OU blog

Personal Blogs

Jim McCrory

This Age of Exposure

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 18 September 2026 at 07:17

A person known for discretion can become a place of refuge

sketch.png

This Age of Exposure

It is easy to imagine that people who enjoy exposing others must simply be cruel. Sometimes that may be true. Some people use humiliation to gain attention, power, or a sense of superiority.

But often the people caught up in a culture of exposure are ordinary people. They have been drawn into a world where attention can feel like righteousness, and public outrage can feel like moral courage. They may be sincere, passionate, and convinced that they are standing up for what is right.

Yet something vital can disappear along the way: mercy.

Without mercy, justice can become a spectacle.

And there is a cost to living this way. People soon learn not to trust someone who turns the failures of others into public information. A person may gather thousands of followers and still have very few people who feel safe enough to come close.

One may gain followers and yet lose fellowship.

The Bible speaks powerfully into this tension.

“Love covers a multitude of sins,” writes Peter in 1 Peter 4:8.

Proverbs 17:9 carries a similar wisdom: “Whoever covers an offense seeks love, but he who repeats a matter separates close friends.”

This does not mean pretending that wrongdoing never happened. The Bible is never careless about sin. But it makes an important distinction between confronting wrong in order to put things right and exposing someone simply to shame them.

Jesus gives a clear example in Matthew 18. If someone sins against you, the first step is not public exposure but private conversation. The aim is to win the person back. Restoration comes before publicity. Redemption, not humiliation, is the goal.

This pattern of covering runs deep through Scripture. Even in Eden, after Adam and Eve have sinned and become ashamed of their nakedness, God clothes them. He does not ignore what they have done. There are consequences. Yet even in judgment, their shame is covered.

This is not permission to hide evil. There are times when wrongdoing must be brought into the light, especially when others are in danger. Covering should never become a shelter for abuse or injustice.

But where love rules, exposure is never enjoyed for its own sake.

There is another cost to a culture of exposure: loneliness.

Relationships grow where people feel safe. If we fear that our failures, foolish words, or weakest moments may one day be broadcast to others, we learn to hide ourselves. We may remain friendly, but we stop being known.

Real friendship requires something more. It requires the confidence that our weaknesses will not be turned into weapons.

A person known for discretion can become a place of refuge. A person known for exposing others can become a place of danger.

That is why restraint has become such a beautiful quality in an age obsessed with revelation. The person who refuses to spread every rumour, repeat every failure, or join every public shaming may never attract much attention.

But they attract something better: trust.

They become the sort of person others can speak to without fear. They become the friend to whom someone can admit, “I got this badly wrong,” knowing that confession will be met with truth and mercy rather than revelation.

The struggle between exposure and covering is not only something happening in society. It reaches into the small choices of everyday life.

Someone tells us a rumour. Do we pass it on?

Someone fails badly. Do we make sure others know, or do we hope and pray for their restoration?

A crowd gathers around another person's shame. Do we add our voice, or do we refuse to join in?

The Islamic idea of satr—covering the faults of others—and the biblical principle of covering meet at an important human truth: another person's dignity should matter to us.

We should guard it as we hope someone would guard ours.

This does not ask us to call evil good, remain silent when someone is in danger, or protect those who continue to harm others. Mercy and truth belong together. But not everything that is true needs to be broadcast, and not every wrong needs an audience.

In an age that can turn shame into entertainment, restraint is a quiet form of courage.

So the deepest question may not be why some people expose others.

It may be what our own habits are making of us.

Every time we handle another person's weakness, we are becoming a certain kind of person. We can become people who collect failures and spread them, or people who know when truth requires speaking and when love requires silence.

A society built on exposure teaches people to hide.

A community shaped by wise covering gives them room to be known, corrected, forgiven, and restored.

And in the end, that choice shapes more than our culture.

It shapes our souls.

Permalink
Share post
Jim McCrory

Feeding on the Macabre

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 18 September 2026 at 06:50

 

sketch%20%282%29.png

Feeding on the Macabre

 Human nature harbours an intriguing contradiction: an affinity for the macabre juxtaposed against a yearning for beauty and goodness. Throughout history, from the tricoteuses of the French Revolution to modern audiences of horror films, people have been drawn to the grotesque and the terrifying. This essay explores why humans are attracted to macabre themes and advocates for a pivot towards more wholesome forms of creative expression.

The Lure of the Macabre

The attraction to horror and the macabre can be traced back to a complex web of psychological, societal, and biological factors. One theory suggests that engaging with horror allows individuals to confront their fears in a controlled environment, providing a sense of catharsis. This controlled confrontation with fear enables people to process anxieties and stresses indirectly, through the lens of fiction.

Historically, public executions and other forms of spectacles surrounding death played a role in communal identities and societal norms. For example, during the French Revolution, the "tricoteuses," or knitting women, would gather around the guillotine, knitting while witnessing public executions. This phenomenon highlighted how societal upheavals could normalize extreme violence, integrating it into the social fabric as a form of entertainment and political engagement.

Psychological Impact of Horror

However, the consumption of horror is not without its repercussions. Research has highlighted several negative effects:

  1. Sleep Disturbances: Films that provoke fear can disrupt sleep, essential for physical and mental health (Rutledge, Media Psychology Research Centre).
  2. Long-Term Anxiety and Fear: Persistent exposure to frightening media can lead to long-lasting behavioural disturbances, such as anxiety that persists into adulthood (University of Michigan).
  3. Desensitization to Violence: Repeated exposure to violent media can diminish emotional responsiveness to real-world violence, reducing empathy for victims (Wikipedia).
  4. Increased Perception of a Dangerous World: The "mean world syndrome" describes how prolonged exposure to violent media can skew perception of the world as inherently dangerous, fostering undue fear and pessimism (Wikipedia).
  5. Vicarious Trauma: Viewing traumatic events in media can cause symptoms akin to PTSD, such as hypervigilance (Wikipedia).

A Call for Wholesome Writing

Given these impacts, there is a compelling case for writers and creators to pivot towards more wholesome themes. Literature, film, and media not only reflect but also shape societal norms and values. By focusing on uplifting, positive themes, creators can foster a more hopeful, compassionate, and resilient society.

Writers are urged to explore themes that emphasize the beauty of the human spirit, the complexity of relationships, and the resilience required to overcome adversity. Such themes encourage reflection on the positive aspects of life and human nature, promoting a healthier, more constructive engagement with media.

The fascination with the macabre, while deeply rooted in human psychology and history, presents several challenges to individual well-being and societal health. As creators of culture, writers have the opportunity, perhaps even the responsibility, to guide public engagement towards themes that uplift rather than unsettle. In doing so, they can help cultivate a more empathetic and optimistic society.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Some Thoughts on Religious Shunning

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Friday 18 September 2026 at 06:39

sketch.png

Some Thoughts on Religious Shunning

Religious shunning can inflict a particularly deep kind of pain. I believe there are  religions out  there in which people could be shunned for reasons that seemed tragically disproportionate—for example, simply leaving the religion, questioning doctrines and rules that are obviously wrong, even though they continued sincerely to worship God. The loss involved can be enormous. Parents may cease normal association with their children; children may become separated from parents; brothers, sisters and lifelong friends can suddenly become strangers. A person may lose, almost overnight, the human world in which he or she once felt at home.

For those who have suffered this, there is a remarkably tender incident in John chapter 9.

Jesus had healed a man who had been blind from birth. Instead of rejoicing over this extraordinary act of mercy, the religious authorities became preoccupied with the fact that Jesus had performed the healing on the Sabbath. They repeatedly questioned the man and even questioned his parents. His parents were afraid to speak openly because, as John explains, the authorities had already decided that anyone acknowledging Jesus as the Christ would be “put out of the synagogue” (John 9:22).

The healed man, however, refused to deny what he knew to be true. He could not answer every theological accusation thrown at him, but he could testify to what he had experienced: “One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see” (John 9:25).

Eventually, the authorities turned on him. They insulted him and “cast him out” (John 9:34).

Those few words can easily be read too quickly. Being expelled from the synagogue was not merely losing a seat in a religious building. Religion, family and community were closely intertwined. Whatever the precise social consequences of this particular expulsion, John presents it as a painful rejection by the religious authorities of the man's community.

And then comes one of the most beautiful sentences in the account:

“Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him...” (John 9:35).

They cast him out.

Jesus found him.

There is something profoundly comforting in that contrast.

The religious authorities regarded the man as troublesome and disposable. Jesus regarded him as someone worth seeking. When others pushed him outside the boundary of belonging, Christ crossed that boundary to meet him. The man had lost the approval of powerful religious figures, but he had not lost the approval, attention or love of God.

This distinction matters enormously for victims of religious shunning. Rejection by a religious community is not the same thing as rejection by God. Human beings may close a door and sincerely believe that they are acting for God; that does not mean God has closed His door. Religious authority and divine authority are not automatically identical.

Indeed, Jesus repeatedly placed mercy above the rigid application of religious rules. When challenged about healing on the Sabbath, he asked, “Is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kill?” (Mark 3:4). Elsewhere he reminded his critics of God's words, “I desire mercy, and not sacrifice” (Matthew 12:7; compare Hosea 6:6).

That should give any religious person reason for humility. Discipline may sometimes have a legitimate place within a faith community, but when religious practice becomes indifferent to mercy, conscience, family affection and human suffering, Christians should remember the character of the One whose name they bear.

And for the person who has been shunned, John 9 offers something gentler still.

People you loved have walked away from you. People who once prayed beside you now cross the street rather than speak to you. You have wondered in lonely moments whether their rejection means that God has rejected you too.

John 9 answers with a picture rather than an argument.

A man stands outside, rejected by religious authority.

And Jesus goes looking for him.

There may be no immediate remedy for the empty chair at the family table, the unanswered telephone call, or the ache of being treated as though years of love can simply be switched off. Those wounds are real, and faith does not require us to pretend otherwise.

But neither does another person's rejection determine your worth before God.

The final word in John 9 does not belong to those who expelled the man. It belongs to Christ who found him.

For anyone left “out in the cold” by religious shunning, perhaps that is the thought worth holding close: being cast out by people does not mean that you have been cast away by God. Sometimes it is outside the door that we discover Christ was already coming to find us.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Charlie Bucket, Golden Ticket and Denouement

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

Charlie Bucket, Golden Ticket and  Denouement 

Have you ever stopped and wondered why we are so fond of happy endings?

Dorothy gets home from Oz. Charlie Bucket gets the Golden Ticket. The Magnificent Seven ride into town and put things right. Even when a story takes us through darkness, loss and terrible injustice, something in us longs for the scales to be balanced before the curtain falls.

We want a denouement.

And when a story denies us one—when evil simply triumphs, goodness counts for nothing and suffering is revealed to have been meaningless—we can feel strangely robbed.

Why?

Some years ago, I came across these words from the English jurist William Blackstone:

“[God] has so inseparably interwoven the laws of eternal justice with the happiness of each individual, that the latter cannot be attained but by observing the former; and, if the former be punctually obeyed, it cannot but induce the latter.”

It demands a little of the old grey matter, but Blackstone was making a profound claim: happiness and justice are not accidental companions. They belong together because they are woven into the moral fabric of reality.

Martin Luther King Jr. expressed a related conviction in that famous line: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

There is something deeply human about believing this.

Watch what happens when somebody casually jumps a queue. It can be in Japan, Australia, the Philippines or Britain. Immediately there is that little internal protest: That’s not fair.

Notice what we are saying. Not merely, I don't like that. We mean something stronger.

It ought not to be so.

That tiny word ought opens an enormous door.

Human beings seem to possess a gravitational pull towards justice. We want courage to matter, cruelty to be answered, sacrifice to mean something, innocence to be vindicated and love, somehow, to have the final word.

That is why denouement matters.

A satisfying ending does more than finish a story. It resolves its moral tension. Something that was broken is restored; something hidden is revealed; something unjust is answered. The world of the story comes back into alignment.

And we recognise that alignment almost instinctively.

Of course, real life does not always give us happy endings. Good people suffer. The guilty sometimes prosper. Some wounds remain open when people die. Christianity does not ask us to pretend otherwise. In fact, it looks directly at that terrible incompleteness and makes an astonishing claim: the story isn't over yet.

That changes the question.

If mankind is nothing more than matter in motion—creatures pirouetting to our DNA in a dark and ultimately aimless universe—our persistent hunger for final justice is curious. Nature could explain why we dislike pain or why cooperation helps communities survive. But our longing goes further. We want justice even for the dead. We want wrongs corrected that no living person can correct. We want the final chapter to make moral sense of all the chapters that came before it.

We want denouement on an existential scale.

Maybe that is why happy endings have such power over us. They touch something older and deeper than entertainment. They whisper that chaos is not ultimate, that goodness is not foolish, that suffering does not possess the final word.

The Christian story makes precisely that claim.

The God who formed the moon and stars, who gave the earth its gravitational pull, also made creatures who experience another kind of gravity: a pull towards goodness, justice, reconciliation and home.

Dorothy wants Kansas. Charlie enters the chocolate factory. The stranger rides into town and confronts the wrong that everyone else has learned to tolerate.

Different stories. The same ancient ache.

We want things put right.

And it may be that the human psyche embraces denouement because, somewhere beneath all our sophistication, we suspect that reality itself has one.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Bad News With a Twist

Visible to anyone in the world

Image by https://unsplash.com/@aaronburden

 Bad News With a Twist

Last Autumn I went through some medical examinations. It came the day to see the consultant for the results.

My wife and I read a scripture that morning as we do every morning. It was Psalm 91: 1,2:

“He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High

Will abide in the shadow of the Almighty.’

I will say to the Lord, “You are my refuge and my fortress,

My God, in whom I trust.”

I said to my wife, “we are going to get bad news today.” She agreed with a pensive look on her face. God had often given us messages through the scriptures that were specific. God continues to speak as he has always spoken, but at times, the right verse miraculously lands in our lap when needed.

And sure enough, cells in the prostate that served me faithfully, turned hostile and have created a rebellion in the pancreas and liver and who knows where else.

The consultant, a kind Asian man, who seemed worried that I never received the full impact of the diagnoses said, “You are very bravado about this?”

“There’s a young man inside me. He has followed me around all his life. His age, I do not know, but he is always there. He comforts me and his presence convinces me God has eternity in view for me,” I replied.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Why Write Personal Essays

Visible to anyone in the world

Image kindly provided by https://unsplash.com/@sickle

There is a beautiful piece of cinematography in Nikita Mikhalkov’s movie Urga, where one is presented with a vast panoramic field of emerald grass. There’s movement in the distance. The image gets closer and closer and slowly coming into focus. It’s accompanied by the sound of rumbling hooves and snorting. Wafts of agitated dust float in a state of suspended animation which hastens the suspense. The camera eventually centres on the focal point, Gombo,  a vigorous Mongolian equestrian shepherd mounted on his stocky steed fill the screen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8j3jY_meJAM&t=3s

The scene acts as an apt metaphor for the personal essay. One begins with something out of focus. A word like ‘nostalgia.’ A sentence like ‘It happened like this.’ A quote like Soderberg’s ‘People want to be loved, failing that admired…our soul seeks connection at any price.’ An image like Avril Paten’s painting, Windows in the West or the German word Fernveh.

Then, my journey begins. I have no maps. I have no coordinates. Just the loose excursions of my mind. My reader joins me on this pilgrimage or saunter; a description that’s dependant on the subject. It’s often highway to seemingly nowhere, but the scenery is interesting, occasionally captivating.  It’s worth the effort.

It’s an image of what’s going on in my head, albeit a glass darkly. But the process of pen to paper sparks a chemistry that is leading to a place. The place appears and disappears in a literary eclipse. We appear lost, but in the large vat of editing, the destination emerges.

Like a camel on the road to Kathmandu, the personal essay can take the load I have to pack on. My memoirs, musings, my angst, the wanderings of my mind, my peculiarities and fears, my worldview, and philosophies. The introduction to the personal essay was like bursting out of prison and finding a voice for all I have to say.

Yes, I could have specialised in poetry, fiction or drama, but  nonfiction was the place I found my voice.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Why Is Matter so Well-behaved?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Tuesday 15 September 2026 at 07:04

sketch.png

Why Is Matter so Well-behaved?

I stepped out my front door and was immediately transported into a hydrogen balloon. Elizabeth—or Lithy, as we called her—was navigating. Beryl had brought our packed lunches, but we found them too salty. The salt gave me acid reflux, so we had to stop for a bottle of Milk if Magnesia. Since we were on level ground We went for lunch. I had a jacket potato; the rich potassium content soothed my tummy.

No, it’s not a work of fiction.

I had just returned from a memory class in Glasgow and decided to evaluate the “memory palace” technique. I chose something ambitious: the Periodic Table of Elements. I gave myself two evenings—an hour each—and began turning unfamiliar names and atomic numbers into mental pictures. Hydrogen, Lithium, Beryllium and Sodium. Hence the strange story at the start.

But something unexpected happened later, during a quiet evening walk. I noticed the structure—not just the rows and columns, but the astonishing logic behind them. Elements grouped by their properties. Reactions that follow predictable patterns. A steady increase in atomic number that moves with a kind of rhythm. It wasn’t just a list—it was a system. Ordered. Balanced. Purposeful.

Why on earth…?

It made me pause.

I began to think theologically. What I experienced was more than fascination—it was the birth of a question: Why is matter so well-behaved? Why do the fundamental components of the universe follow rules? Why is there order at all?

Materialists often say, “That’s just the way nature turned out.” Evolution and chemistry followed the path of least resistance, and this is the result. But that answer, while descriptive, falls short of being explanatory. It tells me how things are, but not why they are so. What gives rise to the coherence, the consistency, the elegant logic embedded in matter itself?

The more I thought, the less I could shrug it off. The periodic table began to feel less like a human construct and more like a discovery of something already written—a grammar of creation. The philosopher Blaise Pascal once wrote, “The eternal silence of these infinite spaces terrifies me.” But in those spaces, he also discerned echoes of something divine: “There is enough light for those who desire only to see, and enough darkness for those of a contrary disposition.”

What I experienced was more than curiosity—it was the birth of a longing, a kind of metaphysical homesickness. That longing has always been there, hasn’t it? The sense that behind the veil of the visible world, there is a hidden syntax—a mind behind the molecules, a poet behind the particles.

As a Christian, I see this longing answered not in accident but in authorship. The Bible speaks of a Creator who brings cosmos out of chaos: “By wisdom the Lord laid the earth’s foundations, by understanding he set the heavens in place” (Proverbs 3:19). The periodic table, with its mathematical symmetry and chemical poetry, feels like part of that wisdom—an embedded signature in the structure of things.

Einstein once said, “The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible.” Pascal would agree and go further: he would say the human capacity for reason, as well as our ache for meaning, points toward something outside ourselves. “Man is but a reed, the feeblest thing in nature; but he is a thinking reed.”

In recent decades, cosmologists have spoken of the “fine-tuning” of the universe—the idea that the constants of physics are so precisely calibrated that the odds of life occurring by chance are vanishingly small. The periodic table belongs within that same awe. Why do atoms exist at all? Why do electrons orbit nuclei with such steadfast choreography? Why is there, as the philosopher Thomas Nagel put it, “something rather than nothing”?

These are not merely scientific questions. They are existential ones.

Looking back on that memory exercise, I see it now as more than a cognitive technique. It was a kind of doorway—an invitation into wonder. And that wonder didn’t lead me away from faith; it led me to ask richer questions. Questions that science can describe, but only philosophy and theology can begin to answer.

The apostle Paul wrote in Romans 1:20, “Since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made.”

That evening, I wasn’t just looking at a chart of elements. I was glimpsing coherence. Order. Design. I was hearing, faintly, a cosmic resonance that whispered: This is not random. This is not meaningless. This points home.

Some patterns are not illusions.

Some are real.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

When Strangers Leave Footprints on the Heart

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 14 September 2026 at 10:35

sketch.png

When Strangers Leave Footprints on the Heart

In the great theatre of life, there are people who walk onto the stage for only a little while and yet, somehow, never quite leave us. We may not remember every detail of the day on which we met them, or even their names, but we remember what they did. More than that, we remember how they made us feel. Years pass, circumstances change, faces fade from view, and still these people remain in some quiet chamber of the heart.

I think of a man from my sixties childhood who gave us a half-crown and told us hungry youngsters to go and buy ourselves an ice cream. To another person it might have seemed a small gesture, hardly worth remembering, but to a hungry child generosity has a different weight. That coin bought more than ice cream. For a brief moment it told us that somebody had noticed us, that somebody cared whether we had a little happiness that day. The ice cream disappeared long ago, but strangely enough, the kindness never did.

Then I remember two young schoolteachers from Södertälje in Sweden whom I met aboard the Princess of Scandinavia in the mid nineties when I was young as she made her way from Newcastle to Gothenburg. We were strangers brought together by nothing more mysterious than being aboard the same ship, travelling across the same stretch of sea enjoying a drink together. Yet sometimes human beings cross the distance between stranger and friend remarkably quickly. Something in conversation, some shared laughter or openness, creates a connection that refuses to be measured by the number of hours we have known one another. The journey ends, people go their separate ways, and nevertheless something of them travels on with us.

There was also a bitter Scottish winter when my car became trapped in a deep snowdrift. Somewhere along that motorway a man saw my predicament, continued on his way until he could turn around, and made a journey of some ten miles simply to come back and offer his help. I have often thought about that. He could have driven on. Most of the world would never have known that he had passed a stranded motorist in the snow, and no one would have condemned him for continuing his journey. But compassion made another demand upon him. He saw another human being in difficulty and decided that my problem had, for a little while, become his problem too.

And then, only this week, there was Steve, a man doing some work in my house. He went beyond what the job required, but what stays with me most is not simply the work he did. It was the human connection that grew while we talked. As the hours passed, we exchanged stories about our lives and discovered that both of us had known difficult childhoods. There was something almost unspoken in that recognition, as though two people who had travelled over some of the rougher ground of life could recognise the landscape in one another.

Perhaps suffering can do one of two things to us. It can harden the heart, or it can deepen it. When pain has not been allowed to make us bitter, it can become strangely fertile soil for compassion. Those who remember what it was to be frightened may become the ones who reassure others. Those who remember loneliness may notice the person standing alone. Those who once needed kindness may become unusually generous in giving it. We cannot always choose the wounds life gives us, but by the grace of God those wounds need not have the final word. Sometimes the very places where life once hurt us become the places from which tenderness grows.

Looking back, I wonder whether these apparently accidental meetings are quite as insignificant as they first appear. A man with a half-crown, two young teachers on a ship crossing the North Sea, a stranger turning back through a Scottish winter, and a workman named Steve sharing stories in my home: none arrived with trumpets or announcements. They simply entered my life, left something good behind, and moved on.

That is one of the quiet wonders of being human. We rarely know which of our actions another person will remember. A kindness that costs us five minutes may be remembered for fifty years. A few words spoken casually may give someone courage at precisely the moment they need it. We may forget the kindness we gave while the person who received it carries it for the rest of their life. There is something wonderfully humbling about that.

And for those of us who believe that God is gathering human history towards a purpose greater than the brief span of our earthly lives, there is another beautiful possibility. Perhaps some of life's unfinished conversations are not finished at all. The people whose goodness touched us and then disappeared beyond the horizon of our lives are not lost forever to us.

The apostle Peter speaks of this magnificent hope: “But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.” — 2 Peter 3:13.

I love to imagine what that promise might mean when translated from theology into human experience. A world in which righteousness dwells would surely be a world in which goodness is no longer interrupted by sorrow, separation or death. No doubt there, in God's great tomorrow, paths that crossed briefly here will cross again. We will recognise persons we thought we had seen for the last time and discover that no act of love was ever truly lost.

Until then, their stories remind me of something I do not want to forget: we are all passing through one another's lives. We cannot know how long we will remain there, but while we are there, we can leave kindness behind.

And sometimes, that is enough to be remembered for a lifetime.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Why Hebrew? On Cancer and Memory

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 12 September 2026 at 12:36

sketch.png

Why Hebrew: On Cancer and Memory

 

With winter coming in, and cancer having done rather more to my memory than I would have liked, I decided to do something completely different with my brain.

I had read those unfamiliar mental exercises—even something as simple as writing your name backwards—can be good for the brain. So I decided to go the whole hog and learn Biblical Hebrew.

Why Hebrew? I was hoping you would ask.

For a start, it is certainly different. You read from right to left, the alphabet is unfamiliar, and at first a page of Hebrew looks as though it might require archaeological equipment. More importantly, though, I love the Bible. The Old Testament was written predominantly in Hebrew, and I wanted to get a little closer to the language behind the English translations I have read for years.

One of the delights of Biblical Hebrew is the way it can make you see and feel an idea rather than simply define it.

The Hebrew word שָׂפָה (safah) literally means “lip,” but it can also mean an edge, border or shore. So, the expression שְׂפַת הַיָּם (sefat hayyam) is literally “the lip of the sea”, where English would naturally say “the seashore” or “the edge of the sea.”

You can see the image: the land forms a lip around the water. It’s wonderfully physical.

For example, Genesis 22:17 describes Abraham’s descendants as being as numerous as “the sand which is upon the seashore.” The Hebrew is literally the sand that is “upon the lip of the sea.”

Biblical Hebrew can be wonderfully concrete. Where English speaks of the ‘seashore’, Hebrew can speak of the lip of the sea. The ordinary word for a human lip, safah, can also describe an edge or boundary. Suddenly the coastline becomes almost bodily: the place where land and water meet is the sea’s lip.”

There’s another intriguing twist: the same Hebrew word safah can also mean “language” or “speech”—presumably through the association with the lips that produce speech. That is why Genesis 11:1, just before the Tower of Babel story, can say that the whole earth had “one safah”—one language, but quite literally, “one lip.”

Take the famous opening of Psalm 23:

יְהוָה רֹעִי לֹא אֶחְסָר

YHWH ro‘i, lo ’eḥsar.

“The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not lack.”

There is no separate Hebrew word for “is” in that first phrase. The two realities are simply placed together: The LORD—my shepherd. It has a wonderful, almost carved-in-stone directness.

Hebrew is rich in concrete imagery. The word ruaḥ (רוּחַ), for example, can mean wind, breath or spirit. These meanings inhabit the same imaginative world: something invisible that cannot be grasped, yet whose presence is known by what it does. It moves, breathes and gives life.

Then there is shalom (שָׁלוֹם). We translate it as “peace,” but it can suggest something fuller: well-being, completeness, wholeness, things being as they ought to be. So when the ancient priestly blessing asks God to give someone shalom, it means rather more than wishing them a quiet life. It is a blessing of flourishing and wholeness.

Another beautiful word is ḥesed (חֶסֶד), variously translated as “steadfast love,” “mercy,” “lovingkindness” or “faithful love.” No single English word quite carries its range. It speaks of a committed, loyal goodness: love that does something.

This is where learning even a little Hebrew becomes fascinating. You don't suddenly discover that English Bibles have been getting everything wrong. Quite the opposite. You begin to appreciate what translators have been trying to carry across—and how difficult their task is.

Hebrew is a real language, not a secret biblical code, and context always determines what a word means. Yet some of its richness inevitably gets thinned out in translation. The face can signify presence and favour; the heart can think and choose; walking can describe how a person lives; breath can speak of spirit; and peace can mean the restoration of wholeness.

Perhaps that is what I am beginning to enjoy most. I am not discovering a different Bible hidden behind the English one. I am beginning to glimpse something of the texture of the original.

Sometimes you can see exactly what the translators managed to carry across. And occasionally you spot something beautiful that fell out of the boat on the journey.

So this winter, while the weather closes in, I shall be sitting with my unfamiliar alphabet, trying to persuade my brain to remember which way the words go.

Cancer has taken a few liberties with my memory. Hebrew, I have decided, can have a go at putting it through its paces.

And if nothing else, I have finally found a language in which starting at the right-hand side of the page is not a mistake.

 

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Happiness Evil Cannot Give

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 12 September 2026 at 08:25

The Creator has so inseparably interwoven the laws of eternal justice with the happiness of each individual, that the latter cannot be attained but by observing the former.”

English jurist William Blackstone

sketch.png

The Happiness Evil Cannot Give

In my early morning today with the Word of God, I became fixed upon a single proverb:

“Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all things.” — Proverbs 28:5

My first instinct might easily have been the instinct of most of us: Well, I am not an evil man.

The word “evil” immediately summons people worse than ourselves. We think of the cruel, the violent, the corrupt and the obviously wicked. Whatever else Proverbs 28:5 might be saying, surely it is talking about them.

But perhaps that instinct itself should make us stop.

Psychologists speak of what is sometimes called the Lake Wobegon effect, named after Garrison Keillor’s fictional town where “all the children are above average.” Applied to ourselves, it describes our rather endearing—and sometimes dangerous—tendency to rate ourselves more favourably than is warranted. Most of us find it easier to recognise selfishness, prejudice, pride and questionable motives in other people than in ourselves.

Then we encounter the Hebrew word translated “evil” in Proverbs 28:5.

It is raʿ (רַע), a wonderfully uncomfortable little word. It can certainly describe what is wicked or evil, but its range is broader: that which is bad, harmful, disagreeable, morally wrong or injurious. Suddenly it becomes harder to keep the proverb at a comfortable distance.

The question is not simply, Am I an evil person. It is this: What is there within me that bends away from the good?

And now the proverb becomes intensely personal.

Its remarkable claim is that evil does not merely affect our behaviour; it affects our judgment. “Evil men understand not judgment.” The Hebrew word translated “judgment,” mishpat, carries the idea of justice, right judgment, what is fitting and what ought to be.

In other words, our moral condition affects our ability to see.

That is a profound observation about human nature. We like to imagine ourselves as detached judges of reality, calmly examining evidence and reaching rational conclusions. But human beings are not quite like that. Our reasoning travels in company with our desires. We are remarkably good at finding reasons for believing that the thing we want is also the thing we ought to have.

Greed can rename itself ambition. Pride can masquerade as self-respect. Resentment can call itself justice. Selfishness can present itself as freedom. Slowly, almost imperceptibly, the moral compass moves.

And this matters enormously because we are all searching for essentially the same country. Namely, Happiness.

We may give it different names—peace, fulfilment, success, love, contentment—but behind so much human activity lies the hope that somewhere ahead there is a life worth having.

Here Proverbs 28:5 contains a warning of extraordinary importance. If evil distorts judgment, then evil may distort our understanding of happiness itself.

Imagine a traveller whose compass is gradually becoming unreliable. He desperately wants to reach home. He walks faster, works harder and covers enormous distances. His problem is not lack of sincerity or effort. His problem is that the instrument by which he determines direction is pointing away from his destination.

There is something like this in the relationship between goodness and happiness.

We may seek happiness through wealth and gradually become incapable of saying “enough.” We may seek it through admiration and become dependent upon the opinions of others. We may seek it through sexual gratification while damaging our capacity for faithful intimacy. We may seek freedom by avoiding obligation and eventually discover that the deepest friendships are built precisely upon loyalty, sacrifice and commitment.

Evil offers us the fruit while quietly taking an axe to the tree.

This is why goodness and happiness may be much more intimately connected than our culture sometimes imagines. Goodness is not merely the entrance fee God demands before allowing us to be happy. Goodness may describe the very kind of creature a human being must increasingly become in order to experience the deepest forms of happiness.

The grateful person can enjoy what he possesses. The generous person can delight in another’s flourishing. The humble person does not have to win every comparison. The forgiving person is gradually released from the exhausting task of carrying yesterday’s injuries. The faithful person can enter the extraordinary security of being deeply known and deeply trusted.

Virtue enlarges our capacity for certain kinds of joy.

And vice does the opposite.

Envy makes another person’s happiness painful to us. Greed makes “enough” perpetually inaccessible. Pride turns other people into competitors. Lust can turn persons into objects. Resentment permits someone who injured us years ago to continue occupying rooms within our hearts.

The terrible possibility is that evil does not merely prevent us from obtaining happiness. It can damage the person who must experience happiness.

And then comes the glorious second half of the proverb:

“But they that seek the LORD understand all things.”

Notice the word seek. It does not say that those who seek God already possess perfect understanding. They are travellers too. They can make mistakes, take wrong turns and misunderstand the landscape.

But their compass is continually being brought back to true north.

Perhaps this is one of the deepest lessons of Proverbs 28:5. In the great human race for happiness—indeed, for eternal happiness—the first question is not simply, How quickly am I travelling? Nor even, How happy do I feel at this moment?

The greater question is:

What direction am I becoming pointed in?

For if God is the source of goodness, truth, love and ultimately happiness itself, then seeking Him is not a diversion from the human search for happiness.

It is the recalibration of the compass by which we hope to find it.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Unsettling Seduction of Darkness

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 9 September 2026 at 20:10

“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”
Romans 12:21 (NIV)

sketch.png

The Unsettling Seduction of Darkness


If you're new here, welcome to A Writer’s Notebook: What It Means to Be Human. This blog offers small extracts from longer essays I’m drafting for a book by the same name. A common thread runs through every post: the question of what it means to be human. And if you're among the daily visitors, I believe we share something important, a love for what is good, a value that quietly permeates this space.

There’s a moment in The Hunchback of Notre Dame when Judge Claude Frollo, Disney’s most complex villain, stands alone in the cathedral, tormented by lust disguised as piety. He gazes into the fire and sings of sin, damnation, and desire. The scene is unforgettable, artistically brilliant, yet deeply unsettling. Not because it lacked truth, but because it so completely surrendered to darkness.

As a writer, I try  to write  about what is good and has human value. Not because I’m naïve or blind to suffering. On the contrary, I see it too clearly. But goodness needs a louder voice. Evil already has a press team with wide circulation. 

Why do we glorify the grotesque? What strange thrill do we find in the demonic, the deranged, the depraved? I recall as a teenager going to see a movie that featured the occult. There was something unnerving, uncomfortable when I left the movie theatre that day. I still have grotesque images in my head half a century later There’s something disconcerting about how easily we engage with darkness even celebrate it. It’s in travel documentaries where a rural village is shown not through its music or harvests but its masks, macabre, skeletal, fearful. Why do such images dominate, as though the heart of a people could be summed up in the sinister? Who decided the grotesque was more “authentic” than the gentle, the spiritual, the existential and the good in the human family?

Perhaps it’s because evil shocks—and shock makes us feel alive, like a slap of cold water waking us from numbness. Or maybe we no longer believe in goodness as something real. We treat it like sentiment, like child's play, while evil is seen as complex, sophisticated, even artful.

In literature, the villain is often more deeply drawn than the hero. In film, darkness wins the awards. In conversation, we’re quicker to dissect corruption than to celebrate integrity.

But this fascination with darkness isn’t just aesthetic; it’s spiritual.

C.S. Lewis observed that evil is always a parasite. It has no life of its own. It feeds on the good, twisting and deforming it. That’s why evil is so theatrical, it must draw attention to itself because it has no substance apart from what it corrupts. The Devil is in the details.

What, then, is evil? At its core, it is the rejection of love. It’s the wilful distortion of what is true, good, and beautiful. It’s Cain raising his hand against his brother. Pharaoh hardening his heart. Judas betraying a friend with a kiss.

Sometimes it’s loud and brutal. Sometimes it’s just the slow erosion of compassion, the muting of conscience.

So why do I write what is good? Because I believe the world is aching for it. I believe beauty restores the soul. I believe kindness is radical. I believe that the light still shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. When I write about a gentle act, a word of forgiveness, a glimmer of grace, I’m not ignoring the shadows or my shadows ; I’m defying them. There is courage in joy. There is rebellion in hope. In an age that glorifies cynicism and darkness, to write the good is a kind of revolution.

And I want to be part of that.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Universe Does Not Owe Us Simplicity

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 7 September 2026 at 13:15

 

sketch.png

The Universe Does Not Owe Us Simplicity

 

The world presents us with great mysteries, and strangely enough, we learn to live with them. Consciousness is one. We experience it every waking moment, yet what consciousness actually is remains profoundly difficult to explain. Time is another. Why does time seem to have a direction, carrying us relentlessly from yesterday into tomorrow? Then there are the quiet mysteries of mathematics. Why is two plus two four? Human beings discovered this truth, but we did not invent the reality behind it. Long before anyone scratched numbers onto stone or paper, two stars added to two stars still made four.

Last year I was sitting in an outdoor café on one of the Scottish islands when I fell into conversation with a physicist. Before long we found ourselves talking about quantum entanglement. It is one of creation’s strangest discoveries. Two particles can become linked in such a way that they have to be described as parts of a single quantum state, even when separated by enormous distances. Measurements reveal correlations between them that cannot be explained by imagining that each particle simply carried a set of hidden instructions from the beginning. Yet this does not allow a usable message to travel instantaneously between them.

There is something wonderfully unsettling about this; "Spooky" said Einstein. At the quantum level, nature refuses to behave according to the common sense we have acquired from living among tables, trees, stones and teacups. Reality is stranger than our everyday intuition tells us it ought to be. The universe does not owe us simplicity.

And this brings me to God.

If God is the creator of this astonishing universe, then all its mysteries ultimately exist within a reality known to him. Yet we human beings continually try to understand God, and there is nothing wrong with that. The desire to understand is one of the beautiful things about us. The difficulty begins when we imagine that God must fit neatly inside the categories our minds have constructed.

Christians themselves have wrestled with this for centuries. Jehovah’s Witnesses distinguish Jehovah from Jesus in a way traditional Trinitarian Christianity does not. Presbyterians, along with most historic Christian traditions, confess Jesus as truly divine, while Christadelphians understand him differently again. These differences are significant, and I am not pretending they do not matter. I am simply saying that a person opening the Bible for the first time need not solve every one of them before being allowed to enjoy the extraordinary story unfolding before them.

Read the Bible first. Let it surprise you.

As you read, you will encounter passages in which God the Father is in heaven while Jesus is walking the dusty roads of Galilee. You will see Jesus praying to the Father, loving the Father and obeying the Father. You will encounter moments in which Jesus speaks of things known by the Father that he himself does not know. Then you will turn another page and find astonishing language applied to Jesus. You will find people worshipping him. You will encounter the mysterious declaration that the Word was with God and that the Word was God, followed by the even more startling claim that this Word became flesh and lived among us.

Then Paul adds another piece to the mystery. He describes Christ as existing in the form of God and yet emptying himself, taking the form of a servant and entering fully into human life. Suddenly the reader is faced with something far larger than a tidy religious formula. God is not becoming easier to put into a box. He is becoming harder.

That need not frighten us. It can be exhilarating.

Think about something much simpler. Can God hear two hundred Christians praying at the same moment? Most believers would answer yes without hesitation. What about two million? What if they are scattered across every continent, praying in hundreds of languages? We do not imagine God frantically switching his attention from London to Lagos, from a hospital room in Glasgow to a kitchen table in Sydney. We instinctively understand that God does not experience presence and attention with the limitations that govern us.

So why should we be astonished when the Bible presents us with a God whose existence exceeds our ordinary categories?

Can God be present in heaven and make himself known on earth? If he created space, why should space imprison him? If he created time, why should time contain him in the way it contains us? If the deepest levels of his creation already overturn our everyday intuitions about distance, matter and relationship, should we expect the Creator himself to be less mysterious than the universe he made?

This is not an attempt to use quantum physics to prove the nature of God. Physics cannot do that. Proton entanglement does not prove the Trinity, nor can a laboratory tell us who Jesus is. The point is simpler and, I think, more beautiful: reality has already taught us some humility. Things can be true without being easy to picture.

We are very small creatures attempting to understand the One who, according to the Bible, called the universe into existence. At times I imagine us like ants living inside a little box in a garden shed. The ants might become remarkably knowledgeable about their box. They could map every corner and examine every grain of dust. Yet beyond the box is the shed, beyond the shed is the garden, beyond the garden are towns and oceans and continents, and above them is a universe whose immensity they could never imagine.

How much greater might the distance be between our understanding and the fullness of God?

So if you are new to the Bible, do not be discouraged when you encounter something you cannot immediately reconcile. Do not feel that you must arrive armed with a theological system and force every verse into its proper compartment like some kind of theological bento box. Read. Explore. Ask questions. Notice the tensions. Notice the beauty. Notice how often the Bible refuses to reduce God to something comfortably manageable.

There will be time to investigate doctrines and listen to the arguments Christians have made across the centuries. Some of those questions matter deeply and deserve serious thought. But do not let the arguments steal the wonder before you have even encountered it.

Open the Bible and meet its God.

Walk beside Jesus through Galilee. Listen to his words. Watch the way he treats frightened people, outsiders, children, sinners and the self-righteous. Hear him pray to his Father. Stand with the disciples when the storm becomes still. Sit at the table at the Last Supper. Follow the bewildered women to an empty tomb. Let the questions come naturally instead of being afraid of them.

You do not have to understand the ocean before you are allowed to stand on the shore and be amazed by it. In the same way, you do not have to solve the mystery of God before you begin seeking him.

Sometimes wonder is where understanding begins.

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Jim McCrory, Thursday 10 September 2026 at 18:22)
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Man from Ghana and the Spark of Life

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

The Man from Ghana and the Spark of Life

“He himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else.” — Acts 17:25

Today, quite by chance, I briefly met a man from Ghana in a supermarket. It was an ordinary encounter, but afterwards it prompted me to explore something of the languages and thought of Ghana. In doing so, I came across an Akan word that arrested me: kra.

Kra is sometimes translated as “soul,” “life-force,” or “divine spark,” though none quite captures its meaning. In traditional Akan thought it is associated with the life-principle received from God, Nyame, and with a person’s destiny. What struck me was the implication that life is not simply something we possess, but something we have received.

We speak naturally of “my life,” yet life is unlike almost anything else we call ours. I did not acquire it, construct myself, or choose to exist. Before I could possess anything, understand anything or make a single choice, I was already alive. There is something humbling in that. Life is less a possession than an entrustment.

This brought me back to a question raised by the scientist James Tour. Imagine a living cell being studied in a laboratory. Suddenly it dies. Much of its physical substance remains: the molecules and structures have not simply vanished. Yet an unmistakable boundary has been crossed. A moment ago it was alive; now it is not. What has been lost?

Biology can describe what fails when a cell dies, and kra should not be mistaken for a scientific explanation. Yet the two perspectives bring us to an intriguing threshold. Science can investigate the mechanisms of living things with astonishing precision, while the transition from life to death still confronts us with the deeper question of what it means for anything to be alive at all.

With a human being the question becomes more intimate. We are cells, organs, proteins, electrical impulses and intricate chemistry, but we are also beings who love, remember, hope, suffer, create and ask what our lives mean. The machinery is extraordinary, but so is the person whose machinery it is.

That is what I found so compelling in kra. It changed the grammar of the question for me. Instead of simply saying, “I have a life,” I found myself thinking, “I have been given life.” And if life is given and the question is not only what I will get from it, but what I will do with what has been entrusted to me. Consider Psalm 15.

Strangely, all of this began with two people briefly crossing paths in a supermarket. He went his way and I went mine, but the encounter led me to an African word, from that word to a scientist’s question, and from that question to an ancient biblical claim: life is something we receive before it is ever something we possess.

I did not make myself alive. I found myself alive. And that is wonder enough to begin with.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Home, Stars, Milkmaids and Bedouin Shepherd Boys

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 7 September 2026 at 13:37

 

sketch%20%281%29.png

The  "Huts", Bogany Farm, circa 1960s AI enhanced

Home, Stars, Milkmaids and Bedouin Shepherd Boys 

Some songs seem to accompany us through life without ever asking to be noticed. We hear them when we are young, carry them somewhere beyond conscious memory, and then, years later, they return. When they do, they bring more than melody. They carry people, places, rooms, weather, and versions of ourselves we had almost forgotten.

Clifford T. Ward’s Home Thoughts from Abroad has always been such a song for me. There is something wonderfully restrained about it. It never reaches for grandeur, yet somehow finds it. Ward, an English schoolteacher before music brought him wider recognition, had a quality that made his songs feel less like performances and more like confidences. When I first heard him, I was young, and although I could not have articulated it then, I sensed that he was not singing at me. He was sharing something, and somewhere between his experience and mine we met.

The title reaches further back, of course, to Robert Browning and his poem Home-Thoughts, from Abroad. Browning writes of England from elsewhere, noticing the things absence has made precious: blossom, birdsong and the coming of spring. It is an old human experience. Distance alters our vision. We begin to see the ordinary things we once overlooked, and a place that scarcely announced itself while we inhabited it can acquire an extraordinary power once we have left.

Maybe that is because home is not merely geography. It is emotional ground. It is the place, or sometimes only the memory of a place, where something within us once settled and said, without words, I belong here.

I found myself thinking about this one Saturday evening while sharing a meal with friends. Among us was a friend from Mongolia, and as she spoke about home, I sensed that she meant something larger than the country marked on a map. It led me afterwards to the Mongolian expression нутгаа санах (nutgaa sanakh), commonly translated as homesickness or longing for one’s homeland. Yet “homesickness” seems too slight a word for what I heard in her conversation. This was closer to a tether: an attachment to homeland that survives distance because the landscape itself has somehow become part of the person.

I found myself envying that certainty. Not Mongolia itself, but the knowledge of where one belongs.

I have never really possessed it. There are places I love deeply. My heart is drawn to the Hebrides and to Norway, and to another place I shall come to, but I did not grow up in any of them. The landscape of my childhood was the heartland of the Clydeside shipbuilding industry, a world shaped more by labour than romance. It was soot, tenements, industry and function. Beauty existed, but you had to know where to look for it.

For me, one of the places where it revealed itself was across the water.

We had a cabin on the Isle of Bute, between Rothesay Golf Course and Bogany Farm, and when the summer holidays arrived, I would spend the full six weeks there. The distance from Clydeside was not enormous, yet to a child it might as well have been another country. Loch Ascog lay on one side, quiet and watchful, while the Firth of Clyde opened towards a horizon that seemed impossibly wide.

Then there were the stars.

City darkness is never truly dark, but on Bute the night seemed to reveal what the city had been hiding. The stars did not merely appear; they cascaded.

My days were spent fishing and wandering with the extravagant aimlessness available to children before we discover schedules. Friendships formed quickly because summer demanded it. We knew, without dwelling on it, that most of us would disappear from one another when the season ended, so we belonged intensely for the little time we had.

The cabin had neither running water nor electricity. One of my daily jobs was to take containers to the communal well. Cows would wander towards me with that peculiar combination of suspicion and curiosity that cows seem to have perfected. The smaller ones sometimes ventured closer, studying me as though I were the unusual animal in the field.

When evening came, we lit paraffin lamps. I can still remember their soft, sibilant sound and the warm, imperfect light they cast across the cabin. My father would read aloud to us: Heidi, Tales from 1001 Nights, Chinese folk stories. We ate pancakes with jam and were given small glasses of stout, which seemed to me less like a drink than participation in some ancient ceremony of adulthood.

As the kerosene burned down, the light softened and the cabin became quieter. Sleep did not arrive abruptly. It gathered around us.

I would lie in bed and look through the window at the stars. The stories my father had read were still alive in my imagination, and I wondered whether somewhere far away a Chinese farmer boy, a Bedouin shepherd or a milkmaid among the Swiss mountains might be looking upwards at the same sky.

I did not have theological language for such thoughts. I was simply a boy staring into the immensity of things. Yet I remember a sense of presence, a feeling that the world was greater, deeper and more mysterious than the visible things immediately around me. Looking back, I think those were among my earliest intimations of God. Nothing was spoken. Nothing needed to be. The stillness itself seemed full.

Then came the part every summer had been quietly moving towards: leaving.

There were bags to pack, the ferry to catch and school waiting on Monday. The wide skies disappeared and the tenements of Clydeside closed around us again. I remember a heaviness that I could not explain. It was not ordinary disappointment at the end of a holiday. It felt more like grief, as though I had left something of myself on the island.

Only by leaving did I begin to understand that the cabins near Bogany Farm had become home.

Not home in the conventional sense. We did not own the landscape and our lives there were temporary. Yet something about those summers felt complete. We needed very little. A paraffin lamp, a fishing rod, a campfire, pancakes, stories, friends and six weeks that seemed capable of lasting forever.

Many years later I encountered a word coined by John Koenig in The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows: kenopsia, the eerie atmosphere of a place that was once bustling with life but is now abandoned and quiet.

I knew the feeling immediately.

When I return to Bute and walk the stretch between Bogany Farm and Canada Hill, the world I remember has largely disappeared. Once there were fifty or sixty cabins scattered across the land. Now there is overgrowth. Nettles have reclaimed paths once made by human feet, and the outlines of our little summer civilisation are difficult to find beneath everything that has grown in its place.

The cows still look at me, though now they seem to have a stronger claim on the land than I do. In fairness, they are probably right. I am the visitor now. The landscape continued living while I was away.

Yet I can still populate that empty field.

I can smell barbecue smoke and burnt toast carried on the sea air. I can hear songs around campfires and children calling to one another through the dusk. I can see adults sitting outside their cabins, leaning into the last of the evening sunlight as though unconsciously storing it against the darker months ahead.

Memory cannot be trusted as a perfect historian. It edits, rearranges and softens. It illuminates one corner while leaving another in shadow. The people I remember may not have been quite as carefree as memory makes them, nor every summer day as golden. Childhood was no more immune to disappointment then than it is now.

But memory's failure to reproduce the past exactly does not make it false. Memory tells another kind of truth. It tells us what mattered.

Something about those summers made people seem more open to one another. Time moved differently. Nobody appeared to be measuring every hour for its productivity. There was space to wander, to talk, to sit beside a fire, to watch the sea or to do nothing of consequence at all. For a few weeks each year, ordinary people seemed permitted to inhabit their lives rather than constantly hurry through them.

The cabins are gone now, and most of the voices I associate with them have long since fallen silent. Still, when I walk through that landscape, absence does not feel entirely empty. Places absorb our stories. A path remembers us in its own way, even when grass eventually covers it. A field once filled with laughter cannot literally retain the sound, yet we retain it on the field's behalf.

This is one of the strange gifts of landscape. We imagine ourselves passing through places, but places also pass through us. They become part of our interior geography, and years later a smell, a quality of evening light, a bird call or an old song can suddenly open the door.

Time is cruel in that it takes away the world we knew, but it is generous in another sense. Only after something has gone do we sometimes understand what we were given.

That has changed the way I think about home.

I once imagined home should be the place from which you came, a homeland capable of producing the deep certainty I heard in my Mongolian friend's voice. I do not think that way now. Some people inherit a profound sense of homeland, while others discover home in fragments. It may be scattered across landscapes and years, held in people, rituals, sounds and moments of inexplicable peace.

For me, part of it will always lie on Bute: in the walk to the well, in the suspicious cows, in my father's voice reading by paraffin light, in pancakes and jam, in campfire smoke and in a little boy staring through a cabin window wondering whether children on the other side of the world were looking at the same stars.

I could return to the exact coordinates, but I could never return to that place. Not really. The place I long for exists at the meeting point of landscape and memory, and time has closed the road back to it.

Yet I no longer think that makes it less real.

Home may not always be somewhere we can remain. Sometimes we recognise it only after leaving. Sometimes it survives as a collection of moments in which, for reasons we barely understood at the time, life felt whole.

And sometimes it returns as an old song, heard in youth, carrying us across the years to somewhere we thought we had lost.

One final, rather lovely footnote: five years ago, I met a woman who had been taught English by Clifford T. Ward. Somehow that small connection pleased me enormously. A man whose song had accompanied my memories of home had once stood in an ordinary classroom, teaching English to someone I would eventually meet.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The One Who Began the Clock Ticking  

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

The One Who Began the Clock Ticking

 

If you have been reading the earlier blogs, you may remember our reflections on the Fibonacci sequence—the remarkable mathematical patterns found throughout nature, from flowers and pinecones to the spirals of a pineapple.

You may also have encountered the Anthropic Principle: the observation that the universe appears to possess an extraordinarily precise set of conditions that allow life to exist at all. Then there is the moral law, that persistent sense that some things are genuinely right or wrong, regardless of what we might personally prefer. Try it out the next time you skip the queue in the supermarket.  

Taken together, these things raise an intriguing reality: perhaps we are more than a chance collection of molecules, pirouetting obediently to our DNA. Behind the mathematics, the finely balanced universe and our strange awareness of good and evil lies something deeper.

And that brings us to the larger question: Who is the Designer?

In Exodus 3:14, God makes one of the most astonishing statements in Scripture:

God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.”

There is something breath-taking in those few words. God does not define Himself by reference to anything else. Everything else has existence; God simply is. It is a small but extraordinary doorway into the Christian understanding of God as the ground and source of all being.

The same thought appears in the opening words of Genesis:

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” — Genesis 1:1

Before matter, before human history, before the first ticking of any cosmic clock—God. The Bible begins without attempting to explain God's origin because creation has a beginning; the Creator does not.

Yet Scripture takes us somewhere even more remarkable. David looks into the vastness of the heavens and asks:

“What is man that You are mindful of him, or the son of man that You care for him?” — Psalm 8:4

This question gets me every time. David looks into that immense night sky and encounters a beautiful paradox. Against the scale of the universe, we appear almost unimaginably small, and yet we are told that we matter profoundly to God.

Christianity does not ask us to pretend that humanity is physically impressive beside galaxies and stars. It makes the far stranger claim that we are personally significant to their Creator.

David could scarcely get his head around it. I am not sure we can either.

And this takes us back to yesterday's blog, where I invited you to do something wonderfully simple: come and sit with the Creator.

Ask for knowledge. Ask for guidance. Ask for wisdom. Bring Him the questions that trouble you and the questions you are almost afraid to ask. Come sincerely, humbly and with deep respect.

Then listen.

For if the God who set the universe in motion is also the God who is mindful of you, it is conceivable that the greatest discovery is not simply that there may be a Designer behind creation.

It is that the Designer may want you to know Him.

 

 

Note: Scripture quotations: Berean Standard Bible (BSB), Public Domain.

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Jim McCrory, Wednesday 2 September 2026 at 15:46)
Share post
Jim McCrory

Come Sit With the Creator For a While

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 30 August 2026 at 09:14

sketch.png

Come Sit With the Creator For a While

Sometime back in the fourth century, a troubled man sat weeping in a garden in Milan. His name was Augustine, and although he would eventually become one of the most influential Christian thinkers in history, at that moment he was simply a man in turmoil, painfully aware of the distance between the life he was living and the life he knew he ought to live.

Then, from a nearby house, he heard the voice of a child repeating a little refrain:

Tolle, lege. Tolle, lege.

“Take up and read. Take up and read.”

Augustine later described the moment in his Confessions. He took the words as an instruction, picked up the Scriptures, and read. What he encountered there became part of the great turning point of his life.

There is something wonderfully simple about those words.

Take up and read.

If you have never read the Bible, or have not opened one for many years, I would like to offer you that same invitation. Not an invitation to understand everything at once, to become religious, or even to settle beforehand what you believe about God. Just take it up and read.

We sometimes imagine the Bible as a distant book: ancient, formidable, filled with unfamiliar names, difficult passages and ideas belonging to another age. Yet the Bible says something rather different about itself:

“Assuredly the word is exceedingly close to you—even in your mouth and your heart—so that you might do it.”

—Deuteronomy 30:14 NKJV

I love that expression: exceedingly close to you.

That is increasingly how I have come to think about the Bible. Not merely as a book to be studied, though it certainly rewards study, but as something close enough to enter the ordinary circumstances of a human life.

In my quiet hours, when I sit with the Bible, my prayer is often very simple: Father, what do you have for me today?

Sometimes I need direction. Sometimes discipline. There are aspects of my personality that still need changing, and occasions when I need the uncomfortable honesty of Scripture rather than reassurance. At other times I come carrying a fear, a disappointment, or something I cannot resolve. I read, and sooner or later a sentence seems to arrest me. I stop. Read it again. Sit with it.

And there it is.

For me, this is not merely an interesting thought from an ancient writer. I receive it as communication from God, meeting me in the circumstances of my life.

Cancer medication sometimes has me awake during the night. Oddly enough, I have come to treasure some of those hours. The house is still, the world seems to have withdrawn for a while, and there is time to read without interruption.

Early this morning, my attention settled on a verse in Psalm 118:

“I called on the LORD in distress;
The LORD answered me and set me in a broad place.”

—Psalm 118:5 NKJV

I stayed there for a while.

Life has many ways of hemming us in. Illness can do it. So can fear. There are pressures outside our control: the unkindness of others, slander and gossip, unhappy relationships, financial worries, loneliness, uncertainty about the future. Then there are the pressures within us, those private struggles that other people may know nothing about.

The writer of the psalm knew that feeling.

The Hebrew language behind his words makes the image especially vivid. The word associated with his distress carries the idea of narrowness or confinement—a tight place, somewhere you can hardly move.

Then comes the answer.

The Hebrew word merḥāḇ means breadth, spaciousness, room.

The movement of the verse is therefore almost physical. The psalmist cries to God from the narrow place, and God answers him in spaciousness.

From confinement into room.

I find that image beautiful because God does not always remove the circumstance that confines us. Some things cannot simply be wished away. I still have cancer. A broken relationship may still be broken tomorrow. Someone who has treated us badly may never apologize. Grief does not obey a timetable.

And yet, in circumstances that have not changed, something within us can.

The walls no longer seem quite so close.

There is room to breathe.

That morning the verse was no longer simply something written by a Hebrew poet thousands of years ago. It had reached across those centuries and entered a quiet room where one man happened to be awake because of his medication.

“The word is exceedingly close to you.”

I thought again of Augustine in his garden and that child’s strange little song drifting over the wall.

Take up and read.

You do not need to approach the Bible with someone else’s certainty. You can bring your questions with you. Bring your doubts too, if you have them. Bring your disappointments, your curiosity, your objections, your hopes, and all the untidy pieces of being human. The Bible is remarkably unafraid of such things. Its pages are populated by frightened people and courageous people, doubters and believers, failures and saints, kings and prisoners, grieving mothers, angry prophets, bewildered disciples and people desperately looking for a way home.

So if there is a Bible somewhere in your house, take it down.

Open it.

You might begin with one of the Gospels and meet Jesus through the recollections of those who knew him. Or begin with the Psalms, where almost every human emotion eventually finds a voice. Do not worry about how much you read. A few verses may be enough.

And before you begin, you might even try the little prayer I use in those quiet hours:

Father, what do you have for me?

Then take up and read.

The book that seems so ancient may turn out to be exceedingly close.

Note

Are you a regular visitor or a new visitor? If so, please drop me a note in private and tell me what articles have appealed to you. You can reach me at JimAlba@proton.me

Scripture quotations marked NKJV are taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Children's Hour

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 29 August 2026 at 10:59

sketch.png

The Children’s Hour

 

I met a couple today on Loch Lomond who spoke so affectionately of their children and grandchildren that, when I later sat down to write, my thoughts returned to them. So I dedicate this little piece to that couple, and to all parents who have watched their children grow from small hands into lives of their own.

What is my most beloved poem? I sometimes ask myself. It feels rather like choosing a favourite wine gum. There are so many that have accompanied me through different seasons of life that choosing one seems almost unfair. Yet today, perhaps because of that conversation beside the loch, I found myself returning to Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Children’s Hour.

On the surface, it is a delightful little poem about a father interrupted at his work by his three daughters, who have decided to lay siege to him. He hears them coming and knows perfectly well what is about to happen. His work, however important it may have seemed a moment before, can wait. The children cannot.

There is something wonderfully familiar in that scene. Longfellow captures the way children can enter the adult world without the slightest regard for its schedules and obligations. To them, a father sitting at his desk is not a man with correspondence to answer or work to finish; he is simply Dad, and Dad is available to be climbed upon. The world of childhood has its own logic, and in that world affection is often expressed by proximity, noise, interruption and an almost complete disregard for personal space.

But the poem runs deeper than this charming domestic scene. Beneath the playfulness lies something more poignant: the father knows, as every parent eventually comes to know, that his children will grow up. The little girls who can so easily storm their father’s room will one day have lives beyond his reach. They will become women with friendships, loves, convictions, disappointments and decisions of their own. They will travel roads he cannot travel for them, and make choices he cannot make on their behalf.

And perhaps the most humbling part of parenthood is that we do not know what those roads will look like.

We bring children into the world without being given a map of the lives they will lead. We can teach them, protect them, encourage them, warn them, pray for them and, if we are fortunate, give them a sense of belonging strong enough to carry with them when they eventually leave home. But we cannot write their stories for them. We can only accompany them for a while.

That is one of the strange sorrows of loving a child. We love someone whose future is largely hidden from us. We see the beginning, but not the ending. We know the child who is standing in front of us, but we cannot know with certainty the adult who is slowly emerging.

Perhaps that is why The Children’s Hour has stayed with me. It is not really a poem about a father being interrupted. It is a poem about a father being given a moment in which his children are still small, still close, and still entirely convinced that he is the centre of their little universe. He is their fortress, their mountain, their place of safety, and they are perfectly content to storm him whenever they please.

There is something almost unbearably precious about such moments precisely because they are temporary. Childhood does not announce its departure. It simply changes, almost imperceptibly, until one day we realise that the small shoes have become large ones, that the voice has changed, that the hand which once reached instinctively for ours now belongs to someone who can find their own way.

Perhaps this is why the couple I met on Loch Lomond stayed in my thoughts. There was something beautiful in the affection with which they spoke of their children and grandchildren. It reminded me that parenthood is not simply the experience of raising a child; it is also the privilege of witnessing a life unfold, knowing that much of its unfolding remains beyond our control.

There is a certain courage in that. We love our children, knowing that we cannot protect them from every sorrow, cannot make every decision for them and cannot see the future that awaits them. We can only give them what love, wisdom and time allow us to give, and then trust that what has been planted in them will continue to grow.

And so, perhaps, when the children come to lay siege to us, the wisest thing is not to think about the work they are interrupting. Perhaps it is to recognise that they are giving us something far more valuable: a moment of their childhood that will never come again.

The work can wait. The children cannot.

Longfellow understood that. And perhaps that is why, after all these years, The Children’s Hour still feels less like a poem about three little girls climbing into their father’s arms and more like a quiet reminder to treasure the people we have been given, while we still have them close.

 

Poetry: "The Children's Hour" by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (read by John Lithgow)

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Paid in Full

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 27 August 2026 at 06:55

sketch.png

Paid in Full

Sometimes people come into our lives who remind us that not everything in this world is negative.

This week, I had my boiler serviced. A next day, the bill arrived. But there was something unusual about it. Where I expected to see an amount owed, it simply said: Paid in Full

I contacted the engineer, assuming there had been a mistake. I told him about it, but his response was simple: “It’s a gift.”

“But I can afford to pay,” I replied.

He wasn’t having it.

During his visit, I had mentioned that I had cancer. He felt that life already presents enough challenges when someone is going through something like that, and he wanted to do something to ease the burden, even if only a little.

It was an extraordinary act of kindness, but it got me thinking about something much bigger.

Some years ago, I was in a European country where a friend of mine visited prisoners in a high-security prison. During one visit, a prisoner asked him a question that has stayed with me.

“I have taken many lives. Will God forgive me?”

We know that feeling when conscience tortures us for our smaller sins.  My friend assured him that if he was truly repentant, God would forgive him.

That is an extraordinary thought, isn’t it?

We all carry a debt. We have all fallen short. We are all sinners. Yet the Christian message is that God did not leave humanity to pay that debt ourselves.

Around two thousand years ago, Christ came into the world and gave His life for the sins of mankind.

As Paul wrote in Colossians 2:

“When you were dead in your trespasses...your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our trespasses, having cancelled the debt ascribed to us in the decrees that stood against us. He took it away, nailing it to the cross!”

There is something profoundly beautiful in those words: He cancelled the debt.

The boiler engineer could have sent me a bill. I could have paid it. But instead, he chose to give me a gift.

And that little act of kindness became, for me, a reminder of a far greater gift.

Christ did not merely reduce our debt. He did not ask us to pay what we could and somehow make up the difference ourselves.

He paid it. And He Paid it in Full.

 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

The Gentle Tongue

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 30 August 2026 at 18:57

sketch.png

The Gentle Tongue

In the stillness of the early morning, I found myself reading Psalm 138. When I came to verse 8, the words seemed almost to rise from the page:

“The LORD will fulfill his purpose for me.”

I lingered there for a while. Those words reminded me of something I so easily forget: God is not finished with me yet.

There are unfinished places in all of us—places where we still need to grow, soften, change, and become more like Christ. For me, one of those places is the way I sometimes speak to people, especially those closest to me, including my wife. I can be too quick with my words, too easily frustrated, and at times I forget the gentleness that ought to mark the life of someone who follows Jesus.

Paul gives us a beautiful picture of that gentleness in 1 Thessalonians 2:7–8 when he describes his care for the believers in Thessalonica with the tenderness of a nursing mother caring for her children.

There is something deeply moving about that image.

A mother does not hold her child at a distance. She carries, nourishes, protects, comforts, and gives herself in love. Paul reaches for this tender picture to show us something of what Christian love should look like. It is not simply about saying the right things or appearing kind on the outside. It is about becoming the kind of people whose hearts are being shaped by the love of Christ—people who learn to carry others with patience, compassion, tenderness, and genuine affection.

Perhaps this is part of what Psalm 138:8 means for us today.

God is still at work in the unfinished places of our character.

He does not abandon us because we stumble in the same place more than once. He does not turn away because we have not yet become the people we long to be. Instead, He patiently continues His work within us, shaping us little by little into people who increasingly reflect the heart of Christ.

There is something both humbling and deeply comforting about this. Spiritual growth is not simply a project of self-improvement that we accomplish through determination and willpower. We are works in progress, held in the hands of a God whose grace is greater than our weakness and whose patience is greater than our impatience with ourselves.

And so my prayer this morning is becoming more than simply, “Lord, help me speak more gently.”

I find myself praying, “Lord, make my heart more gentle.”

I want the words I speak to my wife to bring life rather than hurt. I want my words toward family, friends, and those I meet along the way to carry patience rather than irritation. I want to learn to respond with kindness even when someone frustrates me, remembering that the person standing before me is also someone created in the image of God.

Perhaps the deeper work God desires to do is not merely to change the words that come from my mouth, but to transform the heart from which those words come.

That is a much deeper work.

And it is a work I cannot accomplish by myself.

The God who began His work in me is still working in me. He sees the places that remain unfinished, the habits that still need changing, the words I wish I could take back, and the parts of my character that still need to become more like Christ. None of these things surprise Him, and none of them lie beyond the reach of His grace.

Perhaps even the weakness we become painfully aware of today is not evidence that God has failed to change us. Perhaps seeing it more clearly is itself part of His work. It may be an invitation to bring that very weakness into the light, place it into His hands, and trust Him with the work we cannot complete ourselves.

There is something wonderfully hopeful about knowing that God does not require us to be finished before He loves us. Nor does He abandon us because we are still becoming.

“The LORD will fulfill his purpose for me.”

Those words remind me that my story is still being written by the One who knows me completely and loves me faithfully.

The work may be unfinished, but the Worker has not left.

He is still shaping. Still teaching. Still correcting. Still softening.

Still drawing us toward the likeness of Christ.

So perhaps we do not need to look at the unfinished places in our lives with despair. We can look at them honestly, repent where repentance is needed, ask forgiveness where we have caused hurt, and then place ourselves once again into the patient hands of God.

There is still work to be done in me.

But there is also still a God at work in me.

And because He has not given up His work, I do not need to give up hope.

“The LORD will fulfill his purpose for me.”

May that promise give us courage to face what still needs changing, grace to be patient with the process, and faith to trust the One who continues His work within us.

We are unfinished.

But we are still in His hands.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Do You Worry About the World Your Children Are Waking Up To?

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

Do You Worry About the World Your Children Are Waking Up To?

 

I often meet a man who is rebuilding his life after addiction, carrying with him some of the weight of his past. He had often seen me taking old books into the charity shop, and one day he asked me, “Can you recommend a book for me?”

I thought for a moment and handed him My Life as a Dog.

I told him about Ingemar, the young Swedish boy at the heart of the story. His mother is seriously ill, and eventually he has to leave home and live with relatives. Suddenly, he is separated from the people, places and things he loves, without really understanding why any of it is happening.

Ingemar has an unusual way of coping with the things he cannot comprehend. He compares his own troubles with the lives of people and animals around him. He thinks about Laika, the famous dog sent into space, and somehow persuades himself that  his own situation is not quite as terrible as it might be. He uses imagination, humour and stories to make sense of pain that is simply too large for a child to face directly.

He makes mistakes. He gets into trouble. Sometimes he behaves badly. But beneath all of that is a frightened and lonely child, desperately searching for somewhere to belong.

That, I think, is what makes the book so special. It does not pretend that suffering is easy, nor does it suggest that sorrow simply disappears. Instead, Ingemar keeps going. He discovers small islands of friendship, kindness, laughter and hope. Slowly, he begins to understand that even when life takes things away from us, there can still be people who care, and there can still be reasons to carry on.

I told my new friend that the book was really about surviving hard things without losing the part of yourself that can still laugh, love and hope. It is simple, funny, sad and warm. Most importantly, it does not lecture you about how to live. It simply tells a story about a boy trying to find his way through a difficult world. That is why I thought of it for him.

As I walked away, though, my thoughts travelled much further back, to my own school days and the boy I once was.

I was a rough kid growing up on Clydeside, and, if truth be told, I seemed destined for trouble. I was not exactly showing early promise as a future Nobel Prize winner. Then one day a science teacher seemed to recognise something in us that perhaps we did not recognise in ourselves. Rather than trying to turn us into scholars, he taught us how to make fishing rods.

Fishing rods.

It sounds almost absurd when I say it now, but it changed my life.

He took us fishing and, without perhaps knowing the full extent of what he was doing, introduced us to another kind of life. A life where patience mattered. Where you could sit quietly beside a river and watch the water. Where the natural world could occupy your mind and, for a while, the troubles of the world could become wonderfully distant.

Every weekend, Sammy, Tom and I would set off fishing, far away from the Clydeside. I learned how to make lead floats using a potato mould. I learned to tie flies onto hooks. I learned the strange pleasure of simply being still.

Years later, I took my own daughter and her friend camping in Europe, and my son too. I suppose I was passing on something that had first been given to me by a teacher who understood that sometimes the best way to help a young person is not to tell them what they should become, but to open a door into another world.

And that brings me back to the man I met as I was going to the charity shop.

But what does fishing have to do with someone rebuilding his life after addiction?

More than we realise.

Sometimes a person does not need another lecture about the mistakes of the past. Sometimes they need an invitation into a different world.

If you love your children, take them into nature. Take them camping. Take them fishing. Teach them to identify butterflies, build a fire, watch birds, walk through a forest or simply sit beside a river and be quiet. Give them experiences that ask nothing of them except their presence.

Recently, I watched families with children and young people coming down from Scotland's West Highland Way. They were tired, their feet were sore, and they looked as though they had earned every blister. Yet there was something else in their faces. They looked renewed.

The natural world has a way of doing that.

When we step away from the noise, the screens, the pressures and the expectations, we remember something fundamental about ourselves. We remember that we belong to the earth, to one another, and to something larger than our immediate troubles.

And that is what my teacher gave us all those years ago. He gave a few rough boys a fishing rod, but what he really gave us was another possibility. He showed us that there was a world beyond the one we knew.

Sometimes, that is where hope begins.

There are people who help restore us. There are books that open doors. There are rivers that teach us to be still, friends who remind us that we matter, teachers who see possibilities in us before we see them ourselves, and small acts of kindness that quietly tell us there is still a place for us in this world.

And sometimes, God uses all of these things to lead us home.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Before I Knew Him, He Knew Me

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Monday 17 August 2026 at 10:34

sketch.png

Before I Knew Him, He Knew Me

I get this feeling that comes over me when I see someone standing alone at the edge of the sea, staring out as if listening for something only they can hear. Once I even saw a dog doing the same — motionless, gazing at the horizon as though it too had a private world beyond my reach.

And sometimes I explore my own thaughts . When I listen to Solveig’s Song, or the adagio in Grieg’s Piano Concerto, or the theme from Dances with Wolves, I am struck by how far my mind travels and how abruptly it stops. The music lifts me toward a place I can almost sense, yet never fully enter. My mind has walls. It hints at infinity but cannot cross into it.

These moments draw me toward larger questions — the kind that sit just beyond the reach of tidy answers. What is infinity? How can Scripture reveal Jesus as part of the Godhead and yet distinct as a person from the Father? How does the human mind hold paradox without resolving it?

There is another question beneath all these questions: What is happening in God’s world while I am living in mine?

There is a beautiful and unsettling glimpse of this in the encounter between Jesus and Nathanael. Nathanael had never met Jesus, yet when Jesus saw him approaching, He said, “Here truly is an Israelite in whom there is no deceit.” Nathanael was puzzled. “How do you know me?” he asked.

Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.”

Whatever Nathanael had been doing beneath that fig tree, Jesus knew. Nathanael had been somewhere Jesus was not visibly present, doing something Jesus had not been told about by Philip. Yet Jesus saw him.

And that must have been an extraordinary moment for Nathanael. He thought he was simply living inside his own little world, beneath a fig tree, unseen by the man standing before him. But he discovered that his world was already fully visible to Jesus.

Nathanael did not know Jesus, but Jesus knew Nathanael.

There is something deeply moving about that. We spend our lives trying to understand God, trying to work out what He sees and what He is doing, while all the time we are the ones who are completely known. There are rooms in our minds that no other human being can enter, memories we cannot adequately explain, thoughts that come and go without words, longings whose origins we barely understand. We may not even understand ourselves. Yet none of this is hidden from God.

Maybe this is part of what it means to encounter Jesus. We imagine that we are the ones searching for Him, but then, sometimes, we discover that we have been seen all along.

All of this surfaced again this morning as I walked with God in my morning prayer and read Psalm 131:1–2. Only two verses, yet they carry enormous spiritual weight. It is one of those psalms that seems almost childlike in its simplicity, but becomes deeper the longer you sit with it. It is a psalm about quieting the soul before God.

We enter the mind of a man who lived 3000 years ago and yet, he is not different from us. David begins with humility: “My heart is not proud, LORD, my eyes are not haughty…” He doesn’t merely claim he avoids arrogant behaviour; he goes beneath behaviour to the heart. Pride, biblically, is not only thinking you are better than others. It can also be the restless conviction that you must understand everything, control everything, solve everything, or be important enough to matter. David is saying, in essence, I don’t need to be the centre of the universe. And that is profoundly liberating.

Then he adds, “I do not concern myself with great matters or things too wonderful for me.” He is not rejecting thought or inquiry. Scripture encourages us to seek wisdom. But David recognises a boundary: there are things that belong to God which we cannot carry. There is a difference between seeking understanding and demanding mastery. We can exhaust ourselves trying to explain every mystery, predict every outcome, understand every person, and control every tomorrow. Psalm 131 gently says: You don’t have to.

Some mysteries are not burdens but invitations — not to anxiety, but to trust.

Then comes the heart of the psalm: “But I have calmed and quieted my soul…” David likens his soul to a weaned child with its mother. A nursing infant is restless because it wants something. A weaned child rests simply because it is near the one who loves it. That is spiritual maturity: not abandoning questions, not suppressing longing, but resting in God even when understanding has reached its limit.

At first, our relationship with God often centres on what He gives: Give me this. Fix this. Protect me. Explain this. There is nothing wrong with asking; Jesus teaches us to ask. But there is a deeper place the soul can reach: Even when I do not understand what You are doing, I can rest in who You are.

And Nathanael gives me another way of seeing this.

Nathanael was concerned with what he could see and what he knew. Jesus was standing before him, but Jesus knew something about Nathanael that Nathanael could not have known Jesus knew. There was a part of Nathanael’s world that lay beyond Nathanael’s awareness of Jesus — but it did not lie beyond Jesus’ awareness of Nathanael.

That is the difference between us and God.

We live from the inside out. We see only what our eyes, minds, memories and senses allow us to see. God sees the whole. We encounter one moment at a time; He is not confined by our sequence of moments. We wonder what lies beyond the edge of our understanding, while nothing lies beyond His.

And that is why Psalm 131 does not tell us to solve the mystery. It tells us to quiet the soul.

The psalm gives us a threefold movement: humility, stillness, hope.

First: I don’t have to be God.

Then: I can quiet my soul.

Finally: I can place my hope in God.

It echoes Jesus’ teaching about becoming like a child. Childlikeness is not childishness; it is dependence without shame. A child does not need to understand the whole world before trusting a loving parent.

That is one of the great invitations of this psalm: you may be intelligent without needing to know everything; responsible without needing to control everything; curious without being consumed by questions; confronted by mystery without losing faith. You may simply rest in God.

Nathanael thought he was beneath a fig tree, hidden from Jesus.

He was not.

And there are moments in our own lives when we feel as though we are beneath our own fig tree — alone with our thoughts, our questions, our private struggles, our half-understood hopes. Yet the Christian claim is astonishing: you are seen.

Before you understood Him, He knew you.

Before you began searching for Him, He had already seen you.

And perhaps, ultimately, that is where the soul finds its rest. Not in knowing everything about God, but in knowing that God knows everything about us — and still invites us to come near.

And then comes that final word in Psalm 131: forevermore.

God does not offer the soul a momentary hiding place. He offers Himself as its home.

Psalm 131, in miniature, whispers:

Lower your eyes. Quiet your heart. Let God be God. Rest beside Him. And hope.

A very small psalm with a very large God behind it.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

What is This Dark Place We Have Entered?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Saturday 29 August 2026 at 07:21

sketch.png

What is This Dark Place We Have Entered?

Proverbs 29:18 says, “Where there is no vision, the people cast off restraint.” There is something deeply sobering about those words when we look at the direction of much of modern Western society. When people lose sight of God, they can also lose sight of the deeper meaning of life. The boundaries that once gave moral shape to our lives begin to weaken, and ideas that were once understood as destructive can gradually be presented as expressions of freedom.

Across much of Europe, we seem to be living through a kind of spiritual twilight. Faith is increasingly treated by some as an outdated relic, while unbelief is presented as evidence of intellectual progress. We are encouraged to believe that humanity has finally grown mature enough to live without God, without divine authority and without any fixed moral truth beyond what we choose for ourselves.

But I wonder whether we have confused freedom with independence.

What does freedom really mean if we have no higher purpose? What happens when a human being is told that there is no God, no eternal meaning and no moral reality beyond personal choice? We may call that liberation, but perhaps there is another word for it: being adrift.

It reminds me of The Emperor’s New Clothes. Everyone praised the emperor's magnificent clothing because nobody wanted to admit what was plainly before them. The truth was uncomfortable, so people chose to participate in the illusion.

Sometimes our culture can feel like that. Certain ideas are accepted because they are called progressive, even when we have not honestly examined where they lead. We are told that throwing off every restraint is freedom, that rejecting God is enlightenment, and that morality is simply something humanity invents for itself. Yet perhaps we should have the courage to ask whether the emperor is actually wearing any clothes.

The Christian answer is not to respond with anger or contempt. Scripture points us towards something much better.

Micah 6:8 says, “He has shown you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God?”

There is remarkable simplicity in those words. Justice. Mercy. Humility. These are not the foundations of oppression, but of a truly human society. They remind us that Christianity is not simply about winning arguments against unbelief. It is about learning how to live rightly before God and with one another.

Perhaps Europe does not need another political slogan or another attempt to manufacture meaning from within ourselves. Perhaps what we need is the humility to look beyond ourselves again.

When humanity turns away from God, it may believe it has escaped restraint, but it can also lose its direction. We were never created merely to wander through life choosing our own temporary meanings. We were created for relationship with our Creator.

And perhaps the road out of this darkness begins not with pride, but with humility: to seek God again, to love mercy, to practise justice, and to walk humbly with Him.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

First Day

Visible to anyone in the world

sketch.png

First Day

Life is full of first days. First day back to work. The first day we were born. The first day we got married. The first day we read a book. The first day we went to school.

This is my first day in a strange place they call School. They tell me I’m an “infant,” but I don’t understand how that can be true. I’m five—how can I be an infant? Babies are infants, and I’m not a baby anymore. Am I?

The room feels enormous, with windows that let in slices of sky and rows of tiny chairs that somehow make me feel even smaller. The teacher’s voice drifts over us like a soft hum. I don’t understand all her words, but they sound gentle, safe.

At playtime, I notice a group of girls in the corner of the playground. They’re clapping their hands together, faces bright with laughter. Their voices rise in a sing-song rhythm, and I stop, mesmerised:

Pat-a-cake, pat-a-cake, baker’s man, Bake me a cake as fast as you can; Pat it, and prick it, and mark it with B, And put it in the oven for baby and me.

Their hands move quickly—slapping, clapping, spinning in patterns I’ve never seen before. It looks like magic. Their laughter fills the air, and suddenly the whole world feels like it’s made of songs and games I don’t yet know.

I stand there quietly, wondering about all of it—about how this strange new place can feel so full of secrets.

 
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

I Will Miss This World

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Sunday 16 August 2026 at 09:15

sketch.png

I Will Miss This World

On our walks along Scotland’s west coast — something my wife and I have done for years — we often drift into our own quiet worlds. The sea, the sky, the wind off the loch lomond: they create a kind of gentle solitude we share without speaking. On one of those walks, I found myself thinking how beautiful this planet is, and how much I will miss it when my time here ends.

The thought was prompted, oddly enough, by a man I met who told me he’d abandoned his disappointing hotel and booked into another, taking the financial hit just to salvage his holiday. I understood him. Life is short, and we try to gather good memories while we can.

If you’re new here and haven’t read the backstory, let me bring you into it.

Three years ago, I learned that the very cells which had served me faithfully all my life had turned traitor. They staged a rebellion in my prostate, marched to my pancreas, and finally settled in my liver — a cancerous time bomb quietly ticking inside me.

The diagnosis arrived in September 2023. Neuroendocrine cancer. Spreading. Serious. Delivered gently, almost tenderly, by a consultant who knew there is no script for receiving such news.

And yet, I discovered there was a script — one written long before I knew I would need it.

On the morning I was due to receive my results, something extraordinary happened. Before I stepped into the hospital, before the diagnosis had a name or a prognosis, God spoke to me through words I hadn’t sought but that arrived like a lifeline dropped into deep water:

He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty. I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.” — Psalm 91:1–2

I didn’t read those words casually. They were spoken into my spirit — not just read, but revealed. It felt as though God leaned close and whispered: This is for you. For today. For what you’re about to hear.

I turned to my wife and said, “We’re going to get bad news today.”

And He didn’t stop there.

That evening, my wife — who has walked every step of this path with me — showed me something I had missed. She had been reading the same psalm, but her eyes were drawn to its closing verses:

Because he loves Me, I will deliver him; because he knows My name, I will protect him. When he calls out to Me, I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble. I will deliver him and honor him. With long life I will satisfy him and show him My salvation. — Psalm 91:14–16

In her quiet way, she revealed what I needed most: God was not only promising protection — He was promising presence. Not just a fortress, but companionship in trouble. Not just deliverance, but honour. And most tender of all: long life, whether measured in days here or in eternity with Him.

Cancer can make you feel absurdly small — like Sisyphus, condemned to push the stone of your own body uphill, knowing it will only roll back down. Camus wrote that one must imagine Sisyphus happy, that the struggle itself is enough to fill a man’s heart. But unlike Camus’s Sisyphus, my life is not condemned to futility. The stone is heavy, yes — but I do not push it alone. God’s presence transforms the absurd into the bearable, and the unbearable into the meaningful.

Viktor Frankl, who endured the concentration camps, wrote that those who have a why to live can bear almost any how. My why is clear. It is anchored not in medicine or prognosis, but in God — my refuge, my fortress, my salvation. I know how easily this can sound like well‑worn Christian rhetoric. But unless you’ve walked this path with God yourself, you may never know how it feels from the inside.

Psalm 91 does not promise the absence of pain. It promises His presence in it. It promises that when we love Him and call on Him, He hears, He answers, He walks with us.

I may have been given a year, but I have been given far more than that — I have been given hope. Not wishful thinking, but anchored hope. The kind that steadies a man living with a time bomb inside him.

To anyone who has sat in that sterile room and heard the doctor say “cancer,” or who lies awake wondering what the future holds: God still speaks. And more than that — He stays.

There is a future for those who walk with God. John 5:24 says:

Truly, truly, I tell you, whoever hears My word and believes Him who sent Me has eternal life and will not come under judgment. Indeed, he has crossed over from death to life.

Before all this, I was working on a book called What It Means to Be Human, exploring the question from Christian, subjective, and objective angles. These days I write smaller, “word of the day” style pieces instead — finishing them when I finish them — many of which appear here. Thank you for reading.

And as for the man searching for a better hotel, a better experience, a better memory — I hope he found it. We all want our days, however many remain, to be good ones.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Jim McCrory

Stavanger in a Time of Innocence: Thoughts on the Eclipse

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Jim McCrory, Thursday 13 August 2026 at 07:50

sketch.png

Stavanger in a Time of Innocence:

Thoughts on the Eclipse

I watched the eclipse over Stavanger last night. Wow.

My wife and I went down to Troon beach, hoping to witness it ourselves, but heavy cloud robbed us of the view. Yet perhaps because I could not see it with my own eyes, watching that celestial wonder unfold over Norway stirred something even deeper in me.

I became intensely nostalgic. What a beautiful gift you were given. I wished I could have been there. The last eclipse was August, 1999 and I knew exactly where I was.

It seems half a lifetime ago now, and yet Stavanger in Norway still holds some part of me in its strong arms. Watching the eclipse, the years seemed suddenly to collapse, and I found myself returning to another evening, another sky in a cabin in Randaberg in Norway.

An evening opened before me like a colourful book. I stood watching the water breathe its slow, silver rhythm, staring across the distance towards home. Enigma’s Return to Innocence moved through the air—a song that felt, in that moment, like memory singing to itself.

And joy settled beside me, gentle as a hand upon the shoulder.

Then came the vision I have never quite forgotten: a great golden sphere, heavy with light, drifting across the vastness, as though the earth itself had released some ancient secret into the heavens.

Perhaps that is what such moments give us. Not merely beauty, but a sudden awareness of our own existence within something immeasurably larger. For a few fleeting minutes, past and present touch. The person we were stands beside the person we have become. Distance disappears. Time loosens its grip.

And we realise that the places we have loved never entirely release us.

Last night, beneath the shadow of the moon, Norway reached across half a lifetime and held me again. But still, we are all children under the same stars with hopes of eternity and many other celestial wonders. John 3:16.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 2601831