speaks of a giver. Namely, God.

Note: 

The quotation comes from Romans 2:14. It suggests that although people of the nations were not given the Law of Moses, they nevertheless lived in accordance with its moral principles by instinct. The idea that God’s moral order is embedded within creation itself and can be discerned through human reason.

See Romans 2:14 Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

"I’m Going into Glasgow to Drive Some Trains”

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:38

"For most of history, Anonymous was a woman."

Virginia Wolfe

 

 

sketch.png

On the train to Glasgow this week, I felt the physics of the journey working against me. A man sitting nearby had a heavy cold—the kind of deep, wet cough and persistent sneezing that occupies the air around it. Usually, you’d just find it annoying, but when you have cancer, a stranger’s germs feel like a tactical threat from someone who would best serve mankind by staying home. But here he was gifting man with his own suffering.  As the train hurtled forward, I could almost feel the gravitational pull of our travel vacuuming his infection directly toward my seat. I couldn't risk it; I had to move.

My wife and I found a spot in the next carriage albeit we were separated by the middle isle. I sat beside a young woman. This being Scotland, the silence didn't last long. We have a way of acknowledging each other's existence that doesn't feel like an intrusion. Although discernment must prevail.

"What are you up to today?" I asked.

"I’m going into Glasgow to drive some trains," she said.

Her answer hit me with a sudden, sharp memory of Norway. Decades ago, I was in a massive industrial structure in Stavanger. I remember standing there one early morning , completely struck, as I watched a young woman—the project manager—directing a crew of electricians through their tasks. At that time, Scotland felt miles behind. The idea of a woman in total command of a heavy engineering site was, back then, an anomaly to me.

Now, as I looked at the woman across from me, I realized how much the scenery has changed. I see women behind the wheels of buses, trains  and heavy trucks; I see them in the police, in the boardroom, and leading the country as Prime Ministers.

For centuries, women have been held back by a system designed to keep them small. Seeing them finally take the controls—quite literally, in this woman's case—is a relief. It’s a correction of history that's been a long time coming, and it made the rest of the trip feel a lot lighter.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

Visible to anyone in the world

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

“It is not for me to say how I have earned the love and confidence of my fellow men;

but I am deeply grateful.”

sketch.png

Creative Masters: Pecksniff and the Shape of Self

 

One of my favourite authors by far is Dickens. He was a keen observer of human nature—the good, the bad, and the ugly traits that so often live side by side within us. One character that makes Dickens a man after my own heart is his portrayal of Pecksniff.

There are some people who do not simply enter a room, they seem to become its centre of gravity. Conversation leans toward them, attention gathers almost instinctively, and before long everything begins, subtly, to orbit their presence. At first, nothing feels wrong. They are warm, articulate, often disarmingly moral in tone. They speak of goodness as though it were second nature. And yet, if you remain long enough, something begins to shift. The warmth thickens. The goodness feels arranged. What first appeared sincere begins to feel, well … performed.

It was Dickens who gave me the language for this unease. In Martin Chuzzlewit, he introduces Mr. Pecksniff—a man who does not merely value virtue but displays it, almost as though it were a kind of theatre. He speaks in elevated tones, as when he declares, “Let us be moral. Let us contemplate existence…”—words that seem, at first glance, almost noble. And yet Dickens, with quiet precision, allows us to see beyond the words to the man himself.

What makes these lines so powerful isn’t just what they say, but how Dickens lets us see through them. On the surface, they sound admirable—even admirable enough to deceive. But placed in context, they become almost painfully transparent. The more Pecksniff speaks of morality, the less we trust it.

He tells us, “I am a humble individual, who is very sensible of his own shortcomings,” and somehow manages, in the same breath, to draw attention to his virtue. He insists, “My moral influence is very extensive,” with a seriousness that borders on the absurd. And perhaps most tellingly, he reflects, “It is not for me to say how I have earned the love and confidence of my fellow men; but I am deeply grateful.” Even gratitude, in him, circles back toward self-admiration.

Pecksniff unsettles because he is not entirely unfamiliar. He is not merely a figure of satire, but a pattern—one we recognise, if we are honest, in the world around us. I have met him in different forms across the years. Not always so theatrical, but present nonetheless—in conversations that subtly turn, in kindness that seems to require acknowledgment, in goodness that feels as though it is being quietly narrated.

One begins to notice it in the small moments. You try to share something—a thought, a burden, a quiet joy—and it is gently taken from your hands and redirected. “That reminds me…” they begin, and suddenly your moment dissolves into theirs. You are no longer being heard; you are being used as a passing reference point.

There is also the imitation of empathy. It can look convincing—concerned expressions, sympathetic tones—but it cannot remain still. It cannot sit with another person’s sorrow without reshaping it. True empathy requires a kind of self-forgetfulness, and that is precisely what is missing. Like Pecksniff, who can summon the appearance of feeling while remaining untouched within, there is emotion on the surface but not in the depths.

Then there is the quiet need to be seen. Goodness is not simply lived—it is, in some subtle way, displayed. Not always openly, not with trumpets, but with just enough light cast upon it that it may be noticed. It calls to mind that older warning against performing virtue for the sake of recognition. Yet here it is again, softened, refined, but still present.

Beneath all this lies something quieter still—an assumption, barely spoken, that one’s presence carries a certain weight. It appears in interruptions, in expectations, in the gentle resistance to being overlooked. And if such a person is questioned, even lightly, the response often reveals more than the behaviour itself. There is injury, surprise—sometimes even moral outrage. Dickens captures this perfectly in Pecksniff, who cannot conceive that his motives might be anything other than pure.

Over time, one begins to see that this is more than a collection of habits. It is a way of being—a life curved inward. Not dramatically, not with obvious arrogance, but gradually, subtly. A narrowing of attention that leaves little room for others except as reflections.

And yet, Dickens does not leave us comfortably pointing outward. Pecksniff is not only there to be recognised in others, but, more uncomfortably, to be glimpsed in ourselves.

That is the harder truth.

Because there are quieter versions of this in all of us—the desire to be acknowledged, the small satisfaction in being seen as good, the tendency to redirect rather than truly listen. These things do not announce themselves loudly, but they are there. And if left unattended, they take root.

So the answer is not condemnation, but attentiveness. To live with a quieter kind of honesty. To practise a goodness that does not seek to be observed. To listen without preparing to speak. To give without rehearsing the moment afterwards.

Pecksniff, for all his absurdity, becomes something like a mirror. Not a cruel one, but a truthful one. He reminds us that virtue, when performed, begins to lose its substance. And that the truest measure of character is not what we say, nor even what we believe about ourselves, but how we quietly, consistently turn toward others.

In the end, his grand declarations linger—not as wisdom, but as warning. It is not enough to speak of goodness. It must be lived, often unseen, and without applause.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today’s Thought: The Garden After the Scuffle

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

 

 

 

The Garden After the Scuffle

sketch.png

 

I read this week that a missile had struck a vast gas complex in the Gulf; an installation so large it helps power whole regions, now burning, its output cut, its value counted in 36 billion dollars. 

It is hard to picture what that really means. The reports speak in figures, percentages of supply lost, years of disruption, markets shifting in response. But behind those measurements there is something more physical: metal twisted by heat, pipelines ruptured, the long preparation of engineers and workers undone in a few moments.

I tried, for a while, to imagine that same amount of wealth in another form, not as infrastructure, but as possibility. What could be built instead of broken. What might have been made steady. It didn’t settle easily. The mind keeps returning to the image of destruction, because it is simpler, more immediate.

Perhaps that is something about us.

The simile is apt man’s striving for power is like two groups of baboons in the garden fighting for a banana and ruining the garden in the process. Afterwards, there was very little left worth taking.

It is difficult not to think of that scene when reading about these events. Not because the comparison is exact, but because the pattern feels familiar. A resource is there—valuable, limited, desired. Groups gather around it. Each move is justified by the one before. And in the struggle, the thing itself is damaged, sometimes beyond repair.

The ground suffers as much as the prize.

What unsettles me is not only the scale of it, but the repetition. This is not new. Different places, different names, but the same underlying motion. Effort directed toward control rather than care. Energy spent in contest rather than in preservation. The outcome rarely surprises, yet it continues.

If I think back to the idea of that vast sum of money—what it could do if directed differently—it begins to feel almost like an alternative history that never quite happens. Instead of repairing what is fragile, we seem drawn to test its limits. Instead of maintaining what sustains us, we place it in the path of conflict.

There is a line, quiet but persistent, that comes to mind from the last book of the Bible. It speaks of a time when those who ruin the earth will themselves be brought to ruin. Not as a dramatic flourish, but as a kind of reckoning that mirrors the damage done.

I don’t know exactly how that unfolds. It isn’t described in practical terms. But the idea itself lingers. That there is a point at which the cost of what we are doing returns to us—not symbolically, but directly.

When I think again of the burned-out structures in the Gulf, the interrupted flow of energy, the careful work undone, it does not feel distant. It feels immediate, almost ordinary. Another entry in a long pattern.

And yet, the contrast remains. The same resources that are fought over could, in another direction, be used to steady lives, to maintain what is already fragile. The difference between those paths is not technical. It is something quieter, harder to define.

Perhaps it comes down to what we are willing to leave intact.

The baboons, after their struggle, moved on. The ground remained marked where they had been. No one returned to repair it.

We, at least, are capable of noticing the damage. Whether that leads to anything different is less certain. And I pray, “Let your Kingdom come and may Your will be done here on earth.

 

For You have wielded Your great power
        and have begun Your reign.
     The nations have raged against You,
        but Your wrath has finally come.
        It is now time to judge all of the dead,
    To give a just reward to Your servants, the prophets,
        and to the saints and all who honor Your name,
        both the small and the great,
    And to destroy those who cause destruction to the earth.

Revelation 11:17,18.

The Voice Bible

 

 

 

Reference: The Voice Bible Copyright © 2012 Thomas Nelson, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

 

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: Why 2 + 2 = 4

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

sketch.png

The Mind Behind the Math: Why 2 + 2 = 4

Mathematics presents us with a quiet but profound mystery. Statements such as 2 + 2 = 4 are not merely useful—they are universally and necessarily true. They do not change with time, culture, or location. Whether in ancient Greece or the modern world, whether on Earth or in some distant galaxy, the result remains the same.

This raises a fundamental question: why are mathematical truths true at all?

They are not physical objects. One cannot encounter the number two in nature as one encounters a tree or a stone. Mathematical operations cannot be observed in isolation; they are not material processes. And yet, these abstract realities govern the physical world with astonishing precision. The same mathematical structures that exist in the human mind also describe planetary motion, atomic behaviour, and the structure of the universe itself.

This dual feature—being both abstract and universally applicable—demands explanation.

One possible view is that mathematics is invented, a human construction imposed upon reality. But this struggles to account for its consistency and discovery. Mathematical truths often appear to be found, not created. They confront us as fixed realities, not flexible conventions. A mathematician does not decide that 2 + 2 equals 4; rather, they recognise that it must be so.

If mathematics is not invented, then it must exist independently of us. But in what sense can something immaterial, timeless, and universal exist?

This leads to a deeper philosophical consideration. Abstract truths—logical laws, mathematical relations—do not behave like physical objects. They do not come into being or pass away. They are necessary rather than contingent. Such features are difficult to ground in a purely material universe, which is defined by change, limitation, and temporality.

A more coherent explanation is that these truths exist within a mind—one that is itself not bound by time or matter. If mathematical laws are eternal, universal, and rational, then the most fitting foundation for them would be an eternal, universal, rational source.

In other words, a mind.

This line of reasoning has long been recognised. The scientist Johannes Kepler described his work as “thinking God’s thoughts after Him,” suggesting that the order he discovered in nature reflected a prior intelligence. Likewise, Albert Einstein famously remarked on the deep intelligibility of the universe, noting the surprising fact that it can be understood at all.

From a theistic perspective, this intelligibility is not accidental. If the universe is the product of a rational Creator, then it follows that it would be structured in a rational way—and that human minds, also products of that Creator, would be capable of understanding it. The correspondence between mathematics and reality is therefore not a coincidence but an expression of shared origin.

This idea is also consistent with the biblical concept of logos—a term meaning word, reason, or rational principle. The opening of the Gospel of John presents creation as grounded in this divine rationality: “In the beginning was the Word.” The implication is that order, logic, and intelligibility are not secondary features of the universe but foundational to it.

Without such a grounding, the effectiveness of mathematics remains unexplained. Why should abstract, non-physical truths map so precisely onto a physical world? Why should the universe conform to laws that can be expressed in the language of numbers?

If, however, both the structure of reality and the truths of mathematics arise from the same rational source, the connection becomes clear. Mathematics works because reality itself is ordered according to reason.

Thus, the statement 2 + 2 = 4 is more than a simple calculation. It reflects a deeper consistency woven into the fabric of existence. It points beyond itself to the conditions that make such certainty possible.

Ultimately, the most satisfying explanation is that behind the order we observe is a mind that established it—a mind in which these truths reside and from which they derive their necessity.

In that sense, mathematics is not just a tool we use. It is a signpost.

And every equation, however simple, quietly points beyond itself to the One who made it so.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Where the Brief Lives Rest

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 19 March 2026 at 17:22

sketch.png

Where the Brief Lives Rest

I walked through the Glasgow Necropolis as I often have. It was one of those bright Scottish mornings that softens even the hardest thoughts. The Necropolis, that city of the dead perched above Mother Glasgow; the city of the living, where space not only for memory but for quiet conversation with time itself exists. 

As I made my way among the gravestones, I found myself counting years, not just my own sixty plus but those etched into stone: the tiny, abbreviated lifespans of children lost long ago in a Dickensian age to epidemics like cholera, diphtheria, typhus. Names barely had time to settle and establish into the world before they were carved in stones suggesting they were here.

It’s a strange thing to be old in a place filled with the young who died. I felt not so much survivor’s guilt as survivor’s wonder. I’ve had decades of travel, of reading, of walking beaches at sundown, of writing, of grieving and healing, of faith evaluated and restored. What would any one of these children have become with even half of my years?

My cancer, in that moment, seemed less like an ending and more like a milestone. I don’t know how many more years are allotted to me, but I know now how many I’ve already been given, and I know what a privilege it is to reach an age where you look both forward and back.

The graves made me think of God’s purpose—not as a tidy doctrine, but as a question folded into every name worn smooth by wind, moss, and rain. What becomes of children who never had a chance to choose faith, to assess goodness, to wrestle with meaning? Where are they in the great scheme of things?

Jesus once said, “Let the little children come to me... for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” I must believe that children taken early are held in a mercy deeper than we can grasp. They are not forgotten; they are not lost to God . If anything, it is we who are still lost, walking among headstones trying to make sense of the living and the dead.

There’s a sobering democracy in cemeteries. All names are equal here, whether child or elder, rich, or poor, known, or unknown. We all close our eyes and rest with our forebears. And yet, those of us still walking have something the dead do not: time. Time to reflect, to forgive, to change. Time to be grateful. My cancer has made me aware of time—not just its scarcity, but its richness.

So, I keep walking, not just through the Necropolis, but through each day, carrying with me the invisible company of children who never saw their coming-of-age birthdays or perceived  the invisible grace of a God.

Image generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Today's Thought: When Nothing Adds Up

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 22 March 2026 at 09:14

sketch.png

 

Today's Thought: When Nothing Adds Up

 

“Be careful when a naked man offers you a shirt.”
African proverb

Now I got thinking today about the problem of nothing. No, I am not sitting on rice paper emptying my thoughts to achieve ultimate happiness. I am thinking of another nothing.

Consider the universe with its stars, galaxies, and dark matter. Now imagine it compressed into a sphere no larger than our solar system. Press it further, down to the size of the sun, then to the span of the earth, then smaller still. A watermelon. An apple. A pea. An atom.

You are now holding an impossible weight in a vanishing space.

Take the next step. Remove it all. Not just matter, but space itself. Not just space, but time. What remains is not emptiness, because even emptiness suggests a place where something could be. This is nothing in its purest sense. No dimension, no duration, no foothold for thought.

The mind strains here. It reaches for an edge and finds none. Like a man trying to see beyond the horizon while standing in a closed room, it meets a limit it cannot cross.

Yet from this nothing, we are told, everything came. That is the claim. But in all our science, nothing does not produce something. It has no tools, no energy, no capacity. It cannot act because it is not.

So we face a quandary. If nothing cannot give rise to something, then the origin of all things must lie beyond the physical order. Beyond space, beyond time. Not bound by the rules that govern the universe, but the source of them.

The opening line of Genesis speaks with a calm certainty that cuts through the confusion:

“In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.”

A simple statement, yet it answers the riddle. Not nothing, but a mind. Not chance, but intention.

So be careful when a naked man offers you a shirt.

 

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 1846091