OU blog

Personal Blogs

This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10, activity 6: OER

Visible to anyone in the world

Hi All,

I just read the OER article which had a lot of new information for me. I am aware of open educational resources or open source software but haven't thought about legal implications.
I can see advantages for different users like cutting down on costs (Open Office), using open source as a learning tool for IT students, integrate this in web 2.0 applications and so on. However,  I always ask myself the question if the quality is just as good as commercial software. I do have a lot of commercial resources in my class and have to admit that all of it is pretty expensive. I often experience that I would like to change certain parts in the applications but I'm not able to because of restrictions. Maybe someone else has other experiences?

Am looking forward though to the next activity in where we have to explore OER. See if it can take away my doubts.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10, activity 5: Blogs & Blogging

Visible to anyone in the world

Hello All,

Before I read the article, I asked myself why I was blogging, both in general and specifically for week 10. I am not new to the phenomena of blogging; I have done it before. I kept a cycling blog a couple of years ago, but due to lack of time, I have hardly posted any messages since. The reason I was blogging was that I wanted to share my thoughts about the cycle tours I did. I encountered nice scenery, took some pictures and posted them on my blog. I wrote some comments about the tour and that was it. Looking back at my Blog (http://eusiebiking.web-log.nl/) now, I still enjoy reading it and still enjoy looking at the pictures and think: “shame I haven’t kept it up to date”.
Setting up my OU blog was something different. The reasons were different. I have set it up because it was part of the activity. I did not mind doing it; I do not mind writing in public. However, I can imagine that not everyone feels the same about this, I guess it’s a personal thing.

I found the Kerawalla article quite interesting. It helped me to define what kind of blog user I am. I tried to categorise myself but found it hard to do. I’m definitely not someone who avoids blogging. I do enjoy reading other blogs as well, some of them are very well written and I enjoy reading funny comments. I have looked up blogs from the H800 course, which I’m currently doing myself as well and have to say that it was interesting to read what other students had to say. I admit that I looked up my fellow course mates first and later on, I started to read,  and comment on,  other blogs as well.

I don’t mind making spelling or grammar mistakes in blogs (I’m not an English native speaker), although I try my best to post my messages in the best possible way.

I don’t work with learners who blog, but I can imagine that feelings described in the article are universal. I certainly recognized myself in some of the quotes.

If I had to encourage learners to blog, I too would make the activity flexible. I would introduce it first by getting the students to read various blogs and analyse them. Do they like them? Why do they like them? They could analyse the writing styles. Would they do it differently, how and why? Finally, they could write a blog themselves and then read each other’s work. Activities like this might help them to adopt a blogging learning style...I think.

The paper concludes that there is a range of behaviour towards blogging. I agree, I think it is the same with using new technology in class. Not everyone will like it, not everyone adapts well to new technology.

Well, those were my thoughts and  according to the Kerawalla paper I think I am a mixture of a self-sufficient and resource network building blogger...if such a thing is possible??

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Jan Carver, Thursday, 23 Apr 2009, 07:22)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10, Activity 3 & 4: instructions

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 17:57

Activity 3&4 were aquite interesting to me. I developed some skills about software and resources which I was not familiar with. I wrote some notes about the different applications and resources I used, mainly to reflect my own thoughts.

Using Delicious
I have opened up my delicious account since I had to read the O’Reilly Article in week 5 and have used it for a couple of weeks now. I do like the fact that delicious offers an online bookmark solution. I wasn’t familiar with it; it was quite new to me.
I had to get used to the tags though. In Internet Explorer I had all my favourites organized neatly in folders and in Delicious my favourites are organized by Tags. The side menu is a cool little invention and when synchronized with the main software it gives you a good overview of your favourites.

Using the OU Library
I have tagged a couple of interesting papers in Delicious and tagged them with H800_Block2_2009.  OU Library was often very slow, probably due to the amount of users at around 20:00 hrs.

I am very impressed by the amount of articles one can find in the OU library, it is all new to me and I find it very interesting. Activity 4a and 4b helped me using the OU Library although it clearly speaks for itself as well. I got a bit side tracked by the enormous amount of articles and read a couple of interesting articles.

Using Safari
Safari is a software applications which I’m not familiar with. I advise people like me to follow the tutorial as it helped me using it. I found the bit how to use databases very helpful. I have done a crash course in the past and it freshened up some information that was already been buried deep deep in the subconscious.

I have not done all the activities in the tutorial because it takes quite a lot of time, which I had not at the moment. I did the WWW part and again dug up some information in my brain that was  buried a long time ago.  I would say that I find Safari quite helpful in this stage of my study.

Using the Flash Tutorials

Using the Flash tutorials is quite useful. You have to invest a bit of time though as some tutorials lasts approximately 90 minutes. I have watched the introduction of using IEEE Xplore and the strategies for successful searches. Including the little activities it took me a over an hour. Very helpful information.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10, Activity 2: An alternative for Wikipedia

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 17:57

It's 26 degrees and the sun shines, the sky is blue and I'm researching the internet, looking for an alternative for Wikipedia....mmmm!

I quite like the idea that someone tries to improve Wikipedia. I guess it's not easy to do

  1. What do their different editorial policies imply about differing approaches to authority and to the role of the ‘expert’?
    Citizendium has experts who are the editors. They can approve articles and oversee content. Constables oversee behaviour. There is an editor in chief and stated as “not a dictator for life”, but for 2 or three years. Experts can decide on content and can approve articles therefore have authority in the article submitting process.
  2. What are the most important differences between Citizendium and Wikipedia in terms of their editorial policies?
    Differences between Wikipedia, taken from the Citizendium website:

    Citizendium has editors.
    They are experts in their fields. They work shoulder-to-shoulder with everybody else on the wiki, but have a few extra responsibilities that do not make the project any less of a "bazaar."
    They have a method for approving articles. While Wikipedia has a "featured article" system, they have expert-approved articles. Their approval system actually depends on the judgment of real-life experts—the very sort of people that Nature might consult to judge the accuracy of Wikipedia articles. Editors oversee content in Citizendium


2. How far is Citizendium meeting its goals, as far as you can tell from recent reports?
I found an interesting review about Citizendium trying to build a better Wikipedia
http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/02/citizendium.ars
it gives a clear and good review about Citizendium.

 I don't use Wikipedia often so I can't say that I'm an expert or someone who knows it well enough to analyse, but I do see that Wikipedia offers many articles and is clearly an open source online encyclopedia. Citizendium has a long way to go, but I guess quality articles takes a bit more time.

More to come....back to the sun!

 

 

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10, activity 1: Have you Edited Wikipedia?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 17:57

Hello All,

Here are my thoughts about the article. I have enjoyed reading it. I am not a big fan of Wikipedia, a kind of personal thing. I do like the idea though of having an online open source encyclopedia with contributions from a community. The fact that information is editable by everyone might be a good idea, but I sometimes wonder if that effects the quality and the reliability of the information. 

  1. Is there anything new for you in the article?
    Yes there is. I have only used Wikipedia for looking up quick information; who was Berlage, what has he built etc. I haven’t edited anything in Wikipedia (yet).  The Wikipedia bullies caught my attention: people who try to delete or alter articles on purpose. I knew it was an open source application but I didn’t know that editing an article was that easy and that it became a kind of sport for some to delete or destroy it. I have come across many interesting articles and many interesting links, but if it’s that easy to get rid of the article it becomes less reliable for me.
  2. Does it make you more or less likely to consult Wikipedia, or does it make no difference?
    I don’t consult Wikipedia as my main resource. I have other resources. However for quick information I sometimes use it. The fact that an article might be altered or might not be correct often puts me off.
  3. If you have used Wikipedia in the past few weeks – whether for H800 or for other reasons – review your use of it.
    I hardly used Wikipedia for H800 or other reasons. When I did, I used it for factual research: I had to look up some famous Dutch Architects and wanted to know where and when they were born. I mostly used the search button and typed in what information I needed. For example: I needed to know something about the Rietveld Schröder house in Utrecht, the Netherlands. I used the search field and read through the results. Most of the time I had an immediate hit. I also used the links written in the article for more information about the architect. I often verify the information I have found, just to be sure.
  4. Where have you found it most and least valuable? I have found it most usable for verifiable factual information; factual research. I haven’t edited anything yet; don’t feel the need to do that at the moment. I find it least valuable for professional content. Although I have to be fair to say that I hardly used Wikipedia so it is hard to criticise or judge.
  5. Are there certain types of topic that you feel happy looking up in Wikipedia? For example, do you consult it for factual information such as names and dates, and/or explanations of technologies, and/or insights into broad topics such as ‘learning’?
    I mainly use it for factual information. Factual information I can verify if necessary.
  6. Why is a Wikipedia entry not generally regarded as acceptable as a reference in an academic journal?
    I think because it’s an open source and anyone can just edit information. If I’m looking for information and someone can edit it or vandalise it, how can I be sure the information is correct?
  7. For one view on this, you could search on ‘citing Wikipedia’ within Wikipedia itself! And if you are involved in supporting learners in some capacity – interpreting ‘support’ very broadly to include professional and personal contexts – what advice would you give them about how they could use Wikipedia?
    I would advice them to look up factual information and try to verify it with other resources. I have often experienced that my students came up with three different answers for the same factual question. One looked it up in Wikipedia, another on a regular search engine and another one on an online encyclopedia like Encarta (after research it appeared that the Encarta information was correct.)
  8. How does your use of Wikipedia compare with, say, your use of Google or GoogleScholar? You may like to think back to your tutor group discussion of the graph in Week 1a
    Activity 4.
    I find Google often leads me to more authentic or more varied resources e.g. information that comes from reliable sources like educational libraries, research articles etc. Information that cannot be edited.
  9. And if you haven’t used Wikipedia recently, think about why that is. Are you using other online sources, or books, or…?
    I use other online resources (but still have to double check it) and in class I still use teacher handbooks or other paper resources. I use other resources because I have found them to be more reliable and more authentic than Wikipedia is.

Cheers,

Eugene

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Rachel Mansfield, Tuesday, 21 Apr 2009, 14:57)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Just Playing

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Sunday, 19 Apr 2009, 08:55

I'm just playing a bit with adding pictures in my Blog. As activity 1 is about Wikipedia I've added the Wikipedia logo.


Wikipedia Logo

 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Jan Carver, Sunday, 19 Apr 2009, 19:43)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 10 Blog Set Up

Visible to anyone in the world
Hello All,  I have set up my Blog with my new computer, hooray! Had a major crash last week, apparently one shouldn't tune one's own computer and try to make it faster. Anyway, I hadn't backed up my files and almost lost everything, including all my OU files and docs. Hooked up my HDD to another computer and managed to save all my data. Anyway, I hope everyone had a nice easter. I did and enjoyed some Cadburry's chocolate eggs. I am looking forward working on Blogs this week.
Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 242105